Inflation is likely to rise above the targeted 1% to 3%, prompting the Reserve Bank to hike official interest rates to 5%, BNZ economists are now predicting.
BNZ senior economist Craig Ebert said in an "Economy Watch" note that the bank was now forecasting stronger GDP growth than previously.
"...The overall consequence is greater excess demand than we previously envisaged," he said.
"This, in turn, will drive CPI inflation above the Reserve Bank’s 1% to 3% target band. To bring inflation under control, the bank will be forced to lift its Official Cash Rate (OCR) through neutral, to a braking level of 5%. This process will likely be reinforced by the NZ dollar struggling to hold its already very high level.
"If all of this sounds full on, it is supposed to."
Ebert's comments come ahead of the RBNZ's next review of interest rates on Thursday, March 13. The central bank is widely expected to change the level of the OCR for the first time in three years and actually raise rates for the first time in nearly four years. (The last OCR movement was a drop after the second Christchurch earthquake).
The expectation is that the RBNZ will lift rates to 2.75% from the current 2.5% as the first step in a cycle of rate rises. In its last set of forecasts (in December) running up to 2016 the RBNZ has to date suggested a peak in the OCR of about 4.5% or a little higher.
But Ebert said the BNZ economists are now forecasting real GDP growth of 4.1% for 2014 and 3.5% for 2015.
"This compares to the 3.9% and 2.3% we forecast previously. Our expectations for 2016 are down at 1.8%, from 2.2%. So we still have growth peaking this year, but at a slightly stronger pace and, more to the point, much less of a slowdown in 2015. Outright, this means sustained, above-trend, growth for a good couple of years.
"Why the upgrade? Well, some of it has to do with the fuller acceptance of the high level that net immigration has surged to and the way this has effectively doubled the rate of New Zealand’s annual population growth, to approximately 1.4%. We can’t see why this would turn tail anytime soon. While we had this substantively built into our labour market track, via working-age population assumptions, we felt we needed to do more to reflect this in GDP, via aggregate demand impacts."
Excess demand
Ebert said with a stronger phase of "excess demand" in prospect, the BNZ economists were now forecasting the non-tradables component of the CPI to inflate to a 4.2% annual pace by early 2016, from last year’s 2.9%.
"This is countered, to some extent, by slightly lower inflation in tradables inflation, given the slower retreat we now project in the NZ dollar (more on that later). Totting these two parts up, we have CPI inflation getting to 3.1% by early 2016.
"While this is only 0.2 points higher than we saw before, it’s symbolically (if not significantly) above the 1.0 to 3.0% target band. And, just as importantly, it’s further away from the 2.0% mid-point that Governor Wheeler has said he is intently aiming to achieve."
This reinforced the belief of the BNZ economists that the Reserve Bank would be forced to "not just neutralise its stimulus, but get the OCR to a point where it’s actually having a braking effect on (excess) demand".
"We judge this level to be 5%. Pre [global financial crisis] of course, a 5% OCR was thought of as barely neutral. So, to be clear, we are accepting of the 'new normal' notion that New Zealand’s neutral cash rate is now more like 4-4.5% (assuming 2% inflation, that is).
"We previously projected the OCR peaking at 4.50%. But while we’ve since upped it, to 5%, we haven’t changed the time at which it’s achieved. That remains pitched at September 2015."
Hiking cycle
The BNZ economists are therefore now picking 25 basis-point moves in March, April and June, to 3.25%, then two more in September and December for an end-year 3.75%.
"In this there is an assumption the RBNZ will continue to lag. But come 2015, and relentless growth, and persistence of inflation pressure, we anticipate the RBNZ will add rate hikes at the April and July OCR reviews, to complement those at the March, June and September MPS meetings, in order to get to 5%," Ebert said.
He said the main downside risks to these projections were international and, locally, related to housing and this year’s election.
"The international risks are nothing new but, to repeat, involve commodity risk in relation to China’s importance on the trading front, and funding issues with respect to Europe’s ongoing banking uncertainties.
"The local housing market, particularly prices, will be a key test of how well, or otherwise, folk are prepared for rising rates (although we will also be monitoring reactions from businesses and farms, which also seem overly weighted to short-term debt and rates). The election, due by November, will be most important should it deliver a change to a left-leaning government. In the least, it may inject uncertainty."
Interruptions
Ebert said any of these things "could interrupt the OCR getting to neutral, let alone the 5% we are projecting".
"Of course, nor can we ignore the currency response to a greater than expected tightening cycle, lest it proves more than we anticipate as a base case."
Ebert compared the BNZ' economists' latest view with the most recently available projections from the RBNZ.
"Using the [central] bank’s March-year basis, its December Monetary Policy Statement expected 2.8% GDP growth for 2013/14, 3.0% for 2014/15 and 2.3% for 2015/16. Our outlook is for 3.1%, 4.2% and 3.1% respectively. That’s a cumulative premium of 2.3%. No wonder, then, we are forecasting CPI inflation to get to 3.1% by early 2016, while the December MPS saw a more middling 2.2%.
"But it’s also why we should probably expect the bank to strengthen its macro-economic outlook in its Monetary Policy Statement of next Thursday. There certainly appears room and good reason for this to occur. And for the Bank to lift its (implied) OCR track in no small measure. Its December MPS, recall, inferred a 4.5% OCR by end-2015.
"Might this be lifted to 5.00%, even higher? It’s worth thinking about, and preparing for."
10 Comments
I think Graeme Wheeler is acting too hastily .
What about deflation and near zero interest rates with almost all out trade partners? (China , US ,Japan and Euro)
The falling prices of manufactures in those economies and the strong Kiwi $ are masking the inflationary trends
What's the comparison with these countries Boatman, they have zero to piss poor growth rates, and if deflation, and lower manufacturing prices, and high NZD are masking inflationary trends, god help how high inflation would be here without them - either way that's what we've got. It's interesting when people pick out differences that suit an argument, or a desperate bias, and ignore all the other differences. If we have a 0-2% growth outlook there would be no way we'd be seeing rate hikes any time soon - thankfully that's not the case, although that doesn't seem to be shared with NZ overly leveraged borrowers who just pray for bad times.
Just pray that the USD doesn't get a boost at any point, and the NZD comes down, then you will see new highs in the RBNZ's expected inflation track, and accompanying bank bill track. Those longer term fixed rates with a 5% in them that Roger Kerr pounded on about over the last year will look like an even further distant memory - but then, Roger is a risk manager who points out risks and doesn't pretend to know what will happen, the rest are punters, most without even realising it
Grant , the fact that we trade with these countries listed , is very relevant to us .
If our interest rates go up , so does the carry trade with the countries listed, who will be chasing high yields , particularly Japan . If this happens the Kiwi will get even stronger .
They buy our physical products which risk becoming too expensive if our exchange rate gets further out of whack . We are already finding exportng tough with the strong Kiwi$.
I dont believe we have strong underlying inflationary trends . PPI is largely benign although there is inflation in the building materials sector , and wage rates in that sector , but prices are not moving up anywhere else in the economy .
Furthermore there is no evidence , that I have seen, of a sudden large increase in M3 money supply in the economy . This would normally indicate inflation ahead .
We still dont have employment at 2007 levels , a, nor do we have too much money chasing too few goods and services in the ordinary sense.
"The overall consequence is greater excess demand than we previously envisaged"
Where is the money coming from? Are we seeing substantial wage increases across the board right now that will feed this excess demand? in the coming months?
Or is it all we are we seeing limited debt driven demand in housing?
All this and more in 18months....some steep rises then. No great wait to prove them right, or wrong.
regards
David , Is the BNZ saying the GFC is all over and we have
- Full employment
- Increased aggregate demand in all sectors
- too much money chasing to few goods
- An increase in the PPI which flows into CPI
- Runaway increased M3 money supply
I would like to know in particular about the M3 money supply increase which is always a pre-cursor to inflation
Even if this eventuates you are not going to see much "comeback" for 2 years or so. Even say 50 or 75 basis points over this year is hardly a gound shaking extra income for you.
If you are gambling we are back to BAU, well I think not...mind you, you are not alone, many ppl are also praying for the same thing....
Oh and where is the wage inflation to drive this? no where.
On top of that, if we see a housung market collapse wave bye bye to even what you are getting today....
Be careful what you wish for as they say.
regrds
Something interesting from Jim Rickards
If the nation has a lot of debt then the Debt / GDP ratio is quite important. Obviously if this number gets to large servicing debt becomes painful ( I believe NZ has a slightly high Debt/GDP ratio if you include private debt). Rickards claims that America is now targeting nominal GDP
nominal GDP = real_GDP + Inflation or Deflation
The idea is that GDP is just the labour force participation rate * productivity. In the USA the labour participation rate is in sharp decline, as is real_GDP . To prevent the Debt/GDP ratio getting out of control the USA is deliberately making sure inflation is above a threshold. Steve Keen claims that constantly increasing debt is necessary to have increased spending so we cant decrease Debt without collapsing the economy.
Aggregate demand = GDP + change in debt (all variables implicitly with respect to time)
Just interested in what other people think. Is this sort of thing happening in NZ. Are we targeting inflation above a threshold? Because it seems that would obliterate anyone without inflating assets, but with money in the bank.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.