Unless there's a "material" loosening in New Zealand's tight labour market, inflation could remain above 3% for "considerably longer" than the Reserve Bank (RBNZ) is forecasting, ASB economists believe.
ASB senior economist Mark Smith has undertaken a very detailed crunch of inflation and the potential causes of it and says that developments in the labour market play a pivotal role in impacting inflation, "although many of the factors influencing labour market conditions are outside of the RBNZ’s control".
According to Statistics New Zealand figures, the country had an unemployment rate of just 3.2% as of the March 2022 quarter. But annual inflation at the same time was 6.9%. The next Consumers Price Index (inflation) figures for the June quarter are due to be released on July 18, while the next batch of labour market official statistics is not due till August 3.
In the meantime the RBNZ's got its next review of the Official Cash Rate (currently sitting on 2.0%) next Wednesday (July 13) and is widely expected to lift the OCR to 2.5%. The RBNZ is charged with maintaining inflation in a range from 1% to 3%. However, in its most recent Monetary Policy Statement in May it forecast that inflation would only get back down under 3% by the fourth quarter of next year.
However, ASB's Smith says his work suggests that inflation in NZ looks to have become more persistent compared with the strict inflation targeting regime of the 1990s.
Tackling labour shortages looks to be the key to mitigating inflationary pressure, he says.
“If this does not happen, our analysis suggests annual CPI inflation will remain above 3% for considerably longer than the late 2023 timeframe signalled in the May 2022 MPS forecasts,” he says.
Protracted high rates of inflation are “economic and social poison”, Smith says, being extremely costly to firms, households and the economy in general.
The ‘baseline scenario’ of the ASB economists is for the economy to manage to pull off a soft economic landing, “but risks are building”, Smith says.
“With inflation looking to be persistent, the labour market tight, but with an increasingly wobbly economic outlook, the trade-offs facing the RBNZ look stark.
“It could ultimately mean a more pronounced or sharper period of monetary tightening that could likely exacerbate the slowdown already under way, eventually resulting in sizeable job losses.”
Alternatively, the RBNZ could apply a “lighter touch” to the monetary policy brakes in the hope labour market conditions normalise,” Smith says.
“If they don’t, however, this runs the risk of a prolonged inflation overshoot and higher longer term costs to the economy. For now, we are sticking to our view of a 3.50% OCR peak and cuts from 2024 but we will be closely scrutinising labour market developments going forward.”
Smith draws several conclusions from his analysis, including:
• The inflation process looks to have become more persistent. Once inflation has been high for a period it could be more difficult to lower it.
• Developments in the labour market clearly matter for inflation. Labour market variables (labour costs and labour as a limiting factor) directly impact headline inflation, core and non-tradable inflation. They also indirectly impact inflation via their influence on the output gap and other inflation determinants.
• There is no longer conclusive evidence that prices lead labour costs. In fact, the relationship is stronger the other way around, consistent with what is commonly observed overseas.
• Moreover, headline inflation rates can provide more information over future readings for inflation expectations and not the other way around. This suggests inflation expectations are likely to be more adaptive (based on past inflation rates) than purely forward-looking and it could prove trickier for policymakers to lower inflation if it is well above the target band.
• Labour costs look to have a persistent impact on headline inflation but are not set to peak until mid-2023 according to the RBNZ’s own projections. This and the likelihood that labour shortages will stick around for a while yet suggests it could take a while before inflation falls towards 3%.
Smith says it “is sensible” that the RBNZ is paying more attention to the labour market even if this was driven more by changes to the monetary policy mandate [now including maintaining maximum sustainable employment] than a realisation that labour market conditions clearly matter for inflation.
“However, it highlights the importance of not letting the labour market get too tight and the potential labour market trade-offs that may have to be made if high inflation appears ingrained.”
Factors like immigration settings, skills training and gaps, global labour market conditions and the relative attractiveness of NZ as a place to live and work clearly matter, Smith says.
“Alleviating pressures in the labour market could provide a circuit breaker reducing the need for tighter policy settings that would ultimately crunch the economy and labour demand.”
Ultimately, however, the RBNZ has to play the cards it has been dealt, Smith says, reiterating that with inflation looking to be persistent and with the economy already wobbling, the trade-offs facing the central bank are likely to be stark.
“They can either continue to front load policy tightening to try to get inflation under control, potentially crunching the economy in the process with many people losing their jobs until inflation cools. Alternatively, they could move in smaller steps, hoping high inflation will eventually subside.
“If, however, the current situation of widespread and significant labour shortages is not resolved, this runs the risk of a concerted overshoot of the inflation target and the associated longer-term costs to the economy. Not a nice place to be.”
Separately, in an ASB review of Tuesday's NZIER Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion, Smith said "recession looms" but ensuring inflation will eventually settle to generally acceptable levels (i.e. around 1-3%) should be the RBNZ’s key priority.
"With inflation showing few signs of cooling and capacity pressures intense the path of least regrets for the RBNZ is still to swiftly move to restrictive monetary settings.
"... A cooling in capacity pressures (particularly in the labour market) will pave the way for the OCR to eventually to be moved back to more neutral levels (circa 2-2.5%, but now drifting up)."
30 Comments
A fully qualified maths teacher at Mum's work had to return home last week after delays in processing her residency application. Mum teaches music and is now covering math, a subject she failed while at school.
Nurses and teachers just aren't the priority it seems.
New Zealand for the New Zealanders!
I always thought of music as how we would hear maths.
On an accountant annual budget balancing spreadsheet, your mum's school is winning for them.
But in the long term, what is the cost to our society for those kids who are missing out on a dedicated mathematics teacher?
It's always the same old story. I know several provisionally registered teachers who couldn't get work whilst on provisional registration, all the while schools were clamouring we need more teachers - let's please import them from the UK. Meanwhile, the provisionally registered continued on as relievers, until they either failed to meet the registration requirements (that are almost impossible to meet as a reliever) or gave up on the profession.
It is time for us to look at what we consider full time employment. When I was growing up in the ‘70’s and ‘80’s 40hrs was considered full time, with many working more than this. A DHB I know considers full-time for nurses as 32hrs and only gives that as a full time contract. No wonder unemployment is only 3% if people worked more hours there would be less pressure overall of employers struggling for staff, and the economy would benefit.
Yes lots, I worked as a nurse before retiring a couple of years ago. You would be surprised how few hours So many work. Yes many do work more but people limiting the hours they work is a big issue. As I said there is a big issue in society of what people consider as full-time work.
Yeah this post cracks me up. Speaking as someone with friends and family that are nurses, id bet that those nurses are paid 32 hrs to work 40 hrs a week minimum. I have a friend on a 40 hr salary who is rostered on to work 6am to 6pm 5 days a week with a 15 minute lunch break. Guess what - she is quitting. Respectfully I am not convinced that 'nurses have it too easy' is the reason we have terrible inflation and a shortage of workers.
Actually, I would think that the reason we have a labour shortage is because of changing demographics. I haven't looked too much into it, but the baby boomer generation was an abnormally large cohort (hence the name). Since the baby boomer cohort, the number of people in each cohort following has been decreasing. Logically then, as more and more baby boomers retire, we will see a smaller labour market, because there are simply less workers to fill the positions that existed before. This will mean the balance of power swings more towards employees than employers, which isn't a terrible thing imo
Again, this isn't based on anything but my understanding of demographics etc... but I'll be looking into it today! I'm bored at work lol
Lots of noise from employers/media wanting to import cheaper and apparently harder working immigrants to do low skill jobs. But I think the government needs to stay strong here, after all, if a business has to rely on low skill immigrants from poorer countries to survive (which the taxpayer and society bears the externalities for e.g. congestion, schooling, health) then is it really sustainable let alone desirable, productive economic activity? And there is still a mass of unemployed and underemployed who could be trained up to do most of these jobs. It comes down to an appropriate carrot and stick to unleash their potential. Maybe it is too easy not to work and/or the pay is not appealing to entice locals to work.
And I am not talking about fruit picking jobs or casual labour which RSE, students and backpackers are already (belatedly) allowed to do.
Allowing easy immigration to relieve the employment market would likely have deleterious effects on housing, productivity and accentuate the infrastructure lag. In solving one issue we would create many more issues so it is not advisable. Just let business have time to add efficiency to their labour force.
This banker economist wants the Key government policy of low productivity, high debt and high immigration? He deserves nothing but scorn.
The inflation is only minimally at best caused by wage demand. It is caused primarily by traded inflation due to the oil sanctions on Russia and the logistical breakdowns due to COVID inducing a supply shock. This is a classic example of a midwit guild academic who is repeating the nonsense of the Phillips Curve instead of analyzing the facts.
We live far worse than a generation ago, mired in debt slavery, general misery and widespread poverty and this brainlet wants to return to the pre-covid world order!
Jeez, ever notice how the economists first response to most things is basically: keep wages low, make people work harder, import cheap labour? The problem here is that for the last 50 years economists have been brainwashed to believe in flawed models and assumptions that are heavily weighted towards the interest of business owners and capital. When prices start to increase, it is not profits, real cost increases, wars etc etc to blame, oh no, it's those bloody workers getting uppity. Quick discipline them with unemployment before they gain a sliver of power.
The hard facts are that:
- wages are running well behind price increases
- the NZ weekly earnings data suggest that we have been basically flat on earnings per filled job since January - no sign of a wage price spiral here at all
- we really need wages at the bottom end to increase - they are artificially low relative to prices - meaning they end up being subsidised heavily by Govt (working for families, accommodation supplement etc). If this means it costs 10% more to eat out at a restaurant, so be it
Clearly those looking at labour constraint issues don’t seem to have noticed that self isolation (which is frequently three weeks in the case of a bunch of families I know - because someone has to look after this kids once they’ve got it too) is placing an enormous anchor on our capacity to respond to demand for productivity of any sort.
Add to that the fact that many people are now into round two of COVID - and you’ve got a very clear recipe for a strangled economy with no light at the end of the tunnel.
When is someone going to point out that ‘a strong health response’ stopped being a good economic response long ago ??
Unfortunately as part of the US, EU and other Western democracies sphere we cannot take the route of India Pakistan and probably a few others and obtain discounted Russian crude, diesel and possibly petrol. These countries see the Ukraine/Russo war as a European problem and not their concern. They are prepared to look after their people and in the case of India make a few quids on the side by on selling refined products to the West.
Energy, specifically petrol and crude as well as fertiliser in NZ's case forms a part of our inflation.
It would be an interesting economic exercise to estimate the contribution of QE (money printing?) and the other inflation contributors petrol, diesel, crude.and fertiliser.
Maximising sustainable employment has been a complete failure. Reserve Bank has taken eye off the ball by keeping OCR too low for too long & let inflation get away.
In July 2021, previous RBNZ chair, Arthur Grimes warned that NZ was heading for a well-being disaster & said NZ government needs to ditch the maximum sustainable employment target when setting the OCR as this has created excessive house price inflation.
https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/heather-du-plessis-allan-drive/audi…
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.