sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

The services sector expanded slightly in January, as did the manufacturing sector - results that point toward an economic recovery later in the year

Economy / news
The services sector expanded slightly in January, as did the manufacturing sector - results that point toward an economic recovery later in the year
servicesrf3
Source: 123rf.com

New Zealand's services sector, which makes up about two-thirds of our GDP, broke a 10-month run of contraction in January.

The BNZ – BusinessNZ Performance of Services Index (PSI) for January showed a 2.3-point rise from December to 50.4. (A PSI reading above 50.0 indicates that the service sector is generally expanding; below 50.0 that it is declining).

While that is a rise, the average reading through the history of this survey has been 53.1 - so, the current level's still well below that.

The rise in activity mirrors one seen in the latest BNZ – BusinessNZ Performance of Manufacturing Index (PMI) released last Friday, which snapped a  22-month run of contraction.

BNZ senior economist Doug Steel said the PSI rise "is consistent with stabilisation rather than elevation, but its latest move upwards is encouraging".

He said among the sub-indexes of the PSI, the employment index (47.1) was the only one to decline in January and remains the furthest below 50.

"It continues to suggest further contraction in service sector employment. This adds to a range of indicators showing New Zealand’s labour market is still deteriorating," Steel said.

"The unemployment rate rose to 5.1% in the December 2024 quarter from 4.8% a quarter earlier. Our economic forecasts are for the labour market to lag a pick-up in activity, such that the unemployment rate pushes a bit higher before peaking around 5.5%."

However, Steel said the latest PSI outturn is "reassuring that New Zealand’s economy may be at a turning point".

"Combining the PSI and PMI, the Composite Index (PCI) suggests an economic recovery later this year," Steel said.

"Our forecasts are for GDP growth of around 2.6% through 2025. But economic turning points are messy, and it can be difficult to determine the exact timing of the recovery. The recovery is unlikely to be in a straight line and indicators choppy."

Figures released shortly before Christmas showed that economic activity fell 1.0% in the September 2024 quarter as measured by gross domestic product. This followed a sharply revised down 1.1% fall in the June 2024 quarter.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

5 Comments

Just one month of expansion - and a tiny one at that - after so many months (almost a year) of contraction - could easily be 'noise', and/or pure 'hopium'.

For example, the reading for Activity/Sales (54.4) isn't reflected (yet) in Supplier Deliveries (47.8), nor Stocks/Inventories (50.1). Nor is Employment (47.1) expansionary yet.

I'll start to get happier when we have 3-6 months above 53 - in all segments.

Up
2

I commented below, but I also wanted to add that I don't think the seasonally-adjusted data is great in a downturn. For example, seasonally-adjusted card spending in December looked OK, but January was awful. I think this is in part because in a downturn people are more likely to concentrate their spending (eg xmas) and go without the rest of the time. This changes the distribution of demand, which could make the seasonally-adjusted figures questionable.     

Up
3

Good engineer’s thinking 😎

Up
1

What he said ^^^^

There is a real risk that job losses, lower real wage growth, and the significant slowdown in migration combine to tip us into another big slump. A lot of the macro data is still in negative territory and I am not sure that the disposable income released by (very slow) reductions in household and business debt-servicing costs will be enough to offset the drop in demand caused by lower earnings / jobs / migration.

It is hard to call because some of the macro data (rate of change in jobs, credit flow etc) looks like the start of a recovery (eg 2010), whereas others (rent, benefit claims) look like the start of a collapse (2009). 

I still think a very slow recovery from here is the more likely, but anyone discounting the risk of another fallback will need to show me some new data!    

Up
3

What is Doug Steel smoking?

Up
0