sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Wholesale interest rates drop sharply after Statistics NZ reports soft economic data and the US Federal Reserve signals it could cut interest rates soon

Economy / news
Wholesale interest rates drop sharply after Statistics NZ reports soft economic data and the US Federal Reserve signals it could cut interest rates soon
US Federal Reserve Chair Powell answers reporters' questions at the FOMC press conference on May 3, 2023
US Federal Reserve Chair Powell answers reporters' questions at the FOMC press conference on May 3, 2023

New Zealand’s wholesale interest rates have fallen to a nine-month low on the back of weak economic data and a signal from the United States' Federal Reserve that it may begin to cut interest rates. 

The two-year swap rate was at 4.77% on Friday morning, its lowest level since February, and other durations were at similar lows. 

Swap rates are agreed-upon interest rates banks exchange with institutional investors or other banks. The trade helps banks manage interest rate fluctuations and shapes the terms they offer retail customers for mortgages.

On Thursday, Statistics NZ released gross domestic product data for the September quarter which was much weaker than expected. 

Economic activity declined 0.3% and shocked forecasters who had predicted a roughly 0.2% expansion. Stats NZ also revised its previous GDP reports, removing 0.7% of growth from the past six quarters.

The weak GDP number was underpinned by a downturn in goods-producing sectors, although activity in the services sector was also lower than some had expected. 

Daily swap rates

Select chart tabs

Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA

Fed pivot

Also on Thursday, the US Federal Reserve triggered a market rally with a sudden signal that it could cut interest rates by as much as 75 basis points next year. 

Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank’s benchmark rate was "likely at or near its peak for this tightening cycle” which boosted market confidence. This sent stocks higher, and bond yields lower. 

David Croy, a senior strategist at ANZ, said most market participants were expecting the Federal Reserve to strike a cautious tone after its meeting and were taken by surprise. 

“Then GDP numbers came out and it was the straw that broke the camel’s back, really,” he said. 

New Zealand bond yields fell with their US counterparts early on Thursday and were further encouraged by the weak GDP numbers later that day. 

Nathaniel Keall, an economist at ASB, said market traders were now pricing in an “overindulgent” three or more cuts to the Official Cash Rate during 2024. 

“That said, should reduced demand pressures in the economy translate into a swifter reduction in inflationary pressures, the risk is OCR cuts could come earlier than the early 2025 kick-off we presently forecast,” he said in a note. 

Analysis by ANZ showed market expectations were for the Official Cash Rate to be cut from 5.5% today to below 4.5% by the end of next year. 

This contrasts with the Reserve Bank’s view, outlined in its recent Monetary Policy Statement, which warned another increase to 5.75% was more likely than a cut in 2024. 

Stocks and dollars 

The movement in the interest rates has flowed downstream into currency and stock markets, as well. The S&P NZX50 climbed almost half a percent to its highest level since August, and the NZ dollar was up 1.5% against the US. 

The kiwi dollar was trading at about 61.1 US cents prior to the US Federal Reserve’s announcement but quickly jumped to 62 US cents as markets processed the news.

It fell briefly after the weak GDP data was released but resumed its rally and was still trading above 62 US cents, just short of a six-month high, late Friday morning.

While the local currency was bolstered by a weakening US dollar, it fell relative to other key trading partners such as Australia, the European Union, and Japan. 

Despite that, the Reserve Bank reported the currency’s trade weighted index was near a four-month high on Thursday afternoon at 71.98. The index is only published daily.

ANZ’s Croy said weakness in the US dollar following the Federal Reserve meeting had made the NZ dollar look stronger by comparison, but the soft GDP data had taken some of the shine away.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

43 Comments

So much for HFL

Up
13

The only one who still thinks that is Orr

Up
1

I don't even think he thinks that.

Up
4

Much of what the central banks say is guidance. They don't even have to lower or raise rates, just say they plan to.

Up
4

Lower Much Faster 🍿🍿

double popcorn as I’ve stolen it from the DGMs who were hoping for HFL

Up
8

The only thing that will be inflating is your waistline

Up
1

-0.9% GDP per capita is a truly appalling number. We are going backwards at nearly 4% a year. We have record government spending and still can’t get over the line. With a record current account deficit we can just thank our lucky stars that the USD has turned its trend and now declining. If this weren’t the case we could have some problems if the global currency trading fraternity turned their radar towards NZ. Think Argentina, Turkey. Yikes. 

Up
18

considering the inflation, that's nearly -10% a year.

Up
2

The GDP numbers are already adjusted for inflation. 

Up
6

Who told you that a GDP deflator is applied to this construct? 

Up
1

Nah, it never did.

Up
0

Nominal GDP is published in a different series. Last reported as +2.6% in the June quarter.

https://www.stats.govt.nz/experimental/national-accounts-income-saving-…

Unless otherwise specified, people are generally talking about real GDP i.e. adjusted for inflation. 

Up
3

Thanks, good to know, make more sense. I thought what published were nominal GDP figure.

Up
1

Unless otherwise specified, people are generally talking about real GDP i.e. adjusted for inflation. 

So what are you saying? That a GDP deflator is applied to GDP data when publicly released or discussed around the water cooler?

It's important to know what we're talking about. If CPI inflation is running at say 5% yoy and GDP is reported as 2%, what does that mean to you? 

Up
0

Say nominal GDP was $1,000 in the last period and $1,100 in the current period. 10% nominal increase. Say inflation ran at 10% over the same period. Real GDP growth over this period is zero. 

Around the water cooler, people would say GDP was flat. 

Up
3

In that case, 2% GDP growth yoy with 5% CPI inflation would suggest that GDP is negative. 

Up
0

2% nominal GDP growth yoy with 5% CPI inflation would suggest that real GDP is negative. But no one uses nominal GDP, we use the one already inflation adjusted.

Up
4

If you're talking about real GDP, as people almost invariably are, you just don't have to think about inflation. It's already been accounted for.

Up
3

Thanks mfd, I did not know that. should repost that at the end of the day because I am sure many others are the same.

Up
3

If you're talking about real GDP, as people almost invariably are, you just don't have to think about inflation. It's already been accounted for.

I don't think people understand this at all. I think most people assume that headline GDP data is reported as 'nominal'. And to be honest, if GDP growth is reported as 2% yoy, then rational people would start thinking "if inflation is running at 5%, then our GDP is nominally 7%."

 

Up
0

I don't think most people would do that because most people wouldn't have a clue what any of that means. Most people don't know the difference between nominal and real values. If you mean most people on this site then that's a different matter.

Up
1

It's a little surprising the information isn't laid out more clearly in stats NZ releases. I guess most people looking at them know the background, it's just us enthusiastic amateurs that might run into trouble. 

Up
1

It's a little surprising the information isn't laid out more clearly in stats NZ releases. I guess most people looking at them know the background, it's just us enthusiastic amateurs that might run into trouble.

TBH, I'm not convinced that nominal annual GDP growth typically runs at 5%+. But maybe I'm wrong. 

Up
0

Interesting chat team. Should I start saying “real GDP” in these stories to make it clearer?

There was also some confusion during the election about how the tax take (nominal) had “doubled” under Labour but GDP (real) was only up a few percent! 

Up
1

And yet look at the home page of stuff, nzherald, newsroom etc. This should be front page. Much of our negative societal outcomes are a consequence of poor policy decisions and economic mismanagement by successive governments. 

Up
13

Nah, those media outlets would rather print body positive and equality articles.

Up
2

Not sure what everyone expected to happen when interest rates were increased so quickly - this is exactly what the reserve bank was going to achieve: an economic slowdown to cool inflation. Households have far less discretionary income thanks to rising mortgage payments, and businesses have less money to invest in capital projects due to more expensive lending. 

Up
3

If you had told me 3 years ago that interest rates would be this high, I would have pictured a massive recession, 10% unemployment, housing market complete collapse. We are doing quite well in a way. 

Up
9

Since the last recession, the amount of resilience in the credit market has improved by methods like higher interest rate requirements and more stringent lending practices.

Ironically squeezing more people out of home ownership.

Up
0

lol.. um.. I guess someone finally figured out paying out high interest on the currencies massively printed out of nothing doesn't really make sense... print -> inflation -> pay out high interest on the printed currencies created out of nothing to control the inflation?? XD

Up
2

That's a good point. The madness of higher interest rates needs to end.

Up
4

Wrong. Suppressing the price of money is ultimately destructive for economies. That should be clearly obvious by now.

Up
4

Economies destruct for a number or reasons.

In days gone by, it was often because of fixed money supply.

Up
2

In days gone by, it was often because of fixed money supply.

I know you're just trolling, but what does a fixed money supply have to do with suppression of the price of money?

 

Up
3

Nothing, probably. Just pointing out that any form of money will carry inherent issues, and the factors of destruction are much wider than you've stated.

Up
0

Debasement kills curencies and countires.

Up
1

Sometimes, yeah.

Up
0

Bing Chat advises that there is no definitive answer to whether suppressing the price of money is good or bad, as it depends on the context and trade-offs involved.

I'm not suggesting going back to ultralow interest rates. There is likely a middle ground where it is not destructive. Too high or too low will have negative consequences.

Up
0

Yep.

In a fixed supply system though, once the supply dries up, there's no mechanism to resolve that. Well, other than using something else.

Up
0

And what we saw were reserve banks carefully finding that middle line to not cause too big a recession, but not let inflation get away. Seems like the line is too thin these days.

Up
0

Is it high interest rates on the currency, or is everyone just gloomy as they have too much debt and the cost of said debt is now not as cheap as it once was. Current mortgage rates may be considered higher than average, but this misses the core problem as current interest rates on mortgages would never be seen as 'high' if the average mortgage was not still too high.

Up
3

Is it now more likely that the government will continue (or indeed possibly ramp up) the immigration level? What if they turn it off right now - geez could look ugly. 

Up
2

More immigrants with less jobs?

Up
2