The Reserve Bank might announce a loosening of the "speed limits" on high loan-to-value lending as soon as this month, according to Westpac economists.
Westpac senior economist Felix Delbrück said in the bank's latest "Credit Check" report that he "wouldn’t be surprised" to see the RBNZ "recalibrate" the speed limit soon "simply to achieve its original 15% target".
The LVR restrictions, in place since October, mean banks are limited to committing no more than 10% of their new mortgage lending to high-LVR customers. High-LVR customers are those defined as borrowing more than 80% of the value of their house.
Some types of lending, however, are exempted from the 10% limit. Exempted lending categories include lending made under Housing New Zealand’s Welcome Home Loans scheme, refinancing of an existing high-LVR loan, bridging finance or the ‘porting’ of a high-LVR loan between properties. Then in December the RBNZ announced that it would exempt new builds as well, following strong lobbying from the building industry. This exemption was backdated to October.
The RBNZ had believed that the 10% limit, plus exempted loans, would produce an effective limit of around 15%. However, figures for the first six months of the LVR restrictions showed that banks' high-LVR commitments in that period had fallen to just 5.6% of total commitments, including exemptions, and around 6.8% before exemptions.
Recently the RBNZ expressed surprise at how low the levels of high-LVR lending had fallen and said one of the reasons was lower than projected use of exemptions.
RBNZ Deputy Governor Grant Spencer said in announcing the six-monthly figures this week that the central bank's "initial assessment" was that restrictions on high LVR lending had helped reduce house price inflation.
"A more in-depth assessment of the policy and its impact on the housing market will be included in next month’s Financial Stability Report," he said.
The Financial Stability Report is to be released on May 14 and would provide an ideal time for the RBNZ to make any changes to the LVR regime.
In a speech in March Spencer strongly affirmed that the LVR limits were not meant to be permanent and they would be removed "once housing market pressures have moderated and when we are confident there will not be a resurgence in house price inflation".
For the first time in four years the RBNZ has this year unholstered its main weapon against inflation, the interest rate hike. Already there have been two increases in official interest rates, in March and again last month, with more expected.
Westpac's Delbrück said that as interest rates rose, credit growth may remain subdued without the need for LVR restrictions.
"So the Reserve Bank may also start firming up its communication about eventual exit from the policy," he said.
"That said, any discussion of exit will probably still be fairly halting and tentative.
"Household credit growth has slowed, but not spectacularly, and a loosening of the LVR restrictions is likely to give the housing market a ‘second wind’ later this year.
"With mortgage rates rising and house prices already looking stretched, it’s been our view for some time that this second wind will turn out to be temporary. But the Reserve Bank will probably take more convincing."
Delbrück said that while the RBNZ's LVR limits had "done their job, and then some" regarding reducing ratios of risky lending, when measured against the RBNZ’s broader aim of slowing overall credit growth, the impact of the LVR restrictions had, if anything, been a bit more modest than was intended.
"The RBNZ had projected that household credit growth would slow by 1-3 percentage points. Since September, bank mortgage loans have grown at an annualised rate of 5.1% - down from 6.3% growth over the previous year," he said.
"The slowdown in total household credit growth has been more modest, with some sign of leakage into the non-bank sector and a noticeable pickup in consumer lending in the last six months or so."
He said, however, there was a "broader sense" that the LVR policy was working, "in the sense that there is little sign at the moment of the stronger economy spilling over into a renewed upsurge in debt-fuelled spending, in the way it did in the mid-2000s".
"Importantly, households have stopped leveraging up, despite stronger economic growth and much stronger confidence."
7 Comments
Do you realise this won't happen for at least 20 years?
If these ideas were put up as policy, they would be totally unelectable.
Maybe 70% of NZ loves 'the game' that scumbag spruikers like Olly Slumlord loves to play.
...And so, 70% of NZ will stop what you, and I, want to happen.
I hope that the boomers spend all their gains instead of passing them down to their kids. We need the minority of non property owners to grow asap to get some political power
Highlights how unsuccessful the markerting has been for the welcome home loans. Both by the govt. and by R.A's who from what Ive seen are fairly poorly informed. No first home buyer should be in locked out of home ownership, even with lvr restrictions. You only need 10% dep to buy up to 300k house outside of auck, 425k in welly, and 485k in auck. You get 5k for free and kiwisaver which should get you most of the way there. If you dont qualify for welcome home loan, you earn over 80k, in which case you should be able to save 20k a year no worries (I was able to do this on 50k salary starting out in welly region). Thats a few years of saving, plus kiwisaver to get into first home. Not 'locked out forever'. I never had kids; So i might be missing a key part here. First home buyer grant allowing govt. contribution to kiwisaver of up to 2k per child to be withdrawn for purchase of first home? In any case, letting people borrow to 95% is not going to help affordability or families in the long run
$485k in Auckland gets you an expensive shed or a nasty little unit in a suburb full of beneficiaries. Better off renting. An affordable property for somone earning $80k would be $250-280, we've forgotten what property shoud reasonably cost.
All the welcome home loan has done is set a standard price of $485k for cheaper homes.
Any questions as to whether these lvr have worked or not need to look at changes to QV index based on actual property sales relative to GV. e.g: http://tinypic.com/r/2md4awo/8
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.