Recent commentary suggesting regional New Zealand is being plundered for the benefit of cities such as Auckland and Christchurch is simply not backed up by the facts, ANZ's economists say.
In their weekly Market Focus report the ANZ economics team, headed by chief economist Cameron Bagrie, say it pays to travel and get the full story. This, they say, is what they call knife-and-fork economics, which includes "a few dinners chatting along the way."
Their comments come after Shamubeel Eaqub, chief economist at New Zealand Institute of Economic Research, was recently quoted saying growing inequality between regions was an "elephant in the room" that was being ignored by policymakers. Economic growth was being driven mostly by Auckland and Canterbury, and many other areas were stagnating or going backwards, Eaqub was quoted saying.
In response to this Labour Party finance spokesman David Parker issued a press release saying an overheated Auckland housing market and the Reserve Bank’s response to lift interest rates were "causing massive damage" to the provinces.
Parker noted Eaqub had called the Reserve Bank's third increase to the Official Cash Rate this year, lifting it to 3.25%, a huge mistake that was punishing small town New Zealand. A Labour-led government would stop the growing inequality between Auckland and the provinces, Parker added.
'Not backed up by the stats'
The ANZ team, however, isn't having this.
"We notice some recent commentary suggesting the regions are being plundered for the benefit of the cities. Well, that is simply not backed up by the stats; our own Regional Trends proxy for regional economic activity puts Northland at the top of the annual growth stakes in the year to March 2014," the ANZ economists said.
"In the past 12 months, Northland has recorded strong annual increases in retail trade, house prices, rural real estate sales, dwelling approvals, section sales, commercial consents, online job advertising and regional traffic flows though some of this looks to be bounce out of a deep hole and unemployment is high."
"Canterbury and Auckland have led economic growth over the past few years. (But) strong rise have also been recorded by Waikato, Otago, Taranaki and Nelson-Marlborough," the ANZ economists added.
(The chart below is taken from ANZ's Market Focus report).
The ANZ team went on to say that over the past three years, regional unemployment rates have fallen in half of the fourteen regions they monitor.
"The largest reduction was noted in Gisborne, a region trapped with a traditionally high level of unemployment."
'It pays to travel & labour shortage not a bad problem to have'
"In this game it also pays to travel and get the full story; that’s what we call knife-and-fork economics (that’s a few dinners chatting along the way). While everyone talks about Christchurch, 100km down the road is a place called Ashburton; it’s booming. That’s irrigation for you. South Canterbury is riding the same wave. Central Otago is going very well with evening flights the icing on Queenstown’s cake," ANZ's economists said.
"Ironically in Otago, it’s the city, Dunedin, that is underperforming the region. Southland is just Southland and getting on with business and not crowing about it. Blenheim just had a bumper grape harvest; Nelson has a reasonable vibe - was there last Wednesday. Taranaki - white and black gold working in tandem. Bay of Plenty - Psa being worked through, kiwifruit land prices have rebounded, they’re seeing Aucklanders relocate, and the port is going well. Though the forestry sector is grinding to a halt, which is something we’re watching."
Even in Wellington the ANZ economists noted that although there's no government spend, there's "lots of" IT spend and investment, and Kapiti is doing well. And in the Waikato a two hour wait to get into Fieldays "told us something." And in the Manawatu things are 'trundling along solidly."
"There are weak spots, but this talk of cities surging and the regions being down in the dumps is just hubris. In many cases it’s not a lack of demand or opportunities holding regions back, it’s getting the available resources, particularly labour. That’s not a bad problem to have!" The ANZ economists said.
Westpac sees optimistic regional economic confidence
Westpac issued its second quarter regional economic confidence survey today. In it senior economist Anne Boniface said economic confidence remains in optimistic territory right around New Zealand.
"However in most regions, consumers aren’t quite as upbeat about prospects for their local economies as they were three months ago. This largely comes as no surprise. While the NZ economy as a whole is growing strongly, a number of the key drivers of recent growth have started to lose some of their lustre," said Boniface.
"International dairy prices have fallen sharply, which for dairy farmers means this season’s payout is forecast to be well down on last season’s record breaking level. In addition, housing markets in many parts of the country have slowed under the weight of LVR restrictions and rising mortgage rates. What’s more, the Reserve Bank hasn’t been shy in telling consumers that interest rates are set to rise much further from here."
Although the trend in the survey wasn’t surprising, some details left Westpac's economists scratching their heads, Boniface said.
"For example, economic confidence in New Zealand’s dairy heartland, the Waikato, was pretty resilient, while in Auckland confidence actually improved despite clear signs of a slowing housing market. Meanwhile, some long-downbeat regions have moved further into optimistic territory, in keeping with other signs of local economic life."
"We were particularly struck by a major lift in Wellingtonians’ economic confidence, to its highest level since mid-2010. One slightly surprising exception was Otago – confidence there has fallen back to very cautiously optimistic levels and is now the lowest in the country," Boniface said.
*Westpac says regional economic confidence is the balance of households expecting good, as opposed to bad, economic times in their region over the coming year, as a percentage of total number of households. Sample sizes and margins of error vary by region. The national average is weighted by the share of each region in the total population. The survey was conducted from June 1 to 10, with a total sample size of 1,565.
31 Comments
NZ GDP (nominal, E measure) grew from $207.4 b to $226.6 b from the year ended March 2012 to 2014, so the compounded annual growth rate is about 3% --
(226.6/207.4)^(1/3)-1, copy and paste it in Google.
Then, you draw a vertical line marking the 3% in ANZ's regional GDP vs unemployment graph. What did you see?
ONLY, AUCKLAND and CANTERBURY are to the right of the vertical line.
What does that mean? It means other regions were not growing as fast as these two regions and they are left behind.
Similarly, I ask readers to find out unemplyment data for the past 3 years for NZ and draw a horizonal line marking the value, and observe how many regions are above national average.
So, I think Shamubeel Eaqub should thank ANZ to put the hard stats up to back up his statments. Amusing~~~
xingmowang - As you say the economy grew by $19 billion in the two years from March 2012 to 2014.
That is, by March 2014, the NZ people had spent $19 billion (MV) more than the NZ people spent in 2011 on Goods and Services.
In order for NZders to spend this extra $19 billion (MV) then NZ's money supply also has to increase. You can only spend more money if you have more money.
So where did this extra money come from. Remember, you can only increase the money supply through the banks, and banks dont give money away, they lend it at interest.
Money from immigrants does not increase our money supply. If it did then who creates NZ dollars to give them in exchange for their currency?
Bit of a side issue but important to point out.
Thank you for your contribution.
The truth: regions are not growing economically to the extent of Auckland etc. Some are going backwards.
Notice how the truth about the regions is very quickly renounced by the bank economists.
I would trust Shamubeel over banks who have a vested interest in pushing a high growth Rockstar narrative any day.
Any regional 'growth' is from low holes.
Any wage earner in the regions: you get no wage rise despite nz soaring economy. And you face a higher mortgage bill. This is the new 1 industry economy centred on 1 city buoyed by immigration and offshore investment.
The old joke was "Aucklanders think New Zealand stops at the Bombay Hill.
The new joke is that they think "New Zealand stops at Epsom."
People should get out more. (as Cameron suggests)
The rest of the country is getting on fine, and quite happy for Auckland to have some success. The exporting economy is the South Island. The only niggle is that Auckland needs to pay for it's own infrastucture rather than look over the Bombay Hill for the money. If Auckland was doing well, then it could pay for it's own, but apparently it stuggles to do that.
The exporting economy is the South Island...but lets not forget places like up North, exports in Hawkes Bay and Taranaki Region, plus Wellington Software companies could be worth a look. Friend was down Greymouth recently, holiday with family. Said "All right" to someone at bar, reply..."Jafa". Nice.....?
You are so correct Colin.
But it is mostly based on cows, dairy conversions, installing robot milkers, tractors and the stuff that they tow, irrigation and that white stuff called milk.
Maybe. Maybe not. I hope not. Could be another bubble. Hope not. We own farmland there!
Whats wrong with cow business Rudderless.
It's not Silicon Valley, and it's not multistory, and it's not Google or Apple.
But it's what some very smart, very educated, high tech people do, (while wearing gumboots) and then there is the thing that some people haven't worked out. It supports the nation.
There is nothing ironic about the fact that Dunedin is underperforming. The city has been brought to its knees by the new Stadium. Businesses are closing or leaving by the truckload as it becomes clear that we are in for decades of above inflation rates rises and cuts to all core services. Even the ODT, stalwart supporter of the Stadium due to the allegiances of its owners, asks the question"Should the Stadium be mothballed?" in today's headlines. If what was happening down here was happening in Auckland there would be daily questions at Parliament and a national outcry.
Here's that ODT story you refer to - 'The idea of mothballing Dunedin's Forsyth Barr Stadium might raise eyebrows, but it is officially on the table for the Dunedin City Council.'
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/306889/mothballing-stadium-option
I wonder where things would be at here in Auckland if we'd got the talked about waterfront stadium for the rugby World Cup?
There was a good article on the economics of New Zealand stadiums last week
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/10156608/What-about-the-stat…
Recomended reading. Particularly for those in Chirstchurch, for whom how many hundred's of millions of dollars the city will be in debt from building a stadium is still an open question.
Then there is the issue of the rationalisation of the tertiary sector. If the Nats get in again, Steven Joyce is very keen to get this reform underway. I suspect a large part of the decision-making in that regard will relate to the number/percentage of overseas students a particular institution gets. These overseas full fee payers have become a very critical element of funding in that sector - and a critical element of foreign investment in NZ.
Yes, it's a hollowing out that gets very little/no publicity. Partly the problem of low profile perhaps rests with the institutions. I suspect they are acting parochially.. i.e., using a "competitive mode" type of strategic thinking - rather than a united front across the sector.
And seemingly fearful of telling the public that TEC is not funding their regional tertiary institutions at fair predictable levels.
Is investigative journalism still alive? Of course provincial newspapers & media have little staff depth left anymore ,they have been shelled out as well by 1 of the 2 media companies left in nz, so no accountability at the local level...
And publicly funded org leaders tend not to speak out about govt unfunding. Their careers are at stake.
So , for example, the Hastings hospital will go the way of the dannevirke hospital in the 70s. The rotorua polytechnic will disappear to Hamilton. The Wanganui schools will close and merge to Palmerston. Just stealthily pull the funding out from regional centres. To.... Save money. WHich centralises most services And infrastructure in .... Auckland.
This is how I am seeing the 'growth' in the regions.
Empty State Highways!
Apart from the odd Juicy or Apex rental - and a few trucks - we now drive on what seems like a private road system. Amazing.
Clearly Gerry, John and their banker associates fly everwhere. They never take a 6 hour drive between our main centres.
The wealth of the citizens of any Nation, City, Town or Village is all dependant upon inputs and outputs of money.
Governments can influence the wealth of citizens living in any geographical area by spending taxes taken from all areas and spending it in a single area. Examples are Brazil and the world cup. How the government injects all of the peoples moneis into that event. Governments even burden a whole Nation with debt just to satisfy that one area.
In a small village the people earn their money locally but travel 'out of town' to purchase their needs from supermarks. As a result their village is loosing wealth as too much money is leaving the village.
Take a place like Queenstown. Tourists spend their money there and go. As a result the local economy has an increase in money per capita.
Auckland has an increase in population. But while this puts pressure on housing and infrastructure it does not necessarily translate to an increase in money per capita. If the new settlers bring in more money per head than allready exist then they increase the wealth of Auckland. If they bring in less money per head they decrease per capita wealth.
Went on the recomended road trip:
Walked down Hastings main street: WINZ quotes signs on second hand stores where thriving shops once were. Watched the 35% youth unemployed wandering around.
Went to Gisborne: similar - but KFC doing well. . .
Decile 1-3 schools growing in numbers ...
Dannevirke ....
Wanganui???
etc
I know Dairy & some rural exports doing well ,,, but we definitely seeing a growing underclass in the regions ...
Seems like a 2 tier economy that many dont participate in anymore
Then the banks won't/reluctant lend in some suburbs now in these flatlining reqions with declining sub=areas. May be Too many gangs, P-labds and unemployed etc .. Now that's ironic!
Agree. My impression is that small town NZ especially in the North Island is in quite a bad way. Last month the Herald published an interactive map of New Zealand's most deprived areas. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11254032
Generally small towns in the North Island - Waihi, Paeroa, Taumarunui, Te Kuiti, Turangi, Marton, Foxton, Pahiatua, everywhere north of Hokianga, most of the East Cape - score 10 for most deprived. The rural surrounds are doing a bit better but still only middling.
Poor argument from ANZ. There's no comparative analysis which would show that regional growth is simply retracing what was lost post GFC, especially net of inflation. Their list of growth sectors are mostly non-productive. The diary sector has been in a secular surge for years so irrigation projects in South Canterbury should come as little surprise. Nelson traditionally has low rates of unemployment because they have the lowest wages. Auckland's growth is derived from foreign QE,and Christchurch's from insurance. It easy to show a positive story when there are growth rates relative to nothing.
Shamubeel is closer to the mark.That's why he's employed by a research institute and Bagrie is confined to the lowest rung on the economist ladder - a spin doctor for the banking industry.
Queenstown is NOT in Central Otago.
There is a huge amount of up-to-date Regional data and comparatives here
http://www.mbie.govt.nz/what-we-do/business-growth-agenda/regions
and
http://www.mbie.govt.nz/what-we-do/business-growth-agenda/regions/docum… (this one is a very large .pdf)
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.