The "balancing act" for the Reserve Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) has "become more complex" after the US election result, according to Westpac economists.
In Westpac's Weekly Economic Commentary, senior economist Satish Ranchhod says US domestic fiscal policy is set to become more expansionary and, "crucially for New Zealand, the landscape for global trade will be rockier".
"There will also be impacts on financial conditions that could be important for New Zealand," he says.
Overall, the mix of policies under the Trump administration is likely to be "reflationary", Ranchhod says - though this will take some time to come through given that it will likely be well into 2025 before the policies are enacted.
The change in US administration comes as our Reserve Bank (RBNZ) has started to cut interest rates, having dropped the Official Cash Rate since August from 5.5% to 4.75% and with a further cut expected at the final OCR review for this year on November 27.
Ranchhod says the outlook for our export earnings "is likely to be weaker", especially if a tightening in US trade policies materially dents growth in economies like China.
He says we could see other countries ‘dumping’ exports previously destined for the US on to global markets, which could dampen tradables inflation in New Zealand.
"It’s the balance between those factors that will be important for the RBNZ – while downwards pressure on the NZD [New Zealand dollar] could add to inflation, the downside risks for export earnings and economic growth will be an important offset."
Ranchhod says the Westpac economists continue to expect another large 50 basis-point OCR cut from the RBNZ at the November 27 review.
"But heading into 2025, the balancing act for the MPC [Monetary Policy Committee] has now become more complex. That reinforces our expectations that the RBNZ’s approach to policy easing over the new year will be more cautious, measured and data dependent."
Ranchhod says that in terms of US domestic policy, incoming President Donald Trump has stated that he will enact expansionary fiscal policy mainly through tax cuts in a range of areas.
"Even with the potential increase in revenue from tariffs, Trump’s plan is likely to mean larger increases in US debt and related increases in US government borrowing costs. The result is higher bond yields across the whole US curve, and we expect that to pass through to higher Government bond yields here in New Zealand."
Ranchhod says that on the trade front, the centre piece of Trump’s platform has been tariffs of 10% to 20% on all imported goods, and potentially much larger tariffs on imports from China (possibly up to 60%).
"The imposition of tariffs would clearly mean a tougher environment for many New Zealand exporters. The US is New Zealand’s second largest market for goods exports – in the year to September the US took close to $9 billion of our exports, accounting for around 13% of our total exports. Our major exports to the US include meat products, as well as dairy and beverages (including wine)."
Ranchhod said the exact impact of tariffs on New Zealand’s export earnings will depend on a range of factors. In addition to the level of tariffs themselves, the type of good and consumer preferences will play a role. For goods where there is strong competition from US producers or where consumers are very price sensitive (such as beef used in the US fast food industry), there’s likely to be only limited scope to pass on tariff increases to consumers. That would mean increased pressure on New Zealand producers’ margins. In contrast, for some items like higher quality wines sold at restaurants, there may be scope to pass on a portion of the tariff increase. But even in such cases, higher tariffs would still dent export earnings.
The impact of a tightening in US trade policy on New Zealand would also depend on how other countries are affected, Ranchhod said.
"Of particular importance will be the impact on the Chinese economy, which has already been struggling with weak demand and which could face a much more aggressive tightening in US trade policies than in other regions.
"China is our largest trading partner, and if tougher US trade policies dent growth there, we could see related weakness in the prices for some of our exports, like dairy products.
"There is also the risk that we see retaliatory trade policies as we did during the first Trump presidency when China introduced its own tariff increases in response to those imposed by the US. That sort of tit-for-tat trade war would have a negative impact on global growth, meaning downside risk for our export earnings.
"Even if we are not subject to tariffs ourselves, or if they are less severe than has been signalled, the landscape for global trade has clearly become a lot rockier. Trump’s protectionist focus was evident during his first term in office, as evident in his withdrawal from the TPP in 2017. That approach means that negotiating improved access to US markets is likely to now be tougher," Ranchhod said.
20 Comments
Ranchhod said the exact impact of tariffs on New Zealand’s export earnings will depend on a range of factors.
All the trade experts and mainstream thinking seem to be thinking that tariffs are all bad. However, everyone seems to overlook the idea that Trump looks at things differently - he has weaponized tariffs because he knows others want access to US markets. Trump is smart. And when you realize who wears the pants in the relationship, it comes down to this: Give the US access to your market for US goods and services. If you don't want to play ball, then deal with the full tariff rate.
Now, if the US meat industry is dying, by all means out tariffs on our 'Net Zero by Nature' nonsense (Trump of all people will see through this woke fraud). Possibly. If NZBN fulfills a need for US consumers, it will find its way to market.
How many times has this 'smart' trump been bankrupt? Last count was 6.
Why do so many buy into the BS that he knows what he's doing on a global and economic front?
Tariffs are paid for by the end user. Unless the US can produce cheaper then prices will go up. And we know the US can't.
Stand by for a short live vacation Mr Trump.
How many times has this 'smart' trump been bankrupt? Last count was 6.
DJT has never filed for personal bankruptcy. However, his businesses have filed for bankruptcy protection multiple times.
5 of those bankruptcies are related to the casino industry. 1 is related to the Plaza Hotel.
A couple of ways to introduce stimulus into the economy. Government spending on large scale infrastructure upgrades, such as new ferries and terminals to keep our 2 main islands connected. Or have young people borrowing a tonne of money so they can buy rot boxes from pensioners.
It's just one of the scenarios generally results in a physical asset that all of society can benefit from, and the other shifts the stimulatory debt onto private individuals.
One of the better things to come out of Harvard. I recommend looking at the combined exports from Oceania to the world. That's combining Aussie and Aotearoa. You will see the reliance on Asia - around 70-75%. Why is that important? Aussie is more heavily weighted towards China. Of course you'd have to be naive to not understand how that would impact Aotearoa as well.
If everyone is hit with tariffs and the US can't produce cheaper, then demand for our exports will remain.
The tariffs are almost like a gst. A tax added on to the consumer. The US tax payer will wake up at some point.
The US populace has the problem here. not the rest of us.
What do we produce cheaper that American consumers want from us? Kiwifruit?
The US is largely self-sufficient in dairy production. It is the world's largest producer of cow's milk, with an output of approximately 102.7 million metric tons in 2022. This production is supported by a diverse agricultural landscape and a significant number of dairy farms, 28,000 across the country.
The U.S. dairy sector has maintained its self-sufficiency despite fluctuations in market conditions and consumer demand, with imports generally limited due to trade barriers and a focus on domestic production.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.