sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Dairy Report: Review may probe Fonterra’s ability to bring pressure on farmers who it can identify as not acting in the industry's best interests through poor environmental or animal welfare practices

Rural News
Dairy Report: Review may probe Fonterra’s ability to bring pressure on farmers who it can identify as not acting in the industry's best interests through poor environmental or animal welfare practices

By Guy Trafford

Minister of Agriculture Damien O’Conner announced on Wednesday that the review Dairy Industry Restructuring Act (DIRA) was being brought forward from the scheduled 2020 review date.

The review is to be conducted by MPI in consultation with the wider industry.

The “Terms of Reference” have been published and dairy farmers and those involved in the industry will not be surprised at the focus areas which in the main are to investigate the key parts of the DIRA impacting on both domestic and international markets and the ability of Fonterra to be able to operate in a fair and economic manner.

Talking on RNZ the Minister stated that the review in fact may go wider than the initial DIRA and look at Fonterra’s ability to bring more pressure on farmers who it can identify as not acting in the industry's best interests through poor environmental or animal welfare practices.

To date Fonterra can do some sabre rattling but has no real power to cut farmers off.

The Minister also said that some protection will still need to be in place for farmers in fringe areas for pick-up, which currently is a right but this may get weakened in the future.

Fonterra should welcome this review as in many instances they are operating with one hand tied behind their back; having to pick up potentially uneconomic milk, keep putting up more stainless steel to accommodate this milk, provide ‘cheap’ milk to competitors and welcome back farmers who may have jumped ship to other processors.

However, they did agree to these term when setting up the giant co-op. From a domestic consumer perspective, the Minister did highlight the relationship between Fonterra and Goodman Fielder where much of our domestic milk comes from. And while he provided no guarantees he did say this area will be examined closely to make sure the domestic consumers ability to access (relatively) cheap milk will need to remain. Although with the number of suppliers now providing milk to supermarkets there is perhaps less of an issue than there was.

Another area mentioned was what had happened to the internal Australian market when it was deregulated and the negative effect it had on the industry over there. So farmers shouldn’t expect too wide ranging changes.

The report is aimed to be completed by February next year, before farmers are committed to their next season’s processors.

With the ongoing focus on water usage on dairy farms, farmers may be interested in a no product that has been developed at Lincoln University and marketed as ClearTech through Ravensdown.

A new technology that aids in the separation of wash down effluent from the water that is carrying it, it has the potential to reduce effluent water being spread on to pasture by 42 billion litres nationwide. The saved water is able to be recirculated back through the system and re-used for washing etc.

The Minister of Agriculture has also “clarified what was said by colleague Minister for the Environment last weekend, saying that the “cap on cow numbers” was a “misinterpretation”.

At a Farmers Forum at Mystery Creek on Tuesday he said “There's no plan on [reducing] cow numbers at all. In fact, what we said to Greenpeace, who are thinking about asking for a moratorium, is that we don't buy into it.". It would be useful to all if the government could get its policies in order. While most farmers know there is going to be increasing scrutiny on their externalities, headline grabbing statements not based on government policy are not helpful to anyone.

Dairy prices

Select chart tabs

Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

Great news. Silly to wait until 2020 when small but significant changes can be scoped out now.

Up
0

" It would be useful to all if the government could get its policies in order. While most farmers know there is going to be increasing scrutiny on their externalities, headline grabbing statements not based on government policy are not helpful to anyone."
It would be equally useful, actually even more so, if the media would not add their own deliberately misinterpreted click-bait headlines to stories. Nowhere did any minister say what was headlined.
Re DIRA , Fonterra run the very real risk of being placed on a rack and pulled every which way trying to keep everyone happy. They may be forced to choose between shareholders and suppliers to see who is boss.

Up
0

I thought that a really interesting "end bit" by the reporter as well. The true-blue media types are having to 'make up' stuff/attempt to create controversy. It's what you have do when the policy/discussion being rolled out by a Labour coalition on agricultural matters can't be faulted.

Jack Tame was hilarious on morning telly today when he told the young Nat MP that no where did any Labour member of government say that cows would have to be culled - after she attempted to create that false controversy/'spin'.

Up
0

yes Kate the MSM and others are really struggling with a govt that is doing more than denying, smiling, waving and pulling pony tails - and finding support from the populace in doing so. Meanwhile Natioanal looks more and more out of touch.

Up
0

It would be useful to all if the government could get its policies in order. While most farmers know there is going to be increasing scrutiny on their externalities, headline grabbing statements not based on government policy are not helpful to anyone.

Oscillating policy causes an entirely predictable investment climate: hunker down, wait till the fit subsides, move cautiously and scan for alternatives.

Not a great indicator for Productivity, Growth or (say it quietly) business tax revenue projections....

Ideas (and thinking aloud in public) have Consequences.

Up
0

Policy? Who needs policy? Labour didn't expect to get elected, so they didn't bother developing any policy, just a bunch of promises really. Hence the need for so many committees to provide a smoke screen while they develop some.

They weren't reckoning on The Winston having a Winston First Super Vote, outweighing all others. It is as if we had granted him a million personal votes to use as he sees fit. The Winston has totally outclassed The Trump. Yet the lazy lefty media turn a blind eye to what, to many, amounts to legalised voter fraud. If it smells like legalised corruption...

Up
0

They had a policy, 'The 12 Point Plan for Freshwater Quality' going into the election;

https://pro.newsroom.co.nz/articles/1806-labour-party-reveals-new-detai…

They're now implementing it, as those who voted for them would expect.

Up
0

David Parker has softened around the edges of some of his rhetoric prior to the election.
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/the-country/environment-minister-den…

Up
0