sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Allan Barber reviews the capacity and financial situation at Silver Fern Farms, concluding 'there is no alternative' to outside capital

Rural News
Allan Barber reviews the capacity and financial situation at Silver Fern Farms, concluding 'there is no alternative' to outside capital

By Allan Barber

Silver Fern Farms have been forced to take what CEO Dean Hamilton calls a prudent approach to livestock procurement.

This is code for being hard up against the company’s banking facility, directly as a result of greater livestock availability.

A longer season in the North Island and pressure from drought in North Canterbury are responsible for this situation.

An in-house message to livestock buyers explains the company’s inability to handle all its potential livestock bookings and says it may be necessary to assist some suppliers in finding alternative slaughter capacity. The last time I can recall this happening was more than 20 years ago when industrial action forced AFFCO to get Weddel to kill on its behalf.

Clearly SFF has taken the sensible step of implementing seasonal closures at some large plants, such as Paeroa in the Waikato and Fairton in the South Island. Unfortunately the pursuit of cost savings has clashed with the longer than expected flow of livestock, but it would be financially unsustainable if not impossible to reopen these plants.

The other major factor is the state of the export market which is scarcely conducive to killing and processing more product than absolutely necessary at this time of year. As Hamilton told me, there is no point in filling up the chillers and freezers when the market is as soft as it is at the moment. He could well have added that the company’s bankers wouldn’t have allowed it anyway.

The internal communication to the buyers makes it plain SFF must live within its means which hasn’t been the case for the last three or four years. The hope is expressed that this will create more flexibility next season. However the $1.3 billion spent on livestock so far this year is greater than last year which indicates the company has yet again failed to live within its means.

Three years ago SFF suffered because it failed to meet the market which resulted in too much inventory having to be written down, causing substantial losses over two financial years.

SFF is suffering the ultimate meat industry conundrum: how to run all its plants at optimum capacity when its bankers impose facility limits which render this difficult or downright impossible in prevailing market conditions; another dimension of the conundrum is the conflict between satisfying supplier demand for slaughter space and the inability to turn this into cash.

The meat industry went through this scenario in the 1990s resulting in Weddel and Fortex receiverships with AFFCO only being saved by Weddel going through first and the forgiveness of a large amount of debt. This resulted in a capital restructure which allowed AFFCO to survive, prosper briefly and finally be taken over by Talley’s Group which had deep enough pockets to ensure its long term survival.

SFF is faced with a similar set of problems which can only be resolved by a capital restructure. The shareholder group’s attempts to force a review of the potential for a merger with Alliance are doomed to fail, because the state of the balance sheet and bank constraints make a merger impossible. There are also rumours about the closure of SFF’s overseas offices.

It appears the result of the equity raising process carried out by Goldman Sachs will finally be available for communication to shareholders in August. Unless the shareholders can come up with a minimum of $100 million, and even this may not be enough, they will have no entitlement to influence the company’s future. There may be no alternative to bringing in outside capital to recapitalise all or part of the business.

At that point shareholders’ only option may be to express their displeasure by sending their livestock to another processor, but realistically their options may not be great.

They may well be faced with Hobson’s choice.


To subscribe to our weekly Rural email, enter your email address here.

Email:   

Farms For Sale: the most up-to-date and comprehensive listing of working farms in New Zealand, here »


 

Here are some links for updated prices for
lamb
beef
deer
wool

Dairy prices

Select chart tabs

Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:
Source:

-----------------------------

Allan Barber is a commentator on agribusiness, especially the meat industry, and lives in the Matakana Wine Country. He is chairman of the Warkworth A&P Show Committee. You can contact him by email at allan@barberstrategic.co.nz or read his blog here »

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

2 Comments

They used to pay different prices to different suppliers. There were rumors that Landcorp were getting huge premiums for hinds a few years back,never denied.
Farmers killing 1000 cattle a year, sometimes getting considerably less than a small cattle farmer down the road ,who normally killed elsewhere and whose business they were after. I was not a happy supplier and moved to Affco.
I for one won't miss them.

Up
0

Another challenge for the company is where are they going to get the early season lamb this year for the chilled Xmas trade. North Canterbury still has no grass, 80000 plus ewes still grazing away in mid canterbury, many of these ewes will not be going home, a lot will be mutton before lambing starts. Even the lambs that are born their growth rates will be poor, with no chance for the Xmas boat.

Up
0