sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Alliance Group faces big issues over carbon farming and its own corporate structure in the wake of a proposed closure of its meat works in Timaru

Rural News / news
Alliance Group faces big issues over carbon farming and its own corporate structure in the wake of a proposed closure of its meat works in Timaru

The survival of the Alliance Group of meat plants as a farmer-owned co-operative has been revived by the proposed closure of one of its big processing plants, the 139-year-old Smithfield meat factory in Timaru.  

The proposed Smithfield closure has also put renewed attention on the impact of carbon farming on agricultural communities. 

Approximately 600 staff are affected. Alliance says some of them will be absorbed in other plants, such as Lorneville  near Invercargill and the Pukeuri plant near Oamaru. 

“However, there will be a significant number of redundancies,” Alliance says. 

Alliance’s big rival, Silver Fern Farms, halved its status as a co-op in an earlier restructuring with Shanghai Maling taking a 50% stake.

Eric Frykberg spoke to the Alliance chairman Mark Wynne, and asked him why this is happening. 

WYNNE:  The primary driver behind today’s proposal is really declining livestock numbers.  And as those numbers of sheep in particular continue to decline, it means that Alliance and the industry in general have far too much processing capacity, and keeping that going comes at a huge economic cost.

INTEREST.CO.NZ:  So, fewer sheep are going through, but I guess you still face significant fixed costs?

WYNNE:   That’s exactly right, yes.

INTEREST: Does that mean over the last few months, you would have been running at a loss in operational terms?

WYNNE:   Well, we won’t go into the actual financial details of Alliance as a whole, or site by site. But if you look at livestock procurement over the last few months, that has been really challenging. Some very, very high prices have been paid to farmers as meat processors have been scrambling to get enough stock to keep their plants full. That's not unusual for this time of the year, but this year has been more intense as the livestock flow continues to decline. And I guess, particularly over this last year, the drought in Canterbury, the lower North Island, and the top of the South Island, also impacted livestock numbers.

INTEREST: Has there been a downward spiral as farmers with fewer lambs to sell eat into their inventory of breeding ewes and therefore increase the problem long term?

WYNNE: That is what we think has happened. We understand from Beef + Lamb NZ that roughly 500,000 breeding ewes were processed rather than kept, arguably because of the drought but possibly because of economic pressures as well.  And yes, that will definitely have a knock-on effect in the 2025 season and longer term as well. 

INTEREST: Is there anything to blame for this, the spread of forestry, government red tape, or anything else?

WYNNE: At a high level, land use change has been a part of farming since forever.  Even in the early 2000s in New Zealand, you saw a significant shift out of sheep farming into dairy and in certain parts of the North Ireland, you are now seeing a move out of dairy and into kiwifruit. Farmers are continuously chasing the best economic return, which is very logical. But in recent years, we have also had some significant policy interventions around forestry and that has made forestry, particularly carbon farming with permanent aforestation, very attractive from the point of view of financial returns.  The economics of sheep farming in particular are poor, and the current settings on carbon farming are very attractive.

INTEREST: So, do you think the Government should change those rules?

WYNNE: Yes, I do, I think the rules are not balanced at the moment. They have been strongly influenced by a minority part of New Zealand and it has had a huge impact on farming and on rural communities and employment. These things have been predicted in the past and you are now seeing the actual outcome of those decisions.

INTEREST: So, will you speak to the Government about this?

WYNNE:  Yes, I have already done so and I will continue to engage with the Government, and it has been well received. [Agriculture and Forestry] Minister Todd McClay in particular has been very vocal around the policy settings which are being reviewed, and he hopes to deal with this by the end of the calendar year.

INTEREST:  Will a closure of Smithfield enable your other plants to take up the slack and become more viable themselves?

WYNNE: Yes, that is exactly what happens. This is about decreasing our fixed costs, and then we have the capacity to process Smithfield’s livestock through our other locations, which in turn will be more profitable for those locations as well.

INTEREST: You reported a loss in the September 2023 year of $97.9 million. How are you looking for the current financial year which ends in a few days?

WYNNE: We will reveal all over the next few months, and I won’t comment further until we can release our results to everybody at the same time.

INTEREST: Earlier this year you sought an input of capital from your farmer shareholders. Might that have to happen again?

WYNNE: That process is still ongoing. We have indicated to the farmers that we need to strengthen our balance sheet. This is a highly volatile industry and you need a strong balance sheet to ride through variants that brings. So, we’ve kicked off an internal capital raise and that would be a deduction from the processing sheet for livestock going through Alliance.

We have also indicated to the farmers that we will be appointing an investment bank which will help us lead an external capital raise and we will take that option back to the shareholders. At the end of the day, the farmer shareholders have three very simple choices. If farmers supply the capital, we remain a 100 % cooperative. If they don’t supply enough capital, we will have some external and internal capital and will become a joint venture or a hybrid company.  The third option is to divest 100% of the company. So, we don’t know the outcome, but the choices are clear.  We are going to pursue external capital and put that option back in front of our shareholders.

INTEREST: Is anyone interested in buying part of the company, has anyone knocked on your door?

WYNNE:  We have a number of interested parties, both serious contenders and people we suspect are tyre kickers.  But once we have appointed our investment bank, they will help us work our way through that process, and we expect solid interest.

INTEREST: Besides lamb, you process beef and deer. So, what is the meat industry overall looking like?

WYNNE: Well, the declining livestock numbers in lamb in particular impact pretty much all of the players. Beef is much bigger than venison, but overall, the market for beef and venison is pretty much static. These things can change but they will only change when there’s a fundamental increase in the return on capital available to farmers. If we can get into that – and it is driven primarily by offshore markets – then sheep and beef farming can become an economic unit that can compete and provide a return on capital. But right now, it’s very tough.

Consultation on the proposed closure will run until October 11, and a final decision is expected to be made by October 18.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

21 Comments

This is all going to end so badly for NZ, it's citizens and our standard of living. Does anyone really believe that carbon credits are going to replace our primary export markets?

Up
6

Good reason for concern but the reality is that it is the market, or lack of market. Since the 75 mill peak sheep flock in the mid 80s the sheepmeat industry has been simply eviscerated. This closure means there is  between South Otago & Nelson only two major multi chain export  plants operating as opposed to ten, some forty years ago. The industry survived only  by very effective development and diversification, further processing of lamb and an especially fine chilled product. That is though costly to produce and  ship to ready retail and less than 40% of the actual carcass is well suited. As said before on here, given the expensive niche it services,  it is a strategy for the best of times but not so good in the worst of times.

Up
2

I was reading an article only yesterday on how the demand for lamb is collapsing in Australia. Can we not replace lamb with beef? Beef prices still seem very high with grass fed a premium internationally. What else is viable in that region? Too cool for Kiwifruit.

Up
0

In some ways we have. Hamburgers. That gigantic trade in Nth America  has for long been NZ’s saviour. Frozen lean beef is blended with the domestic grain fed product. Cost effective processing, packing and shipping and shelf life. It is pure commodity and as a trade it really works. In an almost ironic sense you could argue that in this sector this has evolved to  become a virtual byproduct of dairying. 

Up
1

Soil and climate isn’t great for crops in the South Island. It’s also very steep, lamb was the perfect answer til it wasn't. 

Up
0

Radiata Pine trees!

Up
0

More to the point, you cant eat pine needles.  I remember the days when NZ lamb was highly sought after, because its better than other lamb.  You really could taste the difference.  

Up
3

Aren't carbon credits for pine basically bullshit from a climate POV anyway? You are just buying time, but that means nothing without gross emissions actually coming down?

Up
2

No of dairy cows in Sth Canterbury in 2000 were 58,000

Number in 2022 were 243,000

Area in dairy in 2000 -  18,000 ha

Area in 2022 - 73,058ha

Area in forest in Canterbury 2014 - 108,371ha

Forest Area in 2022 - 94,000ha

Canterbury Sheep and Beef Farm Profit 2024/25 forecast Profit : decreases 11% to $48,400 per farm for 2024-25. The predominant Farm Class in the region is finishing breeding farms (Farm Class 6), which are forecast to average $32,300 in farm profit before tax. This leaves many farms in a cash loss situation.

Profit = before drawings, tax, principal repayment, capital reinvestment

Bloody trees causing all the problems says the emperor with no clothes.

Up
13

100% bushman… people are eulogising the marginal dry-stock farming but the moan about high meat prices 

we all play our cards in the market we’re in… I remember in early 2000, 100’s of thousands of hectares of forest land in CNI converted to polluting dairy farming yet no one in Main Street battered an eyelid at it

Up
1

Brilliant JL. Thanks. Nothing, as always,  better than facts.

Up
0

Yes, alot of sheep and beef going to dairy support, don't know if they are included in those numbers. 

Up
0

We have to get the message out there that grass fed meat is a health food. 

Up
0

600 jobs gone in a town of 28,000 (district 48,000)...ouch.

Up
1

Pareora, Pukeuri, Seafield are not too distant. All of them likely short of skilled & experienced workers. It is seasonal and hardly glamorous work in the first place, so recruitment has always been an issue. 

Up
0

"All of them likely short of skilled & experienced workers."

All of them wondering if they are next.

Up
0

Still good paying jobs though. Maybe not as good as the eighties, when the only person in town earning more than the freezer hands was the doctor. ( jobs often reserved for all blacks, or other top sportsmen).

Up
0

Not anymore...a long way from the recompense of the 80s.

https://jobspace.co.nz/33438/boner.html

Up
0

Over 2% of the town's population (obviously I realise people will come from further afield) losing their jobs in one go ... not good.

Up
0

Does anyone have that meme in their head of the dog sitting inside a burning house “this is fine” 

Up
0

Try Spike Milligan - the boy stood on the burning deck, his lips were all a quiver, he gave a cough, a leg fell off, and floated down the river.

Up
0