Last weeks GDT auction failed to make much of a stir with an almost flat line event with a 0.7% drop on the previous auction. It did coincide with a 1 cent fall against the US$ which regained at least half the following day which means some were watching the result.
Probably the most concerning aspect is the lack of any real upturn when the Chinese economy (main driver of dairy demand) is looking reasonably positive, at least by western standards. China is targeting a +5% lift in its GDP this year, less than most previous years (pandemic excepted) but enough to help maintain dairy demand. Especially given the importance the Chinese Communist Party has attached dairy to the peoples well being this should help ensure that demand for milk products are kept at reasonable levels.
Despite some positive market signals coming from China Rabobank has decreased their farmgate forecast, dropping this to NZD $8.50/kgMS, from NZD $9.00/kgMS previously. Rabobank’s pessimism comes largely on the back of the global downturn, increased costs and despite lower production from New Zealand. Perhaps the most concern to future returns comes from the sabre rattling of President Xi particularly over his designs to bring Taiwan back into the fold.
Of more interest lately than the GDT results is the parring back of Labour’s policies to help ensure that they get back into power.
While rural folk whose roads and infrastructure have been severely damaged will welcome the focus and additional funding that Waka Kotahi will be able to apply to roads damaged by Cyclone Gabrielle, they should not think this is the end of a Labour focus on environmental matters. The cynic in me wonders what deals have been done with the Greens to maintain their support post the upcoming election.
Labour moving further to the centre where they are almost indistinguishable from National leaves more of the leftist space wide open to the Greens just as National moves to the centre to counter Labour will leave more space on the right for Act to populate. So, while the numbers of left versus right may have or will get re-distributed actually nothing has really changed except the further right and left parties will be feeling more emboldened.
So, if a Labour-led coalition is returned then there could be more pressure than ever to make up for lost time regarding matters environmental (assuming Labour is reliant upon the Greens support) while if a National-led coalition is elected then Act will be able to apply more pressure to get its policies incorporated; largely a decrease in the role of government and a ‘freeing up’ of individual rights.
Ironically it may be that the closer Labour and National get to having similar policies or approaches the wider may be the gap between which ever is the coalition government (which appears to be almost a certainty) and the opposition bench due to the influence of the minority support parties.
The current wildcard is Te Parti Maori, at the moment likely to support a Labour-led coalition and may increase the voice from the further left.
What upcoming policies are likely to sway the rural sector is open to speculation however, the result of the inquiry into forestry and will be of interest to some key electorates. While the inquiry is focussed on the East Coast, Tairawhiti region the recommendations will likely spill out into other regions. Many of these regions were fairly closely fought at the last elections and so forestry and land use plus both blocks views on what should be done next will be of great interest to many.
The map below shows that many regions but especially Northland, Central N.I. and the Hawkes Bay and Wairarapa regions weren’t that far apart in the last 2020 elections and the upcoming one is likely to be considerably closer.
Source: The Spin Off
Given the large number of people employed in the industry it won’t be just those affected by the slash that will be interested in the inquiry recommendations and the various parties’ responses to it.
While the latest voter surveys have shown that matters relating to the “Cost of Living” are by far the one that concern people, the issues surrounding the environment still rated high. Until we see what the respective parties roll out it is going to be very difficult to get a feel for likely outcomes (always a guess at best anyway). However, it will be worth watching the minor parties’ policies as they may be what gets adopted by the “big brothers” if that is what it takes to get into power.
15 Comments
Having watched Labour rip itself apart with its Maori caucus throwing their weight around, voters have to weight up the internal policies of each party AND then the politics of holding a coalition together.
I think all this makes it harder and harder to see a coherant pathway forward for NZ. To me
We need to
- Fix Health. Attract Drs and Nurses to NZ with good pay and working conditions, make health a safe place to work, not just hospitals but in primary care as well. Fix our earthquake prone hosipital buildings. - Cost HEAPS
- Fix Crime. Sure maybe prisons don't work but neither does no consequence for offenders seem to reduce crime. Lawful NZers need to feel safe, even itf their safer impinges on criminals rights and freedoms. Cost Socially HEAPS
- Fix Infrastructure. Roading, failing apart and the enemy of the green cycleway crowd, but pretty important if you need groveries delivered etc. Fix what we have and decide what we cannot afford.... 3-6waters , just fix the thing professionally! Electricity - we need more if we are going to drive EVs and it needs to be generated locally, give solar tax deducatabilitty.
- Fix Super, now at our liesure or later in a real hurry, Make Kiwisaver compulsary for all 18yo at 10% like aussie...... change super to 67 over the 10 year plan. Act has this as a policy
- Fix Education. Tax penalties or benefit reduction for parents with truant kids... fixed.
- Have a 10-20 year plan for NZ
- Fix Super, now at our liesure or later in a real hurry, Make Kiwisaver compulsary for all 18yo at 10% like aussie...... change super to 67 over the 10 year plan. Act has this as a policy
Is Act's policy to make kiwisaver 10% for 18 year olds (the actual good part of this suggestion) or just increasing super eligibility to 67 (the bad part)?
- Fix Education. Tax penalties or benefit reduction for parents with truant kids... fixed.
That doesn't 'fix' anything if you don't know what the problem is. Poverty actually drives truancy - if families either can't provide transportation or adequate clothing / meals to children, then they may not attend school. Alternatively if families are forced to work long hours to make ends meet, they may not be able to properly support their children going to school (making sure they leave the house on time - difficult if you are at work yourself at 7am) or help them with homework etc.
You need to actually understand social problems before you attempt to fix them. I don't have any confidence you understand the issues.
Consesus is always about a willingness to compromise , i al;so think enforced saving of you own money by you in your own name is good from 18....
why do you think moving the age limit up is bad? the way I see it its not depriving a 66 or 67 year old of a years super, its acknowledging that we used to live to 69 but now we live to 79. If you have no ability to work those years you will be recieving a benefit......
Labour pre Ardern’s exit were a house divided, the rift was the Maori faction, and rather starkly obvious it was too. That faction has been battened down but it is still quite clearly percolating. The Greens expected to be in coalition in cabinet last election and were thwarted by the electorate’s unprecedented use of MMP to stymie that. Resultantly there is a great deal of pent up frustration sitting out there in left field ready to burst through the gate. And by their utterances and posturing, in terms of extremes, the TMP are the sum of both of the other two contenders. New Zealand as a nation faces a gathering storm of economic and societal pressures. A coalition government of these unruly and erratic three parties could hardly be more ill equipped to govern stably. On the other side National and ACT look a more compatible and viable coalition. However for the last three or four years ACT the prospective junior partner has virtually being the senior protagonist inside and outside of parliament. National while belatedly getting some actual discipline in place amongst its mps has at the same time failed to reveal any distinctive persona or innovation. Looks to me like as Chris Trotter surmised here a week back, an election for the least worst.
Right now 50/50. During the next six months the breaking of ranks in Labour will resume in earnest and, by reports this week, their two coalition prospects are even now slinging off at them. Last election National were in a real self inflicted mess, of absolutely no credibility and, as had been the case for quite a few elections, without a single viable coalition party on offer. However both those elements have been rectified.In fact looking at the two parties’ positions now, there has been something of a role reversal. Last election it is supposed that the electorate used MMP by way of switching to Labour to prevent the Greens from being in government, in cabinet. If that is so then it is hardly likely that vote will stay with Labour as it is now certain for Labour to remain in government they will need the Greens and TMP, in government in cabinet. Based on the prospect of that I would predict the electorate will turn to National/ACT again for the same preventative reasons, and in terms of odds, well now 60/40.
Changes the leader and Ardern is exposed as the useless 'Spinster" we knew she was.
Now they have a ' Chip of the old Block!
Same decieptfull ass hats just stalling the bad policies to win the next election. Then boom 💥 back to same devisive ways of poor..
Health
Policing
crime
Esucation
Roads......
And 40% of kiwis buy this shite.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.