sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Strong outlook for NZ beef, but new ideas needed to address key industry challenges – Rabobank report

Rural News / analysis
Strong outlook for NZ beef, but new ideas needed to address key industry challenges – Rabobank report

This content is supplied by Rabobank.


Tight global beef supplies and steady demand for New Zealand beef are expected to support healthy farmgate prices for New Zealand beef producers through to 2025, Rabobank says in a newly-released report.

But with a number of key challenges facing the industry – including the need to decrease greenhouse gas emissions and to reduce bobby calf processing requirements – the bank says new ideas and strategic investment will be required by the industry to find solutions to these challenges and to extract more value from the beef supply chain.

In the new report Capitalising on tailwinds through to 2025, Rabobank says the beef industry has performed exceptionally well over recent years.

“The New Zealand beef industry has grown exports by 94,000 tonnes or 21 per cent over the last five years and enjoyed a golden run of pricing during this period,” report author Rabobank agricultural analyst Genevieve Steven said.

“Growing demand from China has been the key factor that has fuelled an increase in New Zealand beef exports. In 2017, China accounted for just 20 per cent of New Zealand beef exports, but since then, we’ve seen export volumes increase markedly and China is now New Zealand’s largest export market for beef accounting for close to 40 per cent of total exports in 2021.”

Ms Steven said the outlook for New Zealand beef exports over coming seasons remains strong, despite the prospect of increased competition from Australia and Brazil.

“Although beef production in Australia and Brazil is forecast to increase, we expect global beef production will remain tight through to 2025 due to the re-build of the US beef cow herd,” she said.

“We also expect consumption of ground beef in the US will grow as consumers trade down to lower-value beef cuts, in response to economic tightening. And this will play into New Zealand’s favour as we’re a key supplier of lean trimmings into the US for ground beef production.

“We anticipate that tight global beef supplies and increasing global consumption of ground beef will keep demand for New Zealand beef strong and ensure farmgate beef pricing continues at elevated levels over the next few years.”

Change is coming

While the outlook remains positive, the report says, change is coming for the New Zealand beef industry.

“The Paris Agreement is driving global markets to reduce supply chain emissions – the majority of which occur at the farm level – and represent scope 3 emissions for companies downstream in the beef supply chain,” she said.

“New Zealand farmers are experiencing these market signals via increased regulatory pressure. And afforestation, plus emissions and freshwater regulations are also expected to drive a decrease in New Zealand beef production by four per cent over the next three years.”

On top of regulatory challenges, the report says, the sector will also have to find ways to manage the increased need for bobby calf processing, with Fonterra set to bring in new rules in mid-2023 that specify all non-replacement calves must enter a value stream such as dairy beef finishing, veal production or the pet food industry.

“This will result in a significant jump in the number of bobby calves to process annually from mid-2023, and the meat industry is concerned about its ability to process increased volumes of bobby calves due to labour constraints and the highly condensed bobby calf season,” Ms Steven said.

She said industry participants will need to keep an open mind to different solutions aimed at addressing these issues in order to adapt the supply chain so it is fit for the future.

“And the healthy balance sheets of operators throughout the beef industry supply chain mean the sector is currently well-positioned to invest in new ideas and to think outside the box,” she said.

Potential solutions

The report identifies two strategies which have the potential to reduce both emissions and bobby calf processing requirements; closer integration of the dairy and beef industries and capturing more value through net zero carbon attributes.

Ms Steven said further investment into collaboration between the dairy and beef industries could help the beef sector reduce emissions and bobby calf processing requirements.

“One benefit of closer integration is it would allow the beef sector to capitalise on the lower emissions profile of dairy beef cattle. Dairy beef cattle have significantly lower emissions per kg CWT than straight beef cattle, due to dairy cow emissions attributed to milk production,” she said.

“The beef sector could also benefit from genetic research to find low emissions traits, and the use of methane reducing technologies in the dairy industry, that ultimately reduce the emissions profile of dairy beef calves entering the beef supply chain.”

Another opportunity, Ms Steven said, is to more closely align dairy beef genetics with market premiums for beef.

“Improved feedback loops between the beef and dairy industries will help to ensure that the beef genetics being used in the dairy industry align with market premiums, and that dairy beef animals meet finishers’ requirements,” she said.

A further opportunity stemming from industry collaboration that could help to reduce bobby calf processing, Ms Steven said, was the development of a rose veal industry for New Zealand.

“Rose veal – the term given to beef cattle slaughtered at age eight to 12 months – is a niche industry in New Zealand, with veal not commonly consumed domestically,” she said.

“There is an opportunity to develop a ‘raised in nature’ rose veal product which differs to European veal by being grass fed, natural and having low emissions.

“Opportunities may exist in Europe for a ‘raised in nature’ product, while other markets of interest include the US and Asia.”

Ms Steven said the first step in developing a rose veal industry would be to find customers who are prepared to pay a premium for New Zealand veal over European competitors.

“Clear market signals are required to give processors confidence to invest in developing a programme,” she said.

“Beef-finishing farmers could benefit from a rose veal industry by having shorter economic return periods for cattle, greater flexibility with short-term cattle, and a lower emissions footprint from young stock.”

In addition to greater industry collaboration, the report says, there is an opportunity to capture more value across the carcass, particularly with regard to the development of net zero carbon products.

“There are some niche consumer groups who are willing to pay premiums for net zero carbon beef from New Zealand and, typically, these consumers pay a premium for net zero carbon, in addition to a suite of other attributes,” Ms Steven said.

“Net zero carbon attributes are usually accredited to high-value primal cuts, often in the chilled category, because it is easier to pass through higher product costs to a consumer of premium beef cuts.”

Ms Steven said there is an opportunity to export net zero carbon lean trimmings into the US market as an ingredient in net zero or low emissions ground mince.

“A New Zealand-branded net zero carbon mince product is an option, but the challenge would be securing sufficient volumes of zero carbon fat trimmings. To scale this opportunity, New Zealand would need to partner with a company in Australia or the US that also produces zero carbon fat trimmings.” she said.

“Ensuring credibility of the ‘New Zealand net zero carbon product’ stamp will be essential if New Zealand is to grow sales in this area. Complete confidence is needed in attribute claims to avoid green washing and devaluing the integrity of the New Zealand brand.

“New Zealand does have a first-mover advantage because of the work that has already been done here to reduce emissions, but increased competition from other countries is expected within the next five years.”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

16 Comments

Bring on He waka eke noa so we are ahead in the game of marketing green products. Check out Ireland they are already doing it.

Up
3

Hans, are the farmer's in Ireland and the farmer's in NZ playing by the same rules? As my understanding is we are not. 

Up
0

Ag Man, of course the are differences but the point is they saw the writing on the wall a long time ago that promotion of sustainable, low carbon products marketed as green will get easy market access and premium price on some products.

The consumers of this world with money have grown up with climate change etc in their faces and are now older and want products that are proven to be produced with environmental credentials. And to go further there are animal welfare demands also.

I have been working in the rural sector for 40yrs and have seen the change in expectations from consumers. No point putting our heads in the sand thinking they will buy our stuff regardless. Sure there will always be a market but at what price.

I know what it costs to produce lambs and there is not much margin in it. Lets not make it worse.

Up
2

Hans, who saw the writing on the wall? The farmer's, marketer's or the government. It's all fine and dandy to point out what other countries are doing but are they on the same playing field for us the do the same. Let us count all tree's on our farms (just like Ireland) and im sure there would be much more buy in. Im also sure that if Ireland didn't hand out the subsidies like they did to get farmer's on board with what they are doing, it wouldn't be happening.

I'm all for pulling back on emissions but show me another country that is doing it "cold turkey" like we are?

Up
0

Thing is Ag Man, we are not on a level playing field with others who produce in competition to us. Most have huge domestic markets and only sell surplus with the aim of getting as higher price as possible.

NZ on the other hand consume only 10% of what we produce. Therefore it is imperative that we get our profile right as we are reliant on other countries.

Who knows what will happen in the future but right now the Green movement is picking up momentum. Why even the oil producing Gulf States are pushing carbon neutral believe it or not. Europe and the USA are in a spat over trying to entice Green industry with subsidies. 

We only produce Dairy, meat, logs& horticulture, all things that can be produced elsewhere. Lets get our image and marketing right.

Up
2

Hans, I don't disagree with you. I just think we should be using all the tools in the shed including the ones that are at the back and abit harder too get. 

Kiwi Ag is doing a great job, yes you get some that let us down but you also get some parents that let there kids down and always will.

Long term i believe NZ Ag is in a great spot if the powers in Wellington get a better understanding of what Kiwi farmers actually are doing and that is for left and right. 

 

Up
0

I saw a table earlier today (forget where, probably here or Stuff) of the top emitters re CO2.

Milk and beef industries are right up there among the power generators and the gas companies. It's definitely worrying for the future of farms, and the future of NZ exports.

I really think farmers will have to be very open to change and ready to adapt. Once carbon costs are built into their export products they might find themselves unable to be competitive in their overseas markets... time to diversify, time to plant stuff and retire marginal lands if you can afford to.

Up
0

It was stuff, fonterra was not just up there, but nearly equal to all other emitters combined. They have to kick coal.

Up
0

You do realize how those figures were made up?

They appear to include even farm emissions in Fonterra's numbers and the oil companies include the petrol/desiel sales. Basically the EPA absolve consumers of any responsibility which is great for them but utterly rediculous in reality. It allows all and sundry to point the finger at others with no realisation of their own contribution.

Up
0

The farm emissions we need to address are say 20% of the Ag total so in effect it makes up only around @15% of our total emissions. Ag has work to do but it’s not our biggest problem emitter by any stretch - I wish the industry could do maths and sell this point and then do something in a positive manner - would help mental health and well being in the rural industry as well. Some are and have transformed their lives and well being as Hans noted.

Redcows is right - it’s not the companies here it’s all of us who happily drive, fly, drive our boats etc etc who are the issue - including me. We will only move the dial when we all try to do something be it cycle a bit, fly less, use less plastic etc etc. It’s not someone else’s or a faceless companies problem.

Im getting on my bicycle and of to the office.

Up
1

Not made up, but reported by company, not by end use.those figures are due out soon apparently. 

 

Up
0

Its not coal  - The main contributor to our overall carbon footprint is the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dairy farm production systems, primarily from cows. https://www.fonterra.com/nz/en/our-co-operative/the-way-we-farm/sustain…

Up
0

But coal is replaceable , cows not so much . 

The Stuff article . https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/climate-news/130991637/new-zealands…

While the figures are from the EPA , the tallies are calculated by Stuff, i guess giving some weight to Redcows assertion they are made up . 

 

Up
0

Yep made up figures. 

Up
0

Too easy to just say they are made up. Can you point to a specific figure that is made up. I've done a bit of research, but not enough to state made up or not. One thing I are seeing, is dairy's coal use is worst than I thought, barring steelmaking,they are the biggest user.

Up
0

The most efficient beef producing animal is a fresian bull, killed at 9 to 12 months old. But the processor doesn't want that so they generally go to 18 months

Up
1