Highlights
The following is a re-post from the World Gold Council. The original is here.
Central bank buying slowed in Q2 but remained resolutely positive. This, combined with healthy investment and resilient jewellery demand, created a supportive environment for gold prices.
Q2 gold demand (excluding OTC) dropped slightly by 2% y/y to 921t, driven by a marked deceleration in net central bank buying compared to above average purchases in Q2’22. Inclusive of OTC and stock flows, total demand strengthened 7% y/y to 1,255t.
Despite sales from Turkey in response to specific local market conditions, the 103t of net official sector purchasing in Q2 is in line with the underlying positive trend towards gold among central banks.
Jewellery consumption managed a modest improvement despite the high gold price environment, up 3% y/y at 476t. With jewellery fabrication of 491t, inventories increased by around 15t in Q2, in part as Chinese jewellery consumption failed to meet the trade’s optimistic expectations.
Bar and coin investment increased by 6% y/y to 277t in Q2, with Turkey a major driver of growth. And while ETFs saw net outflows of 21t (concentrated in June) these were notably smaller than the 47t outflow in Q2’22.
OTC investment jumped in Q2, reaching 335t. Although opaque, demand from this sector of the market was apparent as the gold price found firm support even in the face of ETF outflows and a reduction in COMEX net longs.
Demand for gold used in technology remained very soft thanks to continued weakness in consumer electronics; it held at just 70t for a second consecutive quarter.
Total gold supply was 7% higher y/y at 1,255t, lifted by growth in all segments. Mine production is estimated to have reached a record for H1 of 1,781t.
Firmer jewellery and investment demand helped offset slower central bank buying in Q2*
The LBMA (PM) gold price averaged US$1,976/oz during Q2, a record high. This price was 6% higher y/y and 4% above the previous record high from Q3’20. Currency moves meant that several countries saw further strength in local gold prices, notably China and Turkey.
H1 gold demand (excluding OTC) was 6% lower at 2,062t. The y/y decline was largely explained by this year’s modest outflows from gold ETFs being compared with the strong surge of inflows in early 2022. Total demand in H1 (inclusive of OTC and stock flows) increased by 5% to 2,460t.
Central bank gold buying in H1 reached a first-half record of 387t. Despite the Q2 slowdown, the strong Q1 start set the seal on a record-breaking H1. Buying activity remains widespread and distributed among both emerging and developed countries.
Local market conditions have driven exceptional gold demand in Turkey in recent quarters. Combined H1 jewellery, bar and coin demand reached 118t, the highest first half year since 2007 when Turkish lira gold prices were a fraction of their current record levels. Presidential elections, dizzying inflation and currency weakness all contributed to drive demand up.
Gold recycling for the first half was 9% higher y/y, with much of that growth coming from China and India. Base effects played a role in both markets, as recycling had been relatively weak in Q2’22. Recycling activity has yet to pick up, notably in Western markets, despite high gold prices and cost of living pressures.
Gold supply and demand
Tonnes | Q2'22 | Q3'22 | Q4'22 | Q1'23 | Q2'23 | y/y change | |
Supply | |||||||
Mine production | 889.3 | 950.4 | 948.5 | 857.1 | 923.4 | 4% | |
Net producer hedging | 2 | -26.5 | -13.3 | 36.1 | 9.5 | 383% | |
Total mine supply | 891.3 | 923.9 | 935.2 | 893.2 | 932.8 | 5% | |
Recycled gold | 285.3 | 268.6 | 290.7 | 311.7 | 322.3 | 13% | |
Total Supply | 1,176.6 | 1,192.5 | 1,225.9 | 1,204.9 | 1,255.2 | 7% | |
Demand | |||||||
Jewellery fabrication | 493.5 | 582.6 | 601.9 | 511.5 | 491.3 | 0% | |
Jewellery consumption | 461.7 | 525.6 | 628.5 | 474.8 | 475.9 | 3% | |
Jewellery inventory | 31.8 | 57.1 | -26.7 | 36.7 | 15.4 | -52% | |
Technology | 78.3 | 77.3 | 72.1 | 70.1 | 70.4 | -10% | |
Electronics | 64.3 | 63.5 | 57.9 | 56.1 | 56.4 | -12% | |
Other Industrial | 11.4 | 11.3 | 11.7 | 11.6 | 11.6 | 1% | |
Dentistry | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | -10% | |
Investment | 213.8 | 103.8 | 250.8 | 275.9 | 256.1 | 20% | |
Total bar & coin demand | 261.2 | 347.9 | 340.4 | 304.5 | 277.5 | 6% | |
Physical Bar demand | 172.7 | 225.5 | 222.6 | 183.4 | 162.9 | -6% | |
Official Coin | 70.8 | 89.4 | 89 | 96.4 | 88.9 | 25% | |
Medals/Imitation Coin | 17.6 | 33 | 28.9 | 24.7 | 25.8 | 47% | |
ETFs & similar products | -47.4 | -244.1 | -89.6 | -28.7 | -21.3 | – | – |
Central banks & other inst. | 158.6 | 458.8 | 381.8 | 284 | 102.9 | -35% | |
Gold demand | 944.2 | 1,222.5 | 1,306.6 | 1,141.5 | 920.7 | -2% | |
OTC and other | 232.5 | -30.1 | -80.7 | 63.4 | 334.5 | 44% | |
Total Demand | 1,176.6 | 1,192.5 | 1,225.9 | 1,204.9 | 1,255.2 | 7% | |
LBMA Gold Price, US$/oz | 1,870.6 | 1,728.9 | 1,725.9 | 1,889.9 | 1,975.9 | 6% |
Source: ICE Benchmark Administration, Metals Focus, World Gold Council
Our free weekly precious metals email brings you weekly news of interest to precious metals investors, plus a comprehensive list of gold and silver buy and sell prices.
To subscribe to our weekly precious metals email, enter your email address here. It's free.
Comparative pricing
You can find our independent comparative pricing for bullion, coins, and used 'scrap' in both US dollars and New Zealand dollars which are updated on a daily basis here »
Precious metals
Select chart tabs
3 Comments
The following is taken from a precious metals newsletter produced by Ed Steer. The World Gold Council will discuss the price but not the price management.
The August Bank Participation Report [BPR] [CFTC.gov] data is extracted directly from yesterday's Commitment of Traders Report. It shows the number of futures contracts, both long and short, that are held by all the U.S. and non-U.S. banks as of Tuesday’s cut-off in all COMEX-traded products.
For this one day a month we get to see what the world’s banks have been up to in the precious metals. They’re usually up to quite a bit.
…..
But as I pointed out above, the world's commodity trading houses and some hedge funds are also mega net short the four precious metals...far more short than the banks in almost all cases...especially the non-U.S. banks. They have the ability to affect prices if they choose to exercise it...which I'm sure they're doing at times. But it's still the big bullion banks at Ground Zero of the price management scheme.
And as has been the case for years now, the short positions held by these Big 4/8 traders/banks, is the only thing that matters...especially the short positions of the Big 4 -- and how this is ultimately resolved [as Ted said earlier] will be the sole determinant of precious metal prices going forward.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.