In hindsight the Reserve Bank's Official Cash Rate (OCR) decision appears to have been a masterstroke. A touch of genius.
NO. I'm not talking about the OCR decision of last week!
I'm talking about the RBNZ's surprise 50 basis-points hike of the OCR in April, which blindsided financial markets and caused general bafflement, including - I must confess - for yours truly. But while we might not have all known at the time just what exactly the RBNZ was up to with that - clearly the RBNZ did.
At this point I'll give a big hat-tip to BNZ head of research Stephen Toplis, who made this comment prior to last week's OCR announcement: "There are some who believe the main reason the RBNZ went 50 at its last meeting, when most thought 25 was the most likely outcome, was because it had decided to minimise the chance that it would have to be aggressive post Budget so as not to become embroiled in the political process. This line of reasoning may have some merit," Toplis said.
Sometimes you just read something and the lightbulbs go off. This was one of those occasions. And for me this lightbulb moment became even more pronounced after last week's OCR decision and accompanying Monetary Policy Statement were released.
Remember that in the lead up to last week's decision the financial markets were in something of a lather and were pricing in a peak OCR of approaching 6%.
The mainstream media appeared ready and willing to offer up some filleted and seared Reserve Bank Governor on their evening menus as the expectation had it that the OCR would be heading for the moon and the Government's May 18 Budget would be the reason. The RBNZ was set up to be the villain of the piece in huge political arguments about the cost of living and the Government's willful contribution to that.
However, the RBNZ was not playing the game. The hitherto resolutely 'hawkish' RBNZ didn't exactly jump into 'dove' clothes overnight, but the hawk suit had suddenly lost a lot of feathers.
In its April OCR statement the RBNZ had expressed concern about the potential stimulatory impact of the then not-yet-released Budget. And it also expressed concern about the potential inflationary impact of a surge in migrants.
However, by the May OCR statement both the Budget and migration were seen as less problematic.
Were these two things perhaps less problematic because the RBNZ had already got the jump on them with the 50-point increase in April?
So, in May the RBNZ has done a 25 point OCR rise and holstered its guns. And the OCR is now in pause mode.
Why was the RBNZ able to do this? Because it had done the 50-point jump in April - ahead of the Budget and ahead of the potential firestorm of political arguments, thus neatly avoiding putting itself in the middle.
The RBNZ jealously guards its statutory independence from the Government. But that doesn't mean it isn't 'political' - with a small 'p' - as an organisation. It can be argued that just keeping oneself out of political arguments will at time require 'political' behaviour and statements. And I think the RBNZ has always done this.
Common sense surely suggested that the RBNZ would need to 'pause' at some point and have a look at what its massive tightening wave - a whole 525 basis points of OCR hike since October 2021 - was achieving. So a pause now is very justifiable. I actually thought the RBNZ should have paused before now anyway. Remember the OCR is a blunt instrument, which operates with a lot of what the economists like to call 'lag'. In other words it takes a while to see if it is working.
So, now we are in what the RBNZ describes as watch, worry and wait mode - just as it happens that the election is coming into view. That's worked out well.
At this point it is probably worth highlighting just exactly where the expectation comes from that the OCR is now on 'hold' for the foreseeable future.
It's in the style of things-RBNZ that the central bank won't say in as many words: "We are lifting the OCR another 25 points and then that's it." No. It doesn't need to - it lets its forecast table do that in true 'raised eyebrow' RBNZ style.
Below is an abridged version of that latest table. (The full table appears on page 57 of the latest MPS.)
Okay, so if we look at the column on the far right, under 'OCR', we can see that the RBNZ is forecasting that the OCR will now stay at 5.5% till the second half of next year. This is the RBNZ's way of 'telling us' it has put the OCR on hold.
Does this mean that it most definitely will NOT move the OCR either up or down till the second half of next year?
Well, of course not. Not at all. That's the beauty of 'saying something' without actually saying it! The 'market' has now decided the OCR is on hold (because the RBNZ wants it to draw that conclusion) but the RBNZ can change its mind at any time. All the RBNZ has to say is that the data changed and that required a change of tack.
So, will the RBNZ change its mind?
Well, interestingly, among the economists Westpac thinks there will be another 25 point hike in August. ANZ says there will be one in November.
I reckon the RBNZ would only make a move in August if it really has to. I think it really intends the 'watch, worry and wait' phase to extend beyond October 14 (election day).
What events might force the RBNZ's hand? Or alternatively what might make it comfortable sitting tight? Let's have a quick look at some of the key dates on the economic calendar for the rest of the year.
As far as the RBNZ itself is concerned, it has three more OCR decisions to make before the election - on July 12, August 16 and October 4 - and then the last OCR review for the year is November 29.
The next key piece of economic data to be released is March quarter GDP on June 15. This could potentially be contentious - and as political as hell.
GDP shrank in the December quarter. If GDP has shrunk again in the March quarter then this will be two consecutive quarters of negative growth - meeting the technical description of a recession. People get pretty excited over the 'R' word and politicians will undoubtedly get very excited if we do indeed go into 'recession'.
On the other hand though, if GDP has just snuck into positive territory for the March quarter (as I suspect will be the case) then we won't be in recession and the earliest point we might technically go into recession is after the September quarter. But we won't have the September quarter figures released till December - well after the election has been decided.
So, there's a reasonable chance the politicians won't have a 'real' recession to play with in the election campaign, although there's a fair chance the June quarter GDP figures - to be released on September 21 - will be negative, so, I suppose they will be able to drum up a 'recession is nigh' narrative.
What about inflation? The next Consumers Price Index inflation release for the June quarter comes out on July 19 and will be the last inflation figure before the election (the September quarter figures come out on October 17).
Then there's labour market figures. The unemployment/wage figures for the June quarter come out on August 2 and then the next ones are not till after the election on November 2.
Looking at this list of data releases suggests to me that the only thing that might force the RBNZ to hike the OCR again before the election could be if that CPI figure on July 19 is a shocker. Somehow though, I doubt it will be.
It seems the road could be looking clear for the RBNZ till after the election as far as any more OCR moves might be concerned. What about after then?
Well, the ANZ economists as mentioned further up the article are forecasting an OCR hike in November. To me, this would have to be a real possibility. Much will likely depend on the housing market. If a National-led Government does prevail on October 14 and does indeed indicate swift reversal of Labour housing measures such as the removal of interest deductibility for investors, then we might confidently expect to see the housing market get another wind. As the ANZ economists have been saying for some time, the RBNZ would not likely be enthused about the prospect of the house market taking off again when the war against inflation is far from won.
So, the RBNZ lobbing another OCR hike in the immediate aftermath of the election would appear a distinct possibility.
But let's see. We are now in watch, worry and wait mode. Maybe the cumulative effects of all the hiking the RBNZ has already piled on us to date will prove to have been more than enough. We just don't know one way or the other yet.
Of course if the economy really does start to struggle more than the RBNZ currently believes it will, then it can start to reduce the OCR. But again, this would not be till after the election. And the RBNZ would have to be convinced inflation really is on the run.
*This article was first published in our email for paying subscribers. See here for more details and how to subscribe.
49 Comments
Plausible.
But if there is a change of Government, and the attendant promises that have been made, "then the OCR is now in pause mode" will likely cease pretty quickly.
The big concern to us all should be "Do we have 20 weeks of pause, left up our sleeves?". And the tragic thing will be if some of us are tempted to think "Yes, and it's over! The Floor is in" only to find out it never was. We have only just scratched the surface of the Change that has to come, if we are to have a sustainable future.
Actually there is no reason to raise the OCR from here, just look at Turkey ! Decided to keep low rates and just let inflation rip and rip it sure did as it hit 80% at one point. I guess my point is that it can now hold the current rate for at least 6 months and the aim will be to inflate away some of the debt. Merry Christmas RBNZ, enjoy that Turkey.
Debt never gets inflated away!
If it did, why are the Americans arguing about how much more to increase their Debt level?
Debt, theoretically, can be reduced in Real Terms IF in aggregate no new Debt is issued. But it always is, and no amount of Income increase (wages etc) keeps up. So all we do is take the old Debt + The New Debt = More Debt. Nothing is diminished. Nothing is "Inflated away" - just the opposite.
(eg: That mortgage you have, that you are going to Inflate away with your pay rise? The next time you move, you'll roll the old mortgage balance amount into the new required amount and then face the future with more gross Debt)
Yes and if interest payments increase in the future as a result of higher interest rates (as the result of higher inflation) then the debt burden can become less and less manageable. So it could actually be very painful inflating the debt away going forward.
Productivity and incomes need to increase more than the debt burden otherwise living standards drop.
I guess the "inflating debt away" idea applied to traditional fiscal theory, where governments were more conservative with their finances and public borrowings were used to fund the nation's productive capacity (e.g., critical infrastructure).
Even the so called Frugal Four have relatively low public debt levels as a % of their GDPs but very high private debt.
If it did, why are the Americans arguing about how much more to increase their Debt level?
Republician Politicians being obstructive to Democrats as per usual. Like our politicians, they seldom actually do what is in the interests of the populace if there is any chance they can score points against the other team.
"Debt never gets inflated away!"
Say what !!??!! ...
With national debt ... It totally depends on what currency the debt is held in. To say nothing of the lending terms that may have specific clauses dealing with currency devaluations. There is a reason Turkey's currency is tanking you know.
With local debt ... [hangs his head and wonders why this even needs saying] ... Go back to 70s/80s in NZ.
There's a chance it might work out but you will have to stump up the nominal cost of the loan to hold on (for a few years) and your house is worth less in real prices than what you paid. If you think a tenant is covering this in rent...
Argentina circumvents this in part with annual rent reviews. Initially the cost is higher then diminishes. With inflation at >100% it is a nightmare. And it is illegal to use $US as the price. Must be in pesos. Disclaimer we have 2 scabby shacks in Argentina that are rented and the country is following Venezuela
Or if they do (get inflation below 2%), it will most probably be because we are fighting a highly deflationary recession - again not good for the economy. But it may cause celebration for some as they will say 'look interest/mortgage rates have gone down - green shoots for the housing market!' without acknowledging the many thousands of people who will lose jobs and/or take pay cuts at the same time (and businesses that will fail as a result).
My thoughts exactly. Recent prediction on Interest.co suggested RBNZ would avoid hiking near the election.
Inaction only cements the idea that the RBNZ is not independent of the Govt. Either that or they're concerned the public believe them to be Govt run, which I could understand after seeing a number of comments from people online about how the Govt is ruining lives with these rate hikes...
Not doing anything of any consequence before elections is standard operating procedure for all government departments and national organisations that are accountable to government - independent or not. It doesn't matter what party is in power. For the RBNZ It's always been like this since the RBNZ was formed.
Ergo, it is completely incorrect to say government is running the RBNZ.
The online commentators you refer too that say government is running the OCR or the RBNZ are just plain wrong. Pick better commentators to believe. The ones that actually understand how the RBNZ functions have been quite clear that the RBNZ screwed up way back when the OCR stayed far too long at 0.25%, while the RBNZ's Funding for Lending Program was saturating the retail banks with cheap money for far too long, and the RBNZ should have risen far, far faster when the economy hit significant supply shocks thanks to pootin.
This is being independent, it’s ensuring the election is all about government policies and not reserve bank action. A biased reserve bank could drop a 1% rate rise / cut right before the election to change the outcome.
They got their rate rises out the way earlier than expected to allow an election pause. But if they have to change rates between now and then (if inflation does not behave as expected) then I’m sure they will.
Orr has no credibility.
He tells NZrs that the OCR would keep going up until inflation was in the 3% range.
Then, based on a very short period of data collection, ( but more than likely it was Robertsons influence using the "Arderns covid spin theory" of keeping the truth away from the masses to appeasethe swing votèrs) tells us inflation is under control and no more hikes are coming..
Now he is backtracking as he realizes that he was a fool to reject the possibility that inflation may ŵell rise and he may have to raise the OCR.
Sorry, but this guy is a compromised Muppet that does not Think through the logic of his fiscal responsibilities .
If anyone thinks he wil not raise the OCR, if inflation is up again next month, then either you are foolish or Orr is definitely in the pocket of Robertson and should resign.
If Orr is holding back the economy for a election thus running cover for Labour, then he should be sacked
,
The RBNZ has been raising rates for 20 months now. Exactly when are we supposed to be seeing the "effects"? Surely it would have happened by now? Yet inflation is forecast to still be over 6% this quarter, barely budging from the 7.3% it "peaked" at. Meanwhile the US have managed to bring inflation down from 9.1% to 4.9% and have done that without effecting mortgage rates for existing owners (thanks to 30 year fixed mortgages). Meanwhile South Africa with the same 6.8% inflation as NZ has just put rates up to 8.7% - as the Taylor Rule would dictate. But we are going to sit on our 6% inflation and "just see what happens"....
"Much will likely depend on the housing market."
From today's auctions: 29 Marau Crescent, Mission Bay
Last sold: Nov 2020 $2.56m
Passed in at: $2.50m
For such a prime location, I'd expect it to have hiked a tad. Apparently not. When primo locations are stagnating then the lower end has but one way to go.
(edited. It was passed in after 3 bids.)
Meanwhile - at the other end of the spectrum - in the auction room flooded with NO2 and/or testosterone ...
21 Rosses Place, Pinehill sold for $1.907m ... On the market at $1.78m which was already IMO a very good price.!
https://www.trademe.co.nz/a/property/residential/sale/northland/whangar…
Dropped from 1.07mill. To 870k
https://www.trademe.co.nz/a/property/residential/sale/northland/whangar…
Dropped from 980k to 750k
https://www.trademe.co.nz/a/property/new-homes/house-land/northland/wha…
New builds Dropped 180k. This was 1.08million 4 konth ago. Land price unchanged in area.
In one area i can give you 5 more as large price drops plus 6 withdrawns and now tryng to rent
Sellers are desperate to sell
A hike in November? Unlikely IMNSHO. We've a world of pain between now and then.
Why? The OCR sat below 3.5% for a long time - starting 2009 - and spent quite a few years below 2.0% - and this became the new normal. In this new normal, households and businesses planned their expenditures. So at 5.5% it is causing a world of pain.
I'm surprised you're surprised, David. Rumor has it Orr gets paid $650k pa. You don't get paid that if you can't plan ahead.
Just wished he 'planned ahead' when it was clear supply disruptions would result in inflation taking off. Should have immediately hiked from 0.25% to 3.5% and bugger the bank's losses. (Even Russia's Central bank hiked to 20% to head of inflation just after 24 February 2022. Smart banker Elvira Nabiullina - although I suspect she - like anyone else watching Pootin mass troops on Ukraine's border - had plenty of time to plan ahead.)
Did he? Or did he just benefit from the reduction in interest rates around the globe during his tenure, that allowed investment bubbles to grow here there and everywhere?
I had high hopes for him when appointed, as by that stage it was obvious to every man and his dog the asset price inflations were caused by the reducing interest rates.. August 2019 was a rude awakening.
Given his mandate is based on a moving 5-year average (if I recall aright) - the RBNZ have not yet missed it (or only just by my reckoning). But that will likely change in the near term, if inflation persists and/or our dollar tanks.
And I've never really understood why the inflation target isn't zero.
He did indeed. However, the Super Fund is run by "guardians" of which Orr was the chief. The actual investment decisions are done by firms they employ. Of course, you need some nous to select good investment firms - no taking that away from him. I doubt that as chief guardian he'd be remunerated anything like as much as RB governor.
I doubt that as chief guardian he'd be remunerated anything like as much as RB governor.
You'd be quite wrong, there was a bit of a kerfuffle over just how much he was earning back in 2017 - his salary was close to $1m, and there will have been a bonus structure on top of that.
He did find himself the centre of some public controversy over his salary - close to $1 million - and his annual pay rises.
[...] "That care is I think shown even by his willingness to take on this [RBNZ] role - including such unpalatable features as taking a pay cut and moving back to Wellington - which is a sign that he is driven by higher motivations."
Whether Devonport-based Orr is happy about the shift back to Wellington is unclear, but the new job will certainly involve a pay cut - as governor his salary will probably be closer to $700,000.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/who-is-the-new-reserve-bank-governo…
Rear view
RBNZ actions are informed by regular current bank data we don’t get. However it will be interesting to see if there has been any significant change in the banks' bad debt provisions when the March quarter figures are made available in a couple of hours time. Presumably some of this expected pain will show up there eventually.
With these guys at the RBNZ not able to hit a target if their life depended on it I do not think they should keep their jobs. It seems like their main purpose is to instil some sort of confidence that "they are in control" and they can "bring inflation under control".
Well their recent record seems pretty shocking. They held rates low for too long when any one with half a brain could realise that reduced supply with easy money was going to give us problems.
Then they crank the rates up to try and kill demand when the root cause of the inflation is mainly supply sided rather than rampant demand.
Can anyone prove that raising the rates like they did has impacted inflation in a positive way apart from tanking the housing market and hurting both property owners and renters?
Surely this job could be done just as well by Artificial Intelligence - free from political interference and purely based on data rather than their personal whims.
But I guess the politicians prefer to have a quiet word with them to say - "election is coming up, don't you dear raise rates again before then".
If anyone goes shopping for food or has dinner at restaurant it is obvious inflation is hot, pay rises will also keep climbing and rates will stay around this level for a number of years. House prices will continue to tumble as people who fixed at 3% have to refinance at 7-8%, over leveraged will have to sell what they can and take the loss. House price’s will probably be down another 15% to 20% over next year.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.