By David Hargreaves
Well, the Reserve Bank got the decision it wanted, but not the outcome.
There's a strange harmony in the RBNZ's 'hawkish cut' to interest rates last week being followed by the US Federal Reserve hiking American interest rates in a 'dovish way', but at the moment it isn't producing sweet music to the RBNZ's ears.
The huge discordant note as at time of writing is the Kiwi dollar, which actually rose against its American counterpart in the immediate wake of the Fed decision.
The explanation for this apparently contradictory turn of events would lie in a combination of the very conditional nature of the Fed hike, the fact the move had been hugely telegraphed, and the fact that our central bank last week attempted to draw a line under any further rate falls here.
I've already said I think our central bank is going to need to drop rates again, and I think the immediate aftermath of the Fed's decision only firms up that prospect.
The more I reflect on last week's Reserve Bank Official Cash Rate announcement the more I think it was a seriously botched job.
If you read the December Monetary Policy Statement closely, I think it looks like a central bank that's decided not to drop interest rates. Indeed if you took your cues from RBNZ Governor Graeme Wheeler's October speech you might again come to the conclusion that there was no intention to further cut rates this year. I really do wonder if that whole MPS document was put together with a kind of assumption that there would be no rate cut - but then late in the piece the decision was made to do a cut.
The disastrous consequence of combining a cut with an essentially hawkish 'no more cuts from us' message was to drive the Kiwi dollar higher.
And now the the US rate hike has occurred with 'dovish' supporting language so our dollar has risen again.
That's important because the RBNZ's expecting a lower dollar and that this lower dollar will cause a spike in inflation. The RBNZ's picking March quarter CPI inflation of 0.6%. It's also picking that the Kiwi dollar will in the March quarter be valued at 69.4 on the trade weighted index - the basket of currencies of our major trading partners. Right now the Kiwi dollar is over 5% above where the RBNZ's predicting it for March.
A spike in the currency right now is pretty significant because of the opportunity it will provide for importers to stock up on forward cover. To use retailer The Warehouse as an example, its annual report for the year ended July showed that it had about $200 million worth of cashflow hedging at the very attractive rate of US76c set to run out next month. It has a further $75 million worth of hedging over the following six months at US68.5c.
Businesses are smart these days. They are going to be able to stock up again in the near future at forward currency rates - certainly not as good as they were - but nevertheless much better than the RBNZ would have imagined or be hoping for. Predicting the direction of a currency is a bit like playing roulette (just as predictable), but I don't see it as impossible now that the Kiwi could climb above US70c early in the New Year. With a US Fed equivocal about further rate rises and our central bank seemingly close to unequivocal about no further rate cuts here, why wouldn't the Kiwi dollar rise further?
I believe that the RBNZ has too slavishly looked to the Fed for a lead. It has spent the last couple of years or more waiting for things to 'normalise' globally and take its cues from that. Well, the US rate hike has finally come, but you wouldn't say the situation has improved for the RBNZ. There is no way it is going to meet its inflation targets next year. Either it chucks the targets away and decides that the economy is doing well enough anyway, or it cuts rates again.
I do think the the RBNZ is, sooner rather than later, going to need to clarify its position and open the door rather more widely than it has at the moment for further rate cuts. Watch this space.
13 Comments
the kiwi dollar will continue to rise against the aussie. They arent in good shape as the baltic dry index tells us, no one is buying much of their commodity yet the introduction of 2 babies each in China paves the way for our 'white gold' to be drunk by the tin full. Viva la Nouvelle Zealnde, we have many years of demand for our products ahead!!
The problem is that the RB is not being supported by the Government.
Whatever measures the RB puts in place, politics will come first with this Government.
High immigration is a disaster for this country, but it keeps wages down and house prices up which is what wealthy National party backers want. This policy of high immigration is not consistent with what the RB wants.
It's all just musical chairs - on every front;
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-16/something-strange-taking-place…
I see another underlying cause here too. The high oil prices of recent times has forced people away from fossil fuels in many areas, or at least made them wary. Fundamentally this means that the oil companies miscalculated on the level of reliance in a big way, and didn't understand that many will be wary of going back to the old ways. Combined with awareness of the effects on the climate the move against oil is well in motion. For those developing the technological alternatives to fossil fuels, the time is nigh for acceptance as more people are ready to embrace alternatives. Economists, forecasters and Governments should revisit their forecasting methods in light of the information age making more people more informed and more aware. This could mean the old theories about market behaviour should be revisited and up dated to encompass an informed world.
This like most things is very complex, miss one or two variables and the entire model is useless. Take for instance discretionary and non-discretionary fuel use. The former is taking kids to the beach and holidays, the latter commuting to your job. I's suggest in the developed world what we have seen is the collapse of discretionary use but also with job losses etc non as well. What the oil companies and indeed many financial types, economists and businesses didnt understand or ignored was the ability to pay. many such it seems assumed they could charge and ppl had to pay no matter what, that has been proven wrong IMHO. The problem is EROEI, no non-fossil fuel gives us 8 to 1 which is what we need for our industrial society so when oil goes so does this way of life. Worse of course we spend 10 to 30 calories of fossil fuel to produce 1 of food and we do it for 7billion. So with no oil, that is one hell of a lot of dead ppl IMHO.
Good points. I noted in other news today a report that the numbers classified as middle class in the US has dropped dramatically. The commentary was that most had fallen into the bottom bracket rather than climbed up to the top one. This would support your points as the modern economic way has employers lobbying Governments to alter employment laws in their favour. I heard jenny Shipley on Nat. Radio on the weekend saying that the current laws give people more choice, but I believe the opposite is true. I suggest that employers have manipulated the current situation and many people are being forced into taking three and four low wage jobs just to break even. The impacts of how current economic theory is applied has just provided more ways to force people in to poverty and dependency.
Yes David I agree with you ,the RBNZ's performance last week was a seriously botched job.It managed to talk the NZ dollar up whilst it professes a wish to see it decline.The dairy community is under serious financial pressure and the only relief immediately available is a lower exchange rate.The perpetual dithering that is exhibited needs to stop.
The dairy community is under serious financial pressure and the only relief immediately available is a lower exchange rate.The perpetual dithering that is exhibited needs to stop.
Due to a global milk glut financed by low interest rates.
And just like black gold a lower price in ZIRP nations does not clear production and inventory. Read more
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.