By Alex Tarrant
Further discussion between New Zealand and the US on a closer trade relationship will likely wait until the US sorts out its position on the North American Free Trade Agreement, Prime Minister Bill English says.
The Prime Minister said he feels good about NZ-US relations, and had never felt concerned, following a 15-minute phone conversation with US President Donald Trump over the weekend. English added he expects Australia-US relations will not deteriorate following reports of a heated phone call between Trump and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.
English on Waitangi day spoke to Trump on a range of issues, with the discussion touching on the NZ economy, trade and China. Speaking to media in Parliament Tuesday morning, English said Trump was “friendly and open” while communicating “pretty directly”.
Trump’s decision to walk away for the Trans Pacific Partnership free trade deal is a set-back for trade, but not the NZ-US relationship, English said. “We will just work round the decisions that they’ve made. As a small country we’re used to that.”
The two national leaders did not go into any detail of a possible bilateral free trade agreement, he said. Trade Minister Todd McClay has visited the US since Trump entered the White House to discuss the potential for a bilateral agreement.
“Their declared position is that they’re interested in trade agreements of significant benefit to the US,” English said. “It might be hard for us to meet all the criteria that they lay down and get an agreement that suits New Zealand.”
“But I think we’re yet to see how the US trade policy actually unfolds,” English said. “They’ve pulled out of TPP; they’re heading into the probably bigger challenge of working out what they want out of the North American Free Trade Agreement. When they’ve worked through that, there might be further discussion [with NZ],” he said.
New Zealand will work to keep the US engaged in the Asia-Pacific region due to its stabilising influence, English said. The phone call included a “general discussion” on China, he said. Asked specifically if they talked about the South China Sea situation, English declined to give further details.
However, English did tell media Tuesday morning that the New Zealand government has “always said that in the South China Sea we want everyone involved to essentially follow the international rules. That’s been our position – we’ve stated it any time that’s been necessary”.
“Clearly the US has a different relationship with China and they’ll proceed with their policy,” English said. “We just want them to follow the international rules. There’s been a ruling from an international court - we would want to see that followed.”
Trump asked after New Zealand’s economy, expressing an awareness that “we’re doing pretty well,” English said. There is something of an idealist vision of New Zealand in the US, English said. “It’s backed up by, certainly substance on economic growth, which is steady, political stability and they tend to see us as a bit of a haven from all the pressures that they’re dealing with.”
The NZ-US relationship is in “pretty good shape,” having improved significantly over the last 10-15 years, English said. “My intention would be, regardless of political debate about what the US policy is on anything, we want a sound relationship.”
Likewise, the US-Australia relationship looks unlikely to deteriorate, he said. “It’s just too important a relationship. We certainly want to see it succeed because Australia’s one of the larger economies in this part of the world and they’ve always had a close relationship with the US – in a sense closer than ours,” English said.
“I’m pretty optimistic that for New Zealand and Australia, we’ll have good relationships with the US under the Trump administration.”
4 Comments
“Clearly the US has a different relationship with China and they’ll proceed with their policy,” English said. “We just want them to follow the international rules. There’s been a ruling from an international court - we would want to see that followed.”
Hmmmm... self serving nonsense?
If China does disregard the decision, the United States almost certainly will portray the case as yet another instance in which Beijing flouts international law. But any U.S. attempt to pressure China over its rejection of the ruling will be complicated by the fact that Washington itself has not ratified the treaty on which the Philippine complaint is based — the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, or UNCLOS. Read more
If it doesn't suit the US it's neither law or sanction.
The United States appears reluctant to launch a large-scale military response to Chinese activity on South China Sea.
US Secretary of Defense James Mattis has declared that the United States sees no reason to launch any kind of large scale military moves in South China Sea due to the current level of Chinese activity in the region.
"At this time, we do not see any need for dramatic military moves at all," Mattis said during a press conference held after the meeting with his Japanese counterpart, Defense Minister Tomomi Inada.,/i>
He added however that disputes should be settled via arbitration and not through force of arms. Read more
Phew - that's a relief for all concerned.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.