About a year ago, reality TV star and beauty mogul Kim Kardashian went extremely viral for complaining that it “seems like nobody wants to work these days”.
The infamous line was given during an interview with Variety magazine and caught fire in the midst of extremely tight labour markets around the world.
In the US there was a lot of talk about ‘the Great Resignation’ as workers embraced flexible working arrangements during the pandemic or just straight up retired.
Participation in the workforce did drop in the early years of the pandemic, but it's back with a vengeance. It was at a record high of 72.4% in June quarter data released on Wednesday.
Some 10,000 New Zealanders, who were not previously interested in working, put up their hands to say they were now looking for a job.
Not all of these people found work— which is why the unemployment rate crept up slightly—but it is certainly not true that nobody wants to work anymore.
More people want to work than ever before in New Zealand’s history. But why?
Brad Olsen, chief executive of Infometrics, said it was likely due to the combination of higher wages being on offer and the increased cost of living pushing people to seek more income.
Many of those 10,000 new workers were people who had previously been caring for children, but were now wanting to work.
“We don't know if it's because of the cost of living or because wage rates are now at a level where people think it is actually really worthwhile to go in,” he told Interest.co.nz
“But it's such a large change, I think it strongly implies there is an element of the cost of living that has shifted people's willingness and requirement to work”.
Henry Russell, an economist at ANZ, said the record participation rate was likely linked to high consumer prices.
“This suggests cost of living pressures continue to draw people into the workforce, but also that tight labour market conditions continue to enable this,” he wrote in a note.
Worker arrivals
Migration has been part of this story as well. A large number of people from overseas have moved to New Zealand and are taking up jobs.
In the June 2023 quarter, there were another 28,000 people employed which brought the total number of those with jobs up to 2.9 million. Much of this reflects people arriving at the border.
But Olsen said inflation pressures were undoubtedly contributing to the record numbers of people participating in the labour force.
“When you have sustained high wages, coupled with high levels of inflation hitting household budgets, people might think it is worthwhile to have the second parent, or whoever, take up some work — because any money they can bring in is going to help that household budget”.
This might not mean full-time work, and it might be a part-time job taken up by a young person to pay a power bill or for groceries.
A report by 1news found many school students were working 25 to 50 hours a week to help their families make ends meet.
It’s a dark side of high participation rates that you don’t see in the data, and has negative effects on students' grades at school where success rates have been falling.
Some overworked, some underutilised
Notably, the underutilization rate rose to 9.8%, from 9.1%, during the June quarter. It is still at a historically low level, but it has moved up sharply during the first half of 2023.
Katrina Ell, a senior economist at Moody’s Analytics, said the largest group contributing to the higher underutilization rate was part-time workers that were available to work more hours than they were offered.
Olsen said this likely included people looking for a few extra hours to cover a few extra costs.
The other factor boosting participation is the actual availability of jobs. People who persistently fail to find work tend to drop out of the labour force.
However, a high level of vacancies can often pull these ‘discouraged workers’ back into the workforce, as better jobs are easier to get.
Olsen said some of those in the looking-for-work category could drop back out of the labour force if unemployment begins to increase as has been forecast.
“You do have job ad numbers in New Zealand that are declining at the moment and returning to more normal levels”.
ANZ’s Russell said it was typical to see participation rates fall as fringe workers become discouraged and exit the workforce.
“That hasn’t happened yet, suggesting that capacity constraints still linger,” he said in a note.
The unemployment rate did increase slightly in June, but it was not due to job losses.
If you add together the 25,000 increase in the working age population and the 10,000 people who are suddenly keen for work, you find roughly 35,000 new workers.
Of those, about 28,000 found employment but the other 6,000 didn’t. This pushed the unemployment rate up slightly.
Olsen said this demonstrated how the unemployment rate could rise, as the Reserve Bank would like, without there being widespread job losses.
“As the population grows and there are more people looking for jobs, people are not able to find jobs as easily and some become unemployed”.
“That is a different scenario than businesses up and down the country, cutting staff and pushing them out the front door.”
95 Comments
Here you go Pa1nter. I have found some hope only a True Spruiker would lap up. Did you sponsor this article ?
"And get ready, because New Zealand is ever more likely to become a haven for climate refugees from all over the world. Some commentators are picking our population will rise to over 15 million from the pressure of climate refugees."
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/300940803/heres-why-h…
Just don't mention where our interest rates are going !
I don't actually like that NZ has a good chance of being the world's life raft. In such a scenario, house prices will probably be pretty low down the chain of concern.
But it's probably something people should consider, outside where they think interest rates might go in 12 month periods.
And Queenstown is the perfect template for what awaits us. A few, with a lot, and the subservient class unable to afford a room to live in at 30 to a hot-bed house, except those workers won't be on holiday, they'll be a seething mass of resentment and discontent.
That is what we are creating for ourselves.
We became a seething mass of resentment and discontent as soon as we created material abundance and the idea everyone can be a winner.
People with little hope can often be happier, because without the illusion of choice they're more inclined to accept their lives for what they are.
But yeah, we'll probably turn into Elysium in the Sth Pacific first.
Many people's lives would be more fulfilling if they removed themselves from the constant seeking of more, that's fairly well established.
You're stuck in a realm of needing people to tell you you're wonderful, or failing that, a pillock. It's free, and I'm sure you can find plenty of willing customers. Enjoy!
Investors fleeing the market in Aussie……. wonder why the market is going down in Queenstown is no brainer. Also Grant says this morning in TV 1 / economy going to deteriorate further … sure the smart kiwis can off load their burden coming spring I guess …. Good Luck
https://www.news.com.au/finance/markets/investment-properties-offloaded…
The only people I know who relocated for a better climate left either Auckland or Wellington to move to Central Otago or Australia as the destination.
We love to make ourselves feel better by fantisising that millions will move here for our "climate", it's beyond parody that the inverse is more accurate.
It's beautiful in Auckland today.
Here's a song about Auckland to raise your spirits:
Karl Sölve Steven - Tāmaki 5000
Our labour force participation rate is rising because more young mums are being forced back to the workforce faster on account of the cost of living crisis. Many Mums dump their kids with grandma a few days a week so they can work part time. Otherwise there is no food on the table. Gone are the days where Dads income can support a family. This article is cope.
Not that long ago, there was no such thing as retirement. You worked until you dropped, or you starved to death, and that still is the case in much of the World today. Lifespan was much shorter and social conflict much increased as the starving fought for whatever they could get. The rule of Law was accordingly harsh.
Looks like those days are creeping up on us again.
All time is relative. What we have today is an anomaly; a pin prick in the fabric of time. Go to most African countries today, or rural China etc and see what the concept of retirement is. It's non-existent. Just as it was in more developed parts of the world, i.e. New Zealand 100 years ago.
" the concept of ceasing to work in later life didn’t begin...until the 19th century."
https://workforce.com/news/the-history-of-retirement-benefits
But there are some pretty good retirement schemes still about!
Judges’ retirement nest egg – which allows judges to contribute to a superannuation fund that is then topped up by $7.50 for each dollar they contribute – is part of their healthy compensation package. In contrast, MPs receive $2.50 from the public purse for every $1 they put in.
Surely one of the easiest jobs going?
Show up, sit in a comfy chair while you listen to one of Harry Tam's cultural reports explaining how this time a hardened gangster is definitely going to stop mugging old ladies if he can just have another chance, hand out a sentence weaker than a can of flat Speights and then discount it further, then go home to your massive pay packet knowing that the taxpayer is giving you a whole heap of extra perks like a huge retirement nest egg. To top it all off, cry foul when the public get sick of your shenanigans and claim they are too dumb to understand.
No wonder none of them want to rock the boat once they are, like 50 Cent once said, "in the club".
by Audaxes | 5th Dec 21, 9:53am
As I noted further up the thread.
Who can afford to accept NZD wages as a form of payment for work rendered, when it is so debased the unit cost of shelter is ~$1,000,000 and it takes a few $millions or more to save $10,000 p.a. at current deposit interest rates? Oh, I nearly forgot, financial repression is rabid with inflation last reported at 4.9%
Has much changed?
Chart of Average Weekly Income by family type before and after housing costs. End of April 2023.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_10pNgf8s19…
What negatives? The negative number is the cost of housing, not their income. Every one of them is still well in the black, even the single beneficiary gets $421 a week and spends $199 on housing, leaving them $222 a week to spend. The welfare family on $63k a year only spends $369 a week on accommodation thanks to all the Govt accommodation benefits. They are far better off than the average worker who doesnt get welfare benefits to pay their rent or mortgage.
For clarity, that chart is the average income of BENEFICIARIES. Not workers. Yes, an unemployed person with a partner and two kids now earns more on a benefit ($63k a year) than HALF of all workers in NZ (median wage is $61k a year). Now combine that with the massive increase in unemployed and single parent beneficiaries under Labour and you quickly realise why there is a shortage of workers.
https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-r…
Free up lots of land for housing development to let section prices fall. Implement the Japanese and Californian building codes to allow importation of a much more diverse range of building products lowering building costs etc. etc.
Get rid of this BS for starters. This is just the middle finger to new home buyers.
"Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency has come out against a proposed residential and business development near Cromwell.
The government agency said, in a plan change submission, it opposed the Parkburn proposal because of climate change concerns and the relatively isolated location of the development."
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/waka-kotahi-opposes-central-otago-housing…
Too many additional staff since Labour 2017, justifying their jobs.
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2206/S00157/more-staff-worse-outcomes…
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/495248/act-promises-big-cuts-to-mb…
Ditch this nonsense.
The Rentier Economy is a Free Lunch
You’ve had, for the last – really since the 1980s, but even since World War 1 – this movement to prevent industrial economies from being low cost. But the objective of finance capitalism, contrary to what’s taught in the textbooks, is to make economies high cost, to raise the cost every year.
That actually is the explicit policy of the Federal Reserve in the United States. Turn over the central planning to the banking system to essentially inflate the price of housing, with government guaranteed mortgages, up to the point where buying a home is federally guaranteed up to absorbing 43% of the borrower’s income.
Well, you take that 43%, you take the wage withholding for social security and healthcare, you take the taxes; the domestic market shrinks and shrinks. And the finance capital strategy is exactly what it is in the United States today, in Europe. Shift all of the money away from the profits of industrial capital that are reinvested in making new means of production. To expand capital into a shrinking economy where the financial sector intrudes more and more into the economy of production and consumption and shrinks the economy. Hudson
Good to see Act talking about something I have said for years - slashing the insanely bloated bureaucracy in Wellington:
https://www.thepost.co.nz/a/nz-news/350048401/act-would-tell-thousands-…
I have seen the awful wastage up close, including when I did some contract work for a government agency several years ago.
Wouldn’t be good news for the Wellington economy and property market, and a pity for the people affected. But I have limited sympathy- we are all paying for this wasteful largesse, and they aren’t delivering frontline, critical social services.
Seconded. I've done some contracting work into govt agencies (including some that ACT has specifically called out in that linked article).
I've massively cut down on this type of work for two reasons:
1) I don't want to be dependent on it if we do get a government that rightfully starts wielding the axe.
2) I actually feel guilty having anything to do with it, as the waste and largesse is so obscene. A man has to eat, but there are more honest ways of doing so.
There are some wonderfully talented, hard working people in the public service who provide great value to the taxpayer. But they are let down terribly by an ever-expanding blob of overpaid, underworked managers, advisers who are taking the proverbial.
Most of those job cuts seem to be in areas that could reduce the wealth of the rich, like fair pay agreements, building and housing, etc. ACT want to keep the status quo of a small number of winners living in their nice neighbourhoods protected from the pesky poor people
And of course light rail because ACT want Auckland to be as much like LA as possible.
Those industry transformation plans are complete jokes, not even worth the papers they're printed on.
Advanced manufacturing is defined as any manufacturing that employs modern technologies, processes and business practices. There are literally references to manufacturing of choco chip cookies, hummus and potato chips as being part of our advanced manufacturing economy.
Basically anything that's slightly more sophisticated than you replicating your granny's recipe in your kitchen is classed as advanced.
Here's an alternative if you want more house hire/train builders not bureaucrats or consultants and build the houses. All the bureaucrats place more bureaucracy in to building will be harder.
Its time we started doing something instead of planning to do something.
The only really good decades the West had were the 50s and 60s. Since then it's been a gradual process of more work for less reward.
That's now in overdrive as we boomers retire and want 1m for each house (ok, 800k now), which keeps the cost of living way up for younger generations.
The tug of war I see now is immigration (wages down) versus demographic collapse (wages up). How will the political class resolve the tug of war in the 20s and 30s?
Nostalgia, but there has also been real change. Back then an ordinary guy could buy a house in his 20s, she could take a decade off to produce a few kids, mortgage paid off in their 50s. The numbers are different now, and the level of desperation much higher.
The first oil shock of 73 woke us up to the decay, and as HM says above, the transition to the unhappy grind of today for the young played out from the 70s.
In retrospect, the aspirations of western civilization peaked around 1969.
Back then most households only had one car, phone, TV. The house only had 2 or 3 bedrooms, no insulation, one pokey bathroom, small kitchen, small fridge, no dishwasher, maybe 5 electrical appliances in total. There weren’t many restaurants, cafes, etc and people rarely ate out. People very rarely went on overseas holidays.
So in many ways life has got better (if you consider having more things is better), but yes house prices have got worse. Mainly due to stupidly low interest rates.
Early Boomers who launched their careers in the “go-go” years before about 1973 had generally more prosperous lives than those who got started in the subsequent inflationary/recession period.....With the Crisis itself placing new burdens on the lives of younger generations, Boomers will choose to retain their moral authority by arguing—uncharacteristically—to impose sacrifices on themselves for the sake of their community. This will seem less surprising in the context of their own families; most Boomers today are already providing generously, sometimes more generously than they can afford, for their own children and grandchildren. But it will seem more surprising when they do so in the context of the national community and support tax and benefit changes that hit their own ranks the hardest. But the logic will be inexorable. The young, acting on behalf of the community at a time of peril, will now have a much better claim on resources than they do. So Boomers will let go.
https://images.mauldineconomics.com/uploads/pdf/TFTF_Aug_05_2023-1.pdf
Excluding NZ Super. A record 211,617 kids on welfare.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgtrTBkmG5si8l5aOueGJy…
Haha nobody wants to work. That's why rentier and finance capitalism is so prominent, why everybody chases property and capital gains, the rise of social media influencers and content creators. Literally the reason for the existence of the Kardashians. Everybody wants the rewards of other people's work.
There are "experts" and motivational speakers out there promoting that "if you do what you love you'll never have to work another day in your life."
Only the peasants have to work.
Well said. Pretty much sums up why property is so popular in this country. The lazy people's mindset, combined with very loose lending conditions and up until recently generous tax advantages made it possible for many simpletons to achieve.
Hell, we even indirectly subsidize this lazy man's investment by giving the tenants tax credits. It's genius, because then these "investors" point the finger back at the tenants for not being "net tax contributors". If they'd just look in a mirror they'd see the number one reason for this staring back at them.
Interesting article. I think the reason for high employment is predominantly to do with the fact real (inflation adjusted) wages have fallen. It just costs relatively less to hire right now than it did pre-pandemic.
When if or inflation is normalised I think you'll see unemployment being very high.
Investors fleeing the market in Aussie……. wonder why the market is going down in Queenstown is no brainer. Also Grant says this morning in TV 1 / economy going to deteriorate further … sure the smart kiwis can off load their burden coming spring I guess …. Good Luck
https://www.news.com.au/finance/markets/investment-properties-offloaded…
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.