sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Economists are tentatively suggesting the 6.9% annual inflation rate might be somewhere near the peak, but they don't see high prices subsiding any time soon

Business / analysis
Economists are tentatively suggesting the 6.9% annual inflation rate might be somewhere near the peak, but they don't see high prices subsiding any time soon
balloons

So, was that the high point for inflation? Or is there more to come?

After Statistics New Zealand unveiled a slightly-lower-than-expected annual inflation figure of 6.9% for the year to March, economists have been trying to make sense of it all.

Crucially of course they are trying to work out whether this is the high point? Will it go higher? How long will be it around for at elevated heights? And last - but by no means least - what will the Reserve Bank do?

In addressing the "obvious" question of whether the 6.9% figure was the "peak",  ANZ economist Finn Robinson and senior strategist David Croy said "at a headline level, it definitely could be".

"Barring some un-forecastable shock, we’re unlikely to see another massive spike in commodity prices like we saw in Q1 [the first quarter of the year] – and so mechanically it will be difficult to see inflation rise above what we just saw," they said.

But here comes the 'but'.

"But it’s too early to claim the RBNZ’s job is done on inflation."

Robinson and Croy noted that inflation had "persistently surprised" forecasters to the upside over the past year - both in NZ and overseas. And with the global environment still highly inflationary, and with global food prices surging, and China grappling with Covid outbreaks, "we could feasibly still see higher headline inflation prints over the middle of this year".

Second, and more importantly, the "domestic inflation pulse" has continued to increase, with non-tradables (domestic) inflation at 6.0% year-on-year and measures of core inflation far too high and heading in the wrong direction.

"The labour market is set to be a big driver of inflation over 2022, as wages start to get the memo about record-low unemployment. So if anything, this continued rise in domestic inflation pressures only reinforces the need for ongoing interest rate rises by the RBNZ."  

ANZ economists were the first major bank economists to forecast a 50 basis point Official Cash Rate rise - which of course did transpire last week. And they still see another 50 pointer coming in May. 

Westpac senior economist Satish Ranchhod said while the inflation figures had been "a touch softer than we expected" the result supported Westpac economists' expectations for a series of further rate hikes from the RBNZ over the coming months, including a 50 pointer in May.

"Inflation is expected to remain above the RBNZ’s target band through the remainder of 2022. And although much of that is due to overseas cost pressures, the domestic inflation picture has also heated up," Ranchhod said.

"Crucially for the RBNZ, both households and businesses are expecting that inflation will remain strong for some time yet. That’s a big concern for the central bank, as if that spills over into wage and price setting decisions, the strength in inflation could be sustained for even longer. That would mean that even larger interest rate increases are needed to rein the inflation monster in. On this front, it’s notable that we’re already seeing growing upwards pressure on wage claims.

"Concerns about inflation expectations saw the RBNZ swing into action at its recent policy meeting with a 50bp increase in the cash rate. Today’s strong inflation result will have done nothing to alleviate those concerns."

ASB senior economist Mark Smith said while the inflation figure was weaker than expected, "it has not substantively changed our view on inflation".

"There is likely to be payback in Q2 [the second quarter of the year] from many of the downward surprises, with airfares and supply chain frictions set to boost prices.

"Uncertainty is high but we could still see a 7% annual inflation print delivered in Q2 of this year.

"Elevated inflation is likely to validate the case for a 50bp OCR hike in May as the RBNZ seeks to quickly reduce policy stimulus," Smith said.

He said the bigger issue is not so much what the inflation peak will be but how persistent the uptick in inflation is.

"We remain wary of a more pronounced and persistent lift in inflation and expect annual CPI inflation to remain well above 5% for all of 2022, and not to fall back below 3% until 2024."

ASB economists have assumed a 3.25% OCR peak this cycle (early 2023) [slightly below the RBNZ's current forecast peak of 3.4% in 2024].

"Going forward, the degree of RBNZ hikes will depend on the outlook for inflation and inflation expectations, the state of the labour market and how the NZ economy responds to tighter financial conditions.

"Households have built up a savings buffer during COVID-19, but unless they are compensated for surging living costs, household spending will remain under pressure over the next few years.

"If this coincides with a cooling in inflationary pressure and increasing labour market capacity, the OCR could well move lower. We have penciled in roughly 100bps of OCR cuts from mid-2024," Smith said.

ANZ's Robinson and Croy say then that headline inflation may well have peaked – "but only because we expect the RBNZ will continue to quickly raise interest rates to force inflation down".

"Without the ongoing tightening in monetary policy that we’re forecasting, we’d likely see rising inflation expectations and the tight labour market bounce off each other in an inflationary spiral that could be very hard to tame.

"Touch wood then, that was the worst of it.

"But higher interest rates will still squeeze indebted households over this year – and engineering a soft landing for this overheated economy will be quite the task for the RBNZ, especially with the housing market already softening.

"But at the end of the day, while the monetary policy medicine may not be pleasant, it’s a heck of a lot better than letting inflation get out of control."

Consumer prices index

Select chart tabs

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

65 Comments

There are high points and there are low points.

On the subject of low points.  How many used-houses did blobby barfoot sell at his auctions today?

It starts with the letter 'Z'.

Up
17

Now house prices are going to take a huge tumble maybe people will start to invest in businesses.

Up
4

Let's not get carried away. We all know that the NZ economy is just selling each other soggy cardboard boxes. 

Up
12

I think you're overestimating Kiwis.

Investing in a business requires learning about the investment risks and doing some financial analysis. Way too mathsy for most of us.

Investing in a property is much easier - the only thing you need to know is it's a guaranteed 200% ROI in ten years. Easy as! /s

Up
11

And you're instantly an investment genius who is brilliant compared to young folks stuffing their faces with smashed avocado!

Up
0

ZIP.

Up
2

Zillion perhaps?

Up
1

Given negative real rates, let's just hope that the RBNZ is acting responsibly and ensure a min 0.5% rate hike in May to protect vulnerable aged persons so they can at least get some return on investment from their investments amidst the rising cost of living. 

Up
11

And to crush young people who just took on massive mortgages (50% sarc....).

Up
5

Well, after all, people with stacks of cash are always the real victim, no matter the scenario.

Up
1

I detect a hint of sarcasm, but could you explain this more clearly?

Up
1

Sure. I don't really care about people who just have piles of money and are wanting better minimal-risk returns if it means enormous financial stress for my family and friends. After all, surely these people should have just saved for their retirement, right? 

Is that how this works? Am I doing this right? 

Up
2

Who are the people with stacks of cash?

Up
7

"aged persons so they can at least get some return on investment from their investments"

Up
5

Should have just saved more I guess. 

Up
2

There are many aged people that have almost nothing. We should be wanting to preserve the value of their meagre savings.

Up
9

Yea but if they couldn't see the problems with getting to retirement with insufficient savings or not taking on enough risk premium to generate the returns then I don't get why that should be my problem?

Up
2

Wow, what a guy.

Up
12

This is the exact same crappy argument I see thrown at people here for committing the crime of buying a family home, presumably any time between 2008 and now; "Should have waited" "Not my fault you couldn't see a bubble" and all this other garbage from certain people on this site.

Apparently they aren't that consistent in their beliefs. 

Up
4

In part, I agree with you GV - we should have never allowed this situation to happen in the first place...its full of moral and ethical failures.......but if you protested against if you got covered in tar and feathers by the popular kiwi rhetoric and told you have a bad attitude and/or are a doom gloom merchant....even when you point out the financial and social implications of what was developing and the future pain it was likely going to cause our country (what I've been pointing out after moving back to NZ after watching the US property bubble burst...then seeing something even worse developing in NZ).

But I quickly realised the average kiwi is more self interested than worried about the future collective good (utilitarian perspective)....and falsely believe that the pursuit of self interest as opposed to doing the right thing by society is the solution to the problem we have/had (i.e. double down on failed paradigms in order to solve a problem) - which is oddly close to the definition of stupidity.

Up
8

If we should never have allowed this situation to have developed, then what part did the NIMBYS play and why are they still playing it. Why did it take so long to make a decision to put a stop to nimbys when the Nats and Labwhore changed the rules virtually in the blink of a  eye. Game playing pollies like peter dunne. At least their power has been greatly reduced and will be further soon.

Up
4

uh, wow, you get my first like (to you).

It is a really good point.

My view is that it is politically easier to piss-off everybody instead of pissing-off only somebody.

Very counterintuitive, but considering how a fake bipolarism works it makes perfect sense

Up
2

GV, you are doing it again.   Getting all sad and sorry for yourself over a house price crash THAT HASN'T HAPPENED YET.

It is far too early to feel so sorry for yourself.   If you think that prices will fall, you have the opportunity to sell.

It just seems like you are saying "wah wah wah, poor me  house prices should never fall and homeowners should never lose money".

Prices have fallen, what? 5%.   You can still sell if you want to.

Up
9

Murphy's law would be that you sell and Adiran Orr reverse course, drops rates back to 0 and house prices explode another 30%.

Up
2

Yep. These forums attract them 

Up
0

How do you think it is being made your problem?

Up
2

If those people couldn't make a low interest rate environment work for them they should have simply invested in something that gave them a higher return, or saved more. We can't run the country for the benefit of people who just want to sit back and accrue risk-free returns at higher and higher rates.

Up
6

You are making about as much sense as a meth enthusiast.

Up
9

To quote Allan Partridge

”that was just noise”

Up
0

Most of the old people I encounter are proud, so don't ask for help, but are cutting back on heat, food, anything they can to pay their rates, groceries and electric bills.  Few have stacks of cash, but I hope that the ones that have a little, are able to get better TD rates.

Up
6

Raising rates to a point where the real return is positive (who knows where that might be if the Fed/RBNZ are too slow to react) would give savers rewards, provide lower risk return to the retired, reduce speculative behaviour, correct house prices, reduce market risk, solve many of the social division/instability issues we have.

But oddly, avoiding pain/bursting a debt bubble is the priority over all of the positives that I point out above.

We have actually lost the plot in a significant way and its possible that this period will be still written and talked about a hundred years from now, in the same way that we can't believe that people allowed 1929 and the great depression to occur. It will be along the lines of 'how the hell did those idiots allow the average house price get to 10x incomes? - were they stupid?".....and the answer to that...is yes we became collectively stupid...but that is how the animals spirits of a speculative bubble happen (see the work by Shiller/Akerlof in 'Animal Spirits')

Up
9

Let us count once more how many investment properties people in parliament, Treasury and the Reserve Bank have in their names and trusts...

Up
0

Absolutely agree, Independent observer. In my mind it is not about favouring savers over house buyers but that we have artificially lowered the cost of money so that assets, labour and risk are mispriced and causing social distortions and disruption.

Up
2

Looking at another Interest article, it looks like a significantly high % of home owners are on fixed mortgages anyways so even if the RBNZ was to hike the OCR, it's not like its going to do much damage to household discretionary incomes as mortgage payments are not going up unless their fixed rates was to expire. The housing market is now saved and households are going to survive without any major issues. 

Up
0

High inflation is a negative, it adds to the cost of building.

Say inflation adds 7% to the cost of construction. Then the cost of a house increases, whether interest rates rise or not.

Up
0

The cost to the developer increases; doesn't mean the cost to the buyer increases, especially when there's ample stock for buyers to choose from and less credit being lent to buy said houses. 

Up
15

Just because it missed by 0.1% or 0.2%, should one rejoice and consider that we are out of the woods.

What a stupidity.

How come,  so called experts are  forgetting that we have a subsidy of 25 Cents on fuel that is roughly 10%,PLUS what happens when it ends or extend or better throw some more subsidies.

Also : Economists are tentatively suggesting the 6.9% annual inflation rate might be somewhere near the peak, but they don't see high prices subsiding any time soon

So inflation has been baked into price. This was the biggest wory that Mr Orr had in last public appearance , which has come true (Though had already when he was speaking).

Up
7

That line looks like it's heading for the moon to me. No sign RBNZ will arrest inflation soon.

Up
6

Seems very optimistic to think that we might be at peak inflation, especially with the new lockdowns in China and skyrocketing energy costs.

Up
6

The war in Ukraine is trundling on as well as Western leaders realise they will actually need to supply the Ukrainians properly because President Putin won't stop until his army is broken or wiped out entirely.

Up
2

Interesting point. I sometimes wonder if the Western govts, specifically the US don't give a hoot if Ukraine falls by the wayside. I'd say its far cheaper for Europe to put up with hardship (heating and reduced industrial output), inflation and higher unemployment and 4million refugees than get directly involved with the war. What I'm wondering if behind closed doors they've are not pushing Zelensky and his cabinet to settle up with Russia. Hand over Donbas and Donetsk, and no NATO. Now we have the UN getting involved. I'm sure Putin has his map, shows what he wants regarding the geography of the region as he sees it and tells them to go away until they agree. Maybe one or two minor points he'll give way on.

Up
0

I think we are past even that point Nigel...why?

Because Putin has backed himself into a corner where if he stops fighting and tries to come to an agreement with the current global order/rules based system in place, while he remains in power, Russia will be severely isolated and made to pay for the actions they have taken...(think post WW1 Germany). So similar to Hitler, he is now isolated and may chose that the best option is to continue to escalate until he has no other option (at all).

Up
1

Off-ramps and golden bridges are closed to President Putin. If he wants to extricate himself from this mess he needs to retreat back to Russia. It's the best deal available.

Up
0

"But it’s too early to claim the RBNZ’s job is done on inflation."

I don't even think that qualifies as an understatement. That's just saying something as filler.  

Up
9

I understand most people want inflation rate to come down. But 0.9 and fuel tax cut still makes up a low 7 to me. I think economists are being a bit optimistic here. As New Zealand starts getting back to normal now, the demand will continue to push price up. Just go to shopping malls and see how busy they are, you will know what I am talking about.

Up
3

Maybe we are at peak inflation but since the narrative has been inflation is temporary and house price falls will be minor I feel a little bit sceptical reading forecasts on economic activity.

Up
0

The Rates will Stay Low for a very long time.  

We are at Peak Inflation. 

Tui Billboard.

Up
9

But wasn't inflation over 7% when you factor in the fact that the government reduced fuel tax and halved public transport fees? So the figures aren't very accurate when you take this into account. So 6.9% is an artificial figure IMO. But very clever of the government, and guessing they did factor this in when they made the decision to reduce the fuel tax and halve public transport fees..

Up
9

Agree, but the public transport wasn't until April 1st, so doesn't impact this quarter.

Up
2

"But it’s too early to claim the RBNZ’s job is done on inflation."

Everywhere you look, the data is flashing 'recession imminent'. Look at the weekly employment stats where job numbers and wages are now definitely wobbling, house sales plummeting, electronic card transactions falling off a cliff, business confidence slumping, Govt fiscal stimulus ending (actually turning negative with tax revenue likely to exceed spending for the coming months). The resulting drop in demand will lead to increased unemployment, further drops in demand, and the doom loop will be off and running.

My point here is that price increases, mortgage rate rises, and media / political narrative have already killed demand, we just have not seen it come through fully in the stats yet. Those still baying for further rate hikes must just want a deeper recession and more people thrown on the dole. I hope I'm wrong.

 

Up
1

You are pointing price increases and mortgage rates rises as they were something that you can fight.

but

fight  price increases => raise ocr =>  mortgage rates rises

fight mortgage rates rises => lower ocr => price increases

also

fight unemployment => lower ocr => house prices up => lower income f$%%$ed

fight house prices => rise ocr => house prices down => recent fhbs f$%%$ed

etc...

see how bad it is?

Up
1

I fundamentally disagree with your logic models - you can replace the OCR middle section with other, more effective, alternatives. Then you are not in the dumb trap they call 'monetary policy'.

Up
0

A question on the rising OCR. Does the RB really need to increase the OCR to past highs to slow inflation? The reason I ask this is because over the last 2 years, the amount that people have borrowed is so much higher than what it was precovid, so therefore wouldn’t a smaller increase in OCR have a larger impact on disposable income and therefore it’s effect on inflation than it once did? 

Up
1

Yes, there is more more "bang for buck". I doubt we will go back to the ~8% OCR of 2008

Up
1

inflation measures look at the price off goods and services, not the volumes sold

Up
0

Inflations rocket engines are on. Interest rates need to be 2-3% above inflation to have any hope of getting it back under control.

Specarus just FOOPed his pants.

Up
1

Highly suspicious of the 6.9% figure too convenient by half , fuel has been lowered by the government and many of the other offshore cost would have barely impacted yet if at all . Inflation has barely started and reserve bank is looking through it already I will be surprised if it is controlled within a couple of years,  let alone by the end of this year. 

Up
2

New to this forum, but I’ve been following it for a while, and I am starting to get worried looking at the comments as a FHB (bought last year). I’m not hoping for a smooth landing but hopefully it is not as hard as the comments are making it out to be ;) 

Up
4

If you think you are going to be settled where you are with good employment are happy with your life situation etc I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I lived through the bubble bursting in the US during the GFC and saw how it impacted people. Some came off far worse than others.

If you only own one home and are in a good relationship with a good job...then just buckle down and ride it out and try not to lose too much sleep over it. You've made a call and have a place to call home so just enjoy it. If you think you are going to have to move at some point in the near future for work etc or because you are miserably in your job and don't have job/relationship security...then I'd definitely consider options as negative equity is a real tough spot and saw how that impacted some in the US who were stuck and couldn't do anything...including considering divorces etc..but couldn't as they owed more debts on the mortgage than the value of their homes...they were properly stuck in a bad place (even resulting in a stress related death of a work colleague).

If you are an investor that has a lot of debt and has gambled...I'd tell you completely difference advice.

I'm sure people who have never lived through a bubble bursting might have a very different story and that's fine...this might not burst in nominal terms....but it looks like there is a higher certainty of pain ahead in real terms until inflation is tamed.

Up
4

Thank you for your valuable insight. We are owner occupiers and we do not plan on moving anywhere for at least another 3-4 years, I believe both of us have stable jobs, but I can see what’s unfolding at the moment, so just trying to be cautiously optimistic. 

Up
5

If you're in a place you can wait it out, somewhere with enough rooms to at least start a family or somewhere you can stay long term, then staying put is an option as long as you have a stable income. 

If you did something totally insane like borrowing less, buying a more modest starter home and was hoping to trade-up in the next two to something bigger, more suitable for a family, then you might have to be a bit more aggressive with your budgeting.

Up
0

It is unlikely headline inflation has peaked

Some key areas to consider;

$6 billion extra spend is planned by Grant Robertson in next budget

Supply chain issues with shutdown of Shanghai

Ukraine war is likely to continue for a long time keeping energy & food prices high

Rents are likely to continue to increase at a faster rate due to reducing rental supply & increased demand

Private rental property yields are too low compared to other investments

Wage growth is too low compared to current rate of inflation so a big catch up is likely

Unemployment is at historical lows

OCR is still far too low compared to historical averages

Up
2

I can see supermarkets ramping up prices on a weekly basis. They can because no-one is questioning it. It is just being blamed on inflation. Lack of competition makes inflation even worse.

Up
1

You don't have to worry Labour is looking into that the same way they have been looking into petrol prices for the last 2 years.

Up
1

a nit- pick "slightly-lower-than-expected annual inflation figure of 6.9%"  fractionally lower

Up
0