So, was that the high point for inflation? Or is there more to come?
After Statistics New Zealand unveiled a slightly-lower-than-expected annual inflation figure of 6.9% for the year to March, economists have been trying to make sense of it all.
Crucially of course they are trying to work out whether this is the high point? Will it go higher? How long will be it around for at elevated heights? And last - but by no means least - what will the Reserve Bank do?
In addressing the "obvious" question of whether the 6.9% figure was the "peak", ANZ economist Finn Robinson and senior strategist David Croy said "at a headline level, it definitely could be".
"Barring some un-forecastable shock, we’re unlikely to see another massive spike in commodity prices like we saw in Q1 [the first quarter of the year] – and so mechanically it will be difficult to see inflation rise above what we just saw," they said.
But here comes the 'but'.
"But it’s too early to claim the RBNZ’s job is done on inflation."
Robinson and Croy noted that inflation had "persistently surprised" forecasters to the upside over the past year - both in NZ and overseas. And with the global environment still highly inflationary, and with global food prices surging, and China grappling with Covid outbreaks, "we could feasibly still see higher headline inflation prints over the middle of this year".
Second, and more importantly, the "domestic inflation pulse" has continued to increase, with non-tradables (domestic) inflation at 6.0% year-on-year and measures of core inflation far too high and heading in the wrong direction.
"The labour market is set to be a big driver of inflation over 2022, as wages start to get the memo about record-low unemployment. So if anything, this continued rise in domestic inflation pressures only reinforces the need for ongoing interest rate rises by the RBNZ."
ANZ economists were the first major bank economists to forecast a 50 basis point Official Cash Rate rise - which of course did transpire last week. And they still see another 50 pointer coming in May.
Westpac senior economist Satish Ranchhod said while the inflation figures had been "a touch softer than we expected" the result supported Westpac economists' expectations for a series of further rate hikes from the RBNZ over the coming months, including a 50 pointer in May.
"Inflation is expected to remain above the RBNZ’s target band through the remainder of 2022. And although much of that is due to overseas cost pressures, the domestic inflation picture has also heated up," Ranchhod said.
"Crucially for the RBNZ, both households and businesses are expecting that inflation will remain strong for some time yet. That’s a big concern for the central bank, as if that spills over into wage and price setting decisions, the strength in inflation could be sustained for even longer. That would mean that even larger interest rate increases are needed to rein the inflation monster in. On this front, it’s notable that we’re already seeing growing upwards pressure on wage claims.
"Concerns about inflation expectations saw the RBNZ swing into action at its recent policy meeting with a 50bp increase in the cash rate. Today’s strong inflation result will have done nothing to alleviate those concerns."
ASB senior economist Mark Smith said while the inflation figure was weaker than expected, "it has not substantively changed our view on inflation".
"There is likely to be payback in Q2 [the second quarter of the year] from many of the downward surprises, with airfares and supply chain frictions set to boost prices.
"Uncertainty is high but we could still see a 7% annual inflation print delivered in Q2 of this year.
"Elevated inflation is likely to validate the case for a 50bp OCR hike in May as the RBNZ seeks to quickly reduce policy stimulus," Smith said.
He said the bigger issue is not so much what the inflation peak will be but how persistent the uptick in inflation is.
"We remain wary of a more pronounced and persistent lift in inflation and expect annual CPI inflation to remain well above 5% for all of 2022, and not to fall back below 3% until 2024."
ASB economists have assumed a 3.25% OCR peak this cycle (early 2023) [slightly below the RBNZ's current forecast peak of 3.4% in 2024].
"Going forward, the degree of RBNZ hikes will depend on the outlook for inflation and inflation expectations, the state of the labour market and how the NZ economy responds to tighter financial conditions.
"Households have built up a savings buffer during COVID-19, but unless they are compensated for surging living costs, household spending will remain under pressure over the next few years.
"If this coincides with a cooling in inflationary pressure and increasing labour market capacity, the OCR could well move lower. We have penciled in roughly 100bps of OCR cuts from mid-2024," Smith said.
ANZ's Robinson and Croy say then that headline inflation may well have peaked – "but only because we expect the RBNZ will continue to quickly raise interest rates to force inflation down".
"Without the ongoing tightening in monetary policy that we’re forecasting, we’d likely see rising inflation expectations and the tight labour market bounce off each other in an inflationary spiral that could be very hard to tame.
"Touch wood then, that was the worst of it.
"But higher interest rates will still squeeze indebted households over this year – and engineering a soft landing for this overheated economy will be quite the task for the RBNZ, especially with the housing market already softening.
"But at the end of the day, while the monetary policy medicine may not be pleasant, it’s a heck of a lot better than letting inflation get out of control."
Consumer prices index
Select chart tabs
65 Comments
I think you're overestimating Kiwis.
Investing in a business requires learning about the investment risks and doing some financial analysis. Way too mathsy for most of us.
Investing in a property is much easier - the only thing you need to know is it's a guaranteed 200% ROI in ten years. Easy as! /s
Sure. I don't really care about people who just have piles of money and are wanting better minimal-risk returns if it means enormous financial stress for my family and friends. After all, surely these people should have just saved for their retirement, right?
Is that how this works? Am I doing this right?
This is the exact same crappy argument I see thrown at people here for committing the crime of buying a family home, presumably any time between 2008 and now; "Should have waited" "Not my fault you couldn't see a bubble" and all this other garbage from certain people on this site.
Apparently they aren't that consistent in their beliefs.
In part, I agree with you GV - we should have never allowed this situation to happen in the first place...its full of moral and ethical failures.......but if you protested against if you got covered in tar and feathers by the popular kiwi rhetoric and told you have a bad attitude and/or are a doom gloom merchant....even when you point out the financial and social implications of what was developing and the future pain it was likely going to cause our country (what I've been pointing out after moving back to NZ after watching the US property bubble burst...then seeing something even worse developing in NZ).
But I quickly realised the average kiwi is more self interested than worried about the future collective good (utilitarian perspective)....and falsely believe that the pursuit of self interest as opposed to doing the right thing by society is the solution to the problem we have/had (i.e. double down on failed paradigms in order to solve a problem) - which is oddly close to the definition of stupidity.
If we should never have allowed this situation to have developed, then what part did the NIMBYS play and why are they still playing it. Why did it take so long to make a decision to put a stop to nimbys when the Nats and Labwhore changed the rules virtually in the blink of a eye. Game playing pollies like peter dunne. At least their power has been greatly reduced and will be further soon.
GV, you are doing it again. Getting all sad and sorry for yourself over a house price crash THAT HASN'T HAPPENED YET.
It is far too early to feel so sorry for yourself. If you think that prices will fall, you have the opportunity to sell.
It just seems like you are saying "wah wah wah, poor me house prices should never fall and homeowners should never lose money".
Prices have fallen, what? 5%. You can still sell if you want to.
If those people couldn't make a low interest rate environment work for them they should have simply invested in something that gave them a higher return, or saved more. We can't run the country for the benefit of people who just want to sit back and accrue risk-free returns at higher and higher rates.
Most of the old people I encounter are proud, so don't ask for help, but are cutting back on heat, food, anything they can to pay their rates, groceries and electric bills. Few have stacks of cash, but I hope that the ones that have a little, are able to get better TD rates.
Raising rates to a point where the real return is positive (who knows where that might be if the Fed/RBNZ are too slow to react) would give savers rewards, provide lower risk return to the retired, reduce speculative behaviour, correct house prices, reduce market risk, solve many of the social division/instability issues we have.
But oddly, avoiding pain/bursting a debt bubble is the priority over all of the positives that I point out above.
We have actually lost the plot in a significant way and its possible that this period will be still written and talked about a hundred years from now, in the same way that we can't believe that people allowed 1929 and the great depression to occur. It will be along the lines of 'how the hell did those idiots allow the average house price get to 10x incomes? - were they stupid?".....and the answer to that...is yes we became collectively stupid...but that is how the animals spirits of a speculative bubble happen (see the work by Shiller/Akerlof in 'Animal Spirits')
Looking at another Interest article, it looks like a significantly high % of home owners are on fixed mortgages anyways so even if the RBNZ was to hike the OCR, it's not like its going to do much damage to household discretionary incomes as mortgage payments are not going up unless their fixed rates was to expire. The housing market is now saved and households are going to survive without any major issues.
Just because it missed by 0.1% or 0.2%, should one rejoice and consider that we are out of the woods.
What a stupidity.
How come, so called experts are forgetting that we have a subsidy of 25 Cents on fuel that is roughly 10%,PLUS what happens when it ends or extend or better throw some more subsidies.
Also : Economists are tentatively suggesting the 6.9% annual inflation rate might be somewhere near the peak, but they don't see high prices subsiding any time soon
So inflation has been baked into price. This was the biggest wory that Mr Orr had in last public appearance , which has come true (Though had already when he was speaking).
Interesting point. I sometimes wonder if the Western govts, specifically the US don't give a hoot if Ukraine falls by the wayside. I'd say its far cheaper for Europe to put up with hardship (heating and reduced industrial output), inflation and higher unemployment and 4million refugees than get directly involved with the war. What I'm wondering if behind closed doors they've are not pushing Zelensky and his cabinet to settle up with Russia. Hand over Donbas and Donetsk, and no NATO. Now we have the UN getting involved. I'm sure Putin has his map, shows what he wants regarding the geography of the region as he sees it and tells them to go away until they agree. Maybe one or two minor points he'll give way on.
I think we are past even that point Nigel...why?
Because Putin has backed himself into a corner where if he stops fighting and tries to come to an agreement with the current global order/rules based system in place, while he remains in power, Russia will be severely isolated and made to pay for the actions they have taken...(think post WW1 Germany). So similar to Hitler, he is now isolated and may chose that the best option is to continue to escalate until he has no other option (at all).
I understand most people want inflation rate to come down. But 0.9 and fuel tax cut still makes up a low 7 to me. I think economists are being a bit optimistic here. As New Zealand starts getting back to normal now, the demand will continue to push price up. Just go to shopping malls and see how busy they are, you will know what I am talking about.
But wasn't inflation over 7% when you factor in the fact that the government reduced fuel tax and halved public transport fees? So the figures aren't very accurate when you take this into account. So 6.9% is an artificial figure IMO. But very clever of the government, and guessing they did factor this in when they made the decision to reduce the fuel tax and halve public transport fees..
"But it’s too early to claim the RBNZ’s job is done on inflation."
Everywhere you look, the data is flashing 'recession imminent'. Look at the weekly employment stats where job numbers and wages are now definitely wobbling, house sales plummeting, electronic card transactions falling off a cliff, business confidence slumping, Govt fiscal stimulus ending (actually turning negative with tax revenue likely to exceed spending for the coming months). The resulting drop in demand will lead to increased unemployment, further drops in demand, and the doom loop will be off and running.
My point here is that price increases, mortgage rate rises, and media / political narrative have already killed demand, we just have not seen it come through fully in the stats yet. Those still baying for further rate hikes must just want a deeper recession and more people thrown on the dole. I hope I'm wrong.
You are pointing price increases and mortgage rates rises as they were something that you can fight.
but
fight price increases => raise ocr => mortgage rates rises
fight mortgage rates rises => lower ocr => price increases
also
fight unemployment => lower ocr => house prices up => lower income f$%%$ed
fight house prices => rise ocr => house prices down => recent fhbs f$%%$ed
etc...
see how bad it is?
A question on the rising OCR. Does the RB really need to increase the OCR to past highs to slow inflation? The reason I ask this is because over the last 2 years, the amount that people have borrowed is so much higher than what it was precovid, so therefore wouldn’t a smaller increase in OCR have a larger impact on disposable income and therefore it’s effect on inflation than it once did?
Highly suspicious of the 6.9% figure too convenient by half , fuel has been lowered by the government and many of the other offshore cost would have barely impacted yet if at all . Inflation has barely started and reserve bank is looking through it already I will be surprised if it is controlled within a couple of years, let alone by the end of this year.
If you think you are going to be settled where you are with good employment are happy with your life situation etc I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I lived through the bubble bursting in the US during the GFC and saw how it impacted people. Some came off far worse than others.
If you only own one home and are in a good relationship with a good job...then just buckle down and ride it out and try not to lose too much sleep over it. You've made a call and have a place to call home so just enjoy it. If you think you are going to have to move at some point in the near future for work etc or because you are miserably in your job and don't have job/relationship security...then I'd definitely consider options as negative equity is a real tough spot and saw how that impacted some in the US who were stuck and couldn't do anything...including considering divorces etc..but couldn't as they owed more debts on the mortgage than the value of their homes...they were properly stuck in a bad place (even resulting in a stress related death of a work colleague).
If you are an investor that has a lot of debt and has gambled...I'd tell you completely difference advice.
I'm sure people who have never lived through a bubble bursting might have a very different story and that's fine...this might not burst in nominal terms....but it looks like there is a higher certainty of pain ahead in real terms until inflation is tamed.
If you're in a place you can wait it out, somewhere with enough rooms to at least start a family or somewhere you can stay long term, then staying put is an option as long as you have a stable income.
If you did something totally insane like borrowing less, buying a more modest starter home and was hoping to trade-up in the next two to something bigger, more suitable for a family, then you might have to be a bit more aggressive with your budgeting.
It is unlikely headline inflation has peaked
Some key areas to consider;
$6 billion extra spend is planned by Grant Robertson in next budget
Supply chain issues with shutdown of Shanghai
Ukraine war is likely to continue for a long time keeping energy & food prices high
Rents are likely to continue to increase at a faster rate due to reducing rental supply & increased demand
Private rental property yields are too low compared to other investments
Wage growth is too low compared to current rate of inflation so a big catch up is likely
Unemployment is at historical lows
OCR is still far too low compared to historical averages
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.