Today's surprise OCR cut by the RBNZ has not only reduced this benchmark to a record low, it has driven wholesale interest rate swaps to record lows as well.
One year swaps have fallen -19 bps so far today, two years have fallen -18 bps, and three years have fallen -17 bps.
The five year is at 2.52%, a -15 bps fall, and the ten year is at 2.99%, a -10 bps fall from the positions they opened at today.
In fact, every single one of them is now at a record low.
The benchmark 10 yr swap rate has now fallen below 3%, the latest in the set to do so.
Interest rate swaps are now at these levels in late morning trade in New Zealand:
OCR review dates | 10-Sep-15 | 10-Dec-15 | 28-Jan-16 | 10-Mar-16 | reduction |
(mid-day) | since 28-Jan | ||||
% | % | % | % | ||
OCR | 2.75 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.25 | -0.25 |
90 day bank bill rate | 2.85 | 2.74 | 2.70 | 2.38 | -0.32 |
1 yr swap | 2.68 | 2.70 | 2.59 | 2.26 | -0.33 |
2 yr swap | 2.75 | 2.74 | 2.63 | 2.26 | -0.37 |
3 yr swap | 2.84 | 2.84 | 2.72 | 2.31 | -0.41 |
4 yr swap | 2.97 | 2.95 | 2.83 | 2.41 | -0.42 |
5 yr swap | 3.09 | 3.07 | 2.95 | 2.52 | -0.43 |
7 yr swap | 3.33 | 3.32 | 3.18 | 2.74 | -0.44 |
10 yr swap | 3.60 | 3.57 | 3.41 | 2.99 | -0.42 |
Daily swap rates
Select chart tabs
22 Comments
Can someone tell me this. I am correct in that the lower the swap rates go, the more expensive it gets to break a fixed term loan? (If I'm completely off the mark, please remember there is reportedly no such thing as a stupid question)
Low interest rates are very exciting for borrowers but a lot (like me) foolishly fixed long term last year. We only get to enjoy the super-low rates on new lending.
Why on the current environment which has been obvious for quite a few years (since 2008 in fact) have people lost faith in floating? The banks can't raise now ever. Rock .....hard place. Raising will kill them along with the gigantic global bubbles. They know it. Can some of you explain your logic under current economic conditions please?
I've been telling people to get 1 year fixed and they're happy to get the savings over being on a floating rate. It's long enough to get a benefit and but not so long as to have floating rates drop below fixed significantly. That way you don't miss out on OCR drops.
Say you have a fixed mortgage for 5.5% with a term of 3 years the bank expects to get all of the interest due for the entire term. If you refinance with the same bank to 4.5% they are going to want that 1% difference for the 3 years. That's a simple explanation for it. If interest rates go up they don't care as they can lend the money to money else and make even more money.
I fixed back when the RBNZ was threatening to massively increase rates a couple of years ago to hedge against the increases. Turns out I bet in the wrong direction.
Hi Nachiavaili,
Its not such a big issue to break a loan, you will be penalised but if you change banks you will get the money back with an incentive. We paid around 18,000 to break a number of loans over a 3 month period but got cash incentive of $15000 from the bank we changed too. We dropped from 6.5% to 5%. Hope this helps.
Thanks Geoff. Other banks will give some cash but the total of all the break fee amounts combined is pretty high... $50k. It's not all bad because my loans are mostly low 5.xx% already and I did get some good cash incentives when I fixed them.
Can I ask which bank you changed to?
Depends I suppose if you are wedded to an economic ideology or not. So fixing for 1 year has cost you some basis points, that cant be a huge "loss" surely?
My personal view is we'll never see a high sustained OCR again, ever (ie above 4%). That is how I see the post peak-oil world unfolding ever more deflation and asset value destruction. Now can there be nasty interest spikes like say Greece? yes as that is the retail rate and not the OCR. Sure you enjoy super low rates but if you cannot sustain the income on that asset that asset's value will drop, however the debt will remain.
In a word yes. In fairness to the bank it funded its deal with you by borrowing at rates that are higher than now. You break the loan they are left with 'expensive' money. So you compensate them.
But 'fairness' is of course a joke word with banks. They will screw out of you what they can.
David Chaston, having read Roger Kerr's commentary on Monday, I would suggest that the time has arrived to remove the author. Many of the so called amateurs on this site have a substantially better grasp of economic conditions,by leaving a contributor so inept and open to persistent ridicule adds nothing to the website, for many readers , some less financially literate may have been swayed by this 'experts' view over the past years. Simply because AMP lurks somewhere is inconsistent with the overall tone of the website.
Hmmmm....
The NZ government 4.5% 15/04/27 bond is currently trading ~ 2.94% and the 10 year swap is as you claim 2.99% mid.
This is absurd in terms of risk discovery veracity. The swap spread is too skewed to the left.
It seems there is not a single reputable market maker with balance sheet capacity capable of borrowing wholesale floating and hedging that liability by paying fixed to receive floating for no other reason than a probable profitable arbitrage opportunity. This is a dire turn of events.
Things seem to be getting tight in the banking sector. Even when the OCR cut was discussed prior to a meeting the financiers did comment that rates cuts are going to be difficult to pass on. They did echo what banks are saying publicly.
I'm wondering if profits are getting slim at the big banks.
Zed's simplistic view:
So if I'm getting paid in USD and the NZD drops as a result of this I should be better off right?
And the price of imported goods will rise and there should be a higher tax take, great NZ will have more money for public services?
Plus I have more change in my pocket because my mortgage rate has dropped (assuming I've floated or fixed short term and don't pay down debt or invest in another...property..that's all there is right?). Or my business loan has reduced because of this OCR change (good luck with that).
As much chance of making a quick buck as winning Lotto or had a ball at Sky Tower Casino ... unless I'm a bank (quick buy shares)
Ah but.... I've save all my life and living off interest so now I've got less change in my pocket. Even if I am a NIMBY Boomer who deserves no less...
And now I'm confused because none of this adds up and to make it worse the OCkeR banks are allegedly acting like a cartel (is that legal?)...This is like unemployment, not working.
At least we can make a difference.. change the flag! Huge difference - cost a fortune but ($26 million is the tip of the iceberg).
I reckon best drop the GST rate, make Google, Facebook, Apple et al, pay their fair share (to be sure to be sure to be sure), reduce Government spending on the fluffy stuff and their corporate mates, and diversify.
All in one day? ...or 8 years of the current administration and still counting.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.