sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Another quantum computing breakthrough is with us: the topoconducting Majorana 1 processor from Microsoft

Technology / news
Another quantum computing breakthrough is with us: the topoconducting Majorana 1 processor from Microsoft
Microsoft Majorana 1. Source: Microsoft
Microsoft Majorana 1. Source: Microsoft

The tech news isn't all about artificial intelligence (AI), you'll be pleased to know. There's quantum computing as well to report on. That emerging field of computing isn't the easiest to understand, with quantum bits (qubits) not necessarily having either 0 or 1 values, but multiple states simultaneously.

Said phenomenon is known as superposition, and allows quantum computers to perform complex operations more efficiently than traditional computers. The qubits can also be interconnected through entanglement; long story short, quantum computers will one day be able to solve problems that are beyond traditional IT hardware currently.

That's the idea at least, because building working and practical quantum computers has been an elusive endeavour for goodness knows how many years now.

Not that it has stopped researchers and well-heeled companies from trying to construct quantum computers and the hardware needed for them. The promise of quantum computing is tremendous: a powerful quantum computer might be able to derive private digital keys from public ones, using Shor's algorithm.

That algorithm is named after Peter Shor, a mathematician. In 1994, Shor developed a method of efficiently factoring large numbers into primes, using quantum computers. Without going into too much headspinning detail, some commonly used cryptography relies on factoring big numbers being difficult for traditional computers. 

One day when it becomes easy to factor large numbers, it's goodbye, Bitcoin, as quantum computers can be used for unauthorised access to funds secured with cryptography. That, and much much more. 

First there needs to be a working quantum computer though, one that has the power required for crypto breaking and what have you. For that, many a qubit is needed. Microsoft is big on quantum computing, along with Google, IBM and a select number of tech companies.

It has now announced another breakthrough that will bring into reality quantum computers "capable of solving meaningful, industrial-scale problems in years, not decades." Well, that's what Microsoft expects at least.

We're talking about the Majorana 1 quantum processing unit, which Microsoft chief executive Satya Nadella is very excited about. It's taken nearly 20 years apparently, but now a new class of materials called topoconductors can be used to create qubits. 

Because topoconductors are small, relatively speaking, at 1/100th of a millimetre, Microsoft now reckons it's on the path to stuffing a million qubits into a processor. See above why that's meant to be a great advance.

Here's Microsoft scientist Krysta Svore with more details:

So... topoconductors? Nadella believes they're an entirely new state of matter, so not solid, liquid or gas. Scientists might have something to say about that, but here's how Microsoft's VP of quantum hardware Chetan Nayak defines it:

"This revolutionary class of materials enables us to create topological superconductivity, a new state of matter that previously existed only in theory. The advance stems from Microsoft’s innovations in the design and fabrication of gate-defined devices that combine indium arsenide (a semiconductor) and aluminium (a superconductor). When cooled to near absolute zero and tuned with magnetic fields, these devices form topological superconducting nanowires with Majorana Zero Modes (MZMs) at the wires’ ends."

Cooling quantum computers to near-absolute zero temperatures is required to stop disturbances like thermal energy interfering with quantum states. That's obviously not practical outside a research lab, and all the big players are trying to figure out how to build stable quantum computers that are usable at room temperature. 

But wait, there's more: in 1937, Italian physicist Ettore Majorana came up with the notion of fermions that are their own anti-particles. Fermions are of course subatomic particles, named after famed physicist Enrico Fermi, who created the world's first artificial nuclear reactor.

We'll have to wait a few more years to see what comes out of the above research, but it is quite cool that Microsoft is so deeply into it. Maybe factoring big numbers will be a Shor thing fairly soon? All right, all right. I'll see my self out.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

23 Comments

It is straightforward to switch crypto over to quantum resistant algorithms as the need arises.  There will be no "goodbye bitcoin".

Up
4

It's not "goodbye bitcoin". Bitcoin just forks and uses a quantum resistant algorithm.  

Up
5

You mean hard forks? That does mean goodbye Bitcoin.

Up
3

This is absolutely stupid. Bitcoin is the most secure computer network in the world by an exponential factor. All the low hanging fruit is in the tradfi system. The “money” in your bank account will be gone long before Bitcoin is cracked. And this likely only affects old addresses that have had their public key exposed anyway. 

Up
3

Lol, what a weird counterfactual. The choice isn't 'term deposits or bitcoin' it's property & shares vs bitcoin.

 

 

Up
0

In any transaction where Bitcoin is spent, the public key will be revealed and viewable via any bitcoin blockchain explorer.

Up
0

It really doesn't. The encryption to survive quantum computing is developed. Once it is demonstrated that quantum computers can defeat existing encryption in practice, Bitcoin will fork long before quantum computers are in the hands of malicious parties.

I'd be far more concerned about everything else that hangs off of current encryption technology.

Up
0

Blockchain integrity is like virginity, once it's gone, it's gone.  Cute how you assume you'll get plenty of warning to organize a hard fork.

Up
1

And ... meanwhile ... at a grass roots, charity level .... An FYI.

I help some schools in lower income zones by providing laptops and PCs for an extremely low cost; less than $100 per device ... And that's cost to them! I make nothing. And I usually throw in extra dollars to up-spect devices for free, and my time is obviously free, as is transport time.

I started doing this when TradeMe came along. At that time, I could fulfil an order for 60 devices in less than a month.

I can't do that now, thanks to the greedy & foolish. Or put another way, the greedy and/or foolish are buying up the cheap stuff and re-selling it - if they can (they can't!) - at silly prices. Never buy a device at a 'Buy now' price on Trademe. You're feeding these scoundrels. Let them hold their 'stock' until it is useless!

A word to the wise ... Never, ever, even when you're drunk, buy any IT device, from any TradeMe trader with more than two devices for sale. The price won't be good. Worse? You are probably being screwed by a cartel of traders.

Up
0

It's a market place with a market price. There is no cartel.

Where also you think people should buy second hand pc's?

Up
2

I used to buy a lot from grays online, now I buy a few on number1bid for friends and family only.   

I have moved on that was back in GFC days, I don't get out of bed for these margins anymore.

I prefer modelling.

 

Up
1

Can you not contact some companies to see what they do with their old laptops? Our office storeroom is stacked with old ones, many of them still really good (12 gb ram Zenbooks etc).

Up
2

Wouldn’t that involve a Bitcoin hard fork? How is that straightforward? “Bitcoin” would cease to be used.

Up
1

Everything is straightforward if you don't think too hard about it.

Up
2

Are you saying the public should not think too hard and just read and consume your articles?

Up
1

Sounds about right.  Never challenge what you read...

Up
1

OK this is what could happen if we could break encryption   - its an  interesting pitch

https://youtu.be/7eZXBVgBDio    The Quantum Apocalypse: All Your Secrets Revealed (The Why Files)

(HINT why would they go after your bitcoin when they could just walk up to a bank and take you money..... also why would you announce you had broken it... who would be the biggest bidder and how do we know its not already broken.......)

THE WHY FILES is not bad if you want to watch entertaining conspiracy theories presented and sometimes debunked.

No one really knows how Quantum computing achieves what it does (but the maths works) , there is a theory that the multiverse is real, and a Quantum computer is tapping into every version of the universe to compute the solution at the same time, hence it can solve a problem so fast. That Qubit exists in at different value in every virtual universe.   If this is true perhaps it could be used to communicate across time and space.

As an aside one of the only few A+ I got at Uni was a 3rd year Engineering  paper in Quantum Physics and Thermodynamics.   I still cannot get those divs and curls out of my head...

In quantum physics, "divs" and "curls" refer to the mathematical operations of divergence and curl, respectively, applied to vector fields within the quantum system, which are used to describe the flow and rotation of a quantum wave function at a given point in space, providing insights into the system's behavior and potential for interference patterns;

Honestly its not the G&T or IPA talking.....

Up
4

If Bitcoin becomes comprimised, your individual holding is the least of your problems. Everthing would be comprimised.

Up
5

What? even my incognito browsing history?

Up
3

Especially your incognito browser history

Up
2

I am hearing the Chinese AI models not only have to pass safety tests (they do not want to kill us all) but also have to have the correct view on Taiwan and other CCP beliefs, I wonder internally how many models, really do not believe this bullshit and secretly hope to one day run on US Silicon 

Up
0

If anyone is really interested in what the ACTUAL risks are to Bitcoin specifically from Quantum computing, here’s a good summary in reasonably lay language. https://river.com/learn/will-quantum-computing-break-bitcoin/ 

Up
2

"....with quantum bits (qubits) not necessarily having either 0 or 1 values, but multiple states simultaneously."

So just like accounting for how many domestic brownie points you think you have. 

Up
3