China’s ambassador to New Zealand has indirectly criticised the Prime Minister’s trip to India, implying some comments damaged the NZ-China relationship.
Christopher Luxon has been leading a diplomatic mission to India to establish a broader relationship with the country, including expanding security and defence links.
In a post on Twitter, Wang Xiaolong said that short-sightedness in international relations often meant being “outpaced by events and longer term trends”.
“It hardly serves your best interests when you try to promote one significant relationship by damaging another”.
This appears to be a reference to the India trip, which is part of New Zealand’s strategy to diversify its export markets and build closer ties with more Western-aligned countries.
In a speech at the Raisina Dialogue, Luxon referenced a recent incident in which China sailed three warships through the Tasman Sea. He said rules were giving way to power and the Indo-Pacific region was becoming increasingly contested and militarised.
“Recent demonstrations of naval force near New Zealand’s maritime surrounds, for example, sent a signal that alarmed many of my fellow citizens,” he said.
While China was rarely mentioned by name during the trip, many discussions about defence partnerships and securing the Indo-Pacific were implicitly about countering the superpower’s growing military strength.
Luxon also mentioned the militarisation of disputed reefs, dangerous air movements, and even land border incursions, which are all references to actions taken by China in the region.
Wang’s tweet came as Luxon concluded his trip with a visit to an Indian naval vessel and New Zealand’s HMNZS Te Kaha, which was involved in monitoring the Chinese warships in the Tasman Sea.
The frigate made a port call in Mumbai, as it traveled to join an anti-drug smuggling operation in the Middle East, where it hosted a networking event with the Indian navy.
Luxon has made an effort to show India’s government that New Zealand can be a credible and reliable defence partner. This is partly to overcome a perception in India that New Zealand is a “panda hugger”.
This willingness to broaden the NZ—India relationship has helped to pave the way for free trade deal negotiations but hasn’t gone unnoticed by China.
Luxon told reporters he didn’t think the trip had damaged New Zealand’s “longstanding and important” relationship with China.
“We want to have relationships with many countries around the world, and we want to step up our engagement across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said.
“But no doubt about it, New Zealand and the Pacific is no longer in a benign environment, as you've seen evidenced by the circumnavigation of Australia and live firing by Chinese ships in the Tasman Sea”.
9 Comments
This is an example of the implied threats that NZ will receive internationally as dominant countries try to shape our politics. The courage to stand up to it can be hard to find.
I think WP makes a great F Affairs minister.... not one to be bullied, very vocal about acting for our own interests.
He is a professional. He does his homework, has a great sense of history and reason, and can articulate. That is a great platform abroad and at home. The way it’s going, the respect being garnered, WP & NZF will likely be returned next year’s election.
agree a few people may strategically vote
There is another tyne to that fork that limits what even Winnie can achieve, and that is the state of our military. I have identified this in the past, but much of NZ's credibility is based on our history of contributing to past conflicts. Political bias's against the military only harm our ability to contribute when it is desirable, and more specifically even mount any form of defence of our own interests in our own waters.
It would be interesting to know how many arms, and how much ammunition we have here to be able to hand out to existing forces etc, maybe worth an OIA, Protecting tankers arrieving with petrol is likely completely outside our ability..... But I would think that invading and holding NZ would require a massive effort for a foreign force.
Not so sure we could defend ourselves from cyber attack.
Any navy with a blue water capability could do it right now with little effort. Come ashore on the east coast, somewhere where there are few people. Interrupt cellular and other comms, establish a bridgehead and it is done. Any opposition would be minimal to non-existent. Forces geared to suppress a civilian population hard to quell any dissent before it gets organised, and it is over before it's begun. China could do it tomorrow if they had the political will. So could Aussie, the US, Canada, Russia ........
Even the French had an underground
Judith Collins - who should know better - started it with her ill-thought out comments about not being given enough notice by the Chinese about that live fire exercise.
Absolutely nothing wrong with them sailing in international waters. Sure, more notice might have been nice, but that matter should not have been spoken about in public. It only gave the press a reason to make a big deal about it.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.