By Amy Errmann*
With over-tourism in the spotlight as the travel industry continues to rebound after the pandemic, popular destinations around the world are feeling the strain.
Bali is overwhelmed by waste and traffic, Australia’s sacred sites have suffered environmental damage, New York is facing rising rents due to short-term rentals, and Singapore’s scenic spots are becoming clogged with crowds.
Frustrated locals are pushing back – from spraying water at tourists in Barcelona to organising protests in Venice. As the northern hemisphere high season ends, Aotearoa New Zealand is preparing for an influx of visitors ahead of its summer tourism season.
And much like those other tourist hotspots, the government is looking at how to manage the negative effects of tourism on local communities and the environment. This includes tripling the international tourist tax from NZ$35 to $100.
The aim of the increase is to attract tourists who are more mindful of their impact and willing to contribute to its mitigation, while also reducing visitor numbers to protect the country’s unique landscapes and cultures.
But are there other ways the tourism industry can evolve to ensure benefits for both travellers and the communities they are visiting? So called “slow travel” could be the answer.
Spain Anti-Tourist Protests Threaten Entire Region: Residents of number of prominent Spanish tourist destinations are voicing their concerns regarding the influx of tourists, claiming that it has rendered their cities uninhabitable.
— eTurboNews | Trends | Travel News (@eTurboNews) August 12, 2024
SOURCE:… https://t.co/kqs0jdTyL7 #travelnews pic.twitter.com/9JWohMUXiZ
Hunting the perfect photo
Overtourism isn’t just about too many people in one place. It’s also about how people travel.
Instagram-famous landmarks draw massive crowds, disrupting local life and sometimes even leading to closures.
Travellers often pack their itineraries with as many sights as possible, racing from one place to another in a frenzy to capture the perfect photo. This hurried approach not only creates congestion but also limits meaningful engagement with the destination.
And it’s not just a numbers game. The way tourists behave also plays a critical role.
A 2019 report from the United Nations raised concerns about trash from tourists in developing small island states, including the Pacific Islands. According to the report, a tourist visiting these communities produced about 7kg of waste a day, compared to about 2.5kg produced by a local.
The issue is not necessarily about travelling less, but about travelling more responsibly. The tourism industry needs to be encouraging travel habits that allow both visitors and locals to enjoy tourism without compromising the integrity of the destination.
The rise of slow travel
Mindfulness – being fully present in the moment – has gained popularity since the 1970s. The concept has influenced a number of sectors, including slow food, slow fashion, and now slow travel.
It’s about experiencing destinations at a relaxed pace, focusing on deeper connections with local cultures and sustainability. This often means staying longer in fewer places and choosing eco-friendly transport.
Understanding slow travel and mindfulness is important because they create richer, more memorable experiences. Fast, hectic travel often leaves little positive impact. Slow immersive travel, on the other hand, fosters lasting memories and reduces overtourism, pollution and cultural damage.
Research shows when we consciously immerse ourselves in our surroundings we can have more meaningful experiences. Surprisingly, even luxury travel – often dismissed as wasteful – can encourage respect and mindfulness for those who invest financially and mentally in their journey, unlike cheaper, mainstream tourism.
Activities such as “forest bathing”, hiking or engaging with local cultures boost wellbeing and meaning, going beyond just “taking a photo for likes”.
This mindful approach can change our behaviour on a personal level. By focusing attention on fewer experiences, travellers can heighten their sense of awe and appreciation, making the travel more memorable.
This idea is evident in “peak experiences”. Disney, for example, creates emotionally-charged moments that stick in visitors’ minds. Other experiences, such as “digital detoxes” or pilgrimages can leave a contemplative impression.
By concentrating on a single aspect of a visit, it becomes special and memorable. Even in busy places like Disneyland, focusing on one unique element can make the experience feel slower and more meaningful.
The sustainability of tourism
In the Faroe Islands, slow travel helps protect local traditions and landscapes by encouraging thoughtful visitor behaviour, such as using local guides to minimise environmental impact.
New Zealand can leverage its natural beauty to offer similar immersive experiences. Tramping (hiking), for example, can promote a mindful connection with the environment.
But even here, there needs to be a focus on balancing tourism with preservation. Popular spots, such as the Department of Conservation huts and the Te Araroa Trail, are already becoming crowded. It is essential to educate visitors on responsible practices – such as cleaning equipment – to ensure they understand their role in protecting nature.
Travel that fosters a deeper appreciation for local cultures and environments benefits both visitors and the destinations they explore. The challenge is finding the right balance – encouraging meaningful travel experiences while still ensuring accessibility for all.
*Amy Errmann, Senior Lecturer, Marketing & International Business, Auckland University of Technology.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
11 Comments
Arrogantly cutting off their noses to spite their faces. Few people (besides marketing academics on taxpayer funded sabbaticals) have the time & money to be "slow tourists" & ordinary families will think twice before forking out $400-$500 for the "privilege" of improving NZs balance of payments deficit.
Piffle!, the tourism industry itself specializes in plane/bus/boatloads of fatties being fleeced at the highest possible turnover. Cultural and environmental concerns only observed where enforcement is effective and DOC 'preserves' a lot of areas by lock and key rather than providing serviceable access.
It’s unclear what the actual proposed solution is here. “Slowing” tourism doesn’t affect the volume of it does it. Are we talking about pricing some people out?
Too often these anti “over-tourism” advocates are basically saying “I should be able to travel without having to deal with the other tourists”.
Personally, I think it’s a good thing. A few overrated sites take the hit from the instagrammers, and they cross subsidise everything else. I couldn’t care less if there’s a line for fergburger, or an obstructed view of the Wānaka Tree.
I live near the Wanaka tree and walk past the crowds that are there most afternoons. Everyone brings a good vibe taking photos etc and it reminds me how lucky I am and I have no problem with them at all. I can have the tree to myself in the early morning if I want.
Raising the taxes on tourists will hopefully start to both scrape off the tightwad, sleazy tourists who give travellers a bad name, and go a least a tiny way to an industry that has externalised so many of it's costs actually contributing more to the communities whose infrastructure and attractions they rely upon.
"New York is facing rising rents due to short-term rentals" I know it's a travel article written by the AUT marketing department but come on. Rent controls and planning restrictions are clearly the culprit lol.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.