sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Former National Party minister will chair the board of Pharmac which has been burnished with a $1.7 billion budget boost

Public Policy / news
Former National Party minister will chair the board of Pharmac which has been burnished with a $1.7 billion budget boost

Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced the Government will continue to provide Pharmac with enough funding to maintain current medicines in Budget 2024.

The Act Party leader has also appointed former National Party minister, Paula Bennett, to chair the board of directors and oversee the independent organisation. 

Bennett raised almost $2 million for the National Party ahead of the 2023 election and appeared to endorse Act candidate Brooke Van Velden in the Tamaki electorate. Van Velden shared an image of her drinking a cup of tea with Bennett in the electorate, each wearing a suit in the colors of their respective parties. 

While the social media post didn’t include any explicit endorsement, some interpreted it as a suggestion that voters should support Van Velden over National’s Simon O’Connor. Van Velden won the seat.

Seymour ultimately ended up with an Associate Health portfolio and was made responsible for Pharmac.

His decision to appoint such an openly political figure to run the independent agency was heartily criticized by economist and self-styled government watchdog, Michael Reddell

Pharmac was supposed to be a highly independent operation that delegated real power to technocratic experts to make tough decisions within a strict mandate, he said on Twitter. 

“How then is it appropriate to appoint a highly political, partisan, person with no domain experience as chair,” he asked. 

The previous chair, Steve Maharey, was a former Labour Party minister who was found to have breached impartiality rules in two opinion columns he wrote for the Sunday Star Times

He resigned after the election and a highly-experienced health profession, Peter Bramley, had been serving as interim board chair. 

Bennett held several ministerial portfolios and after politics took a job as one of eight senior leaders at real estate agency Bayleys Realty Group. 

She has never served as board chair or worked in the pharmaceutical industry previously. 

'A world-leading medicine procurement agency'

Seymour said he thought Bennett was the best person to help transform Pharmac into a world-leading medicine procurement agency.

“Paula brings a wealth of experience to this role, with extensive experience in governance and organisational change,” he said. 

The upcoming May budget will give the medicine buying agency a four-year budget of $6.3 billion—its largest ever—fulfilling campaign promises made by most political parties.

While Labour increased Pharmac’s budget while in office, it didn’t guarantee that funding would continue across the forecast period in Budget 2023. 

Instead, maintaining that level of funding was made as a campaign promise and baked into the parties’ election fiscal plan. This created a ‘fiscal cliff’ in the official budget numbers. 

National and Labour both included $180 million for Pharmac in their election campaign fiscal plans but the number announced today was significantly higher. 

Seymour said he had been informed that more than $400 million per year was needed, just to maintain access to existing medicines. He blamed Labour for creating a “fiscal challenge”. 

Labour’s health spokesperson, Ayesha Verrall said the agency’s budget had been increased by 51% across the six years Labour was in government. 

“Labour did more to increase access to medicine than any government before it, and will continue to fight to see the investment in the health of Kiwis continue,” she said. 

Seymour needed to explain why the budget increase was $1 billion bigger than has been forecast prior to the election, Verrall added.

“Hopeful patients and advocates will welcome this funding — but David Seymour needs to be up front with them about how far it will go”.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

19 Comments

Did the Nats misunderstand the criticism of 'jobs for the boys'? 

Up
11

There was an ex Labour minister in this position before the election. Both he and this appointee seeminglyare regarded as being reasonably capable. But that’s not the point which is that the position here has not been, and is not being, taken up by a chairperson politically independent and that simply does not sound a good note. New Zealanders deserve and need their medical services and capacities to be free of political niceties. That should be a no brainer.

Up
5

Absolutely.  Paula identifies as a woman so therefore not a boy.  Shows quite a progressive and inclusive mindset on National's part.

Up
0

Lol. Best bit of sarcasm I've read today.

Up
0

Thank you! I'm not sure everyone got it.

Up
0

Another tranche of cronyism. Pitchforks are surely being sharpened?

Up
6

“How then is it appropriate to appoint a highly political, partisan, person with no domain experience as chair,” he asked. 

Her real estate experience surely?

Up
17

With her experience at pulling up ladders on generations following, the concern might be that she is there to weaken Pharmac's market power in favour of pharmaceutical companies. One certainly hopes not.

Up
8

Who's the young photogenic teen 

Up
0

A face that private healthcare & tens of thousands of public taxpayer funds to fund & skip the queue gets you.

Up
2

So I take it that Bennett has:

a. Decided that real estate isn't the sure bet it was a little while ago, and

b. Decided that a mayoral tilt in 2025 would split the vote on the right and lead to another Labour mayor

Up
3

This "hole" business needs to be explained better. Presumably there is funding to cover the 2023 -2024 year . the next tears funding is in the 2024 budget. Labour promised as increased amount in their election promises , and presumably it was covered in  their fiscal projections in their election promises . 

So where is the "hole"?

Up
0

Why is her "extensive experience in ... organizational change" so valuable? Is she about to do a hatchet job on pharmac?

Up
1

It's not at the board level where we have a problem with pharmac. It's the CE who needs moving on. Perhaps the former might deal to the latter.

Up
0

Quite clearly the NACTF don't give a damn about how this looks. This does not bode well for the future.

I'd also add that pharmaceutical companies have a penchant for 'throwing large sums of money around' to get their drugs approved & sold. And they're not above ensuring the money isn't traceable to them so long as the recipient is judicious with spending it. Just saying.

Hmmm ... and an ex-real estate agent, and party fund raiser, is in charge now .... Hmmm ... What could go wrong!

Up
2

Quite staggering that it is over $ 1000 per head of population.  Around $300 per year.

Up
0

Is it? Doesn't seem that unreasonable, I'm almost certain we would pay more without the bargaining power that pharmac has.

Up
1

Wasn't thinking of that angle so much, but that we have become a nation where we consume that much medication.  

Not suggesting it shouldn't be available to those who need it, I take a small dose myself.

And some of it is necessary because of long waits for elective surgery, mine is.

But we really need to start looking at preventative health care, with regard to obesity in particular. And of course the smoking changes won't help.

Up
0

Those Boomers take a lot of pills these days...

Up
0