sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

An apartment purchased for $290,000 sells for $350,000 two months later

Property
An apartment purchased for $290,000 sells for $350,000 two months later
Right side of the tracks - the apartment block at 6 Porters Ave.

An Auckland apartment in a building located beside railway tracks has increased in price by $60,000 in two months.

According to QV.co.nz the two bedroom apartment at 6 Porters Ave in Eden Terrace was purchased for $290,000 on July 31.

Yesterday it sold at auction for $350,000, a 21% increase in two months.

The property was located in a block adjacent to the railway tracks and alongside a level crossing with barrier arms and warning bells a short distance from Mt Eden station, but that didn't seem to deter several prospective buyers bidding to own it.

However it also has much to recommend it because it was relatively spacious by modern standards with 75 square metres of floor space on two levels. It had two bedrooms, two bathrooms and a tandem car park (accommodating two cars if parked one in front of the other).

It's location in the CBD fringe suburb of Eden Terrace made for a short trip into the city and it was five minute's walk to the corner of Symonds St and Mt Eden Rd.

It had a 2011 council valuation of $245,000.

It was sold at what was a lively apartment auction conducted by Ray White City Apartments yesterday, with strong competition from buyers and all seven apartments that were on offer selling under the hammer.

A mix of apartments that would appeal to both owner occupiers and investors was offered and potential buyers for both types of properties were out in force.

There was good competition for the investment units and a notable feature was that two units were offered in the Zest building, which was one of Auckland's largest shoebox complexes, and both sold for substantial premiums above their original purchase prices. 

The full results are below:

1906/1 Courthouse Lane. The Metropolis building. A 44sq m, one bedroom apartment, fully furnished and fitted out. Sold for $326,000. Vacant but rent appraised at $450 a week, which would give a gross rental yield of 7.2%. Rates $1262. Body corporate levy $5092. According to QV.co.nz the property was originally purchased for $285,000 in 2005 and sold again for the same price in 2011.

2i/220 Victoria St. The Beaumont building. A 114sq m apartment with two bedrooms, two bathrooms and two car parks, overlooking Victoria Park. Sold for $800,000 compared with its council valuation of $475,000. A previous sales history was not available. Rates $1927 and body corporate levy $8327.

16/6 Porters Ave, Eden Terrace. A 75 sq m, two bedroom, two bathroom apartment on two levels with a tandem car park. This apartment was located adjacent to the railway tracks near Mt Eden station but that didn't deter potential buyers and it sold for $350,000. Rates $1185 and body corporate levy $2849. Vacant but rent appraised at $540 -$560 a week if rented furnished. According to QV.co.nz it was originally purchased for $257,000 in 2006 and resold for $290,000 in July this year.

315/72 Nelson St. The Zest building. A 23sq m, one bedroom shoebox. Sold for $150,000. Rates $765. Body corporate levy $1742. It was rented at $280 a week fixed until next March, which provided a gross rental yield of 9.7%. According to QV.co.nz the apartment was originally purchased for $126,000 in 2003 and resold for $94,000 in 2008. 

412/85 Wakefield St. Tetra House. A 39sq m one bedroom apartment with two bathrooms, managed as part of the Waldorf complex. Sold for $202,000. The management contract provided rental income of $1365 a month (including GST), providing a gross rental yield of 8.1%. Rates $1799. Body corporate levy $4166. According to QV.co.nz it was purchased for $251,000 in 2006.

615/72 Nelson St. The Zest building. A one bedroom 29sq m shoebox. Sold for $150,000. Rented at $270 per week providing a gross rental yield of 9.4%. Rates $878. Body corporate levy $1791. According to QV.co.nz it was originally purchased for $195,000 in 2007.

505/149 Nelson St. Ascent building. A 41sq m one bedroom apartment sold for $160,100. Rented on a periodic tenancy for $320 a week providing a gross rental yield of 10.4%. Rates $828. Body corporate levy $2337. According to QV.co.nz it was originally purchased for $101,000 2003 and resold for $102,000 in 2008.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our new free Property email newsletter brings you all the stories about residential and commercial property and the forces that move these huge markets. Sign up here.

To subscribe to our Property newsletter, enter your email address here. It's free.

Email:   

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

12 Comments

Hopefully IRD are aware of such sales and will collect our share of the profit on this and other similar transactions where it would be very hard to claim that they had a long term goal in mind.  

Up
0

Well if it was bought to rent out, and probably was, "your share" matches up with how much effort and risk you took _0%_.

Up
0

Good luck with trying that argument with IRD.

Up
0

I rent out other properties.  Some are declared on memos as investment sales (based on equity rise).  Others are documented as "hold and rent".

There is a clear mathematical purpose listed on the documents.
I have in the past been offered significantly more than a "rental property" was worth, so after discussion with the other parties it was decided that it would be improper business not to cash-in the property at that rate (was equivalent to 15yrs of rent, and property required repairs...)

If it is properly documented, and you don't get one of the socialists/sociopaths that work in government, then it's no big deal.

Perhpas you should mind your own financial matters rather than trying to rort other people.

Up
0

2 months? Same as above. YOU need to PROVE to IRD that was your purpose - good luck with that. 

Up
0

A death in the family?

Up
0

Outstanding. On an annualised basis that's better than 110% pa return on your money assuming the speculator used their own money. If using OPM, the performance is even better still

Up
0

I'm wondering if OPM was the reason for the quick resale....

Up
0

Sure - if it was OPM and sourced from OS even more urgency with the kiwi falling

Up
0

exactly.  and if they went in with under 20% equity, they might have had to jump asap.  If so I bet they're partying up after that auction!

Up
0

OK so where is the rest of the reporting....what up grades have been done between sales

I can list her so many resales in short periods with so called huge profits.. but know these have new bathrooms kitchens carpets etc...

here are a few,, picked out as are also expremes thu rest not far behind

 Randwick Park 1st sale  June14  sold Aug 14  $417,000 ' Profit' 102K

 Clendon Park,  1st sale   july 14 Sold Aug 14 $360,000   'Profit' $78K

Manurewa, 1st sale April 14   Sold Sept 14  $430,000  'Profit '  $99K

Hill Park  1st sale Feb 14  Sold  June 14  $450,000  'Profit'   $70K

After expenses, GST, legal fees, Real estate agents, Tradies, permits , consents one tends to come dow to on a good day $20  ave day $10K  so to do well one must turn over a lot of houses per yr... and to do that, there is a lot of hard work....more than most are prepared to do.....and then after all that u have tax.

The picture look a little more balanced now since reality factor put in?

I can go back years with real examples

Up
0

800k for Beaumont is v lumpy.

 

 

Up
0