New Zealand home building consents rose last month, with the biggest increase in Canterbury, reflecting rebuilding efforts in Christchurch after the devastating earthquakes.
Building consents rose 8.3 percent to 1,326, seasonally adjusted and including apartments, according to Statistics New Zealand. Excluding apartments, consents rose 3.7 percent in January, the first gain in three months.
Canterbury’s gains were driven primarily by permits for retirement units, suggesting a build up of demand because of the ongoing aftershocks in the region that have delayed the reconstruction efforts.
Consents in Canterbury jumped to 379 last month, the highest of any region, from 199 in December. In the city of Christchurch alone, there were 209 consents issued, up from 61 in the previous month.
By contrast, new dwellings authorized in the North Island fell 0.8 percent to 595, with those issued in Auckland falling 10 percent to 232.
There were 198 consents issued for apartments, in unadjusted numbers, last month, from 148 in December.
In the year, total home building consents fell 9.1 percent.
Total non-residential consents fell to 655 in January from 814 in December.
Here is the reaction from ASB economist Jane Turner:
Residential consents
Residential building consent issuance remained subdued in January. The 8.2% increase in consents was boosted by a large increase in apartment consents. Apartment consents are often lumpy and volatile month to month. The increase this month was due to 174 retirement units, which were concentrated in Canterbury. StatsNZ noted that some of the consents for these units had been delayed due to earthquakes.
Excluding apartments, residential consent issuance picked up a very subdued 3.7% over the month, following from the previous month’s flat result. Over the second half of 2011 it appears that building demand has lost some momentum. We still expect to see a gradual increase in underlying building demand over the coming year, particularly from Auckland given the increasingly tight housing market.
Canterbury consent issuance was skewed by the retirement units approved. If these were excluded, then consent issuance would have remained at low levels. It is still too early to see a pick up in earthquake-related residential building. We expect to see the early stages of this activity over the second half of 2012.
Non-residential consents
Non-residential consents dropped in January, although this is not unusual for the time of year. Non-residential consents in January are down slightly on year-ago levels. Over the past few months, non-residential consents have shown tentative signs of improvement. Nonetheless, commercial construction intentions remain reasonably subdued in business confidence surveys, and point to a very gradual recovery in commercial construction over 2012.
Implications
Consent issuance remains weak and continues to point to a very subdued construction outlook in the near term. Low levels of housing construction over the first half of 2012 will continue to put pressure on the housing supply and generate upward pressure on house prices, particularly in Auckland andCanterbury. As earthquake reconstruction activity picks up in earnest in 2013, we can expect some of these supply pressures to alleviate. Given there remains a large degree of uncertainty and risk of further delays around the rebuild process, will still see no urgency for the RBNZ to increase the OCR before December 2012.
Building consents - residential
Select chart tabs
11 Comments
I assume that the retirement units in ChCh were for one of 4 large developments which had been delayed by the quakes. Of course this won't even go a little way towards the number lost.
My best guess would be that the consent is for Ryman's new Philpotts Rd development which has at least 150 villas, and is just now starting on ground works.
Big developments do sway these numbers, but as yet there is really no evidence of an effort to rebuild being underway.
We lodged one yesterday in the Waimak district and the guy said they were snowed under. He said they received 50 BC applications the previous day alone - seems high based on those figures although the February figures are not out yet.
There are lots of people from Chch flocking to the Waimak area, especially Rangiora, and if I believe the local papers, there is a significant house shortage and consequently rising prices in the area.
That's probably because from tomorrow (1 March) councils won't accept building consents for houses and small apartment buildings unless structure and watertightness aspects are designed by someone licensed to do so.
From tomorrow they'll probably get hardly any - there's like only 50 people in Canturbury plus registered architects and engineers on the list so far.
Yeah, good point. The licensing thing seems to be more about paperwork & more money for the council than actual qualifications though. The guy who did our plans (and who has a few decades of experience) has sent in his form but there seems to be a big queue and long processing time so it'll be a while before he actually appears on the list.
I guess he's not the only one to have left it till the last minute of March and even April may well see low volumes of applications.
Y'all may be interested in my take on the LBP slo-mo-train wreck to come.
Essentially, I think it will fork the market: the simple stuff will go dark, under the radar, into the black economy. The new build will soldier on with another layer of cost.
The middle (extensions, renovations that cannot be disguised as R&M) will stop. Why bother?
Much of the last 10 years was discretionary building. Folk who had an entirely functioning kitchen just had to remodel, often spending more than we did on a whole new house in the middle of the decade. Folk who haven't grown any more bums, and who demographically are reducing the number of occupants per house, just had to add three ensuites, othen spending ditto.
It was a collective social arrogance, not a need but a want. Not surprising it morphs into 'why bother'.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.