Real estate agency group First National has reported 43% of its offices said conditional agreements fell over in July, mostly because of negative building reports and financing criteria.
"For some time now, seemingly over-zealous building inspection reports have been causing buyers concern, frightening them away in many cases," First National Group General Manager John Stewart said.
"The focus on ‘leaky home syndrome’ and what many would call normal wear and tear has in many cases been unreasonable,” he said.
“While one can sympathise with the need for conservative approaches, particularly in view of the inspection companies' own exposure to liability should they miss or understate an issue, I know of far too many instances where reports are, quite frankly, over the top and cause needless buyer concern."
First National's Bay of Plenty offices reported some deals failed because buyers couldn't sell their own homes, while the new Unit Title Act was a factor in the lower North Island and Canterbury.
A stand down period for insurance in Canterbury was also a factor in deals falling over there, First National said.
First National's monthly survey of its offices measures listing levels, sales, market trends and overall activity. It found house prices have fallen in July compared with a year earlier across 51% of the country, which is a slight improvement from June’s 57% figure.
The survey found 40% of agencies across the country saw house prices as being the same, while 9% said prices are higher.
In the July 2011 survey, 60% of offices said two-bedroom property prices were lower than July 2010, while 51% said three-bedroom home prices have fallen. Four bedroom homes were the exception after a quiet year, it found.
Here's more detail from the First National release:
On a regional basis, First National's sales force generally reports house prices are the same or lower.
In the western region of the North Island, prices are lower for two-, three- and four-bedroom properties, the only region to record across-the-board price falls. In Canterbury, house prices are consistent with a year ago except for four-bedroom properties in Christchurch, which are experiencing a more positive trend.
The Howick First National office has doubled its sales from a year earlier, as investors and first-home buyers made decisions on houses and sections. Listings are up 1.3% from June 2011, but down 8.9% compared with July 2010. Most First National offices report a shortage of properties.
"The buyers are there in numbers noticeably above last year, almost right across the country and in most markets, but vendors just seem afraid to go to market," Stewart commented.
"This is resulting in some fierce competition through multi offers, tenders or at auction, with reports of properties realising above expectation. Vendors' devotion to spring and summer selling remains, to the cost of many this year I fear."
The number of contracts exchanged in July is consistent with June and a year earlier. Notably, Howick, Stratford, Dargaville, Rotorua, Waikanae and Timaru appear to be bucking this trend and reporting substantial sales growth. Looking ahead, Stewart believes that, given buyer pressure, well presented and market-priced properties will continue to sell well.
“While the likely slow increase in mortgage interest rates may deter some, well-funded buyers will remain in the market,” he says. "Presently though, for those sellers who present their homes best in their sector and area, buyer competition is proving to be a rewarding experience. Whether this continues as the likely increase in listings flows in during spring will be an interesting feature of the recovering New Zealand economy."
7 Comments
""For some time now, seemingly over-zealous building inspection reports have been causing buyers concern, frightening them away in many cases," First National Group General Manager John Stewart said."
Hahahahaha
I'd say that was proof that banks don't like you making rational decisions with your money not that the building inspection was over-zealous.
This is the bit that is interesting.
"....and what many would call normal wear and tear has in many cases been unreasonable,” he said."
A classic sign of a descending market.
People don't mind spending the money to paint and wallpaper when they expect to see a capital gain in a few years time when they sell, but they sure as hell won't when there is no chance of recovering that outlay.
Perhaps people are starting to realise that houses are actually a liability not an asset.
Well put Scarfie. Mr Stewart's comments reek of growing desperation.
It's likely most of the reports ARE NOT overzealous, rather they adequately state the crappy building condition that most NZ houses are undoubtedly in. It seems to me that NZ buyers have historically been far too undiscerning when its comes to building quality.
Kiwis are STILL paying far too much for piles of rubbish.
Property at even the very top end of the market is poorly built junk. Materials are the cheapest to be found. Workmanship is below merely sub-standard. Yet these places are touted as "luxurious". In almost any other developed country they'd be lowest priced entry level starter homes for young low income couples and families.
And look at the prices being asked (and even being paid). Simply ridiculous. They should change hands for a small fraction of the money. Yet still people want to enslave themselves to the bank for the next 20 years or more in order to "own" such rubbish.
If anything, the building inspectors aren't being strict enough.
North Shore (Auckland) July property report out (scroll down to pdfs for actual sales prices vs. CVs):
http://www.valuationrodney.co.nz/news.htm
Everything looking pretty damn flat. Though:
"A continuing slide in new listings has turned New Zealand housing market into a seller's market, says property website Realestate.co.nz.
However, asking prices are continuing to slide - the mean asking price in July was $403,000, nearly $11,000 lower than it was in May."
Go figure the figures I say.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.