Average housing values declined for the second month in a row in June, according to the latest valuation data from Quotable Value (QV).
This country's average dwelling value was $916,285 at the end of June, according to the QV House Price Index (HPI), down by $10,487 since the end of April.
The biggest drops have been in the Auckland region, where the average value was $1,250,372 at the end of June, down by $31,624 since the end of April.
Not only are values declining, the rate at which they declining is increasing.
According to QV's HPI, the average NZ dwelling value declined by just -0.2% in the three months to May, but that slide increased to -0.9% in the three months to June.
In the Auckland region the drop in values increased from -1.4% to -2.8% over the same period.
Other regions with average value declines greater than 1% in the three months to June were Tauranga and Palmerston North, both -1.3%, and Wellington region -1.2% (see the chart below for the full regional figures).
"Frosty economic conditions continue to impede New Zealand Aotearoa's now ice cold housing market, causing home values to dip with the temperatures in most main centres," QV said in its HPI report.
QV Operations manager James Wilson said there were still some pockets of modest value growth, mostly in the South Island, but even these were starting to wane.
"Even Christchurch and Queenstown, two of our more bullish housing markets in recent years, [are] now experiencing little or no growth whatsoever," he said.
"Tough economic conditions are continuing to make it extremely difficult for potential purchasers to save a sizeable deposit for a home, secure finance from the bank, and service a mortgage with interest rates currently sitting around 7% and onshore inflation still biting.
"Many house hunters are in hibernation now until conditions improve, potentially on the other side of winter, maybe longer.
"As a result, downward price pressure has spread across all segments of the market now, with investors, owner-occupiers and even first home buyers, still the most active group in the market today, all taking a noticeable step back as we pass the halfway point of the year," Wilson said.
- The comment stream on this article is now closed.
•You can have articles like this delivered directly to your inbox via our free Property Newsletter. We send it out 3-5 times a week with all of our property-related news, including auction results, interest rate movements and market commentary and analysis. To start receiving them, register here (it's free) and when approved you can select any of our free email newsletters.
236 Comments
It is the average that is falling.
logical, more of the market saturating, price drop junk built at the end of the boom.
good stock probably holding up well.
is it bargain time for beat up old houses and ticky tacky?
It's fascinating to be living through the biggest (dollar value) housing crash in NZ history. It shows that loads of people willingly ignore the writing on the wall.
The massive gains and stupid auction results "news" puff pieces are being replaced with mortgagee sales as the new lead news stories.
I always assumed that during a crash everyone would be aware of it and act accordingly. No so.
The bulk of people are still unaware or non believers. Recall those days when the bbq crowd would crow about their rental and everyone seemed to be in, boots and all? It was the same with shares - all those share groups at work....and then pop!
Until the 'bbq' chatter goes mainstream the big drops still lie ahead. The race for the door has not yet begun. This is what the smart money is waiting for.
I smell smoke, The race for the door is not in full swing but most have collected their belongings and left their seats, where is the exit?
As with all emergencies, most head for the same exit... that's when it really gets interesting.
Yea.. that damn shares bubble popped.
Can you believe the S and P 500 has only been hitting all time highs since Jan. Sounds like a popped bubble..
2008 young fella. Every workplace had a share group.
was worse in 1987
That’s the thing with all time highs isn’t it? Still worth more now than at the height of the bubble.
When the s&p 500 is propped up by only a few companies as investors flock to the only companies increasing in share value, the end is near for the good times.
It is possible that right now is the worst time in the past 100 years to be holding shares (some data would show you’d be much wiser to just hold the 10 year treasury now)
https://x.com/hussmanjp/status/1810320121346543679?s=46&t=MUwQeKa7MkEJ7…
It is possible that right now is the worst time in the past 100 years to be holding shares (some data would show you’d be much wiser to just hold the 10 year treasury now
Gold total return has surpassed bond returns after a 50-year period where bonds dominated.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-23/bonds-decades-long-l…
Yea of course it's possible it's the worst time in the past 100 years to be holding shares.
But equally, it might be a good time.
The truth is you have no idea, neither do I.
Agree that the stellar returns over the last 1 year and 5 years are unlikely to be repeated in the next 1 year/5 year though. That's fine with me.
there are 3 way this can go.
1) Up
2) Down
3) nowhere at all.
I'm picking things will go down a bit then up a bit then stay the same for a while.
Yea of course it's possible it's the worst time in the past 100 years to be holding shares.
But equally, it might be a good time.
Definitely been a good time to hold IREN and Nvidia. Without a doubt.
"But equally, it might be a good time"
Yes you might be right, but as a rational investor....
Right now you could buy the S&P 500 using the IVV ishares Exchange Traded Fund and receive 1.3% yield, or you could by a 10 year treasury (risk free) and receive 4.3% yield. Its pretty clear those buying the S&P 500 must be speculating on future capital gains, otherwise it doesn't make any sense at all from a risk vs return standpoint.
Its the same concept as the NZ housing market. People saying they are investing when buying negatively yielding property. Its a massive warning sign of trouble ahead and potentially very poor returns (at some point...as you say we just don't know when).
Which is summarised nicely in that Hussman tweet: Ben Graham on the difference between investment and speculation.
There is intelligent speculation as there is intelligent investing. But there are many ways in which speculation may be unintelligent. Of these the foremost are:
(1) speculating when you think you are investing;
(2) speculating seriously instead of as a pastime, when you lack proper knowledge and skill for it; and
(3) risking more money in speculation than you can afford to lose.
Yip the highest household allocation to stocks (as a % of household financial assets) in the past 70 years which again shows people are possibly overbuying the hype in the market and should have a more balanced portfolio (towards cash/bonds).
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GR-Oe4MaoAA0Y6U?format=jpg&name=small
I don't think you really understand stocks or yield of stocks, let me educate you a little bit.
The yield you have cited is presumably the dividend returned to investors. That is not the same as company profit. Companies make profit and re-invest it, to enable them to make more profit in the future. This is called retained earnings. As you can see it is incorrect to compare 'yield' of stocks and bonds in the way you have.
Likewise a portion of those 'speculative capital gains' are actually real capital gains from retained earnings.
Hope this helps clear some things up for you.
Ok Warren Buffet good luck reading your way through the financial records of every company of the S&P 500 and ensuring you correctly pick the extremely small number of stocks that won't lose earnings (and share price) in the coming recession (and every other thing that can affect the success or failure of a company in the future and the associated return to the investor).
Basically what you are saying is that you are smarter than the market - what Hussman is pointing out is that 99% of investors are not so would be better off holding the risk free asset at 4+% guaranteed for the next 10 years.
Just to clarify, I'm not saying the sharemarket is definitely going to crash from here. But it is possible that it is flat for years with quite poor returns (i.e. lower than the risk free asset). Rates may drop and shares could boom again....or inflation could reappear and rates go even higher pushing shares down even further.
Yea duh, but sounds like you are advocating “timing the market”. I think I will stay invested in equities as I think long term they will outperform bonds.
Unlike others I even think the last 200 years of equities outperforming all other classes isn’t’t in itself good enough evidence that this will continue (probably ready too many power down kiwi posts). But from where I sit it’s the most likely outcome.
Yea my returns may be better if I take all my money out of shares put them in bonds for 5 years then put them back in shares again. But they may not.
I dont try and time the market, that’s for fools or people much smarter than me.
Cool and the point of my original post (which you appeared to dislike) was by a guy smarter than both of us who was pointing out the risks of buying shares now. ie based upon current market conditions, the likely return looks about as bad as it has using a model and data tested against real market conditions and outcomes over the past 100 years.
If you personally stay long on shares regardless good for you - you might be young and have decades ahead of you in the market. If you are old and can’t risk big losses now or in the near future, this type of data point could save you making a retirement/lifestyle altering mistake (which a lot of Americans could be as they are currently the most invested in the sharemarket as a % of total assets as they have been in over 50+ years - generally this only happens when a market is approaching a peak ie it is over invested).
"It's fascinating to be living through the biggest (dollar value) housing crash in NZ history"
The bigger the party, the bigger the hangover.
Reminder of the narrative / reasoning from property commentators saying at or just after the peak:
1) Tony Alexander - 19 reasons why there's no crash - December 2021
https://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_…
2) Catherine Masters - July 2022
Why the New Zealand housing market is nowhere near crash point
https://www.oneroof.co.nz/news/why-the-new-zealand-housing-market-is-no…
3) Ashley Church - April 2022
Four reasons the housing market won't crash
https://www.oneroof.co.nz/news/ashley-church-four-reasons-the-housing-m…
4) Kelvin Davidson - Dec 2021
“But will prices actually fall? I’m not convinced because in the past a serious housing downturn has come with a recession, but no one is suggesting that and unemployment is low at 3.4 per cent.”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/homed/real-estate/127305870/what-lie…
5) Nov 2021 - Here's why it might be fruitless to pin your hopes on a house price crash
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/300449314/heres-why-it-might-be-fruitl…
Nice list.
They all forget that if they are going to make predictions, they should do them far enough ahead, that their critics have forgotten they made them, or they are dead and no longer have to live with the shame, embarrassment, or liability to those who took their advice.
Lest We Forget.
Ashley Church, a self-proclaimed property expert and failed National MP candidate
Kelvin Davidson, of Corelogic, an American company slowly collecting all of NZ's property data.
Anyone surprised 😊
19 Reasons! Who can argue with so many reasons
Crazy Horse.....sits on rocky bluff overlooking the vast, dusty plains and mulls ...."the force is strong with those with vested interests".
Wow 49 thumbs up so far, I'm beginning to think that I'm wasting my time on here along with the five or so other people that actually own a house.
How good would it be for some genuine chat about constructive ways achieve job stability, reignite NZ’s economy, get house prices affordable over the longer term…instead of just rants from a few fellas getting a hardon about property crashing 🤦🏻♂️
Serious question - do you honestly believe that the many people on here wanting house prices to fall to realistic levels, for the wider good of our country long term, don't own houses?
Following on from that. I’d like to understand what you see the benefits are (other than existing house owners getting richer) of prices increasing at anything less than a reasonable rational rate please.
Most of the people, here, included myself, have financial interests in a home/housing.
Some here however, are Greed driven and want housing to skyrocket to the moon, creating "unworked riches" for themselves and in turn, shutting out the poorest half of NZ from owning a home at a lower and reasonable DTI.
They want the Housing Ponzi back, in full force. Shame on this small lot of home hoarding, flippers.
I can assure you that it is not “unworked income” at all!
if you were an investor you would know that!
Investors that provide housing deserve to get some financial compensation for providing this rental accommodation and subsidising tenants living expense.
"Investors that provide housing deserve to get some financial compensation for providing this rental accommodation and subsidising tenants living expense"
That is the narrative that permeates non owner occupied owners in the long term rental market and the most likely source of that narrative was from property investor association lobby groups to the political parties.
The primary motivation for many of that group is that most purchased with the intention of tax free capital gains. The negative cashflow situation is due to the fact that this business model is unsustainable in the long term due to higher costs of financing and house prices levels.
A cashflow oriented non owner occupier buyer avoided buying at the high price levels that many capital gain oriented non owner occupier buyers paid.
Not from any property investors federation at all!
It is from the school of reality!
The tenants in NZ should be appreciative that they have been given the opportunity to live in a property that someone else is generally paying more out in costs currently than they are receiving in rent!
Unfortunately we have a lot of people in NZ that are not in a financial position to purchase a home and therefore have this major jealousy streak!
They wish that house prices crash and all property owners suffer financially!
The news is that property prices will never drop to such a level that they are much cheaper than what they currently are!
That is just fact, you only have to see what is also happening in Australia as well.
"The tenants in NZ should be appreciative that they have been given the opportunity to live in a property that someone else is generally paying more out in costs currently than they are receiving in rent!"
A 100% equity financed (0% LVR) purchase is positive cashflow for most non owner occupier owner purchasers (even after tax on a 3 - 6% yielding asset). Whether the return is adequate is an entirely different issue.
A property investor who chose 100% debt financing (via equity release on other real estate, and mortgage on the property being purchased) to purchase that 3-6% yielding asset is likely to be negative cashflow on that single property.
The non owner occupier gets to choose how they finance their purchase. The negative cashflow situation is entirely a consequence of their choice to finance their purchase with a higher LVR and level of debt than a 0% LVR purchaser.
False.
The government subsidise landlords over $2b per year. Landlords who have over-leveraged have made their own bed. If they want to complain about being negatively geared, they can go talk to a brick wall, or simply not buy the property in the first place - as many landlords are deciding to do now.
Ultimately it just means that everyone agrees that prices are too high/unaffordable and that sentiment is likely to keep flowing through into the data.
Thank you for you service.
"Investors that provide housing deserve to get some financial compensation for providing this rental accommodation and subsidising tenants living expense."
In 2020, when interest rates were at 2.5%, did you own properties that were yielding 5%? Now if you are continuing to hold, as the cost of financing has increased to 7% or above, combined with the rising costs of insurance, council rates, maintenance, they are now in negative cashflow? Has the previous positively geared carry trade now become a negatively geared carry trade for many property investors?
Here is a comment I recall from June 2020 from what I think is a previous account:
by THE MAN 2 | 3rd Jun 20, 2:24pm
If you have properties that are giving investors returns of say 5% and with tax savings and interest rates at 2.5% approx. why on earth would you want to deleverage or reduce debt servicing???????
If you had a business that wasn’t viable, then you would be better to bail out!
If I had a property that wasn’t paying its way, then I would be offloading it however interest rates would have to be exponentially higher than they currently are and likely to be ever again!!!!
LOL
? I think you will find a number of us ‘DGMs’ own a house
Yeah I’m one of those DGM’s who own a house and want house prices to keep going down. Mainly so my 3 kids and their mates who have recently entered the workforce can one day own their own home too. Call me short sighted and selfish.
Ah yes I see the logic... so when your 3 kids and their mates who recently entered the workforce get their shit together and buy homes, what do you want to happen?
1 house prices to stabilise
2 house prices to rise
3 house prices to "keep going down"
I guarantee you wont say number 3, if youre being truly honest
The rapid increases we have seen is coming to an end - anyone can see that. Houses have become some get rich quick scheme decoupled from reality which is ludicrous.
Once house prices fall back to rational levels more in line with what Kiwis earn (which by any measure they certainly aren't now) then by all means they should also increase at a similarly rational rate.
Probably every parent says the same thing "prices should fall but when my kid is finally on the property ladder prices should increase at a rational rate"
Sweet as - keep twisting my words to suit your opinion.
It is impossible for some to believe that others don't share in their particular greed. That people see houses as things to live in, rather than a ladder to riches or a means to take a slice of others paychecks.
He is good at that
Bang on…so it’s kinda f*^k the people who brought houses over the last couple of years because they aren’t his kids…you know, they’re someone’s kids but not his 🤷🏻♂️😂
Come on, I agree I don’t want to see a stupid increase like we had, 40% rise in a year is dumb as shit…but surely we can use tools to slow growth, DTI’s, more modestly built homes, wages increases and moderate inflation will do the job with patience
everyone else who has worked for 10 years should struggle to get one, except for his kids, they should be able to get 1 easy.
Hahaha yeah exactly what I’m saying rookie.
Or am I suggesting house prices are decoupled from reality currently (unless you are in the MAGA spuiker camp) and they need to come down to a rational level.
By the same token as a so-called DGM I understand that house prices will not decrease once they reach that rational level. At that point ideally, they should start increasing at a rational level related to reality.
But hey ho. You do you champ.
The market is a honey badger, what you want to happen just does not matter.
One of the most prolific traders in the 20th Century, Whenever there is a talk about biggest traders in the world, His name is always seen in the list.
His trading career was extremely volatile to say the least. From being among the richest in the world at one of time to losing it all - His journey is one which every aspiring trade must read. In my opinion, Ideally we should have the attitude to learn from all and not just successful people. I feel one can learn more from people who were once successful and later failed in their lives.
Let’s use this thread to share and study some of his top quotes:
-
There is only one side to the stock market; and it is not the bull side or the bear side, but the right side
-
A man must believe in himself and his judgment if he expects to make a living at this game. That is why I don’t believe in tips.
-
A man must study general conditions, to seize them so as to be able to anticipate probabilities.
-
To anticipate the market is to gamble. To be patient and react only when the market gives the signal is to speculate.
-
Don’t take action with a trade until the market, itself, confirms your opinion. Being a little late in a trade is insurance that your opinion is correct. In other words, don’t be an impatient trader.
-
A prudent speculator never argues with the tape. Markets are never wrong, opinions often are.
-
If I buy stocks on Smith’s tip I must sell those same stocks on Smith’s tip. I am depending on him. Suppose Smith is away on a holiday when the selling time comes around?
-
If you can’t sleep at night because of your stock market position, then you have gone too far. If this is the case, then sell your position down to the sleeping level.
-
The average man doesn’t wish to be told that it is a bull or a bear market. What he desires is to be told specifically which particular stock to buy or sell. He wants to get something for nothing. He does not wish to work. He doesn’t even wish to have to think.
-
He really meant to tell them that the big money was not in the individual fluctuations but in the main movements, that is, not in reading the tape but in sizing up the entire market and its trend.
-
People who look for easy money invariably pay for the privilege of proving conclusively that it cannot be found on this earth.
-
It is foolhardy to make a second trade, if your first trade shows you a loss. Never average losses. Let this thought be written indelibly upon your mind.
-
Nobody can catch all the fluctuations. In a bull market your game is to buy and hold until you believe that the bull market is near its end. To do this you must study general conditions and not tips or special factors affecting individual stocks. Then get out of all your stocks; get out for keeps! You have to use your brains and your vision to do this; otherwise my advice would be as idiotic as to tell you to buy cheap and sell dear. One of the most helpful things that anybody can learn is to give up trying to catch the last eighth-or the first. These two are the most expensive eighths in the world.
-
Remember this: when you are doing nothing, those speculators who feel they must trade day in and day out, are laying the foundation for your next venture. You will reap benefits from their mistakes.
-
It is literally true that millions come easier to a trader after he knows how to trade, than hundreds did in the days of his ignorance.
-
Professional traders have always had some system or other based upon their experience and governed either by their attitude towards speculation or by their desires.
-
I think it was a long step forward in my trading education when I realized at last that when old Mr. Partridge kept on telling other customers, “Well, you know this is a bull market!” he really meant to tell them that the big money was not in the individual fluctuations but in the main movements, that is, not in reading the tape but in sizing up the entire market and its trend.
-
I never hesitate to tell a man that I am bullish or bearish. But I do not tell people to buy or sell any particular stock. In a bear market all stocks go down and in a bull market they go up.
-
After spending many years in Wall Street and after making and losing millions of dollars I want to tell you this: It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting. Got that? My sitting tight!
-
The “lucky” trader is one who minimizes mistakes and, if they do make a mistake, acts to minimize the damage by exiting from the situation quickly. In practice this means having a written plan for each trade you enter, the most important element of which is the stop-loss.
-
“I can’t sleep” answered the nervous one. “Why not?” asked the friend. “I am carrying so much cotton that I can’t sleep thinking about. It is wearing me out. What can I do?” “Sell down to the sleeping point”, answered the friend.
-
Speculation is far too exciting. Most people who speculate hound the brokerage offices… the ticker is always on their minds. They are so engrossed with the minor ups and downs, they miss the big movements.
-
The semi-sucker had read books about trading – usually written by yet higher grade suckers – but he did not realize that reading books was not the same as trading experience. This type of sucker could quote all sorts of wise sayings about the operations of the stock market. He did not lose money as quickly as the beginning sucker because he had learned some of the most rudimentary trading rules
-
A loss never bothers me after I take it. I forget it overnight. But being wrong – not taking the loss – that is what does damage to the pocketbook and to the soul.
-
The market does not beat them. They beat themselves, because though they have brains they cannot sit tight.
-
I did precisely the wrong thing. The cotton showed me a loss and I kept it. The wheat showed me a profit and I sold it out. Of all the speculative blunders there are few greater than trying to average a losing game. Always sell what shows you a loss and keep what shows you a profit.
-
Whenever I have had the patience to wait for the market to arrive at what I call a Pivotal Point before I started to trade; I have always made money in my operations.
-
Losing money is the least of my troubles. A loss never troubles me after I take it. I forget it overnight. But being wrong – not taking the loss – that is what does the damage to the pocket book and to the soul.
-
It is what people actually did in the stock market that counted – not what they said they were going to do.
-
Play the market only when all factors are in your favor. No person can play the market all the time and win. There are times when you should be completely out of the market, for emotional as well as economic reasons.
-
The desire for constant action irrespective of underlying conditions is responsible for many losses on Wall Street even among the professionals, who feel that they must take home some money every day, as though they were working for regular wages.
-
Do not use the words “Bullish” or “Bearish.” These words fix a firm market-direction in the mind for an extended period of time. Instead, use “Upward Trend” and “Downward Trend” when asked the direction you think the market is headed. Simply say: “The line of least resistance is either upward or downward at this time.” Remember, don’t fight the tape!
-
The game of speculation is the most uniformly fascinating game in the world. But it is not a game for the stupid, the mentally lazy, the person of inferior emotional balance, or the get-rich-quick adventurer. They will die poor.
-
He will risk half his fortune in the stock market with less reflection that he devotes to the selection of a medium-priced automobile.
-
The only thing to do when a person is wrong is to be right, by ceasing to be wrong. Cut your losses quickly, without hesitation. Don’t waste time. When a stock moves below a mental-stop, sell it immediately.
-
Emotional control is the most essential factor in playing the market. Never lose control of your emotions when the market moves against you
-
In a narrow market, when prices are not getting anywhere to speak of but move within a narrow range, there is no sense in trying to anticipate what the next big movement is going to be. The thing to do is to watch the market, read the tape to determine the limits of the get nowhere prices, and make up your mind that you will not take an interest until the prices breaks through the limit in either direction.
-
On Pat Hearne – He made money in stocks, and that made people ask him for advice. He would never give any. If they asked him point-blank for his opinion about the wisdom of their commitments he used a favorite race-track maxim of his: “You can’t tell till you bet.”
-
All through time, people have basically acted and reacted the same way in the market as a result of: greed, fear, ignorance, and hope. That is why the numerical formations and patterns recur on a constant basis.
-
Men who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon. I found it one of the hardest things to learn. But it is only after a stock operator has firmly grasped this that he can make big money.
-
Experience has proved to me that real money made in speculating has been in commitments in a stock or commodity showing a profit right from the start.
-
There is a time to go long. There is a time to go short. There is a time to go fishing.
-
I can only rise by knowledge, If I fall it must be by my own blunders.
-
Watch the market leaders, the stocks that have led the charge upward in a bull market. That is where the action is and where the money is to be made. As the leaders go, so goes the entire market. If you cannot make money in the leaders, you are not going to make money in the stock market. Watching the leaders keeps your universe of stocks limited, focused, and more easily controlled.
-
One of the most helpful things that anybody can learn is to give up trying to catch the last eighth – or the first. These two are the most expensive eighths in the world. They have cost stock traders, in the aggregate, enough millions of dollars to build a concrete highway across the continent.
-
I don’t know whether I make myself plain, but I never lose my temper over the stock market. I never argue with the tape. Getting sore at the market doesn’t get you anywhere.
-
Failure to take advantage of a serendipitous act of good luck in the stock market is often a mistake.
-
There is nothing new on Wall Street or in stock speculation. What has happened in the past will happen again, and again, and again. This is because human nature does not change, and it is human emotion, solidly built into human nature, that always gets in the way of human intelligence. Of this I am sure.
-
Instead of hoping he must fear and instead of fearing he must hope. He must fear that his loss may develop into a much bigger loss, and hope that his profit may become a big profit.
-
Don’t get too confident over your wins or too despondent over your losses.
From Jesse Livermore, never heard of him, good quotes BTW
Some really good rules in there....
Jesse Livermore. This is literally my Bible. Stick to those rules and you will make millions. Ignore them and you will lose millions. What is really strange though is how often one breaks those rules, even knowing how stupid that is, because psychologically we are programmed to think "this time is different". Another reason why the study of Behavioural Finance is so important if you want to be rich.
No, prices change at the margin. Econ 101
Notable that Hastings district has just overtaken Hamilton city for average value. I know Havelock North is constantly adding medium-higher end builds, and Frimley is also expanding, but is there a lot of "affordable" housing being built in Hamilton?
Hastings has 30 percent >1m (120/400) Hamilton has 24 percent >1m (264/1090)
Hamilton has a high proportion of units and terrace to suit rentals for the student market I suspect
The majority of new houses being built in Hamilton are townhouses or duplexes I would say. Most of the bigger builds tend to be just outside the city boundary (in the Waipa region, though just 10-15 min drive to Hamilton).
Correct me if I'm wrong (I'm sure many will) but I find CV's an issue here. Agents always say to ignore them, but the first thing we do when house hunting is look at CV's.. Most were historically 30+% lower three years ago, and seem to dictate the asking prices. Why do we even have it? Is NZ the only country burdened with this irksome reference?
its how rates are set.
Yes but also, perhaps inadvertently, how house prices are set or expected to be at.
People misunderstand how they are used, or how to use them.
They are a valuation at a specific time to allow the council to make rates apportionments between properties. That's all.
At this point in time, they would represent the market value but as they take a few extra months to come out, they are still slightly less accurate than if you got an immediate valuation.
But what they can be used for from that point on is a ratio of what today's price might be based on that CV.
Eg the CV is $1,000,000 and prices have dropped 10% since then, then the present value would be $900,000. IE you can use it as an estimated price without getting an appraisal or current valuation.
There used to be a table that showed what this is.
Hello vendors, when will you'll come out of hibernation? The reality is that the market will continue to be frozen..
The NZ Housing market crash speeds up on its run South.
This sucker is going down.
Buyers should offer only the previous 2012- 2015 price range or walk.
We already see some recent sales, at around 2018 prices.
This market is but Mid-crash.
Negative equity should not be your future.
Don't be the Bankers and Overprced Vendors, Useful Idiot.
Massive discount or walk.
There is stock galore.
??Prices are down 14 percent from peak according to QV??
Maybe NZ Average but AKL and WGTN are down by way more, apart from Riverhead.
QV like to cherry pick, REINZ out soon and if QV is down with falls accelerating REINZ is going to be epic.
If you look at wage-adjusted house prices and a rough mortgage affordability index (wage adjusted house price index x interest rate), it is pretty clear that we are going to continue to see an adjustment. Here's a simple graph to illustrate.
So which of the following three variables moves to get us back to historic trend, and by how much does each move?
- House prices
- Interest rates
- Wages (ability to service debt)
For example, could we see wages up 5%, house prices down 20% and OCR down to 3%. Or will RBNZ crashing rates in late 2024 do all the work?
Maybe I'm missing something but in that chart mortgage costs went up between 2002 and 2008 and so did house prices. Then mortage costs dropped dramatically but prices stayed levelish. So there's only a correlation from 2016 onwards. 🤔
Yes, in the loony tunes period pre-GFC, the overnight cash rate rose from 5% to 8% (pushing mortgage costs up) but house prices still continued to rise. Households, landlords and businesses kept on leveraging - pushing private debt levels up from 110% of GDP in 2004 to 160% in 2009. This position was completely unsustainable - interest payments on private debt hit about 15% of GDP. The economy collapsed. Note that private debt levels have stayed around 150% of GDP since.
My point is that the collapse in 2009 put mortgage costs relative to wages back in the same range they had been pre-2004 (the green shaded area on the graph). House prices didn't really collapse relative to wages though, it was a crash in interest rates that did the adjusting. From 2009 to 2020 mortgage costs relative to wages were pretty steady - with interest rates edging lower over that period (enabling house prices relative to wages to go up). Then in 2020, RBNZ dropped interest rates and reduced mortgage costs to unprecedented low levels. House prices responded immediately - reaching for the sky.
Then in 2022, when rates were hiked aggressively, mortgage costs broke above the trend and everything started to get wobbly. House prices relative to wages reduced sharply. The question now is will we see mortgage costs back in normal ranges as a result of a collapse in (a) house prices or (b) interest rates - or some combo of the two?
"The market can stay irrational longer than you can remain solvent" - John Maynard Keynes
Don’t forget about animal spirits in these type of events also - you are data driven in your analysis which is great but most humans are not. They are driven by emotion - so if prices really start falling and peak greed goes to peak fear then prices could fall much further than what any data would suggest as people flee to the exits simultaneously.
As I’ve stated on here numerous times before, asset price falls could accelerate as rates are dropped for a period of 12-24 months as we try to turn the economy and animal spirits around.
Fair. Although the idea that animal spirits will encourage everyone to sell their house during a crash might be a stretch!
I'm not suggesting 'everyone'. Market pricing is derived by the actions of the marginal buyer and marginal seller. We had excess marginal buyers on the way up during house price euphoria. It is quite possible we see the reverse if a negative feedback loop develops over the next 12-24 months.
Yield curves are still inverted so if history is anything to go by, we should see peak market pessimism in the 12-24 months after the yield curve normalises. That will be the time to step in and buy if I were a FHB.
In terms of animal spirits, I would suggest the book by Shiller and Akerlof if you want to explore this subject and look beyond raw data and more the way collective human emotions can influence markets/economies (ie we all tend to lose the plot simultaenously, and we tend to return to rationality simultanously - because humans like to think like one another for safety reasons/herding mentality).
I read this book post GFC to better understand what happened in the US while I was living there as it was difficult to comprehend to boom and crash at the time while living through it:
https://www.amazon.com.au/Animal-Spirits-Psychology-Economy-Capitalism/…
In this book, acclaimed economists George Akerlof and Robert Shiller challenge the economic wisdom that got us into this mess, and put forward a bold new vision that will transform economics and restore prosperity. Akerlof and Shiller reassert the necessity of an active government role in economic policymaking by recovering the idea of animal spirits, a term John Maynard Keynes used to describe the gloom and despondence that led to the Great Depression and the changing psychology that accompanied recovery. Like Keynes, Akerlof and Shiller know that managing these animal spirits requires the steady hand of government - simply allowing markets to work won't do it.
Of note we've had government followed by government that have used animal spirits to feed into the collective boom psychology of our housing market (i.e. high house prices are good, we won't allow house prices to fall, its a good problem to have etc, rockstar economy). This isn't prudent management of the economy in my opinion. It only creates an excessive boom which is almost always followed by a bust of equivalent intensity to the boom. We should have had governments repeatedly warning people to avoid taking on too much housing debt over the past 10 years - instead they played along with the FOMO for the short term economic benefits of debt expansion (a fatal long term error if the debt growth rate is much higher than productivity growth that will be use to pay off that debt in the future).
Sorry, I was teasing. I'm a big fan of Keynes and have listened to Shiller quite a bit (podcasts), but not yet read his books. I'll put it on my holiday list.
Yes I thought you might have been but needed to be clear. I've read a few of Shiller's books (Irrational Exuberance, Phishing for Fools, Animal Spirits, Narrative Economics) so a lot of my views are based upon his analysis of pricing assets and the influence of market psychology (so a combination of both cash flow analysis as well as collective hysteria of groups).
Likewise, the field of Behavioural Economics/Finance is now taught as standard economic theory. Anyone in the share market knows that Behaviour Finance is what rules, and the Efficient Market Theory is a load of bollocks. The housing market is the same, just much slower to respond. But all humans are the same emotional creatures, hence all markets where humans trade are the same.
You can take the Duke University Behavioural Finance course online for free at Coursera. Highly recommend it.
Indeed, the first leg down from peak, followed by a dead cat bounce (now admittedly titled by MSM) is only the opening act of a price bubble crash. Once fear sets in the capitulation phase can quickly take hold. This is where the real price correction happens.
The crash doesn’t require everyone to sell at once, it just requires an increase in distressed sellers. We’re already seeing this as the NZ economy grinds to a halt - the increase in distressed sellers is happening now while at the same time we’re seeing a decrease in potential buyers.
Yes it is quite possible we see a lot of boomers downsizing over the coming years (ie selling a lot of 3-4 bedroom homes) while over indebted millennials struggle to pay mortgages and hold onto their jobs/incomes with potentially sticky inflation.
As i've pointed out, on my current street there are around 12 homes and 80% are widowed women (70+) in 3-4 bedroom homes, all of which need to sell in the next 5-10 years. We are going to need a lot of immigration to have buyers for all these homes or a big transition from people renting into people owning.
I_O - an observation, and a question....
If we have an ever growing population of 70+ widows needing to downsize from a 3-4-5 bedroom homes (presumably into something much smaller) but more probably into a "rest home" situation - where do the likes of Ryman / Summerset etc stand with having HUGE property portfolios (essentially) that are currently massively over-priced?
Are companies that are deep into retirement homes / villages / communities likely to adjust their entry fees / costs to buy downwards as a result of the lost equity evident in their customers? Sounds like a massive problem in profitability for them, and a worse situation for their potential customers if they don't adjust accordingly...
Last look Ryman share price is down around 70% which could give you some indication of what may lie ahead.
https://nz.finance.yahoo.com/quote/RYM.NZ/
The problem with the above comment about adjusting down their entry fees/costs to buy is that the debt associated to the construction of those assets still exists on the balance sheet of these companies so their debt to equity ratios could quickly blowout from what looked reasonable to what could look quite terrible. i.e. who would want to lend more debt to these companies with deteriorating financials? And if their cash flows aren't increasing to cover higher interest expense on high debt levels, how long do they remain solvent in the eyes of debt/equity holders? And if they need to increase their fee's, how is that going to impact our older generations who need even more $ to be able to afford retirement - at the same time when their nest egg (their home they are planning on selling to fund their retirement) is falling in value?
I'd suspect rates, insurances and power will see them moving earlier. Heating a a home 24/7 is not cheap.
Yes, all those about to retire baby boomers will start to panic when they see their retirement savings start to evaporate and will rush to cash up while they still can achieve the retirement lifestyle they aspire to.
I do not see wages going up much next few years, see OCR falling but not to 3%, so most of the movement will be house prices.
Re the OCR, if the first move is a surprise it will likely be only 25bps, if well signaled could be 50. Your 3% would require 10 x 25bps cuts, although likely their would be a few 50s early on.
Food prices globally are not going to fall, there is too many concerns about food security, I think its going to be to be tough to keep CPI inside 3%.
I see no relief until budget 2025, I am glad NACT cut things here, as anything inflationary would have been real bad, but by 25 we are going to need some vision and targeted spend to get things moving.
Global food prices are interesting - they are 20% above the steady level we had between 2015 and 2021 having spiked in 2022/23. However, global food index is back at 2010 to 2014 prices. Just one of the many reminders that our quality of living increases between 2009 and 2021 were built on cheap imported energy, offshore improvements in productivity, and bank credit flowing into our economy at around 8% of GDP per year (net).
I see no relief until budget 2025, I am glad NACT cut things here, as anything inflationary would have been real bad, but by 25 we are going to need some vision and targeted spend to get things moving.
National will spend more than they are letting on, and they know it. If jfoe is right in the numbers above, that's what it would take to get private debt growth to start pumping again. If that's not happening until mid to late 2025, then there is a whole lot of juice leaking out of the economy which needs to be plugged by something, and that something is a fiscal deficit, and it will continue.
Yep. Govt and Treasury might think they are able to turn off the spending tap, but that is not how an economy works. Spending on welfare, crime, health etc will all fly up as things turn to custard - and the tax take will reduce at the same time. Remember, when the UK coalition Govt came into power in 2010, they promised to crush the deficit. They made wide-ranging spending cuts, tanked the economy, and the UK Govt deficit has gone up and up ever since.
Yes it looks to me as if we are cutting spending when we should be increasing it (now) and were spending far too much when we should have been cutting (in the 2021/2022) when inflation was too high.
The problem is we increased debt from $65,000 to $115,000 per pesron in 2018-2022. Interest rates on this debt are now double so we have to unwind this situation. The only way to do this is to cut spending or raise taxes. Raising taxes will choke the economy so that only leaves cutting spending. There is no way out without a hard recession IMHO.
Hard recessions force Govt to spend much more than they tax! Now, tell me, does that increase or reduce the Govt debt?!?
What about a significant drop in private debt/gdp, replaced by a large jump in public debt/gdp?
The only three economic ways out of this are:
- More private debts.
- More government deficits.
- Stop buying crap from overseas.
Cutting govt spending or aggregate increases to tax will lop the head off the economy we're currently choosing to choke.
The right amount of money in the right pockets will solve this predicament, as jfoe says in a comment above: appropriate tax and more government spending. Private debt is tapped out.
I am glad NACT cut things here
Some of the Govt spending cuts were inflationary.
Significant wage growth will cause price inflation which will prevent a rates drop so 2 and 3 are mutually exclusive and I’d pick neither.
Price drops, although I’d love them, are going to be severely impacted by replacement cost which is just horrendous. So much of a build is labour rates are that is still coming through
We really are in a pickle.
My guess is a that with reduced employment a lot of people leave and then house prices can drop without the replacement value support. This would be over the next 3 to 5 years.
replacement cost will be negated by land price drops.
Love the smell of equity vapor in the morning. One spark and 🔥 🔥 🔥.
"Love the smell of equity vapor in the morning"
I understand the sentiment towards those who speculated on tax free capital gains using high amounts of leverage, using deposit recycling techniques who were extremely aggressive in building a portfolio of residential dwellings.
Unfortunately a lot of the collateral damage will be owner occupiers and business owners who borrowed too much for current interest rate levels and caught out in a recession as they didn't plan for those conditions. There will be cashflow stress and also mental stress of losing their home, their entire net worth / life's savings (or more) and their future financial security. If you know someone under those conditions, remember to check in on them as some may start thinking about self harm. You may be in a position to help them get through these challenging times. Get them professional help if necessary. There is light on the other side. There are real people, entire families affected here.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/521593/business-owners-caught-up-in…
CN refreshing to see someone on here considering the personal effects on a lot of everyday people. I couldn’t agree more with my lack of empathy for those who tried to make a quick buck but a fair few out there did what they were advised to do by brokers or their bank and I am gutted for them and what they must be going through.
"a fair few out there did what they were advised to do by brokers or their bank"
There are huge conflicts of interest that many owner occupier buyers are unaware of. Unfortunately many owner occupier buyers placed their trust in these self labeled "advisors" who were operating in their own financial self interest.
A number of commenters here were warning about the high house price risks, so that owner occupier buyers became more aware of the house price risks to make a more fully informed purchase decision and avoid getting themselves into a vulnerable situation. There was very little mention of house price risks due to huge financial self interests involved. The few warnings by knowledgable insiders were drowned out by the property promoters motivated by their financial self interests. This was certainly my motivation - to provide a counter point to the narrative by those with their self serving interests, especially having seen collateral damage from other residential property bubbles so thst people could avoid similar situations.
Many of those giving warnings faced vitriol (such as negative labels, name calling, etc) from the property promoters with their vested financial self interests. Those with their financial self interests were unable to refute the reasoning, so resorted to attempts to discredit those giving warnings with name calling.
Many tried to warn about the huge conflicts of interest by property promoters, and mortgage brokers. It is understandable that those who experienced so much vitriol now feel vindicated.
People were free to choose to ignore those warnings and are now facing the undesirable consequences of their earlier decision to purchase which includes financial stress and mental stress.
Where to from here for:
1) potential owner occupier buyers? Caveat emptor
2) owner occupiers who are in cashflow stress and mental stress? - talk to your lender to see what options are available. For those in mental stress, talk to family, friends support networks and if necessary talk to counselling and helpline services.
Well said CN, but Avergeman doesn't care. All that matters to him is that others are suffering whilst he is not (yet).
Thanks CN for your accurate assessment of the situation and your empathy for those struggling. We need more like you on this website. It is very telling that you have only 10 up votes, whereas those smirking and calling "popcorn" have 20-50 up votes.
CN is my memory correct in that you have a property blog? I know someone who posts on this forum does. I wondered if you could do a post and also occasionally post the info here in a similar fashion to your post above made at 10.52am with a list of things people could do who might find themselves in mental distress because of financial stress. Many people may not want to/or find it hard to ask for help and the collective brains on this forum should be able to make a lot of good suggestions on ideas for people feeling like they're going under, obviously the getting professional help being one that should always be included. I suggest this because this is how financially naive I was up until a few years ago - I didn't know there was such a thing as an interest only loan (and I am not young). I had only ever known people who bought investment property with a cash deposit and the rent covered the expenses (the good old days). Interest only if available could be a life saver for some. Anyway, just an idea as property and wellbeing is obviously an interest of yours.
"a list of things people could do who might find themselves in mental distress because of financial stress"
That list should come from mental health professionals.
You're right, my words weren't chosen well. Mental distress is the realm of mental health professionals. I should have said financial stress which if not addressed could develop into mental distress. I was thinking practical suggestions like some of the following:
You mentioned above talking to your lender which could mean going interest only or extending the term of the loan.
Could family members help? For example, could you get part of an inheritance in advance from parents or grandparents etc?
Many parents have done well from property and recognise how much easier it was for them, they may be more than willing to help out financially, it's worth asking. I know parents who are in awe of their children and their achievements and would like to feel they can still help out and if with $, all good, many don't need as much as they have. There's also the option of parents taking a share of the property if that's what people feel more comfortable with.
Can you WFH to help save travel and some childcare costs? Go from two cars to one? Commute to work with others and pay a share of the petrol?
Could you benefit from talking to a budget advisor?
I know people who have been helped financially by members of their church, can friends, extended family help?
Can you rent a long held rental owned by someone in your family at a reduced rate and rent your property out and top up the mortgage (as long as it's financially doable).
Upsticks, sell and move somewhere cheaper, I thought this was a good story about a family who moved from Auckland to Balclutha. They went from renting to owning but people can go from owning somewhere expensive to owning somewhere cheaper:
Can you move back in with family, go flatting as a couple (not ideal with children) and rent your property out?
Not sure how practical this one actually is, but I read about a family that lived in a tourist location and rented their home on AirBnB in the weekends and during peak holiday times. They packed up the kids and a tent and went camping in summer or stayed with relatives at other times and this helped them cover their mortgage.
Auckland would be a lot worse if it wasn't for Riverheads outstanding upwards trajectory...
Visited Auckland weekend just gone ... very over populated ... quality of life seems fake too me... parks and reserves well beaten and battered ...car parking at premium rates... streets clogged with vehicles...high density builds wont look so grand when time takes its toll.... certainly is the big smoke ....saw homeless living in cardboard down viaduct,beggars at bottom of bullock track and at mcdonalds drive thrus...your smashing it Auckland....lol
Don't worry...the govt has a plan. It's called mass immigration.
At dear old Bishop wants to double the population of Auckland..seriously what is he smoking?
(Apparently he is doing good work)
Awkland is bursting. It cannot take another million. The infrastructure is simply not there and what is, is groaning under the load of the last half million arriving. Schools, health care, transport, housing, all massively under spec for current loads.
And we haven't even talked about the lack of electoral mandate to have the last million arrive, let alone more.
Just stop it.
The only way to change that is for NZ First to become the majority party. At least their coming in legally. Image the disgust in the US when millions of "boat people" just arrive at will, and then given a notice to appear in six or seven years to determine if you ever had proper grounds to claim Asylum. I predict the party pushing that policy will be gone the next election.
And what’s the relevance? He’s doing incredible work.
A well-earned 0 upvotes.
I'm an Aucklander, quality of life is pretty great. Loads of beaches to walk around, super easy to play sports (loads of golf courses, tennis courts, parks etc.). Heaps of cafes, bars and restaurants, loads of gigs. Great to be a young(ish) Aucklander.
Oh and house prices coming down as well, what a bonus!
To be honest I feel the same way, whilst also agreeing with a lot of the negative sentiment. Auckland is a nice enough place to be if you have a lot of money, but that’s not the way it should be.
Yea agreed.
It just irks me a bit when people talk about e.g. how terrible the public transport is in Auckland compared to say New York. Try being a tennis player in New York.
I think Aucklanders sometimes don't know how lucky we are with the level of amenity we have.
I'd live in AKL if they had more functional public transport, as I've been ruined from living overseas for a while and experiencing what they have to offer. Living in a smaller city has it's compromise too in terms of transport however, but less of the big city problems.
I agree. As an ex Aucklander, I'd go back to live in a heartbeat only if I am earning well into the 6 figure salary.
For me now, except for the weather in summer, Brisbane is a much better alternative than Auckland !
Hey! You’re talking about the world’s 10th most liveable city here. Tied with the might of Osaka, Japan. Having gone to a few events in the CBD late at night over the last couple of years, I’ll take Osaka thanks.
I dunno man, looks prohibitively expensive to play golf in Osaka. I'd take Auckland I think.
I lived 25 years in Auckland building a career. In the late 90’s through to around 2015 it was great but then came the mass migration to Auckland which didn’t have the infrastructure in place to cope.
Moved away 3 years ago, the traffic, wet damp climate and rampant crime being the main reasons.
Depends where and how you live. If you don't have to go near the motorways during the week, it's a great place to live. beggars and homeless - give me a break.
Pt Chev mcdonalds 10am 6/7 beggar at drive thru ...10.40am 6/7 person sleeping in cardboard box in plain view on the traffic island across from where the tepid baths viaduct is.. 1.20pm 6/7 person approaching cars queued up on bullock track /grt north rd.... give me a break....
I live 10km from work and commute on the motorway every day. It takes 25 min on average, honestly no complaints. I've always intentionally lived closeish to work.
Maybe I've just figured out how to live in Auckland better than anyone else? Honestly it seems like it reading these comments.
That's the wealth talking. No one lives 10km from work & can choose where to live if they are poor. I know of many families in Auckland homeless because there is no where to rent within 25km of their work... and they have been looking for over a year.
Nah, I'm just young(ish) and until recently I could choose to rent a room and live with friends anywhere in Auckland for <$250 a week. Granted I'm not flatting anymore.
Anywhere above $100 a week for rent and you have a higher income then most impoverished. Granted it is how the other half lives that least concerns people. For many, things like a single space in a garage and a visit to a GP is too expensive. Hence our ever expanding housing waitlists, public housing need and motel emergency accommodation that often is overcrowded and without any cooking facilities. Sadly that is a significant percentage of the population still and even wealthy retirees can get access to a lot of social housing support through the govt and councils with priority over all other socioeconomic groups. But getting housing close to within 20km of work... that is a pipe dream... well at least the dream helps with the trauma.
If you can also access PT to travel for work that is also something denied to much of the population still. Even Aus research highlighted how only around 50% could regularly access PT at all if their work allowed for it.
Where do you live Phalanax ?
Mount Maunganui ..... lived in Auckland Robbies reign and beyond .... Westmere.....Mount Eden ....Waitakere...when Tim Shadbolt towed a mixer.... Tauranga's a terrible place to live Auckland folk are better off staying in Auckland ... lol ... Ive also lived in the Wairarapa and South (Lawrence and others) and further north than Auckland (Bay of Islands) and Kaiwaka , Dargaville ....NZ is the best country in the world .... Im a lost Oamaruvian ... lol.... Aucklanders need to enjoy this great land and free their souls from the concrete jungle that they adore.
Wingman made a very good point yesterday. According to OneWoof, Riverhead is up from $1.4m to $2.87m in the last 3 years. Absolutely stellar gains. Here I'll even prove it to you full 2024 sales data:
A property sold for $4.23m (14% above 2021 RV) and one sold for $1.51m ($35k below 2021 RV). ($4.23m + $1.51m) / 2 = $2.87m
You forgot West Harbour.....
Welcome to the latest property news from Barfoot & Thompson West Harbour and Hobsonville branches!
The arrival of winter had no impact on the Auckland housing market in June with sales prices edging higher than those in May.
“From a price perspective, June’s trading was positive with the median price at $1,020,000 hovering around where it has been for the previous three months,” said Barfoot & Thompson Director, Stephen Barfoot.
“Compared to the median price for June last year, it was 2.5 percent higher.
“The average sales price was more robust, edging up 4.5 percent over that for May to $1,236,336, which is 12.6 percent ahead of where it was this time last year."
Oh the poetry!
The news just gets better…………………….for first home buyers and those who are getting close to being first home buyers.
I bet you're glad you're not an agent anymore, so few sales, many agents are taking a big hit.
Never an agent Yvil. I didn’t go to university to waste my time doing that. At one stage in my youth when I was particularly lazy school wise my late father said to my brothers I was so lazy I would have to resort to being a RE agent, an insurance agent or a bank manager. Obviously he did not rate such occupations as being respectable ones. Luckily I worked a lot harder at uni.
You named yourself "Ex Agent". Why do you try to mislead people ?
This example is a classic. Had a price on it yesterday of $4.5m which is what they paid for it in 2021.
https://homes.co.nz/address/auckland/ponsonby/13-tole-street/pNxAa
If the roof looks that rough in the glamorous photos, what's it like IRL?
This is one of Ponsonby's top properties. Its modern living for a villa, its north facing, its livable, in a supper quiet street.
This is LOCATION, LOCATION,LOCATION and the tagline is
Disregard CV- Will be sold.
I think it will go around $3.8mil lets see.
Some rugby players will buy it and there goes the quiet neighbourhood!
Its got T20 player written all over it......
Wait so they brought 407 m2 of an old property at an exceptionally overinflated value compared to last sale ($ and date), during a period of heightened speculation with lots of free bank capital being gifted, did nothing to the property and expect a profit after a couple of years... Do they know what due diligence is and how market values work? The price they paid for it in 2021 is the massive indicator. They did not buy for a value increase in a short period. They put down a huge amount above the value and then want to sell in less then a few years. Even the bad speculators are not that silly.
I know the area well. $4.5 Mill sounds too expensive. It's a nice reno yes, but it's still sitting on only 400m2 of land. It was sold in 2014 for $1.8 Mill.
House prices are way to high compared to average wages, the crash will continue especially in Auckland where you need four people on average wage and a large deposit to be able to purchase a average house. This is after the already 20% crash form highs every day more people go deeper into negative equity
"House prices are way to high compared to average wages, the crash will continue especially in Auckland where you need four people on average wage and a large deposit to be able to purchase a average house. "
It was interesting to watch how house prices managed to reach such unaffordable price levels in Auckland. Previously residential houses were affordable on a single median income household with one parent being the carer of children (& without the bank of mum and dad) to requiring more than 2 median incomes (and requiring the bank of mum and dad)
House buyers were then required to combine multiple median incomes, multi-generational median incomes to be able to purchase high house prices relative to incomes in Auckland.
In an environment of rapidly rising prices, owner occupiers with underleveraged property were encouraged by property promoters to "release equity" (i.e borrow against their home) to use as a deposit to purchase a non owner occupied property - in effect 100% financed by debt. Property investor calculations were using 100% debt financing in their calculations. This resulted in many outbidding owner occupier buyers. As prices continued rising, there was more equity to release, leading further house price rises and even more equity to be released. Then there were the land bankers, and those who built additional dwellings on the back section. Then the town house developers outbid these buyers to build 3-8 townhouses on the site of where the typical 3 bedroom house on a large section.
At some point house prices become entirely unsustainable.
This led to higher number of potential owner occupiers buyers now unable to afford to buy and rent in the private market. This led to increases in rents where lower income families required the accommodation supplement.
Those unable to afford to rent in the private rental market increased in large numbers so that there was a shortage of social housing and waiting lists for social housing increased. There were so many on waiting lists for social housing that many needed to be housed in motels paid for by the government.
This led to other unintended social consequences.
https://www.oneroof.co.nz/news/revealed-the-surprising-odds-of-homeowne…
Even this article about the possibility of house prices drops undercooks the risk. It looks like they have used nominal prices and they are saying that if the house prices goes up $1 in nominal terms over 10 years it has increased in value ... Spruikers gotta spruik.
Great article, thanks for the link.
In the spirit of "Experience is the best teacher", the RBNZ would be ill-advised to stop the lesson simply because the pupils don't like what they are being taught.
Interesting to note the South Island including happy Christchurch is holding up nicely.
Now is the time to be buying as nothing surer, prices will increase in the Spring and interest rates start dropping!
Yes beat that wave of hibernating buyers who’ll emerge during the next 20 - 30 percent slide.
Yeah I wonder about Christchurch prices. We've certainly held up well compared to the rest of the country after playing catch up, and seem to be a popular place to move to. But when I go for my bike rides out towards Halswell/Tai Tapu, there's new houses being put up all over the place. And around me in Spreydon, there's single houses constantly being turned into 4-5 townhouses. I wonder how long prices hold up for?
Yes Christchurch has always been the poor cousin. Its house values reflect its low population which in turn reflects its lack of popularity. Regional cities in the North Island have higher house values than Christchurch.
Chch has the second biggest population in NZ and the happiest city in NZ.
It is also the most modern as well and the most opportunities to get ahead financially.
Auckland is not a very nice City now, despite what people that live there say, but not worth debating that.
The skinheads, they moved down to Timaru but only matter of time before they come home again!
Personally dont think the skinheads were a problem in ChCh that you keep going on about!
Far too busy making millions to be worried about something that was not an issue!
It is not as if there is no crime in Auckland, ram raids, murders etc. and a far more dangerous city than ChCh.
Hopefully. We dont want the Mongrel Mob and Black Power moving in. If you cant count on the police and courts to do anything about gang crime you can only rely on the rival gangs doing the job.
Regional cities in the North Island have a lower population than Christchurch, you may need to rethink your logic here.
I did not say that. I was talking about house prices in Christchurch being lower which is a reflection of where it is, the weather, the quakes and the the far right residents.
You don't see the non-sequitur?
"Its house values reflect its low population which in turn reflects its lack of popularity. Regional cities in the North Island have higher house values than Christchurch."
House prices are cheap because of the low population, but smaller cities have more expensive houses?
By the way, the weather is great. Another bluebird winter day today.
Yup, its just gone 4.30pm and I've just turned the heat pump on. No MDRS rubbish allowed in Christchurch, we value our sunlight in winter.
House prices are lower in Christchurch because the Greater Christchurch area is swamped with vacant land for building on - people move out of Christchurch to build in Rolleston, Lincoln, Prebbleton, Kaiapoi and Rangiora. The population of those areas should be included in the calculation of Christchurch's population. In fact, for the relief of Christchurch City Council ratepayers we need to amalgamate those areas into a Super City like Auckland did. I'm tired of CCC ratepayers paying for everything while Selwyn and Waimak ratepayers get to use the same facilities for free.
ChCh prices will hold up well, as it is the most stable market to be in.
Yes it is very popular with so much going on now.
Yes I believe that the dog box apartments are overdone and they will come to a grind as people will find that there is no capital gain on them and they are too small.
ChCh prices will hold up well, as it is the most stable market to be in.
Funny I never thought of earthquakes and liquefaction as providing stability...
You can make as much fun out of ChCh as you like, it is known as the happiest city in ChCh for a reason!
Millions have been made by property investors/speculators that just could not be made in other parts of NZ .
40% annual returns are very possible without stress.
"Funny I never thought of earthquakes and liquefaction as providing stability..."
You're a classy guy Agnostium, NOT.
It does seem to be turning negative slowly, as the previous quarterly changes were positive (even Queenstown is now starting to turn). The city is obviously more affordably priced, and that will make it more resilient to pricing downturns. But, I suspect, there are other factors at play. Collectively, the city tends to lag behind forces already at play elsewhere, so we could also see prices head south in the next few months.
There could also be a psychological element to it, as there is a strong belief in the stability of the status quo/ suspicion of change in the collective mindset that may be bolstering prices. Obviously, if the underlying factors are calling for a correction to happen, it will happen. But, the 'head in sand' tendency of the city's culture may be delaying it. Time will tell...
There are four townhouse developments on the street one over from me. The first is completed and still has one unit for sale (out of 6). The second across the road from the first has 5 out of 6 units available for sale. Both developments have dropped their prices since first advertising the units. The third development is about to complete, and the fourth is still in build stage. Meanwhile a nice three bedroom renovated house on a proper section on my street is going for about $60k more than the price of the townhouses.
I have popcorn.
Is that a copy and paste from July 2023?
I just looked at a few (including ours) on Homes.co. What downturn? 😆🤣⬇️
The 'downturn' this article is referring to is average price per dwelling being massacred by high density houses/townhouses being built and sold.
A housing market investor calculation. Time for the vendors to realize that this is the reality
1 price of property $ 800k
2 cost of capital $800k x 7% = 56k per annum
3 max rental income $700 per week $36k per annum
4 Government is saying they want the market to fall another 16% or 128k
So to buy this property you will lose at least 148k in the first year and 20k per year while interest rates are at current levels assuming the 16% drop happens in the next 12 months
And in this calculation I haven't included maintenance management fees, insurance, tennant risk, vacancy etc.
In a falling market. This property cannot be priced other than someone taking a punt or owner occupying at around 500k. Reality.. money in the bank.. is lousy but way better than the property market.
As the Comb says....
Investors are not active in the Market
Tony the Comb! Always good for a laugh. He takes himself so seriously.
He reminds me of the Tony Robbins style hype infomercials, everytime I hear him on the radio.
I wonder how much of this drop how higher end house being discounted at more than the average discount,
or that 1% (ish) drop across the board.
I guess another question is was the average sale price above or below the average house price?
The stuff at the bottom of the market tends to have more potential buyers... crap is crap though.
In past corrections good family homes in the middle just went off market. IE not listed, this is very different feel, lots of listings, although 30% are being withdrawn due to no offers at the wasting everyone's time levels.
I think the biggest bargains will be the older houses on 800 m sq, if held buy a developer , they may well be eventually sold. No one wants to live in these cold old damp houses with shower curtains... but we are still no where near that point yet.
So it would make sense they would have more bargaining power and likely less debt, so they aren't forced to sell?
And higher value house could have less buyer, more debt and more chance of having to take a loss?
Christchurch seems to be the opposite - higher end homes are scarce and are selling for a premium above CV. Meanwhile the market is awash in 2 bedroom townhouses that are not selling and are now having to price discount. The stuff in the middle is more variable - nice places in good school zones sell, places that need work or in poor locations are sitting.
I see you found the jar of copium. Did TTP, or was it Mr. Riverhead, leave it at the Property Investors AA meeting?
You should have taken heed of the posters on this site in early/mid 2022, which is when I called the crash and expected it to be a 5 to 10 yr correction/stagnation.
Which crystal ball do you possess?
does that actually answer the question? if not why bother answering it?
I think anyone would be silly to take advice from someone like you here, whether you are right or not.
Haha wowee the ego on this fella is awesome…”taken heed” love it 👏😂
Well National Party (Coalition) is only 7 months young, still 29 months to go and plenty of time to shape the country.. You voted what you wish for.
Yawn, you guys know that all its going to take is a small drop in the OCR to have the market pumping by summer right ?
I think that's what most economists are forecasting,
I was talking my boss who said with lending being expensive, business have plans (if they can afford it) to make "moves" once interest rates drop, in investing in capital.
As soon as they get wind (some confidence) I'm sure there will be a big group of people making moves.
Id say this exists in residential housing too.
For a potential buyer, the drop in OCR and holding a steady job is mutually exclusive!
My perception is that people are assuming that we will experience another COVID boom when interest rates start falling ie that is that unemployment won’t rise and we will have extreme fiscal/monetary policy to protect the economy and pump asset prices once more.
If this is true, I would get ready for 10% interest rates down track as inflation goes back up above 5% again, and even lower asset prices in real inflation adjusted terms (if not nominal as well).
I doubt it would last long (and it would just be another draw down of our most capable buyers) but hypothetically if things did go back to normal after after a small OCR drop, then we have found our neutral rate and no further cuts would be needed.
Seems unlikely. Prices are unsustainably above wages. Reversion to the mean has begun. It’ll be difficult to arrest.
I would also wonder how many people sold in the peak are waiting for a sign to come back?
I assume a drop in the OCR would be a sign.
Rookie, I suggest you start learning from the very experienced people who have been here for a while.
You seem very much exposed to the Housing market and require the Housing Ponzi, which is now deflating more rapidly, to start reinflating again......
- Your wish, is akin, to building a sandcastle at the waterline, at 1/2 incoming tide. You're hoping to protect it against forces that you simply cannot assail or counter.
If your Overleveraged, Delever now.
We would need retail mortgage rates well below 4.5%, to arrest this once in a generation, Housing crash. Very simple.
Until then it's hardhats and deleveraging time, or go down with the ship.
- We all have choices now, take them, before choices are made for you!
I mean it seems quite obvious that is happening to some level.
Gecko is probably 1 of them, hoping to make big gains at the expense of others.
You are making a lot of assumptions in your statement and you're starting to sound like a broken record,
and the last person anyone should take advice from.
take some advice from me, change your name to NZsheep, it fits you better.
- We all have choices now, take them, before the BANKS MAKE CHOICES for you!
- We all have choices now, take them, before choices are made for you
History says house prices start rising at the END of an interest rate cut cycle, not at the beginning. After all, why rush to buy when both prices and mortgages will be cheaper in six months time? You buy when you think both are not going to get any cheaper not when you know that they will. Buyers can sit on their hands longer than sellers can remain solvent in a recession.
Yep that's Fair,
but as FHB, how long are you willing to wait before you get pushed aside again?
I don't how good FHB are at timing the market?
Unless you were desperate to move, a FHB is better off renting at present, saving the difference between what they pay in rent and what they would pay on a mortgage, in order to have a larger deposit and less debt when they eventually buy. The delay will better set them up financially for life.
And when should they buy?
It's quite frustrating as a buyer at the moment - we sold in March and looking for a step up from our first home but sellers are not prepared to meet the market
We're renting in the meantime, waiting to find a place with a seller not in la la land
Best buys are likely to be from vendors who have owned for many years and houses that need a bit of a tidy up.
Translation. You sold in March hoping the market would crash. What makes you think the market was not in la la land back in March, only a few months ago ? Pays not to listen to most of the people on here. The time to sell was the market peak. A million dollar house I looked at in Papamoa mid 2020 the smart buyers walked away with an extra $500K after only living in it 18 months.
Some of us sold in the first week of Nov 21.
That was a sound of a bell ringing. We where still in level 3 lockdown, that ended Dec 3rd 21... by then sales had slowed a lot.
I thought you were in the top 1% (or at least have a lot of money) and also have a high IQ, why didn't you buy the house in Papamoa?
I put in an offer on paper and missed it by $15K. On reflection I'm glad I didn't get it, something much better came along for $200K less and I don't intend to ever sell it. Looked at a lot of houses, it was very hard to buy a decent build in a elevated position. I went off of Papamoa in the end, the whole lot of it is built on sand and it is only 3 to 4 meters above sea level, its pretty much a disaster waiting to happen. Its also devoid of bird life except for seagulls and there are no decent views because its flat.
Fair enough Carlos, you got the best house for you. Interesting comments about Papamoa, I know little about the area but good to know.
Fantastic beach however but just about anyone in Tauranga can get there in 20 minutes or less so no big deal.
Time to sell is at market peak.
Second best is a declining market.
As someone who sold a few months ago.... I look back to my old neighbourhood and what's listed and not selling - and give myself a bloody big pat on the back.
I could buy back in and get a much better home already.
"Time to sell is at market peak."
Sharp comment there, rastus!
If only someone had told us this earlier!
Same here. We're looking for a 2-3 bed in central-ish Auckland. Our budget is around the $1M mark. Hoping to find something stand-alone and with a bit of value-add (do-up), but to live in as our home. We're renting for now and hoping for some better deals in the coming months. Crazy how hard this is, even though we have a million bucks! Agents tell us now is the time, we won't get a better deal, where the sentiment on this website suggests there's no harm in waiting!
"Agents tell us now is the time, we won't get a better deal,"
Remember the HUGE potential conflict of interest if the agent that told you that has a house to sell you.
Real estate agents do not owe potential buyers a fiduciary duty.
CAVEAT EMPTOR.
We won't get a better deal
The "we" in this sentence is the agent speaking in the third person.
Be careful who you listen to. Obviously the agent has a vested interest, but on the flip side there have been commentators here that have been picking a crash every year for 20 years.
I'd say its a bit 50/50 at the moment. This could be the bottom, especially with interest rates probably heading down soon. Or there could still be a fair way down to come yet.
Same here, except I sold in Feb 2022, also been renting since.
Opportunities will come, I missed on a few properties for various reasons, a backup offer that was actually higher than the first one, I guess vendors were in a hurry, then several offers that were almost laughed at and now (3 or 4 months later) agents are calling me back saying they would be accepted. I don't feel pressured, pretty sure I could offer 50K less for those now and my offers would still be accepted.
In my experience less than a third of sellers are ready to meet the market at the moment.
I just counted 3 potential buyers waiting for vendors to "meet the market".
Perhaps it's the buyers who need to meet the market?
Offer only what the 2012 to 2015 price was, this is where the market is headed towards.
Don't be Negative Equities, Useful Idiot.
So house price momentum seems to have turned negative in many markets. This seems to impact the house price expectations of many potential buyers in those markets.
Something from the Who for the current housing market (with slight adaptation)
… I'll tip my hat to the new Coalition
Take a bow for the new legislation
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my card and pay
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again....
This won't be over until no one wants to touch property, even with someone else's bargepole (using an expression that perhaps Tony Alexander now better understands). That's what happened in the UK 30 years ago. No one was left on the "until prices drop, I'll wait" list. There was only a list of those looking to sell; renting out what they had if they had to move etc, and rents rising well above any metric related to the cost of borrowing. Why? Because even the lenders didn't want to lend. They, too, had been taught a lesson. And until the banks have suffered a sound reminder of the exuberance of the last 20+ years; on their balance sheets, then there is a lot further to go.
And as for the RBNZ? They should have gone with the old “Do it once and do it right and do it quickly”, but dragged the chain. So now; right now, is their chance to get this out of the way. And a lower OCR isn't the way to do that.
Sadly, the 2023 election got in the way of that, with Orr unwilling to bite the hand that made him.
40% off for this beautiful house, well.. not exactly a house but under the same category (houses in Auckland) hahaha....
https://www.realestate.co.nz/42601546/residential/sale/22-library-lane-…
You're as cold as ice
Chasing leverage for your life
You never take advice
Someday you'll pay the price, I know
I've seen it before, it happens after 84
Your spec losses leave you pale
You're digging for gold, you're throwing away
A fortune in vapor, but someday you'll pay
Negative leverage has you in its vice
You're as cold as ice
When you build insane amounts of cut and paste high density housing, average price will tank across the the regions where developers thought this was a good idea (Akl/Wlg). You will also see those houses selling at a much higher number (of sales) than the family home on a section, so the 'average' data skews.
This article does a great job of puffing the Doomers chest out 😆 (the pecs are looking good).
When QV can drill down on average price of a dwelling per sqm of land (zoned resi) then I'll pay attention.
Since 1992 property prices in NZ have increased at 6.4% annually.
House prices have never dipped far below that compounding annual growth rate, and the recent decline in average prices has just hit that upward curve.
So not a bad time to dip your toes in the water. But not many will, most here are property keyboard warriors.
Interesting how an asset that is priced using the sum of the future discount cash flows of peoples incomes (in the form of rents/mortgages) can rise so much higher/faster than the value of the underlying cash flows.
i.e. the asset rises at 6.4% but the cash flows that justify the price only rise at 3% (as targeted by the RBNZ to keep inflation under control). I wonder what would possibly allow that asset to grow so fast relative to the cash flows from 1990 - present?
Most kiwis know that owning your own place is a pretty good bet. And in addition, no landlord going to jack your rent up or give you notice.
I doubt lots of them are going to dissect 'future cash flows'.
Has there ever been a time where it costs more than twice as much to own than rent? When we bought our place 15 years ago the mortgage was cheaper then rent, and even 3 years ago there wasn't much in it.
Anyone that buys now is gambling on interest rates heading down. If they don't then most kiwis will know that owning your own place can also be a pretty bad bet.
There is a disproportionate number of pissed off people on here Wingman, this site is not a general representation of the people out there, you of all people should have figured that out by now.
yeah there are more spruikers here
Dead, Cat, Bounce.
Lets see how many more %, the NZ Ponzi Housing market has dropped master Winger....by Dec 2024
Interest facts here:
Just replace Canada for NZ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fm-Ui8S1eTU
-10% Dec23 to Dec24
watch and learn wingnut
Thats seems logical, yet a -12 or -13% could be the stretch target for this longterm, collapsing Star, that is the NZ housing market, to Dec 2024.
For anyone whose traded a number of instruments, I see nothing coming to the rescue for the NZ Housing market for years, albeit locally or internationally. Downside risks abound currently.
NZ would need, at minimum, Big New Mortgages written well under 4.5%, strong and stable employment figures and growing wages to regain a stable housing foothold again, at much lower prices.
there are considerable headwinds
Prices are still far too high. Hopefully interest rates stay high until early/mid next year so that housing prices have an opportunity to fall further. Disappointed ocr wasn't raised a bit last week to assist with dropping inflation quicker.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.