Westpac's economists are sticking by their forecast that house price inflation will accelerate to 7% next year, but only just.
In the latest Home Truths newsletter Westpac's Chief Economist Dominick Stephens conceded the forecast was a bullish one.
"We have encountered a great deal of scepticism about that forecast - most other economists expect the current low rate of house price inflation to persist," he said.
Stephens said recent sales volume data was "choppy and hard to interpret" and it would probably be a few months before a clear trend emerged, but tentative signs of improving sales levels in Auckland and Canterbury supported Westpac's view of a rising market, as did the recent fall in the total number of homes available for sale on Realestate.co.nz, but he said it was also too early to call that a trend.
And as for prices, Stephens described the REINZ's July selling price and days-to-sell figures as "...definitely weak data."
Taking all of those factors into account, Stephens is sticking with the 7% housing price growth forecast for next year, but his view is far from unequivocal.
"We think there are straws in the wind supporting our view that the housing market is going to pick up, so we are sticking to our forecast 7% house price inflation next year," he said.
"But the evidence is by no means conclusive - more data will be required before we can draw any real conclusions about which way the market is heading."
The full Westpac Home Truths newsletter is available here.
The comment stream on this story is now closed.
45 Comments
Wishful thinking? Seems pretty optimistic to me.
Oh I see it is based on "straws in the wind".
It’ll be “green shoots” next month.
Look at all those bulls grazing on greener pastures!
Westpac is not the only institution/commentator forecasting significant house price growth over the next 12 months or so........
TTP
When in the history of modern economics has the entire financial system got something wrong? Oh, just 11 years ago!
Westpac concedes it is in the minority in this case, though. From the article: ""We have encountered a great deal of scepticism about that forecast - most other economists expect the current low rate of house price inflation to persist," he said."
TTP you are predicting flatness right? Or has that changed again?
The optimism seems an overkill, given job creation and economic activity across major industries has slowed down dramatically.
We're pretty confident that house prices will increase by 7% next year, but the evidence is by no means conclusive
(in other words non-existent)
More data will be required before we can draw any real conclusions about which way the market is heading
(Predictions don't work with the luxury of hindsight/sunset clauses I'm afraid. You make a prediction and own it).
Yes. It's a forecast sprinkled with modifiers.
Sounds like a lot of ass covering.
Question - if house prices crashed next year, and FHBs bought now with mortgages from Westpac, at least partly on the basis of bullish predictions like Zorro's, could Westpac be held liable?
I assume his commentaries have got fine print to protect their backsides. In fact they do, fine print at the end:
'This material contains general commentary, and market colour. The material does not constitute investment advice,
blah blah blah......'
At the very least though, it would be a really awful look wouldn't it?
"Buy shares in my company and you're guaranteed to double your money in 18 months".
Note: This material contains general commentary, and market colour. The material does not constitute investment advice.
"It will accelerate to 7% next year...but only just". I think the sun will rise tomorrow, but only just and then I'm driving to Auckland, but only just. And when i get there, I'll go for lunch, but only just.
Just another day as a bank economist. But only just.
The lower limit of the 7-10 year theory. That fits into the mainstream thinking about how house prices behave and is nice use of media to keep spirits high (important when your business model relies on the attitudes and behavior of the public). And in the case where the forecast doesn't match the actual outcome, there are all those other known unknowns and unknown unknowns that can easily explain when or if the forecast is not realized.
"recent sales volume data was 'choppy and hard to interpret'"
Indeed, hard to interpret with a "house prices only go up" mindset.
Data series of sales showing stabilising of decline at 15-18% drop in Auckland is not really sufficient to be doing a uk chancellor a la 1990 “green shoots of recovery” meme. Esp lame when series is in fact still deteriorating in Christchurch and Wellington
The bank is really counting on it being 7% and I’m not allowed to say it’s likely to be less.
Mr Economist would you bet your house on that 7% figure (or even a 1% figure). Somehow I doubt it, but you are hoping your words get some poor FHB to bet their life on it by taking out a ridiculously massive mortgage. Please stop spruiking this nonsense and accept reality. Every country in the world is now talking of the enormous looming recession.... except little old NZ.... because we are special?
ForeignBuyer is right this is just bank spruiking the housing market to keep mortgage growth rolling along
Nice try Westpac
Any further asset appreciation from here puts New Zealand at....well...I'll just repeat an article from earlier this years :
" NZ's household debt levels are reaching terrifying heights"
https://www.noted.co.nz/money/property/household-debt-nz-levels-reachin…
In 2009 outstanding mortgage debt in this country stood at about $165 billion. 10 years later - today - household debt stands at $265 billion.
What could we; should we, have done with that $100 billion of debt that we have taken on as a Nation in the last decade that has otherwise gone into pointless asset appreciation? I could list schools; police; hospitals - even lower taxes! But I guess we all have our priorities, as does Mr Stephens....
Building new houses is good economic activity and is real economic achievement. I understand that inflating the price of existing stock of houses is not desirable. And I know people contribute this to credit availability. Bank recklessly creating credit that ends up in house prices. But, I also see the very high construction costs (and I mean construction costs in a very broad way including site preparation and infrastructure to finishing produces put in a house) in NZ (for really sub-par quality for the price you pay) as a huge contributor to this issue. Land prices are about 1/3 (maybe except for Auckland, where land prices are higher) of total cost and sure that can reduce (logically to the cost of developing a new section and adding infrastructure on it). But I doubt that the remaining 2/3 reduce by much.
So while the market can crash, it does not mean a flood of houses will appear in the market and housing will all of sudden become affordable. the owner-occupiers will sit tight, the investors will continue to squeeze as much rent from the renting population (and government will need to increase welfare so less people end up needing state housing). Prices will be low (can be significantly lower) but stock will be very limited. Stagnation. Can be long stagnation. But it does not improve anything.
NZ does need a better system to build houses. It is a dream that change in credit availability alone will reduce house prices. No laborer will accept under $21 hour.
It’s all about the cost servicing that debt. We are trapped in a less than virtuous circle of asset bubbles and stupidly low interest rates.
Bank economists know nothing. Prior to ditching private banking because of the fees and spin, I would get a regular visit from one of the bank economists at my home to keep me informed of what’s going on. He would have a different story or “out look” every time but always an underlying sales pitch
I'm pretty sure bank economists don't do house calls, unless you're worth >$100m that is.
..or a particularly hot blonde...or bloke
They actually travel the whole country to selected clients. In my case our holiday home in the southern lakes. Your private bank manager rolls them out as a sales tool. But I think it is also a junket for both manager and economists
How negative do they expect interest rates to go?
Given we are pretty much in a Global recession, can you really see house prices rising in that environment???
Adam, we really aren't "pretty much in a global recession". The standard for a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative growth. We simply aren't seeing that sort of pattern with any significant number of countries experiencing that globally. Annual global GDP growth rate is about 3% currently.
Here is 53 pages of Global economic data that would say otherwise... All depends on how you measure it and all the signs are there that one has started. https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/ce/7/5816/5799/GLOBAL%20ECONOMY%2…
I can't see anything that indicates global recession in these 53 pages of graphs. Nevertheless, recession is almost universally defined in terms of GDP growth - two or more consecutive negative quarters equals recession. Perhaps you meant there are some indicators that suggest there may well be a "global recession" at some point at the future?
Technically of course you are correct on definition of recession.
However, growth is shrinking almost everywhere, as is trade volume.
Australia and China are looking v dodgy on growth and financial trouble, as consumer is flaked out.
EU growth has been pathetic of less than 2% for 18m.
NZ growth forecast by treasury in 2017 was (laughably) 4.5% pa. Currently it is 2.4% and falling each quarter.
Recession follows about 9 months after its causes. So watch out in Oct-November
False Propoganda ....Vested News .....
What has to happen - will happen. If such false propganda could help or prevent, will never ever have recession.
Any prediction from Westpac on what Fonterra share price would be next August ?
Buy now price can only go up!!!
What's that smell.....?
Smells like cows or something. Ah, I know what it is!
It's b/s!!
"We think there are straws in the wind supporting our view..."
Doesn't sound very convincing
Mr Stephens needs to justify his salary at Westpac and he probably needs deliver periodic reports and predictions, however a prediction is worth just as much as how accurate it is and stating its weakness completely invalidates it.
The economists often get their house price forecasts quite wrong usually to the underside from the ones I've seen over the years.
So westpac are picking 7% growth in the property market in the next year, you think thats a bit light but the RBNZ has slashed their price growth expectation to 1.5% this year and 3.1% next year...
https://www.interest.co.nz/property/101097/its-latest-monetary-policy-s…
Now who should I believe????
The RBNZ immediately acted and dropped the OCR - at an unusually large decrement - so they've put their money where their mouth is.
Westpac has done...well...nothing, except jawboning. And expressing a fair amount of scepticism in their own prediction.
I know which way I'd lean...
.
Glonal economy slowing, rexession fears, US & NZ elections next year which causes stagnation, Hong Kong, Brixeit, Argentina, Trade wars and Westpac thinks the longest bull run in history is going to get even bigger??? 'Our future profits are looking shakey, we need to spark up the market to improve them' is what I hear.
Years ago Westpac forced my parents to sell half of their orchard. I argued at the time to let them carry on as prices would increase. They stated that their predictions did not show this and half of the property was sold. Two years later the new owner sold it for double the amount he paid.
Pump and dump!
Never once did the pie man make any kind of suggestion that perhaps not buying pies would be wise.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.