sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Woman at centre of Malaysian immunity mess calls for McCully to resign and criticises Key's sincerity; Labour to fund gifted student teachers; Your view?

Woman at centre of Malaysian immunity mess calls for McCully to resign and criticises Key's sincerity; Labour to fund gifted student teachers; Your view?

By Bernard Hickey

With 71 days left until the September 20 election, here's my daily round-up of the political and governmental news from in and around Wellington on Thursday July 10, including criticism of Murray McCully and John Key by the woman at the centre of sexual assault allegations against a Malaysian diplomat and more Labour policy on education and the Canterbury recovery.

The political focus today is on comments to 3 News' 3rd Degree by Tania Billingsley, 21, the woman at the centre of the sexual assault allegations against Malaysian diplomat Muhammad Rizalman bin Ismail.

Billingsley voluntarily relinquished name suppression to criticise the handling of her case and the sincerity of both Murray McCully and John Key. She said the issue only appeared to become real to the officials and McCully when it started to affect them. She was upset McCully had not asked about her case in the seven weeks before it became public.

"Clearly he doesn't know how to do his job properly," Billingsley said, adding she wanted a personal apology from McCully and she wanted him to resign.

"I would like an apology from him, not just for what I feel is a really incompetent handling of the situation, but in his reaction, like the fact that even when asked directly about me and things like that, that he just brushed it off," Billingsley said.

"He was so intent on trying to put responsibility and blame on everybody else that I just feel like he wasn't actually addressing and putting energy towards fixing what had happened. Obviously it was painful for me to watch that, seeing someone be so dismissive of something that's been so traumatic to me, but it is also embarrassing watching a grown man trying to put blame and talk his way out of what effectively is failure at his own job," she said.

Billingsley also criticised John Key 's initial comments.

"I just remember the very first thing I watched on it, and just seeing him looking bored and annoyed at having to be talking about it, and just saying there's nothing that we can do pretty much. 'Oh it sucks but it is what it is.' And that's what I was getting. I don't feel from him any sincerity in his concern for me," she said of Key.

McCully has declined further comment on the issue, saying it was a matter for the Police and the courts. Key is reported to be on leave until July 21.

Green call

The Green Party called for the review of MFAT's actions to be expanded to include the actions of McCully and Key, and for McCully to stand down while the review was being conducted. It also wanted an independent review conducted, rather than an internal one by MFAT.

“It is astonishing that Ms Billingsley was still waiting for an apology from anyone in Government yesterday," said Green Co-Leader Metiria Turei.

“Mr McCully has said he’d apologised, but an off the cuff apology over the TV doesn’t cut it, especially for a generation that doesn’t even watch it. Mr McCully would never have considered a TV apology good enough for the Prime Minister and it’s not good enough for Ms Billingsley," Turei said.

Labour CERA and ECan policy

Meanwhile, Labour Leader David Cunliffe said a Labour Government would appoint a board of qualified locals to govern the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) and oversee the return of its powers to local authorities by the expiry of CERA legislation in 2016.

“Another important step to restoring democracy in Canterbury is to reinstate local body representatives to Environment Canterbury (ECan), a right denied residents since the sacking of the previous council in 2010, as soon as possible," Cunliffe, saying an election could be held as soon as 2015.

Cunliffe said a Labour Govenrment would also work with the Christchurch Council "to come up with a fair and sustainable solution to the city’s ballooning debt, largely a consequence of a government imposed cost-sharing arrangement."

“There will be no set restrictions on the options that can be negotiated in these discussions."

Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee said adding another layer of governance on top of CERA would not speed up the recovery and would only water down the central Government's accountability for its NZ$15 billion of spending.

“Locals already have a strong voice in the recovery through ongoing input from the Community Forum, and consultation on projects that are particularly important to the community such as the successful Share an Idea campaign, and the upcoming consultation on future use of the Red Zone. It should also not be forgotten that CERA employees are almost all residents of Christchurch, who have a clear understanding of local issues, and certainly feed this into their work," Brownlee said, adding the Government was also consulting Cantabrians about the future of ECan.

He said Labour's "open-ended policy" on debt sharing with the Christchurch Council would "remove the certainty around the Anchor Projects and central city, and subject New Zealanders to an unquantified financial commitment."

“Once again Labour has shown they have no grasp on the issues that are actually important to Cantabrians, and have not yet offered a single policy that will make the rebuild happen better or faster. This policy is the latest fizzer in a long line of announcements that show Labour really has no idea what Christchurch needs."

Labour education policy

Labour Education spokesman Chris Hipkins announced a Labour Government would centrally fund dedicated programmes for gifted children outside of regular classes and re-establish a Gifted Advisory Board.

Labour would also fund an additional 100 special needs teachers, he said.

(Updated with Labour announcement on Canterbury recovery policy, reaction)

I'll keep updating this through the day.

See all my previous election diaries here.

See the index for Interest.co.nz's special election policy comparison pages here.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

24 Comments

No, the critisim seem to be our National  ministers and then PM a) dont seem to give a damn about an impact on a NZer, b) tried to palm off the case and then the responsibilty for it rather than deal with it as was their duty and obligation.

regards

 

Up
0

Come on Steven that is not correct I think we will all find that there has been a huge amount of work going on by McCully and Key to ensure this junior Diplomat is held accountable in NZ. For a start off it Malaysia is returning the Diplomat to NZ who the heck do you think got that organised?????

MFAT are the one's who have completely screwed up here. Both McCully and Key have said they were not properly briefed by MFAT officials......are you disputing this?

It was Malaysia who invoked Diplomatic Immunity.

It was MFAT who had a series of informal communications which ended up with Diplomat able to return to Malaysia.

 

This is just another example of your beloved Government Agencies stuffing up. At least hold the right people accountable.

Up
0

a) not "my beloved agencies"

b) Ultimately the agencies are controlled by a minister, or should be, if the truth is they failed to brief the Minister(s) then yes heads should roll.

c) More than happy to see what truth comes out of it in the hopefully not to distant future.

regards

 

 

Up
0

Precisely Kimy , this is nothing but trial by media and jungle justice

While I feel sorry for the girl who was attacked , there has been no trial of the accused ,and until that is concluded , we must keep our heads.

NZ is signature to the Diplomatic agreement that allows immunity , and as much as we may dislike it , its the order of things .

Oddly , I also got the sense that the young lady seems to have political motives in this whole affair , her entire focus and comments were about the Foreign minister and the PM who she felt should stand down .

Up
0

Of course here comments were about the Foreign Minister. There is apparantly an active police investigation about the actual attack, and she will have been told (by the Police and a lot of others) do not discuss the details in the media or you will risk blowing the conviction.

On the other hand there is no court case over Malaysia having (apparently) been willing to waive diplomatic immunity but MFAT going "no, its cool, head home". All she has been discussing in the media is the governments response to her in the wake of that. NZ is a signature that allows, but does not require, immunity, and anyone who has been paying attention will have noted Malaysia expressed willingness to cooperate.

Up
0

Precisely Kimy , this is nothing but trial by media and jungle justice

While I feel sorry for the girl who was attacked , there has been no trial of the accused ,and until that is concluded , we must keep our heads.

NZ is signature to the Diplomatic agreement that allows immunity , and as much as we may dislike it , its the order of things .

Oddly , I also got the sense that the young lady seems to have political motives in this whole affair , her entire focus and comments were about the Foreign minister and the PM who she felt should stand down .

Up
0

I wonder when the NZ news media is going to release evidence of NZ spying during the TPP negotiations.

Malaysia is part of the TPP.

I wonder if Malaysia was spied on.

I wonder if NZ diplomats already know what these relelations are and they are trying to get into everyones good books beforehand.

There is a lot of opposition to the TPP in Malaysia. If spying revelations prompted Malaysia to withdraw it wouldn't just affect NZ but America would be very concerned as well. If Malaysia withdrew it could be the beginning of the end for TPP, which is a central part of America's pivot to Asia.

Spy boss quiet on Snowden speculation

Susie Ferguson: "There's some speculation that he (Edward Snowden) has files that pertain to New Zealand, what do you have to say about those?"

.....

Susie Ferguson: "Is it about spying on allies?"

Ian Fletcher: "I can't answer that, sorry."

Susie Ferguson: "Is it about spying during the TPP negotiations?"

 

http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/243709/spy-boss-quiet-on-snowden-speculation

Up
0

This whole thing is looking more and more politically motivated

Up
0

What has this got to do with interest.co.nz, finance, borrowing and saving, Bernard?

Or, since you oppose them, is this just another opportunity to sledge the current government?

Random questions:

1) How is it that a "feminist" and "activist" has nil presence online apart from references to this story

2) How unlucky does someone have to be, to be a "feminist" and "activist" with strong views on a "NZ rape culture" and then be the victim of a sexual attack by someone with absolutely no connection to the victim?

3) How does it work that a couple of months ago a minister had to resign because he injected himself into the process of a public service (Police) on behalf of a NZ citizen, but now a minister is expected to resign because he didn't inject himself into the process of a public service (MFAT) on behalf of a NZ citizen?

Politically motivated? Dead right. Be interesting to see just where the connections are...

Up
0

Those questions, at least to me, read like a particularly distasteful conspiracy theory in the works.

She is a young woman who, being profoundly unhappy with the way the government treated her in the wake of it stuffing up (and however you stretch it, the Government did stuff up), chose to waive her right to privacy so people could discuss her case with the Government without the Government being able to say "we can't discuss that due to privacy". I'm sure she knew that would lead to some people discussing her motives in a (to me) creepy manner, but she may well have seen it as the only way to get some acknowledgement from those in charge of the Government that the Government had done her wrong in its handling of the issue.

If McCully should resign is arguable, but there certainly used to be a tradition of Ministers taking reponsibility for the actions of their department even if they were unaware. But I don't see your "random questions" 1 & 2 being very relevant to that discussion, as they seem to be calling her history into question.

If being the father of a teenage girl makes me biased about this, then that is a bias I am happy to have, and think is one that should be shared by more people.

 

Up
0

I thought that MInisters were meant to be kept fully informed by the appropriate department head.  Witholding information or not accurately informing any Minister of any department seems to be the current practice and too many people are demanding that the knife fall of the Minister concerned rather than the people who failed in their duty to advise.

 

What did MFAT think it was doing communicating informally and giving the impression that it was OK for diplomatic immunity to proceed?

 

We have a victim here, who is understandably frustrated and annoyed......the fact is she can lash out at MP's simply because the person who attacked her was a diplomat and a Government Agency is involved because of the person being a diplomat. If the accused had not been a diplomat would the victim have been making the same statements against the McCully?

 

There appears to not have been clear communication between the Police and MFAT. Was the Minister of Police informed?  Was the correct process/procedure followed when dealing with these issues?

 

Seems to me that a large number of civil servants have failed this young women.....tells me that incompetence is rampant in the civil service. It certainly doesn't tell me that the Ministers are at fault.....how the heck can a Minister do their job of representing the voters when they are being misinformed or worse not informed?

 

If a civil servant is not undertaking his/her duty and that compromises the Minister then in effect the failure to undertake the duty is a force applied for the purpose of overthrowing a Government member by member.  I would have thought these types of actions would be considered Treason !!!!

Up
0

Treason? He he.

And who do you think is responsible for the way the department is run? Oh, the minister. If it is run badly then he is at fault (like a bad CEO).

Up
0

'cause with the erection coming up, NZ is on borrowed time and is going to need some saving!

Up
0

I think erections are a thing of the past for most of the boys on this site.  

Up
0

3) is a stuff up in both cases doesnt matter of its due to a bad-action or an in-action.

regards

Up
0

Craig there is a very large level of seperation between the Minister and the Ministry....MFAT is a Public Service Dept and the Chief Executive and Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade is John Allen. The State Sector Act outlines the responsibilities of the Chief Executive.

Legislation that they administer includes the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act.

So it is incorrect to say that the Minister is the CEO and basically runs any MInistry he/she is MInister for. I think this is a common misconception amongst the public !!

John Allen has to take full responsibility for this issue as that is his job. Did his staff members not notify him of this fiasco? Someone here has made an enormous Faux Pas !!

Up
0

Add Kate Wilkinson as MInister of Labour, Nic Smith Minister of ACC to the list.

Kate Wilkinson most certainly wasn't running the day to day activities of the Labour Dept.

Nic Smith was acting for a constituent.

Up
0

Can we stop rewriting history on this one. Williamson was not Liu's electorate MP.

Up
0

Maurice is a bit of a phantom

 

Just been reading about Motukawaiti Island, off Matauri Bay

 

Who the heck is in charge of OIO? This is hands-off stuff

 

Nothing much has changed except strangely Maurice Williamson's name pops up in the following October 2012 article - is he the minister for everywhere and nowhere?

His fingerprints are on far too many unsatisfatory situations

 

NZ Herald 10 July 2014

[quote] This is a very complex investigation involving a number of individuals and organisations Mr Usherwood said

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=1…

 

NZ Herald 22 Oct 2012

[quote] OIO manager Annelies McClure said the investigation was complex, involving a number of individuals and organisations. She did not put a timeframe on when it would end, saying the OIO was still seeking information and documentation http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10842062

Up
0

Liu could not speak english - so someone was acting as his mouthpiece - and Maurice and Donghua were to become next-door neighbours in Pauanui, on Maurice's recommendation even though Donghua could'nt understand a word he said

Up
0

So Maurice was known as the "go to" man ?

Up
0

Personally I always thought of him as useless in a Nation sense, as a local MP maybe he shined....goo d riddance as far as I am concerned.

regards

 

 

 

 

Up
0

You asserted Liu was Williamsons constituent. I disagreed with you because that was factually untrue. If you had asserted that Liu might have lied to Williamson and Williamson might have been to stupid to know the person who he had repeatedly had dinner with wasn't his constituent, then I would have agreed it could be possible but it is something you would have had no evidence for. 

And certainly Cunliffe believe that Liu was his constituent, unless you have a rather unusual definition of what the words "I have been approached by my constituent" that were in the letter actually mean.

Up
0

There are two sides on every coin/.  For this one, so far we've only seen (or heard about) one side.. and judgement has been made on the other side.

Up
0