By Alex Tarrant
The outlook for the global economy has eased slightly since Treasury finalised its Budget forecasts in April, Acting Secretary to the Treasury Gabriel Makhlouf says.
In speech notes released on Thursday morning, Makhlouf, who was deputy chief executive under just-departed Secretary John Whitehead, said the international economy remained a source of potential downside to New Zealand's economic recovery.
Treasury's forecasts in the May 19 Budget showed GDP growth was expected to be 1% in the current year to June 30, before rising to 1.8% in the 2011/12 year, 4% in 2012/13, 3% in 2013/14, and 2.7% in 2014/15. See more here in Bernard Hickey's Budget 2011 overview.
The budget is relying on that strengthened growth from 2012/13 to boost tax revenues and help it reach a budget surplus (before gains and losses) in the 2014/15 year, although Prime Minister John Key has expressed desire for a surplus to be achieved a year earlier.
The government has said the recovery in economic growth would be partly based on rebuilding activity in Christchurch, but that it also relied on a strengthening export sector, meaning a stabilising global economy was needed for demand for New Zealand exports to increase.
The forecasts, and expected revenues, also show the government's net debt to GDP ratio will stay below 30% - peaking at 29.6% in 2015. Key and Finance Minister Bill English have both expressed a desire for net debt to stay below 30% of GDP, which they say is the level at which international credit rating agencies begin to take more notice of a nation's public debt.
Some set-backs to global growth
"While there are signs the global economy is recovering, there have been some set-backs recently," Makhlouf said in a speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs.
"The recovery is being driven by emerging economies, in particular China and other Asian countries, and there are some additional benefits for New Zealand via Australia. Activity in the major developed economies has been slower to rebound as they were more directly affected by the global crisis and their economic challenges are more entrenched," Makhlouf said.
"Temporary shocks have also adversely affected economic activity, in particular the Queensland floods in Australia and the earthquake in Japan. These events are expected to reduce growth in the short term – today Australia reported a 1.2% fall in GDP in the first three months of this year – but rebuilding in both countries will boost it subsequently," he said.
Eurozone problems, rising food prices in developing countries could hurt NZ
Notwithstanding the positive headline picture, there remained an elevated level of risk around global growth.
"While there are some upsides, on balance the risks are weighted to the downside for the forecast period as a whole," Makhlouf said.
"As a result, the international economy remains a source of potential downside risk to New Zealand, with the possibility of rising global imbalances causing increased policy tension, the need for significant structural and fiscal policy change in many developed economies, and continued financial difficulties in a number of peripheral European economies," he said.
There was also the possibility of higher food and fuel prices eroding disposable incomes, especially in developing economies.
"What can be said is that the global recovery is more assured than it was in 2010 as the recovery has become more strongly established," Makhlouf said.
"Since Treasury finalised its economic forecasts for the Budget in mid-April, the outlook for the global economy has eased slightly with weaker data reported in the United States and in China, leading to a modest correction in some commodity prices. Concerns about euro area sovereign debt have intensified again," he said.
"In our Budget forecasts we developed a scenario in which rising consumer prices and monetary tightening, especially in developing countries, bring a slowdown in world growth, though we are still a long way from such a scenario.
"My last comment on this is that the chief challenges for policy-makers in this environment are the timely withdrawal of monetary and fiscal stimulus in such a way as to support growth and manage emerging inflation pressures, especially in developing economies. Little has been done so far to reduce global imbalances between high-savings, low-consumption economies (such as China) and heavily-indebted, high consumption economies (such as the United States)," Makhlouf said.
(Updates with background on forecasts)
19 Comments
Heh. I know the Top 10 is read by some in Treasury and I've had a few chats with Gabs. Nice guy.
They have a fundamentally different view though.
I'm a bear on consumer spending and debt. They're sticking with their models based on pre-GFC relationships.
We'll see.
I don't see 4% growth here any time soon.
cheers
Bernard
Bernard, surely anyone predicting 1% growth in the year to June 2011 must have had too many whiskeys while crunching the numbers.
Growth in the six months to Dec 2010 was zero, hence we'd have needed to see 1% growth in the March and June quarters.
Well with 15% of the economy either shut down or in shock for about half the March quarter and a good chunk of that still shut down or at least with wallets clamped for the June quarter, how is there any hope of growth unless the rest of the country has had stellar performance?
If a few floods in Qld can cut Aussie GDP by 1.2%, in the midst of a commodity boom there, then how can NZ not have seen a significant reduction in growth given our calamities and our already weak performance?
If GDP growth is just -1% for the year to June 30 2011, we will have done well. I suspect -2% or maybe worse isn't far from where reality lies.
Treasury is nothing more than a govt spin-machine. There was a nice piece on pending assets sales from Vernon Small in this morning's Dompost. He makes the point that "favourable" Treasury analysis only considers asset yield relative to cost of debt, so potential for increasing asset values is left out. On the other hand the govt thinks it can get a good sales price because investors will (unlike Treasury) consider potential for increased asset value (capital gain) as well as yield. No worries, the sheeple won't notice.
Never you mind about Treasury warnings here in NZ...the following is a warning to all the fat bankers and other thieving polly shites in the usa...one day very soon the triggers will be pulled...!
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article28421.html
and there will be nowhere to hide.
Nice article...this is somewhat baised.....but pretty much sums it up....
"The Republican mantra since the Reagan era has been to cut taxes and allow the “free market” to work its magic. They have succeeded in convincing a vast swath of Americans that lowering the highest tax rates have benefitted the masses. This is completely untrue. An unfunded tax cut today is just a tax increase on future generations. Democrats went along with tax cuts as long as the Republicans went along with spending increases. The Democrats hit the jackpot, with a supposedly fiscal conservative president signing a Medicare D bill that added trillions of unfunded liabilities to our national balance sheet. The Republicans are on cloud 9, as a supposedly liberal anti-war president has increased war spending to $1 trillion per year while ramping up our foreign wars of choice. Everyone gets what they want in Washington D.C. This is called bi-partisanship."
regards
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.