A new economic conditions index indicates the New Zealand economy is not re-entering recession, although neither does it inspire confidence a strong pick-up is underway, BNZ economist Craig Ebert says.
The release of the inaugural Business New Zealand-BNZ Performance Composite Index (PCI) comes against the backdrop of some economist expectations for official figures to show negative economic growth in the fourth quarter of 2010 after a 0.2% contraction in the third quarter. Both Prime Minister John Key, and Finance Minister Bill English, have said there was a possibility of two consecutive quarters of contraction in the second half of 2010, meaning the economy entered a 'double-dip' recession after five quarters of low or flat growth.
The new PCI moulds together the results of the monthly Performance of Manufacturing Index (PMI) and Performance of Services Index (PSI) into an index representing 80% of the New Zealand economy, Ebert said. Like the PMI and PSI, a PCI score above 50 indicates expansion in combined activity from the previous month, while a score below 50 indicates contraction.
"It made sense to agglomerate the information content of the long-running PMI and more newly minted PSI survey. Apart from increasing the sample size, the PCI offers a bigger picture take on the economy’s pulse. And not only from an “overall” point of view, but by way of the production, new orders, employment, and other sub-detail of the PMI and PSI surveys," he said.
Two versions to choose from
There were two versions of the index due to technical issues, such as the weights given to each index in compiling the overall PCI, Ebert said.
"One of these strictly adheres to the proportion that each of the PMI and the PSI represents of GDP. According to the national accounts, manufacturing makes up about one-eighth of real production-based GDP, while the services sector (excluding Government administration and defence) is measured at approximately two-thirds. Sure, even these weights, and definitions of manufacturing and services, are open to debate, and they change over time. However, to be clear, this is the basis on which the GDP-weighted PCI has been constructed," Ebert said.
"The strength of the GDP-weighted PCI, of course, is its representativeness of the industries that comprise the economy. However, it is also the case that it relies upon a PSI survey that is not only shorter-running, but has, for the meantime, a sample size less-deep in respect of the wider sector it purports to represent," he said.
"In regard to this caveat, we thought the other valid way of combining the PMI and PSI was simply to throw all the responses together and see what bubbled to the surface. It’s democracy in action. We denote this as the free-weighted PCI. Sure, this, like the GDP-weighted PCI, is not perfect. But we think the two should capture the bounds of belief in the economy’s performance, while leaving readers to assign the emphasis they prefer.
Over time (since April 2007, when the PSI began), the free-weighted PCI had clearly been choppier than the GDP-weighted PCI, even in seasonally adjusted terms, technically because of its higher weighting toward the PMI, which had had a rougher ride over recent years, Ebert said.
"Yet the free-weighted PCI also arguably gave a better warning of the degree of recession the economy was entering in 2008/09," he said.
"Since about mid-2009, however, the two composite indices have been similar enough. And, funnily enough, they were at very similar levels in their latest reading, for January 2011. Of course, this simply meant they both portrayed a lack of follow-through, on what was only a faint growth signal over the closing stages of 2010.
'No double-dip, but doesn't inspire confidence in recovery'
The GDP-weighted PCI was a seasonally adjusted 51.3 (from 52.2 in December) while the free-weighted PCI was 52.2 (from 52.6), Ebert said.
"While still positive, these results don’t inspire confidence of a strong pick-up being underway," he said.
"This has been the net result of the PSI pulse almost stalling in January, while that of the PMI picking up. Yet, combined, they also remained in expansion mode, as they have been since late-2009. This bears mentioning, as there have been a lot of commentators starting to conclude the NZ economy is re-entering recession. This is not the message of the Composite indices (nor the range of other business surveys, for that matter).
"More that earlier optimism has given way to a sense of frustration. Quite different to how things looked a couple of years ago, including by way of perusing the Bank of New Zealand-Business New Zealand Composite indices," Ebert said.
Performance composite index
Select chart tabs
11 Comments
The last resort – or the collapse of a failed, mismanaged NZeconomy ?
Loosen up immigration laws by the government, because of massive immigration desire coming from USA/ UK and Europe- to “artificially” revitalise our economy.
Bernhard, can someone from the media let us know about the latest real immigration figures - August 2010 until January 2011. It would be very interesting to see the development in the next few years.
http://www.immigration.govt.nz/migrant/general/generalinformation/statistics/
--
Prime Minister - that would indicate for the first time at least - a sign of an economic strategy - pprrrrrrrr !
Um,. a double dip assumes you are gonna climb out on the far side?
In which case, it ain't one. This is the start of the 'long emergency', a downward saw-tooth path to nowhere.
They will know, Bollard signalled it with his comment about being in the shyte if oil stayed above 100/barrel ............... where it is now.
They have to talk confidence - have to keep the boosting going.
GDP, as I noted here, is a nonsense count anyway. We could break every window, trash each others cars, trash everything in sight. The resultant activity would treble GDP overnight.
You'd spend decades just getting back what you'd trashed, though. And then, you'd find someone else had used up all the remaining fossil energy...........
I say again, GDP is a piece of poppycock, and it says little for our intellectual savvy that a majority voted for 'growth' based soley on it as a measure.
If you add in REAL costs - Natural Capital for starters - the place has been in a permanent recession probably since the Maori turned up, certainly since the European did.
Bring on real accounting.
I love the rule of 1 positive = "totally positive" even if it's .01%
but....... a true negative must =2 negatives in a row!
What a crock. We ARE in recession, regression, transgression,stagnation, stagflation, manipulation............
Basically all economists talk utter crap while ignoring the REAL world
Agreed. Someone should ask the ever growing number of those who have lost,or are in the process of losing - their jobs what they think. The country is solidly in recession & I cant see us getting out of reccession in the next 2- 3 years. I'm not referring to the Alice-in-Wonderland assessments by economists - I'm talking about whats really happening to people.
So .. answer this question .. would like some serious answers .. if NZ is in recession .. and is having to run a current account deficit to pay for the current costs of running the country .. do you really think increasing the intake of 30+ year old migrants plus families plus dependents, (plus eventually their parents), will (a) fix the problem?, or (b) increase the problem ?
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.