By Alex Tarrant
New Zealand's rising debt levels will not bother the international ratings agencies unless government debt hit 30% of GDP from about 18% now, Prime Minister John Key said, adding that debt is tracked to reach as high as 28.5% of GDP.
Key was talking to RadioLive's Andrew Patterson after the release of the government's half-yearly fiscal update. The interview aired on Patterson's Sunday Business show.
Asked about Finance Minister Bill English's comments that there was no buffer room in the government's books for another disaster like the Christchurch earthquake, Key said: “Well I don’t know the context in which he said that and often the context has a big impact on what he actually meant.
"He [English] probably meant, I suspect, that the government doesn’t have room to muck around - just because we might actually get back into surplus quicker or a year earlier than people think, we still owe a reasonable amount," Key said.
"The truth of it is government debt at the moment is sitting at around about 18% of GDP and is likely to top out at, in all the numbers we have, at 28.5% of GDP. Now relatively speaking how does that put us? The answer is in very good shape to a lot of other countries. So the UK on its way to 100% of GDP, the US on its way to 100% of GDP, Japan at 200% of GDP," he said.
"The ratings agencies tell us ‘look if your debt is under 30%, you’re of no concern to them, if it’s between 30-60% they think it might hold back growth a little bit, but again of no major concern, anywhere near 100% then you really get their attention.
There was no question about government not being able to sustain another earthquake in New Zealand if it were to happen tommorrow, Key said. "The answer is yes we can."
"But I think his [English's] main point would be ‘we don’t have any room for anything frivolous. We just simply need to try and build that balance sheet back up so that when the next thing happens, and there will be another thing, we’re in the best position to withstand it,'" Key said.
"But again, if you have a very strong balance sheet, as we effectively have had, if we hadn’t used that and allowed ourselves to continue some expenditure in infrastructure areas or entitlements and benefits, then the impact of the recession would have been much harder felt in New Zealand than it has been," he said.
"So it’s not like we’ve been wasting the money, we’ve just simply been using it for what we thought was appropriate this time."
Last week Key said New Zealanders shouldn't panic about public debt. See more here.
'Surplus track is a commitment'
Meanwhile, Key told Patterson the government's talk of getting back to surplus in five years was "pretty much a commitment" rather than just an aspiration. "Next year when you see what we’re doing, you’ll see that again we’re taking further steps to make that a reality. We have been very disciplined about our spending, we haven’t blown our NZ$1.1 billion [additional budget spending]," Key said.
"The last time Michael Cullen had a NZ$1billion new budget spending initiative I think was in his first budget, and by his second budget he was already breaking that. And from there on it blew out," he said.
"People say ‘well he [Cullen] didn’t cut taxes because he had these surpluses but he didn’t think they were structural’. But he put in place other structural spending. He didn’t cut taxes because he didn’t want to.
"We’ve had three major rounds of tax cuts since we’ve been in government, and you can see that by the fact that if you are a retired New Zealander, the married couple break for superannuation, which is paid at 66% of the net after-tax average wages, it was around about NZ$750 per couple per fortnight.
"Since we’ve been in office it’s now just under NZ$900 – I think it’s NZ$890 last time I looked. Well that is a huge increase for those people and the reason for that is because we have essentially cut taxes and lifted net after-tax wages by so much," Key said.
Patterson: But aren’t you also counting on being able to reduce that deficit as a result of the government bond rate declining, when a number of economists have said in the last few days that may not be a realistic assumption?
“Well there’s a lot of different factors there isn’t there," Key said. "No one really is sure. It’ll depend on what yields are like. What we do know is Alan Bollard had originally written into his bond curve predictions, I think, or certainly the market estimates were, a 1-1.5% tightening in 2011.
"He [Bollard] then scaled that back to 1% and I think now he’s saying that is less likely. So there doesn’t look to me to be a lot of upward pressure on interest rates," Key said.
"That doesn’t mean we don’t pay more on the international markets, but certainly domestically there’s not a lot of upward pressure on interest rates," he said.
"And again, relatively speaking, because New Zealand’s debt at a government level is in good shape, government-issued debt is actually well sought after. Nevertheless those external liabilities – and you go back to that issue of we borrow a whole lot because of our private sector debt and we borrow almost all of it from offshore - it’s not a sustainable position.
"New Zealand has to get on top of its penchant for borrowing so much money from foreigners. You just need to start saving more," Key said.
(Updates with comments on surplus track, bond rates)
25 Comments
I could go with "a sheep asleep at the wheel".
Seriously though, some tough questions need to be asked about the quality of our assets especially if John Key is basing his willingness to borrow $12-15 billion a year on our having "a very strong balance sheet".
We don't. Leaky homes liabilities, student loan debt as an asset, and I recall a $10 billion valuation for the rail network and $15 billion worth of housing stock in HNZ. The last two make Landcorp's over statement of farm asset values look trivial.
"Hon JOHN KEY: Yes, I am very concerned about New Zealand’s future debt levels. In the short term, the prospect of excessive levels of Government debt could well bring about a downgrade from credit agencies. Members will be aware that Standard and Poor’s recently gave New Zealand a negative outlook. A downgrade would lead to New Zealanders paying higher interest rates, and would risk our having lower growth rates into the future. I remind the Leader of the Opposition that if he wants to make promises about doing more and spending more, he should know that the money can come only from debt, given our current cash deficit. Maybe he should show some restraint."
What happend to Keys views of February 2009?
Has anyone seen the Monty Python skit where the city of Atlantis is sinking and the Governer keeps telling everyone not to panic as it is just a "little damp underfoot"? It s a classic and very appropriate for NZ.
Alex - see if you can get hold of it.
Morgan Stanley wrote an excellent piece on sovereign debt and consoluded that currentdebt-GBP ratios are largely irrelevant as they are historic. What is important is its future capacity to tax v. its future committed liabilities of entitlement expenditure.
Here lies NZ's issue - our tax base is still risky as it is overly-reliant on the income tax of small % of skilled individuals, who are the most likely to move to Australia if things get bad here.
In addition, we have a hugh futire committment for entitlement spending, especially when the baby boomers start retiring next year.
Likewise: I recall the news footage on Sky from about two years ago, of the chief of some small Nigerian village; standing atop a still smouldering disrailed fuel tanker, and assuring the villagers to come out of the jungle as..." It's safe! There's nothing to worry about..". Whatever it was he was about to say after that, was replaced by the massive explosion under his feet.
Here it is everyone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8IBnfkcrsM
Fantastic clip. I'll try get Bernard to put it in his top 10. Probably a bit rich to embed it in the above post.
Cheers
Alex
Have updated with some more comments from Key during the interview.
He had a go at Cullen, and he's cool about the interest rates we pay on govt borrowings.
They don't have a link up yet, but you can get to it here
http://www.radiolive.co.nz/Audio/tabid/109/Default.aspx
It was on Sunday between 9:30 and 10am
They recorded the interview during the week. It you listen, Key sounds tired in it. Time for a holiday in Hawaii
"New Zealand has to get on top of its penchant for borrowing so much money from foreigners. You just need to start saving more," Key said.
We knew this in 2007 .... Since then the GOVT has had a penchant for borrowing.
The latest credit statistics show that the only sector pay down debt, in a meaningful way, is the business sector.
M3 money supply is growing again.
With the GOVT stepping in to provide "life support" and "liquidity".. with its $250-300 million deficits... we had a window of opportunity to ,kind of, DE-TOX off of our debt addiction.... BUT we didn't...
Now we are in a far worse position to deal with issues.
As Govt debt quickly creeps up to 30% of GDP... the metaphor of "painting oneself into a corner" comes to mind.... Add that to private sector debt, and it becomes disturbing.
It is disturbing that he says GOVT debt will top out at 28.5% of GDP... but that part of the forecast is for GOVT bond rates to decline.... ( which is a BIG assumption )
Patterson: But aren’t you also counting on being able to reduce that deficit as a result of the government bond rate declining, when a number of economists have said in the last few days that may not be a realistic assumption?
$300 million divided by population of 4 million equals $75 per week for every person.
Say half the population is working then that equals $150 per week.... $7800 per yr.
This is actually a kind of hidden tax... but the payment of it is in the future.
AND ... this is all compounding away.
Considering all the "talk fests" and working groups .... run by , supposedly, our best minds... what has resulted from and come out of them,,,,.... has been a little pathetic.
Les and John thru their lobby group ( exporters association ) have come out with better questions, than most of these govt sponsered groups.
(Brash for example, is still coming out with yesterdays thinking to the problems of today )
Not good.
Our public debt may be low, but once you take into account private debt I believe we're up there with countries like Greece, Portugal, Ireland. How can we afford to pay off public debt when Kiwis, at current rates (*), will be paying off the mortgages on their leaking homes for the next 25 years?
* beware of the use of 'at current rates' any time you see it because it somehow implies that nothing is going to change for the worse.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.