The Accident Compensation Scheme (ACC) is anticipating climate-related factors will affect future claims.
The state insurer made this observation in its latest annual climate report, released alongside its annual report for the year to June 2024.
ACC board chair Tracey Batten and deputy chair David Hunt wrote in the climate report that climate change poses “significant” risks including increased frequency of extreme weather events that may impact the type of injuries New Zealanders experience.
The pair said addressing these challenges would require a coordinated and informed approach.
The state insurer revealed a $7.23 billion deficit in the June-2024 financial year, driven by a 16% increase in injury services and compensation. ACC said the deficit had “exceeded” its budget expectations.
ACC said the deficit was mainly driven by significant increases in the outstanding claims liability (OCL) calculation, which is the expected lifetime costs of supporting accidents that have already occurred.
"The recorded deficit does not affect ACC’s ability to cover the cost of providing all its services to New Zealanders. However, higher than expected OCL increases indicate the costs to support clients are rising faster than expected, which could result in shifting higher costs onto future generations," ACC said.
In the 2023 financial year, ACC reported a $911 million surplus.
During the 2024 financial year, ACC said over two million injured people were paid out over $4 billion for treatment and rehabilitation services, and almost $3 billion of compensation payments.
ACC said in its 2024 climate report it believes climate-related factors have the potential to impact injury types, claim volumes, and access to treatment and rehabilitation services in the future.
The report found that ACC’s exposure to climate risk is “extremely broad”.
“Because injuries are caused by a wide range of factors, and occur in many different settings, it is challenging to understand how climate change will influence injuries in Aotearoa New Zealand,” the report said.
“Despite the inherent uncertainty, we recognise that by beginning climate modelling, we can collaborate more effectively across the health and wider public sector.”
ACC is a Crown entity. It was set up under the Accident Compensation Act 2001 in order to deliver the country’s accident insurance scheme with the purpose of delivering injury prevention initiatives and no-fault personal injury cover for everyone in NZ.
ACC said in its climate report that it had a responsibility to contribute to national planning for climate adaptation. It began a three-year programme of work back in 2023 to work on understanding the climate risks and opportunities that ACC could be exposed to in the short, medium and long-term.
“Climate risk is already included in our enterprise risk framework, and our existing monitoring of claims data helps us watch for climate-related impacts on injuries and rehabilitation,” ACC said.
“The current work programme extends this approach by developing a forward view that will help enable early adaptation and planning. The work will lead to a formal climate adaptation plan for ACC.”
ACC has set targets to reduce the carbon intensity of its investment portfolio by 60% by 2025 and 65% by 2030, compared to 2019 levels.
11 Comments
An $8 billion dollar swing of expenditure in only a year takes a little more explanation than "higher than expected OCL increases". I'm not biting hard at climate change being a leading factor for future cost changes either - an influence but not a headline. This feels like the covid excuse is no longer acceptable so climate change is the next best place to hide from uncomfortable conversations when questions are asked.
They aren't saying Climate Change is a leading factor.
The reasons for the swing are explained here.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/530961/acc-announces-7-point-2-bill…
Sarc?
We know vehicle injuries will be going up thanks to Simeon Brown's ideologically driven blanket roll back of evidence based road safety measures.
A completely self-inflicted wound, what a clown. He will be directly responsible for more deaths and serious injuries on our roads and higher ACC costs.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/09/16/people-will-die-more-concerns-raised…
Can someone tell ACC to read AR6?
"evidence is lacking or the signal is not present, leading to overall low confidence of an emerging signal for
-
River floods
-
Heavy precipitation and pluvial floods
-
Landslides
-
Drought (all types)
-
Severe wind storms
-
Tropical cyclones
-
Sand and dust storms
-
Heavy snowfall and ice storms
-
Hail
-
Snow avalanche
-
Coastal flooding
-
Marine heat waves"
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapte…
https://stoppress.co.nz/news/panasonic-urges-kiwis-stop-weather-waffle/
profile,
So here's the dichotomy; AR6 does indeed say this, but the IPCC does not doubt the reality of anthropogenic climate change-https://www.ipcc.ch/2021/08/09/ar6-wg1-20210809-pr/
With 4 young grandchildren, I would be ecstatic if it could be shown that while climate change is real, we are overstating its effects. I am not a scientist, so all i can do is read widely on the subject and come to conclusions while accepting that new evidence might require me to alter my views.
Firstly, teach them the IPCC's oft overlooked quote "the climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible" then put them on to IPCC AR6 WG1 Chapter 12 Table 12.12. This table details the signal of climate change for various phenomena, listed above, has not yet emerged beyond natural variability.
While you are at it teach them the difference between The Summary for Policy Makers, which is written by politicians and quoted by the media, and the Working Group reports written by scientists.
If that doesn't get them to sleep on time I don't know what will!
profile,
Well, I don't make predictions, but society can't just sit on its hands and say, the future too difficult to allow us to make accurate predictions, so we will do nothing when there are things we do know. We do know that there is much more CO2 in the atmosphere and that is primarily the result of human activity. We do know that higher levels of CO2 act to increase the temperature. We know that there is worldwide glacier melt as a result. We know that warmer air can hold more moisture. We know that in some area, sea levels are rising. I could provide evidence for all these statements if required.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.