sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

With a weak NZ dollar harming the outlook for imported inflation, could the RBNZ be tempted to intervene to try and prop the NZ dollar up?

Currencies / analysis
With a weak NZ dollar harming the outlook for imported inflation, could the RBNZ be tempted to intervene to try and prop the NZ dollar up?

With the New Zealand dollar taking a battering at a time the Reserve Bank is striving to reduce the highest inflation in 32 years, could the central bank be tempted to intervene in the currency markets in an effort to prop the Kiwi up?

A weaker NZ dollar comes at a bad time for the Reserve Bank. That's because it worsens the outlook for tradable, or imported, inflation stemming from the likes of petrol, food and clothing. For the June year tradable inflation weighed in at 8.7%, the biggest annual movement since the Statistics NZ series began in June 2000. It was a major factor in the overall annual Consumers Price Index (CPI) inflation rise of 7.3%, the biggest increase in 32 years.

BNZ Head of Research Stephen Toplis noted this week that: "At the time of writing the NZ Dollar Trade Weighted Index was sitting at 67.5. This is 5.9% below where the Reserve Bank had assumed it would sit. If it stays here that could add as much as 0.6% to CPI forecasts, which is clearly unhelpful."

The Reserve Bank has increased the Official Cash Rate (OCR) to 3% from 0.25% last October as it strives to get CPI inflation back into its 1% to 3% target band, and is expected to lift the OCR by another 50 basis points next Wednesday, October 5.

At the time of writing the NZ dollar is at US57.19c, having been above US70c as recently as March. Over the past decade it has ranged from a high of US88.21c in July 2014 to a low of US56.08c in March 2020, challenging that low as recently as Wednesday.

To assist its monetary policy inflation fight, might the Reserve Bank be considering currency market intervention, buying the Kiwi dollar, to try and prop it up?

Kiwibank Chief Economist Jarrod Kerr doesn't think so.

"It's a lot easier to sell your currency because you can print as much of it as you like and sell it to get it down. It's much harder to prop up your currency because you have to use your foreign reserves to do so, and my understanding is we don't have much in the way of foreign reserves, probably about $10 billion," says Kerr.

He points out that the main story in currency markets at the moment is the strong US dollar, so effectively the Reserve Bank would be fighting the US Federal Reserve, and a global push into US dollars as a safe haven and the world's reserve currency.

The Fed, Kerr says, is a central central bank that has proven itself to be "quite assertive" in its monetary policy tightening. The Fed has increased the Federal Funds Rate, its OCR equivalent, to a range of 3% to 3.25% from a range of 0.25% to 0.50% as recently as March. 

"That interest rate advantage that we had against the US dollar has evaporated. So that's a big reason why the Kiwi has come off," says Kerr. "Most of the world's currencies have come under pressure against the US dollar."

Jason Wong, BNZ's Senior Markets Strategist, also doesn't expect any Reserve Bank currency markets intervention. Wong says Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Orr's comments on the NZ dollar to date recognise there isn’t much the Reserve Bank can do to affect its value on a sustainable basis.

"I can’t see any level that the Reserve Bank would step in to intervene. If he [Orr] was truly worried about its downward path, then given the inflationary backdrop the most sensible policy would be to counteract that with higher interest rates," says Wong.

How about a 75 basis points OCR hike?

While most economists, including Kerr, expect a 50 basis points OCR increase when it's next reviewed by the Reserve Bank on October 5, Kerr says a 75 basis points increase might be considered due to the weak Kiwi dollar.

"I think so because it's frustrating our tradables [inflation] forecast. We've had a lot of things moving in the right direction for us, we've had a cooling in commodity prices to some extent and the expectations of where commodity prices go is in our favour. Shipping costs have come off quite a lot. So imported inflation looks like it has peaked and looks like it's going to head south into next year and that's great. But obviously that has been frustrated by the drop in the Kiwi currency," Kerr says.

Whilst a weak NZ dollar is good news for exporters and tourism, Kerr notes the vast majority of the economy is dealing with much higher interest rates, very high inflation and a lack of confidence.

The Reserve Bank has intervened in the currency markets from time to time in the past. One such example was in April 2013 when it sold NZ$256 million in a move that proved quite effective in weakening the NZ dollar, which was trading as high as US86c.

A Reserve Bank spokesman says the central bank generally doesn't comment on operational aspects of foreign exchange activities. He notes any currency market intervention would need to be consistent with the Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Committee’s Remit.

Additionally the spokesman says the new Reserve Bank Act requires the Reserve Bank and the Minister of Finance to agree on a framework for the management and use of foreign reserves.

"In light of this, we are in the process of undertaking a comprehensive review of our foreign reserves management framework which will include governance arrangements, the objectives of holding foreign reserves, funding arrangements, and reserves adequacy," the spokesman says.

RBNZ could intervene 'if the exchange rate is exceptionally and unjustifiably high or low'

The Reserve Bank spokesman also points to a 2004 speech by Orr when he was Reserve Bank Deputy Governor and Head of Financial Stability. In the speech Orr said at times the NZ dollar has varied by far more than can be justified by relevant economic fundamentals.

"It is at these exceptional and unjustifiable levels of the exchange rate that the Bank would consider buying or selling foreign currencies for NZ dollars in an effort to influence the level of the exchange rate. There is no mechanical rule underlying this new objective - such decisions are made in context," Orr said.

"An important part of the Bank's consideration to intervene would be the dynamics of the foreign exchange market at the time and whether we feel our actions will be effective. In other words, the Bank would intervene at opportune times, not when the currency's direction is being dominated by strong international trends or consensus opinions."

"We do not intend wasting our reserves by defending a particular exchange rate level, nor do we intend standing in the way of strong market trends or beliefs. We also do not expect to attract speculators who think they can `take the Bank on'. If we are not defending a particular level of the exchange rate, we have no mechanical rule, and we intervene consistent with our monetary policy objectives at opportune times, then it is unclear what nature of speculator would be attracted by our actions," said Orr.

Orr noted an intervention strategy would be consistent with the Reserve Bank's primary objective of achieving and maintaining price stability.

"Hence, foreign exchange intervention can be viewed as another instrument for the Bank, consistent with achieving our monetary policy objectives, albeit a very secondary instrument to our most powerful one of the Official Cash Rate. Intervention would be considered in reasonably infrequent circumstances, that is, when the exchange rate level is exceptional and unjustified by economic fundamentals, and when we believe an opportunity to be effective exists."

The Reserve Bank would contemplate intervening, Orr said; "if the exchange rate is exceptionally and unjustifiably high or low, and we think an opportunity exists that would ensure such intervention was effective."

"By exceptionally high or low, we mean when the exchange rate is nearing its cyclical extremes, as has been seen in New Zealand over recent decades on a three to five year cycle. By unjustifiable, we mean when the exchange rate has moved well in excess of any relevant economic fundamentals, such as relative productivity, commodity prices, growth, or inflation," said Orr.

He added that most of the time NZ's floating exchange rate performs important economic functions such as acting as a buffer against shocks to the terms of trade or relative business cycle pressure.

"We believe our floating exchange rate serves New Zealand well," Orr said.

Meanwhile Kerr notes that the Kiwi dollar always underperforms in a world with weakening risk appetite.

"The Kiwi dollar loves growth and confidence – even irrational exuberance. Whereas traders are quickly reminded that the Kiwi is a flightless bird when risk sentiment turns south," says Kerr.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

35 Comments

Direct currency intervention is only a very short-term band aid that creates more problems than it is supposed to solve. The only viable option is to increase the OCR by at least 100 bps next month, and to forecast an OCR peak of 5%, to be reached by early next year and to be held at that level for the foreseeable future. 

Anything less than that, and the NZ dollar will keep depreciating, creating more inflation and therefore forcing the RBNZ to go up to 5% anyway.  

Up
30

There must be a point at which the currency devalues so much that the overall inflation cost at a consumer level alters spending patterns more than the effect of a 75bps or even 100bps rise.

Up
5

Time for some shock and Orr. 100bps all the way baby.

Up
10

History might give us a clue as to the result. ( I know. We all know this story). But have we just had a re-run of Black Monday? Maybe, not yet.

Andy Krieger, a 32-year-old currency trader at Bankers Trust, was carefully watching the currencies that were rallying against the dollar following the Black Monday crash. As investors and companies rushed out of the American dollar and into other currencies, there were bound to be some currencies that would become fundamentally overvalued. The currency Krieger targeted was the New Zealand dollar, also known as the kiwi. Krieger took up a short position against the kiwi. In fact, his sell orders were said to exceed the entire money supply of New Zealand.

Up
5

Thanks be. Can you post the link please.

Up
0

The US dollar milkshake theory is playing out in front of our eyes. 
 

Up
10

It's not a question of 'intention'. It's a question of 'capability'. Can the RBNZ afford, with the amount of foreign reserves it has, to prop the currency up by direct currency intervention? 

There really is one obvious solution - increase the OCR by at least 100 points. Fail to do so and get punished. The UK/GBP is already a very obvious example and the NZD is right behind.

But it does look like a leopard never changes its spots. In 2004, the double/empty talk engaged by Orr remains breathtaking - "There is no mechanical rule underlying this new objective - such decisions are made in context," Orr said."

Up
10

Minimum is 0.75% rise is minimum, if nort more ut will Mr Orr come out of his comfort and act.

Up
5

It's a question of 'capability'.

Well said. And the answer is the RBNZ doesn't have the capability nor the aptitude to handle a play like that. Gambling in a suit.

Up
0

Wouldn't a gambler ,who can tilt the wheel in its favour,go all in with a leveraged 10 billion nzd purchase ,then, whack OCR up 200 BP afterwards? 

Up
1

More like a high roller hedge fund come in with 10B to take on RBNZ and short the NZD.

Up
1

Perhaps a review of the RBNZ's F5 table (Foreign Currency assets and liabilities and currency flows) recently updated might be in order and a reflection on one of the larger moves of the NZD, Feb 2008 (0.8150) to Mar 2009 (0.4920) a fall of 40%  During that time the RBNZ sold NZD 1.644bio between Feb 2008 and Jun 2008 and then bought NZD1.261bio between Nov 2008 and Mar 2009.  The distribution of the NZD moves since 1999, not normally distributed, puts it currently around the bottom 20% of outcomes.  In short I don't think the RBNZ at this level would be concerned about the currency as much as inflation outcomes.  Sure inflation outcomes are impacted by the level of the currency but supporting the currency at these levels is not effective when the USD is so dominate and likely to be raising interest rates faster, and perhaps higher, than NZ.  As an aside the average NZDUSD rate (as per RBNZ daily data) in the period they were selling was 0.7851 and buying was 0.5443 so I don't think we are at a tipping point on the currency yet but I bet they would love to add a few hundred million to their pocket if it was going to be effective.

Up
2

It's not just against the USD - that's a definite issue but not the only issue. It's that the TWI-5 is decreasing, and the NZD remains weak(er) against other currencies (which are also weakening against the USD). When the US raises its interest rates and NZ is left behind, the NZD would be a complete disaster.

In 2008 to 2009, I don't recall an inflation issue at play. Yet today you have it. When there's an easier albeit painful path out, take it when it still exists. 

Up
3

The interest rate spread is only part of the issue really. It’s mostly about the global market and usd strength.

When risk aversion is at play, we always get hit hard. NZD always goes down harder than AUD, EUR, etc, in these environments, so I’m not sure if we would be seeing much of a difference if our current setting was 3.5 vs 3.

I know a lot of commenters on here are pushing 100, but I feel like it would do a lot of harm, and not much good. 

Up
0

That's the real question. Why is it that the NZD goes down harder against the currencies you named, and other currencies too? Even the peso and the ringgit have strengthened against the NZD - and these governments are not the most stellar.

Is there a scenario whereby the NZ economy can withstand those shocks better than the rest? Maybe when a well-managed, stable and forward-looking government and central bank team is in place? 

Simply blaming it on the USD is a cop-out and easy excuse for 'nothing to see here' Orr and team.

Up
1

Why is it that the NZD goes down harder against the currencies you named, and other currencies too? Even the peso and the ringgit have strengthened against the NZD - and these governments are not the most stellar.

Because those countries have commodities that NZ doesn't have?

 

Up
0

100 or bust.

Up
0

100 and bust?

Up
0

no 100 and 100% bust

Up
0

is this a troll -- or just a filler piece as nothing else to write about today ?    not a hope in hell that they will intervene --- and even less chance it would be successful ---  

Even the concept that we could buy 10, 20 even 100 billion worth and get more than a few days relief is laughable --   the US dollar juggernaught is crushing all in its path -- and until globally inflation is tamed, recessions have been had and are nearly over -- there is no stopping it -  

Hell the UK announced a buy back of about 140 billion sterling   which has done little more than temporary stabilise the pound --   and we might have 10 bill to play with .... 

Up
7

Yeah, 100% the answer to the question in the headline! No chance of doing any good. It did feel like a bit of a troll when I read it too, or maybe let’s say encouraging discourse…! 

Up
0

The Fed, Kerr says, is a central central bank that has proven itself to be "quite assertive"...

I don't see a single OECD central bank that really has a handle on inflation. One suspects that, had RBNZ already taken the steps required to bring inflation to within the target range, we would not be discussing Kiwi weakness.

Up
5

Swiss National Bank? Alarmed that inflation has shot up to 3.5%

Up
0

Edit

Up
0

Hopefully, and then I can get the rest of my NZD out at a slightly better rate

Up
0

Orr is right on the mark in this instance. 

FX intervention is an option of last resort and we're nowhere near that. The best thing for us is to reach close to 5% in fairly short order and sit there, then RBNZ can watch global rates and offer a 50-75bps premium over AAA debts

Up
4

5 is a very powerful number ... Nothing wrong with sitting on 5% , it's the perfect default in my opinion .  Folk will hate it but its a solid play.

Up
1

A very polarising thought: could the current events, politics, war, the diminishing western influence, and the rise of Asian economies (China, India, SKorea, middle east) be the precursor to a new medium of exchange, otherwise known as money? End of USD hegemony!

Up
2

Countries like Russia and China have been at this for many years, Russia's reserve currency is currently the Chinese yuan (RMB).

Check out Ray Dalio's The changing world order.

Up
0

"The Kiwi dollar loves growth and confidence – even irrational exuberance. Whereas traders are quickly reminded that the Kiwi is a flightless bird when risk sentiment turns south," says Kerr.

Great quote.

 

 

Up
4

Can't sell any gold for a simple reason: there isn't any. 

Up
1

Hiking interest rates is the only solution.

Wallstreetbets could make a fool out of any RBNZ initiatives overnight, as could any FX trader working for one of the major investment banks.

NZD USD will bottom at just below 50 cents as per GFC.

 If things turn to custard, then yes much lower.

But you are talking more serious issues to worry about then.

Up
3

But how could this slump in the kiwi be happening?  Even run-of-the-mill NZers are millionaires!  THEY ARE DISRESPECTING US!

Up
0