sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Fletcher Building says 'macroeconomic pressures' are expected to persist and economic activity to remain subdued at 'below mid-cycle levels' for the remainder of the financial year

Business / news
Fletcher Building says 'macroeconomic pressures' are expected to persist and economic activity to remain subdued at 'below mid-cycle levels' for the remainder of the financial year
fletch-int1.jpg

Construction giant Fletcher Building [FBU] has reported a bigger half-year loss of $134 million,  versus $120 million a the same time a year ago.

The company says in its report on NZX that "macroeconomic pressures are expected to persist and economic activity to remain subdued at below mid-cycle levels for the remainder of the financial year". Fletcher again won't pay a dividend, having halted payments last year. The company has raised cash from shareholders in order to pay down debts.

In the past 12 months the embattled construction giant has had a host of replacements of both directors and senior staff, including a new chairman (Peter Crowley) and new chief executive.

CEO Andrew Reding, who is also managing director, said the first half of the 2025 financial year "continued to be a challenging period for our businesses as very difficult trading conditions continued across all our segments".

"This included a broad-based slowing of demand, intense competitive forces and persistent inflationary pressures. Our businesses navigated these obstacles by focusing on optimising operational performance and tightly managing the things within our control. We are pleased with the progress achieved to date on our key priorities which have been: resetting governance and leadership roles of the Group; the ongoing strategic review; the Group-wide cost reduction programme; cash; being prudent with capital expenditure; and progressing the resolution of outstanding legacy issues."

This included a $170 million provision for leaky pipe issues in Western Australia and sale of the Tradelink subsidiary.

Reding said the company was  making progress in "resolving" its remaining construction "legacy projects".

"The New Zealand International Convention Centre project [in Auckland] is now in its final stages, with major construction works substantially completed. Our focus has shifted to finishing, testing, and commissioning, and we remain committed to delivering the project, with handover scheduled by 30 June 2025."

The Residential and Development division reported gross revenue of $240 million, a $111 million and a 32% reduction on the prior period.

EBIT (earnings before interest and tax) for the division was $14 million, compared with $41 million in the prior period. 

Reding said performance in the Residential and Development division "reflected the overall housing market in New Zealand", with 115 fewer units contracted and sold versus the prior period, with average market prices also down approximately 2% on the prior period.

"However, some tentative signs of improvement began to appear post the first OCR cut late in 2024, with sales up 17% between September-December 2024, as compared to July-August 2024.

"Pleasingly, the Construction division performed well with revenue up 16%, with higher work volumes arising from key infrastructure projects."

The  company said the most active part of the residential housing market continued to be in the lower price point, first-home buyer segment, "an area of strength for Fletcher Residential".

This was supported by the introduction of promotions such as a $10,000 First Home Buyer Grant, providing strong market differentiation. As a result, 304 units (including 21 apartments) were taken to profit compared to 419 units (including 47 apartments) in the prior period, with 114 contracts already executed to settle in the second half of FY25.

In briefly commenting on the outlook for Fletcher Building for the remainder of the financial year to June 30, Reding said the macroeconomic pressures are expected to persist and economic activity to remain subdued at below mid-cycle levels.

"Despite this, we remain focused on what we can control: delivering operational excellence, tightly managing costs, prioritising safety, and providing the best possible service to our customers. I look forward to sharing further details on our strategic review prior to our upcoming Investor Day in June 2025."

This is the company's results presentation.

This is the company's half-year financial report.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

11 Comments

At least the presentations won't take long to prepare - just update a few numbers but the messages just stay the same.........

Up
3

I find it astounding that a company which effectively runs a monopoly manages to lose money in the largest industry in our country.

Up
10

It is absolutely flabbergasting. 

Like the brain of an NFL player, this company should be donated to the worlds leading business schools and studied in detail.

Up
5

interesting their stock price has come up, they really not showing they can turn it around are they.

how long will they continue like this before its split?

Up
0

Perhaps the loss was not as bad as people were expecting. 

Up
0

that convention project is just the gift that keeps on giving isnt it? 

Up
1

If this isn't a barometer of the economy I don't know what is. Interest rates are heading lower for sure.

Up
0

How many unsold apartments and town houses have they got on their books? Do these unsold get a value and then shown on the balance sheet reducing their loss? Not an accountant but if this number is inflated upwards  would it not result in a lower loss. The loss could be worse than stated if there's over valuation.

I think Trump's accountants did overvalue properties for either banking covenants or to enable to borrow more. I suspect It is likely to be a common practice and probably world wide.

Up
0

Too many is the answer!

It’s a good point - are they ‘marked to market’ or not. Clearly they should be. Lower of cost or market value.

M.

Up
0

I've just had a look at Fletcher living website where i assume these are all Fletcher built town houses terraced etc. For Akl 153 for sale. Too many as you say.

Up
0

FBU has been an instrument of mass value destruction for shareholders, and yet the management remains the same. Have they no shame?

Up
0