sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Fletcher Building indicates that paying down its debt is in order to prevent a fire sale of assets

Business / news
Fletcher Building indicates that paying down its debt is in order to prevent a fire sale of assets
fletcher-offer1.png

Embattled construction giant Fletcher Building [FBU] is seeking to raise $700 million to pay down debts and avoid having to conduct, in effect, a fire sale of assets.

The company went into a trading halt on NZX on Monday as it announced the planned capital raise, which is fully underwritten by investment and advisory group Jarden. 

Fletcher, which recently announced a $227 million loss for the financial year to June 30, 2024, said the capital raising is "being undertaken as a prudent measure to strengthen the company’s balance sheet and improve financial stability and resilience in the current challenging environment".

The company said the capital raising would support its commitment to "maintaining an investment grade credit rating and covenant headroom under our debt facilities".

The statement said that while the company expected that market conditions will eventually recover, an improved financial position allowed it to focus on operational performance and "preserves optionality in relation to its portfolio and reduces short term pressure to realise assets at below intrinsic value".

The company's incoming managing director and CEO Andrew Reding said the equity raising "bolsters our financial position, assisting us to better endure near-term market headwinds".

"With a strengthened balance sheet, the company can focus on executing key operational initiatives in preparation for a market recovery. In addition to the equity raising, Fletcher Building remains committed to ongoing cost reduction initiatives to manage profitability in the current operating environment, and we have targeted approximately NZ$180 million of gross overhead cost savings to be delivered in FY25."

Fletcher has already been selling assets and when it announced its full year results it made fleeting reference to potentially selling at least part of its residential business. It said at the time that now was the right time to "explore capital partnership options for residential and development, to invest in and drive the next phase of the business’s success".

"Consequently, we have engaged [investment and advisory group] Jarden to explore partnership options with both local and international investors," the company said then.

The capital raising announcement on Monday doesn't give any updates on this.

FMA investigation

Among a number of risk factors highlighted around the company, however, is the previously undisclosed fact that it is being investigated by markets watchdog the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) in regard to compliance with "continuous disclosure obligations".

It relates to announcements Fletcher made to NZX on February 5 and February 14 this year. The February 5 announcement among other things, disclosed a further $165 million provision in relation to the troubled, fire damaged, New Zealand International Convention Centre project in central Auckland.

The February 14 announcement was to announce a $120 million loss for the first half of the 2024 financial year.

"In June 2024, the FMA issued to Fletcher Building an information-gathering notice under section 25 of the Financial Markets Authority Act 2011 in relation to the Investigation," Fletcher said.

"The Investigation is ongoing, and the outcome is not known at this time. However, Fletcher Building believes that the release of information in the relevant announcements in February 2024 complied with its continuous disclosure obligations. If the FMA was to determine that Fletcher Building did not comply with its continuous disclosure obligations, Fletcher Building may be subject to adverse consequences," the company said.

An FMA spokesperson said the FMA generally does not comment on whether or not it has received a complaint about - or is making inquiries into - a specific entity or person.

"The FMA is aware of the information released to the market this morning, but has no further comment, in order to protect the integrity of its inquiries," the spokesperson said.

Fletcher recently announced it would be making a A$155 million provision for a 'joint industry response' (JIR) relating to leaky pipe issues involving its Iplex subsidiary in Western Australia.

In the capital raising materials released on Monday, Fletcher said parties continued to work to finalise the JIR long form documentation "and were targeting that to occur by the end of September 2024".

"There is a likelihood that time frame will not be met."

Fletcher said there has been no change to the assessment of the expected provision that Fletcher Building expects to make in its FY25 financial statements if the JIR is finalised, "being the pre-tax provision of approximately A$155 million which was announced on 30 August 2024".

"However, that provision does not represent an assessment of the litigation risk or other risks to the group relating to the plumbing failures outside the JIR itself. That provision is the group’s assessment of the cost to it of meeting its commitments under the JIR, if that JIR is agreed.

"However, Iplex® AU’s direct costs under the In Principle Terms are not capped. If the JIR is agreed on the In Principle Terms but Iplex® AU’s direct costs exceed its expected share of those costs, or it incurs significant litigation or other costs outside of the JIR itself in relation to the plumbing failures, then this could have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Group.

"If entry into the JIR is delayed beyond September 2024, Iplex® AU will need to consider its position in relation to continuing to fund participating builders on the terms of its existing Investigation Fund."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

21 Comments

This bodes well.

Up
5

I went against most of my core investment principles (never back NZ management teams) and bought some shares in FB recently. Needless to say, I won't be making that mistake again. We need to ditch the management team and board and bring the Chinese in. NZ has become way to comfortable with mediocrity, it feels entrenched.

 

 

Up
0

There are some very good local management teams leading successful companies. Not sure why you would think fletchers are one of them though…

Up
2

"The Equity Raising will be at a fixed price of NZ$2.40 per new share"

Nowhere near enough of an enticement to risk a further capital injection? Jardens could end up with a lot of stock left on their balance sheet. The problems that caused all of this; Higgins etc, are still there. Recent lows of ~$2.70 aren't that far back in the rear vision mirror, and if Air NZ is any guide, the Right Issue price will be the new listed price in no time at all. $2.25 might have been a better level....

Up
4

Sucking the blood out of the rest of the NZ market to support a truley awful company and the fat cats running it.

Up
10

Please Infratil, can you not make an offer for Fletchers?

Is Fletchers still a sinecure for the likes of retired army types?

Up
2

Please dont :-)

Up
3

A building company run by lawyers, mbas, accountants and no technical / operational / engineering experience at the exec level that i can see... But strong leadership, vision and dei policies to hold the company together. Perhaps Ross Taylor wasn't that bad - was just in bad company.

Up
3

But no-one who's worked in an enterprise that actually makes things?

My background is in the design and making of things in the tech industry in a number of different countries, and working alongside startup companies in NZ the number of 'advisors' that seem to function on magical thinking is extraordinary.

Up
0

I once had one of these ideas magical advisor mba leadership people tell me that making it work was an "engineering problem" when I pointed out their idea couldn't possibly work due to physics...... 

Up
0

When a good ceo joins a bad company it’s the company that leaves with its reputation intact.

Up
0

After you. 

Up
0

Google "Fletchers" and "Riverhead" together.

Up
0

You mean this rejected idea...?

Up
0

Time for it to be broken up and sold off in pieces.

Up
2

This feels like an ostensibly rich family member who is temporarily financially embarrassed and would like to borrow $1,000 to enable them add to their extensive NFT portfolio. They'll pay you back next month, twofold. Have faith in them and their investment decisions. They're family!

Up
0

Signed by your friendly Nigerian Prince

Up
2

Their future looks as clear as mud, they've publish no clear plan, and they ask for more money?

"Trust us. We know what we're doing."

Up
1

Over the ditch, the M&A activity in the building sector is huge.  The fact FBU cant find a buyer for anything is indicative of just how dire their business is. 

Up
2

Who in their right mind would give FBU more capital without a change in executive management (at least) as part of the deal?

Up
3

Ex Du Val investors?

Up
0