sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Zhang Jun explains why - and how - China must stimulate household consumption to achieve a robust recovery

Business / opinion
Zhang Jun explains why - and how - China must stimulate household consumption to achieve a robust recovery
High rise in China

Chinese bank deposits increased by CN¥26.3 trillion (US$3.9 trillion) last year, according to recent data from China’s central bank, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC). Spurred by China’s rigid COVID-19 containment strategy, which the government rolled back in December, household savings surged by CN¥17.8 trillion in 2022, growing by more than CN¥5 trillion in the last two months of the year alone.

To many Western economists and analysts, these so called “excess savings” represent pent-up demand that could lead to a wave of “revenge spending” this year and drive the global economic recovery. But while China is expected to experience a recovery in consumption this year, Chinese households will likely maintain a higher level of precautionary savings over the long term.

To be sure, the increase in Chinese household savings last year is unusual and reflects consumers’ inability to spend as a result of China’s strict zero-COVID lockdowns, which forced millions to remain indoors, sometimes for months at a time. Now that China has abandoned the policy, the floodgates have opened, and it stands to reason that much of these forced savings would spill out, lifting consumption higher.

But not all of the excess savings reflect suppressed consumer spending. A very large proportion of the increase in deposits reflects what households choose to save as a precaution. Chinese households save mainly in the form of housing and financial investment, and last year they delayed home purchases and pulled out of the stock market and other underperforming financial assets in favour of keeping their money in bank deposits. According to several estimates, housing purchases declined by roughly CN¥3-4 trillion in 2022, mostly owing to investors’ expectations of a sustained economic downturn. Even if consumer spending could return to normal this year, heightened uncertainty will most likely prevent Chinese families from putting their hard-earned savings into housing or stocks, so bank deposits will remain higher.

PBOC household survey, conducted during the third quarter of last year, shows that Chinese households are still inclined to save. Only 22.8% of respondents said they would like to buy more things, compared to 58.1% who said they would like to increase their savings and 19.1% who said they would like to invest more. In part, this reflects the longstanding propensity of China’s population, as two decades of strong income growth have had little impact on households’ saving rate. But it also reflects ongoing wariness about the economy, with Chinese households – already struggling to deal with the rising costs of housing, education, and health care – seeming to play it safe and prepare for a rainy day.

Chinese policymakers must acknowledge the risk that excess savings pose for the country’s economic development and address the cost-of-living crisis that makes Chinese consumers reluctant to spend. While China has made great progress in rebuilding its social security system over the past 30 years, it has yet to provide its citizens with a level of protection commensurate with its economic strength. Even in major cities like Beijing and Shanghai, where household incomes are relatively high, residents still struggle to afford the exorbitant costs of housing, health care, education, and eldercare.

To encourage savers to spend again, China must first make housing more affordable in major cities. Building an adequate supply of government-provided public housing and long-term rentals in urban areas, and ensuring that these apartments and homes meet high safety and quality standards across the country, could disincentivise household saving and encourage more current consumption, especially among younger people.

Apart from affordable housing, providing financial support to families through welfare programs is crucial to restoring consumer confidence. To minimise the heavy burden on households struggling to pay for their basic needs, Chinese policymakers must redesign the government’s fiscal spending. Increasing social protections and offering more welfare benefits for low- and middle-income families could lead to higher spending and a more sustainable development path for the next decades.

But without a major overhaul of its fiscal policy and tax system, excessive household savings could severely impede China’s long-term economic prospects. In recent decades, the Chinese government has relied on a strategy of investment-led, credit-fueled growth to boost aggregate demand and offset sluggish consumption. But the government’s adherence to this strategy over the past decade has inevitably helped to create a speculative property bubble that made housing unaffordable for many and contributed to the country’s ongoing economic slowdown.

It is not too late to change course. China’s economy has reached a pivotal point. The government has the resources and capacity to implement fiscal and welfare policies targeting families rather than industries, and to make such a fiscal system compatible with healthy long-run economic development. But first it must take immediate steps to increase social protection and welfare spending for its low- and middle-income families. If Chinese policymakers spend more on households, they will find that households are more willing to spend.


Zhang Jun is Dean of the School of Economics at Fudan University and Director of the China Center for Economic Studies, a Shanghai-based think tank. Copyright 2023 Project Syndicate, here with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

19 Comments

You need stability and confidence in your household wealth and income to be confident in spending. 

How many Chinese do you think are confident in their own property sector? 

Up
4

The article seems to think if there's enough state welfare then confidence will increase and people will consume more, everybody happy.

Good case for a CBDC that you can't bank.

Up
1

I do wonder which authoritarinistic leader engendered less confidence in their citizens : Xi in China , or Ardern in Zealandia .... luckily for us , ours cleared off after the damage was done & the future looked bleakest ...

... less bleak in Zealandia now she's scarpered  ... unbleaker than before ...

Up
3

Lol. Massive overhauls of the tax system is twiddling. China’s biggest problems are their demographics, and their government. Neither can be changed.

China was always destined to be a middle income country.

The boom days are gone for good.

Up
4

Neither can be changed.

Unless they clone people.

Up
0

Suggest that and you are the Antichrist.

Up
0

..  being a " middle income country " is nothing to sneeze at  ...it's perfectly fine if the citizens have a free & democratic system , affordable food & housing , a competitive health & education system ... a clean environment ... good water ...

Life is sweet ... quite simple , really ...

Up
3

Aren't Luxembourg and Qatar high income countries. NZ used to be high income but as the rest of the developed world improved faster we are now middle income. I reckon I'm happier here than I would be in most higher income countries.  Of course much depends on where you fit into society.

Up
1

... my primary gripe about Zealandia is that we've had successive governments who've lost sight of those most basic needs that people have ... Key thought that $million houses were a good thing ... Ardern thought that saving the world was more important than fixing the frigging pot holes ...

We should be doing so much better as a nation with the resources we have : our infrastructure  , health care & education have gone backwards for 20 or 30 years ... why ? ... when we pay so much tax , why ...

Up
5

We've been paying around the same level of tax and that hasn't risen to meet the increased costs of running the country. Aging population, support for legacy systems whilst trying to deploy new ones, etc.

Up
0

Potholes more important than planet?

I'm trying

Up
0

Yes , you are ...

Up
0

Good. I think there are too many people just think the planet is just a thorn in their side

Up
0

NZ is high income. Middle income countries, globally, are places such as Argentina and Brazil.

Up
1

Just checked the figures and you are right. We are number 32, lying between Aruba and Malta.

Up
2

Australia is 21 ... so much for our high minded ideals of saving the planet by shutting down mining  ... the Aussies are going from strength to strength  & distancing themselves from us ...

Up
0

The thought processes of our current political classes has been sub-par for a long time now. How long? Well, at least the 40-50 years I've been following it. Creating massive welfare classes is not a recipe for a small nation a long way from anywhere, if it wants to stay & keep playing in the premiership.

We are not alone in this misguided adventure as anyone with half a brain can read about in countries like the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Spain & even the great US of A.

Such are the standards of what passes for education these days, that we can clearly see the free world that we grew up in, disappearing into the secular clutches of socialism, under the guise of the social democrats, with its poor law & anti nuclear family garbage that has dragged us into the beginning of the abyss, written about all those years ago [but mostly forgotten today] whilst we sit behind our keyboards & bitch at one another over.... well, most things as it happens.

We are today well into the decline of the Anglosphere which is sad, but which is also inevitable if you study the history of humanity. And whilst not perfect by any means, will be remembered for once great education system for the masses, its fine & in some cases, outstanding institutions [of which parliament was once one] it's love of sports - which replaced warfare in many instances & as the first real dominant culture in human history [that I can figure out] to give women so many of the freedoms they take for granted today [when two out of three women world wide, still do not have these same choices].

Taking things for granted is not solely a female perogative [prerogative]. Men do it daily, hourly in many cases & it is not that beneficial for our increasingly fragile psychological facilities in the long term. Life is a gift. Each day is a gift. We should not squander it unnecessarily. Every day counts. Every day is special in some way. Honour it. Celebrate it if it calls for it. But most of all, share it with one another as much as you can. You can never have too many friends. Therein lies the joy of the journey.

Up
4

Consumption as in, eat more? 

Or is it consumption as in 'keep that landfull' turning over.

Surely there is a better way to live on this planet 

Up
0

... yes , there is  ...

Up
0