sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Martin Whetton says events in fixed income markets this week have no historical precedent, suggesting a sea-change in the way the US is viewed

Bonds / opinion
Martin Whetton says events in fixed income markets this week have no historical precedent, suggesting a sea-change in the way the US is viewed

By Martin Whetton*

• Wednesday’s price action for fixed income markets, specifically Treasuries has no historical precedent. It is not so much the range- wide and choppy, but the nature of the violent unwind and fall in liquidity, or actually the absence of the liquidity that is concerning. As we noted in the Antipodean Wrap yesterday, and with no embellishment, the age of US exceptionalism (at least financially) has come to an end.

• To see the enormous shift in USD swap spreads, the largest move seen since SOFR was introduced, in this (Asian) time zone, the sharp ‘flash-crash’ move higher in US Treasury yields, and the USD sold heavily, was to witness a stripping away of the shield of liquidity and safety. No other market has had this reserve status in the modern era, and those who had it previously, saw their empires crumble.

• Dramatic? No, it shouldn’t be seen that way. The US has enjoyed the prime position in global finance since the end of WW2, cemented with Bretton Woods a generation ago. Global trade, recycling of money to finance America, structurally lower yields and low forex risk have been benefits.

By losing or diminishing credibility as a financial safe haven, the willingness of creditors to LEND money to the US is reduced. Never forget, a buyer of a bond is lending to that entity. In this case the US Government. A genuine question a lender always asks, and should ask, is ‘Will I get my money back?’.

• The world, political and financial is looking on with horror, not bemusement, at an administration that prioritises the signing of an executive order for more water-power in shower heads, on the same day that the bond market breaks and investors question the long-term credibility of the administration having flip flopped on the largest of their policies, tariffs.

• The coming weeks are a big test for the bond market. Large net supply in Treasuries comes to market, investors are unsure of the long-term funding plans now that the ‘big, beautiful revenues’ aren’t flowing as planned.

• The jump in yields in the order of 20-25 basis points in a 20 minute period isn’t the first time we have seen such an event, but, combined with the moves in swap spreads yesterday, crunching tighter, such that a UST 10-year yielded 60 basis points over the same tenor swap rate is simply staggering.

• To be sure, there would have been the impact of the VaR (Value at Risk) event that saw bond positions sliced, and the ‘basis trade’ unwound. That played its part. But more broadly, even with central clearing allowing for some narrowing of swap/bond spreads in recent years (it is not a recent change in market structure) the ultimate risk-free curve, of USTs, the ‘golden collateral’, the actual instrument any investor from Tennessee to Tokyo can buy, is being challenged.

• That money did not scramble to secure USD funding (via the basis markets), to buy Treasuries and the USD for safety, is startling and a sharp warning.

• Hemingway’s quote about going into bankruptcy and how it happens (not that this is a possibility as a sovereign to be clear and we would be very cautious to suggest anything different) was “Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.” Think of that in terms of the loss of hegemony, financial authority, and liquidity.

• Giving that hegemony, that authority, that liquidity and reserve status up, perhaps not willingly, but flippantly and without due consideration is not something you just ‘get back’.

• It will take a long time to de-dollarise reserves, and a hat tip to the Deutsche Bank analyst who discussed this theme some weeks ago, but the path, which had started slowly at first, is moving to ‘all at once’. My colleague Richard Franulovich recently discussed the acceleration of de-dollarisation under the Trump administration in a note entitled AUD: Shifting long term flow risks (11 Mar 25).

• Trust is earned hard and lost easily. The expression used for the US government debt is ‘full faith and credit’. Dollar bills carry the term ‘E pluribus, unum’ ‘Out of many, one’.

• Those dollar bills also carry the term ‘Novo ordo seclorum’ which means ‘a new order for the ages’. As we watch the institutional framework and hegemony of the last eight decades change so rapidly, and, from the observation of many people, dismantled, those words printed on millions of pieces of paper, IOUs, have a somewhat hollow feeling.

• A favourite ever quote on markets comes from the former CEO of Citicorp, Walter Wriston, who observed that “capital goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well treated”. Words to remember.


*Martin Whetton is Head of FM Strategy at Westpac Institutional Bank. This article is used with permission and first featured here. (Whetton also featured in this episode of interest.co.nz's Of Interest podcast in 2023).

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

20 Comments

Thank you for a very pertinent article Martin.

Is it possible that China is selling a significant stake of its large US treasury holding, in retaliation to Trump's tariffs? 

Up
4

Starting to pay attention to the wider world Dr Y. China has been selling US government debt at a record pace and has been slowly reducing holdings of US Treasury securities for a decade, but now it's quickly selling both Treasuries & US agency bonds. However, if China sells USTs in size, they have to put it somewhere and FX would move. Some data even suggests China isn't the only one selling Treasuries.

China is buying gold - which the US can't sanction and steal.

Up
4

My goodness, Yvil, this sounds like something I would write or have written many times this year.

We are more aligned than I thought.

Up
3

Aligns with Dalio’s long term debt cycle and the theory of the 4th Turning. 80 year cycles. 

Up
2

That's linear thinking. 

Thus nonsense. 

80 years ago there were a little over 2 billion, living mostly consumption-less lives. No comparison. 

Yes, there will be a turning. Yes, we were already overdue. Yes, the US was only going to cease being the dominant hegemony (flip a coin long enough, tails comes up) Yes, globalisation has peaked and is receding. 

But seeing it in terms of bond markets, or any other hedged-debt proxy markers, is fraught. Not based on the physical realities. Unfortunately, we came to believe a narrative not unlike the one pie-in-the-sky-when-you-die religion peddled a century earlier (residual ignorance can live long). And listening to ANYONE suggesting repetitive, same-length cycles - is a waste of time. 

Up
0

And yet you believe the end is near so is this not also entirely linear thinking? Or actual linear thinking taken to the most extreme possible position with no scope for alternative outcomes?

Up
4

The end of an exponential trend beats most folk reaction-wise.

And is final.

80 year cycles, are presumably an assumption of continuity. 

The difference is stark. 

Up
0

The end of an exponential trend beats most folk reaction-wise.

It actually has to occur first.

Which we'd need a good 5-10 years to establish, over the current events instead just being an accelerated decline of a hegemon.

I know this is an exciting time and you're all giddy, but if you keep acting so impatient, there'll be no end of the world for anyone and that's that.

Up
6

You are smarter than that. That's nonsense. Might as well say you're going to wait until you're dead, to prove you're going to die. Just nuts; on that basis nobody would write wills. 

Google World3. Any version of the graph. Allow an extra doubling-time (tantamount to allowing an extra planet). Work out whether you are better planning for that (near) event, or waiting until it has happened. 

As I said, you are smarter than that. 

 

r

Up
0

There's a lot of ways we could meet a sticky end. And a lot of potential precursors to any of them.

Any weather event, gets attributed to climate change.

Any change to the status quo, gets viewed as the beginning of the end.

If I were a gambler, my money's on a decline in total global prosperity, with a range of winners or losers.

Maybe one of the losers pushes the big red button.

But what do I do with the knowledge of these possibilities? I live a low footprint, I produce as if there will be a tomorrow, and I try to make good time for the people closest to me.

Up
3

Indeed, "the end of an exponential trend.....is final" is a statement that conveys no useful information and is likely untrue in the context of human time scales. An exponential trend could be tiny or variable, or even having a cuppa, and what does "final" mean? PDK has kind of lost it unfortunately. His arguments have some utility and are worth checking out, but they need to be expressed more intelligently. He's possibly been exposed to too much entropy.

Up
0

And end of exponential growth for who?

There's great swathes of the populace who's fortunes have been declining for decades now.

Up
0

Wealth?

Maybe you're not so smart. 

:)

Up
0

People saying how would it be impossible for the US to lose reserve currency status - my argument has been that it is not and it could happen in the coming decades. All it neees is for other countries to abandon buying UST and then it becomes impossible for the US to fund its deficit spending and if it can’t fund its deficit spending it can’t fund its military (in its current form) and if it can’t fund its military/navy it loses dominance. See the Dutch a few hundred years ago. 

Up
4

I-O,

But can you see a legitimate alternative right now? One theory I have come across is that China and Russia might use their combined gold reserves to create a gold back crypto-currency. I quote, "Russia and China will pool their official, placing it on deposit in a Swiss non-bank vault governed by Swiss law. They will then invite other participants in the scheme to do likewise. At the same time, the two countries will launch a new digital currency on their distributed ledger." there's more but that's the basis of it. I have no idea whether this has any credibility or not, but I do not believe that any realistic alternative to the US$ could be based on a current currency, or basket thereof.

Up
2

‘But can you see a legitimate alternative right now?’

It’s quite possible people were saying the same thing prior to the fall of every other reserve currency that has existed. The US isn’t the first, nor will it be the last. Who or what will replace it I do not wish to speculate. Unless the US halves it’s deficit spending (currently circa 6% GDP) then the end of USD dominance could happen at a rapid pace - but people would rather burn down Tesla stores and draw swastikas on Elon Musks cars than see the imperative role he is playing on trying to preserve USD dominance (by avoiding bankruptcy/complete run on UST as people rapidly realise how far beyond their means the US are living). 

Up
3

The big question is where if not the USD will the worlds wealthy place their funds.....there is only so much s**t to own, especially if you remove US assets from the mix.

 

Up
2

its gold

Up
1

Perhaps.....not exactly liquid however.

Up
0

Trump is bullion people

Maybe that counts? 

Up
1