
The sudden sharp rise in non-performing residential mortgage loans figures during January was, for me, an unpleasant surprise.
The Reserve Bank's loans by asset quality figures showed that in January, non-performing housing loans rose by $165 million to $2.328 billion.
That's a 7.6% rise in a month, which is a lot. The $165 million figure was the biggest monthly rise in non-performing loans since June 2020 immediately after the big Covid lockdown.
Separate data from credit bureau Centrix has confirmed a recent spike in mortgage loan stress.
The reason the $165 million rise in the RBNZ-reported figures was so surprising for me was that in the whole of the previous five months, the non-performing loans total had increased by just $115 million. It appeared that the 'crunch' we saw after interest rates started climbing steeply in the 2021-22 period may have been easing. But seemingly not.
The other reason the latest monthly mortgage figures were a surprise stems from the fact that since August of 2024 the RBNZ has been reducing the Official Cash Rate (OCR), down from 5.5% to 3.75% as of now.
Banks started reducing their mortgage rates before the OCR was even cut and popular fixed rates have been reduced by anything up to 200 basis points from the peak levels seen towards the end of 2023. The interest rate cavalry is arriving. Relief is on the way.
So how can we now be apparently experiencing more stress on the mortgage front line?
Well, I concur with those who have speculated that the new spike in the stressed loans figures was due to the deteriorating labour market position. It seems to fit as an explanation.
One of the saving graces of the recent OCR hiking cycle was that we went into it with incredibly low unemployment - just 3.2%. A full jobs market means everyone's working - and they can service mortgage debt.
However, by December 2023 the unemployment was up to 4.0% - and then by the end of December 2024 it had moved swiftly up to 5.1%. In more personal terms that move up from 4.0% to 5.1% last year represented 33,000 people losing their jobs. It's a lot. If we work on the figure quoted by the RBNZ that about a third of Kiwis have a mortgage that would mean 11,000 of those people had mortgages. It must have an impact.
For any mortgage holder it's bad news if interest rates go up, and it's even worse news if house prices go down, driving those with a mortgage into negative equity. Depressing as that may be, however, it's not catastrophic as long as the mortgage holder can service the debt.
But lose your job...and that's a whole different story. Okay, if mortgage payments can't be kept up with then there is the option of selling the house. But if the house is in negative equity that's a real pickle. And if sufficient people are forced to sell up this puts downward pressure on house prices, making the whole problem worse.
So, we may have moved on from a situation where people were struggling to meet mortgage payments because of the high interest rates - to one where some can't meet payments because they don't have jobs.
The RBNZ is forecasting unemployment will peak at 5.2% in the March quarter we are now in. But it is also forecasting that unemployment will come down only gradually, to 4.9% by the end of this year and to 4.5% by December 2026.
Any 'upside' surprises with those figures may not portend well. However, there are some reasonably hopeful signs coming from the monthly Stats NZ Employment Indicators that the jobs market is thawing. We will be watching this space.
From the beginning of the OCR hiking cycle in late 2021 I have been surprised at how well those with mortgages have managed to cope with the large rises in payments seen.
Remember, the potential difficulty for people keeping up with rising mortgage payments was exacerbated by the extraordinary 40%-plus surge in house prices during the pandemic. It meant that anybody buying at the top of the market in the 2021-22 period was faced with much bigger mortgages than they would have taken on previously.
And they were able to take on these mortgages because of historically low interest rates. But once the rates went up, well, trouble...
I had a quick look at some selected examples of past interest rates taken from the monthly average figures for new 'special' rates compiled by the RBNZ.
I've used two-year rates for convenience, though I appreciate that in the very recent past much shorter terms have been in vogue. But the reason I've chosen two years as the example is because as at March 2025 the two year term is currently offering the lowest rate in the market.
Anyway...
In March 2021 the average two-year 'special' rate was just 2.6%.
By March 2023 it had shot up to 6.5%.
As of early March 2025, the best current 'special' for two years is 4.99%.
The current average-sized new mortgage, based on monthly RBNZ figures, is about $360,000.
So, I jumped on to the helpful interest.co.nz calculator and crunched some numbers.
If we used a time machine and went back to March 2021 and took out a $360,000 mortgage for a 30-year term, we would have been paying $1441 a month.
The same-sized mortgage, for the same term, would as of March 2023, at the 6.5% rate, be costing $2275 a month.
And now? At the current 4.99% rate the cost would be $1930 a month.
I appreciate that these examples are not exactly apples-with-apples, but they do provide some indication of just how much of a difference the movements in rates have had for those with mortgages. And they help to illustrate two things:
Firstly, the rate rises really did cost a hell of a lot. The rise in payments between the first example from March 2021 and the second example from March 2023 is 58%.
But secondly, while rates are now coming down, we are not going 'back'. Rates are not going down to the levels they were at before they started rising in the second half of 2021.
Yes, the 4.99% current two-year example is over $300 a month cheaper than the March 2023 example - but it's still almost $500 a month more than the March 2021 example.
People are getting relief as rates come down - but those who had mortgages going back to 2021 and earlier will still be paying more than they were.
So, how far down might rates go?
Well, the RBNZ has virtually promised 25 basis point cuts to the OCR at each of the next two reviews on April 9 and May 28. That would take the OCR to 3.25%.
The financial markets are fully pricing in another cut by the end of the year - so, an OCR of 3% by year end.
(Note that as I was writing this the news of Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Orr's resignation was breaking. It's early days yet to speculate as to whether his leaving will make any difference to any timing on rate moves. Off the top of my head, I wouldn't have thought so.)
Banks are already indicating rates might not go much lower - but I think they would say that. I wish I had a dollar for every 'interest rates have hit the bottom' headline I saw probably from about 2017 to 2021.
It's only a guess, but I reckon we might yet see rates as low as say 4.25% towards the end of this year.
Interestingly though, if we apply the above stated $360,000 mortgage example with a 4.25% rate that would be $1771 a month - so, STILL more than $300 a month higher than if the March 2021 rate was applying.
What we've got then is the fact that rates are still much higher than they were and likely to remain that way. And this is coupled, crucially, with the fact that the size of mortgages got much bigger.
In 2015 the average mortgage size nationally was $193,000. By 2021 this had risen to $345,000 - that's a 79% rise. At the time it was feasible because interest rates were still dropping. Much bigger mortgages became 'serviceable'. But it was a trap.
I do therefore wonder if there's more people out there than might be generally realised who want/need to rebalance their mortgage situations.
There may just simply be some fatigue now at how long some people have had to keep taking in belts in order to meet mortgage payments. And some people might want to break the cycle.
So, what should people do? Well, unless mortgage rates go a lot lower from here - and that's probably not going to happen unless there's some kind of global meltdown (although, let's face it that's not the most unlikely scenario given the current global situation) - then selling up and getting cheaper may be the best option for some.
Of course that might not be an option for those who bought at the top of the market in 2021-22 and probably got the cheapest thing they could at the time - which will have subsequently gone down in value. It would be frustrating.
All of this makes me wonder two things: Will the numbers of people struggling to meet mortgage payments stay higher for longer than has been expected? And will we continue to see large numbers of houses coming on the market, regardless of how much oversupply there may be? Auckland's biggest real estate firm Barfoot & Thompson reported having its most properties for sale in 14 years as at the end of February.
The major bank economists seem to have settled on the idea of a 6%-7% rise in house prices this year, with this mostly happening in the second half of the year. There is agreement among them that an uplift will be unlikely till the overhang of unsold houses on the market is removed.
I was intrigued that the RBNZ, having increased its estimate of likely house price rises this year to over 7% as recently as in its November Monetary Policy Statement had then virtually halved that estimate - without any comment - to just 3.8% in the February MPS.
It was a pretty interesting thing to do in such a short space of time.
All in all then, there's plenty of things to watch out for.
What seems clear enough so far is that we can't just simply assume that because interest rates are now going down, everything in the economy will just 'come right'.
*This article was first published in our email for paying subscribers first thing Thursday morning. See here for more details and how to subscribe.
22 Comments
66 Mortgagee sales on Trademe up 3 from last week or up 4.7%
Probably Nothing
That is nothing... how many regular sales are happening? Can you let us know the percentage difference.
that's a freaken lot if it keeps growing at that rate.
That is nothing
Right on cue. It's a predictable strategy for Nifty and his like minded crew to trivialise this...
Sad.
Its just a flesh wound.....
To downplay, smells of Spruik. How much it rises from this point depends on a lot of very real and negative world events now coming to the fore.
No desperation from me...just giving you all a reality check. Have a read & retract your nonsense spruiker BS: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/540806/where-are-the-mortgagee-sales
Reality check as per article cited - Kelvin Davidson, chief property economist at CoreLogic, cautioned against thinking mortgagee sales numbers had peaked for this cycle.
It sounds like you would really enjoy watching a corrida ITG, plenty of blood there.
Ole NiftyGrifty on back of the Ponzi twisty.
Remember, it was not the ICEBERGS exposed tip that sunk the Titanic. It was the vast, hulking unseen mass, that was existentially killing to man and machine.
So as it is for the Banks hiding of the horribly large Debt grenade Icebergs underbelly, that they have created over the last 10 years!
Debt Junkies be sunk.......
The reality...
Where are the mortgagee sales?
There have been very few mortgagee sales reported over the last couple of years relative to the number of accounts that have gone into arrears
...they're still very low compared to past cycles - about 200 over the past year, versus more than 2500 during worst times post-GFC
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/540806/where-are-the-mortgagee-sales
Have you considered that since the GFC, CCCFA was introduced.
The banks are treading a careful line here. IMHO they are not closing as fast as in the past, but they cannot absorb losses either, I suggest that there are a lot of mortgages that are in hardship, but cannot stay there forever, it seems the sausage machine is starting to produce the delayed sales now.
Its impossible to judge this cycle with the GFC because this cycle is not over yet, indeed it may
only be the end of the beginning
I also suggest your bleating has been wrong since Nov 2021, you should re examine your frame of reference and consider if you still do not understand the evolving situation.
CCCFA has required more prudent lending, which would result in more borrowers not getting into a precarious situation. If we didn't have CCCFA, perhaps we'd be in more trouble like GFC...
The bank takes the biggest loss on a mortgagee sale... especially when values have been declining. As the article states, banks have been keen to work with borrowers to repay arrears and get back up to date with payments... seems pretty reasonable.
I can assure you I see multiple situations daily where they could only meet payments with interest only and at the old low rates - they were clearly buying anticipating a flip for cap gains. Customers of the property seminars no doubt.
So...bucket loads or mortgagee sales to come along with heavy discounting.
The banks must be holding back - a managed retreat.
For the first time in a long while I know people who have been made redundant and are having trouble finding employment. I don't really know that many people yet I know three in this situation. Fortunately they do have the means to get by okay but things are certainly a bit dicey out there and older workers are encountering ageism to be sure. At the same time there are probably far too many very old workers in employment who don't really need to be.
I count myself as one of these people yet for a number of nonfinancial reasons am finding it difficult to disengage. Also receiving superannuation may be a disincentive to retire for some folk as they are now in a quite comfortable position. Usually they will have a mortgage free home and other assets but with a reasonable salary and super on top of that they may find themselves in a very comfortable position with the added bonus that they are not particularly worried about losing their jobs for the first time in their lives. Now they can have a quite relaxed working life. It might even make them better workers if they still have all their faculties.
It's not quite relaxing for me as I have already put in 50 hours work this week however part of the problem is with the employers. They are not employing younger people to take older workers places. I don't really have younger employees to pass my knowledge onto or help me with my workload. Employers have been aware of the looming mass exit of older workers for some time yet never quite got around to doing anything about it. They often have a policy of restricting new hires, even if people retire, so some managers are keen to hold onto the staff they already have.
You'll find Zach that upskilling employees has not been a focus of a large portion of employers for the better part of 2 decades. Hard to get a job out of uni or high school as nobody is willing to train an they all want you to have experience, then they wonder in times like these why there is no people around with any experience, or who can walk right into the job, as they aren't willing to take risks and mould someone new to the role to suit. This is likely due to laziness or the ability to get cheap workers for overseas and afford to be picky in the past, but with the mass exodus of knowledge and skill with the great retirement upon us, they are in a pickle for sure.
It’s not really that surprising when you actually think about the unemployment cycle. Once it starts it’s a slow moving beast. If Tim down the road gets made redundant it probably takes 6 months before he’s off the payroll. The average person will stick their head in the sand until the money stops coming so spending reductions take another while. Then once this happens this reduced spending weighs on the local car sales so they cut a staff member and so on. So this rolling maul happens regardless of interest rate relief. We are only really 6 months in to this situation so I personally fail to see instant recovery on the horizon regardless of all the economists forecasts. Banks are making money they aren’t rolling staff out the door so there’s a degree of rose tinted lenses on the forecasters recovery thesis if you ask me.
Global recession is inbound, NZ cannot bounce until recovery.. we are probably years off a local bottom.
S&P500 hovering at 200day MA, I think it has to drop further on CTA model selling. If it retests the 200dMA a few times then rejects it we are easily looking at a 20% fall, but many kiwi savers could fall further as they are loaded with MAG7 darlings, see Tesla downgrading Q sales going forward Just wait til the next free Chinese opensource AI news.
The mag7 can fall 30% and still too expensive
Yep volatility is the theme of 2025 for the Mag 7. Black, grey and white swans are hovering over the S&P darlings.
Locally we still have a tough road ahead. We saw the delayed impact of OCR increases, we’re now seeing the delayed impact of OCR cuts.
The word ‘uncertainty’ was mentioned 56 times in the latest MPC for a reason.
https://www.investing.com/indices/us-spx-500-candlestick
look at how the height (high - low spread) of the candlesticks are much wider then normal trending trading.
This is an ominous sign and occurs at most major tops. The Doji star at the last top is the clear sell the farm signal.
I was intrigued that the RBNZ, having increased its estimate of likely house price rises this year to over 7% as recently as in its November Monetary Policy Statement had then virtually halved that estimate - without any comment - to just 3.8% in the February MPS.
I think they were trying to influence investor sentiment and spark some private credit growth to help the economy look better, but trying this on more than once is blatantly obvious that they are ignoring the data and hence wouldn't stick.
I do not think a single bank has had a negative forecast in the last 4 years but here we are....
So the lesson is that they are not allowed to call drops..... or they are useless and should be ignored.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.