Economists are raising the possibility that the Reserve Bank may cut interest rates twice more before the end of this year - despite the RBNZ indicating the possibility of just one more cut in the next 12 months.
Some bank economists say the economy is slowing more rapidly than is openly acknowledged - "in our view".
Other bank economists have raised the spectre that the RBNZ may need to take further macro-prudential measures - such as the actions already seen against the housing market - as a direct result of the rate reduction.
The ANZ has been very much in the vanguard of - effectively pushing for - the RBNZ to cut rates. It predicted today's cut and is sticking with its pick that there will be a follow-up next month..
Chief economist Cameron Bagrie and senior economist Philip Borkin said the RBNZ’s current forecast implied half a percentage point of cuts all up, "but the door is certainly open to more".
"Beyond the immediate macro developments seen as justifying today’s action, the RBNZ importantly also acknowledged that there are still risks of weak price-setting behaviour becoming entrenched, and that this would require a further policy response. That’s a green light for the market to push for three cuts," they said.
"A July cut remains our base case given the risk profile we see for the upcoming economic data flow. The odds are also sitting around 50% for whether there is an additional cut beyond that before year end."
Bagrie and Borkin said the RBNZ's previous projected combination of monetary conditions ("TWI and a flat-lined OCR") was insufficient to get inflation back to 2% - the targeted mid-point of the RBNZ's official monetary policy target.
"The RBNZ simply felt it need to act. End of story."
Bagrie and Borkin said the RBNZ’s GDP forecasts over the June to December quarters (0.8% per quarter) "look high" given economic challenges that are beginning to mount.
"We are already detecting weaker signals for Q2 economic activity and to us, the risks look more skewed to a below-trend outcome. The market will continue to push for more than one cut from here. That said, the RBNZ’s non-tradable inflation estimates for Q2 and Q3 (0.3% q/q and 0.2% q/q respectively) look more realistic than the previous projections and are consistent with our Monthly Inflation Gauge.
"...The economy is slowing more rapidly than is openly acknowledged, in our view."
Strategy 'too cute'
Bagrie and Borkin said normally they would expect the RBNZ to follow one cut with another in very short order.
"But it is interesting to note that communication from the RBNZ suggests they are looking at being more tactical from meeting to meeting. As such, on the face of it a follow-up move in July looks a 50-50 proposition. That sort of strategy looks a little too cute to be advisable to us (witness the RBA’s experience of late)."
While the ANZ and about five other banking economic teams had picked a rate reduction, around eight had not.
The BNZ was one of those that didn't and its head of research Stephen Toplis was refreshingly candid in his assessment:
"Got that one wrong!"
He said the BNZ economists were "clearly surprised" that the RBNZ lowered its cash rate.
"We continue to believe there was no urgency to move and that the cut will exacerbate the excesses in the housing market. But, that said, we can also see the logic behind the Bank’s move.
'RBNZ was spooked'
"In short, it was spooked by the threat that the NZD would spike if it didn’t cut and was very conscious that the combination of falling dairy prices and rising oil prices was threatening to undermine economic activity. Moreover, the RBNZ has always intimated it would want to make its first move at the time of a Monetary Policy Statement and it may have thought that September was just a wait too long. And so it responded."
Toplis also saw the likelihood that there could now be as many as three rate cuts this year.
"From a financial markets’ perspective what is now important is what will happen next. In that regard, we believe that, having started the easing process, the RBNZ will have no option but to continue it. Accordingly, we now forecast the RBNZ to cut again in July and believe there is a 50/50 chance of yet another reduction in September."
Westpac was another bank that didn't pick the rate reduction.
"The Reserve Bank surprised much of the market, including us,by reducing the OCR by 25 basis points to 3.25% today," chief economist Dominick Stephens and senior economist Michael Gordon said.
They believe the decision by the RBNZ is risky.
"We feel the monetary policy situation is more finely balanced than the RBNZ’s assessment.
"New Zealand is torn between rampant house prices and strong domestic demand on one hand, and a weak export sector and low inflation on the other. The RBNZ has chosen to emphasise the latter and downplay the former. But today’s OCR cut does run the risk further stimulating the Auckland housing market."
'Not anticipated'
They said that since the OCR cut wasn’t fully anticipated by the market, wholesale interest rates had fallen, which in turn was likely to flow through to fixed-term mortgage rates.
"Today’s REINZ House Price Index showed that Auckland house prices have risen 25.6% in a year, and if that continues, domestic demand (and consequently domestic inflation) is sure to get a lift.
"The RBNZ has presumably decided that this is a risk worth running. Nor does the RBNZ really make a case that the risks around the housing market have been adequately addressed through other measures. For instance, the proposed restrictions on loan-to-value ratios for investor lending in Auckland are expected to reduce house price inflation by 2-4%. That is less than the gain made in the month of May alone, according to today’s REINZ House Price Index.
"There is every likelihood that we will see yet another tightening of macro-prudential policy, as a result of the lower OCR."
ASB had predicted rate cuts - but later in the year.
'Merely a matter of when'
"The need to cut the OCR has become increasingly evident over the past month and in our view was merely a matter of when," ASB economists said.
"We had expected the first cut would be a little later this year but the RBNZ has made a more decisive change in its view – and all credit to the Bank for doing so.
"The inflation environment has proved to be very different to what the RBNZ envisaged when it started lifting the OCR last year; the RBNZ is now responding to that. Dairy price weakness and strong growth in labour supply have been important drivers of the RBNZ’s shift in stance."
The ASB economists are forecasting a further quarter of a percentage point cut in rates.
"On balance we lean to the next cut occurring in September," they said.
"But a cut in July is a very real possibility. We lean to September because of the potential for the upcoming CPI to be stronger than the RBNZ has forecast, the relatively measured tone of the Statement, and a medium-term inflation outlook that looks far more comfortable against the stated objective of aiming for a 2% rate.
"On the NZD, the RBNZ is clear that there is scope for further falls – and that they are justified. We wouldn’t see further near-term NZD weakness as an impediment to delivering a second OCR cut."
30 Comments
well cant belive that bnz are quoted here after calling for fixed rates for last three years. what was the number of time by dominic again ?? here a good rumour, a private survey of chinese buyers intention for qld real estate company found up to 63 million potentially interested buyers. Nzd pays interest american dont so which currencie will go up? RBNZ predict big down side for NZD?? help me out here.
1) The government is weak, incompetent and showing no leadership on the issue. The elephant in the room is the immigration rate which will continue to push up Auckland house prices in yet a bigger bubble.
2) The RBNZ is hamstrung. It is implementing macroprudential tools for Auckland to try & decouple Auckland from general monetary condtions but it wont be enough against the rampant immigration rate.
3) The RBNZ should have bought the LVR restrictions in immediately and then dropped the OCR, not the other way around.
4) The government needs to give the 12 month rolling inward immigration rate to the RBNZ as a macroprudential tool. The migration rate could have then been managed against out ability to build more housing supply an sort out the RMA. The OCR could also then be a lot lower and the NZD a lot lower.
Hello - The kiwi is going lower, much lower against the US$, anything pegged to the US$ and also the other majors. I wouldn't park my rusty pushbike in NZD at the moment. Anyone from China that bought at the recent high of 87 cents will have a currency loss of about 20% to offset against any capital gains now if they were to sell NZ assets.
I'm gobsmacked that you're gobsmacked. It has been obvious for some time-though not it seems to most economists-that the Reserve Bank should not hold the rest of NZ to ransom,just because of the Auckland house market. Its primary role is to target inflation through the OCR and it had become clear that the rate rises early last year were a mistake.
If I were the BNZ,I would be looking for a new Chief Economist.
The one thing you could guarantee if that happened Johnny you'd be considerably poorer when you went to buy something at a shop or at the petrol pump. If, and its still a big if, the Fed starts hiking, even very slowing later this year, an NZ OCR at those levels will have the NZ Dollar heading down toward 50 cents. Result....tradeable inflation way way out of negative territory, the productive sector booming, the RBNZ hiking to new highs. Won't happen of course because the RBNZ makes these calls and understands the process better than everyone and will respond cautiously to the data as it evolves. The only way you'll get a NZ OCR at 1.5% is if US rates are negative and well below zero which ain't happening
World’s most actively traded market ‘not functioning as normal’
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9a5b334e-0fb5-11e5-94d1-00144feabdc0.htm…
Well, the NZD has gone from 88c US to 70c US since last July, or thereabouts. Say we are 50% through the cycle then 50c seems likely. Guesswork I know, but it's as good a guess as any. I don't think it's driven by NZ events, it is the global carry trade reversing.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/
Hmm .. Reluctant to comment further on declining rates to avoid provoking the Bank Apologists or the Hike Enthusiasts!
It's a weird world we live in atm, who knows with the US and/or meltdown we could see a liquidity crisis and then spikes in rates. Also we have had 7 years of 'hikes' calls while rates declined/flattened. Now we have the economists calling 'cuts' so maybe we should go contrarian?
Hmm .. Reluctant to comment further on declining rates to avoid provoking the Bank Apologists or the Hike Enthusiasts!
Hard to provoke those that have cleaned up on the telegraphed bond market rate rises - what did 25 bps on the O/N rate do for anybody other than banks' NIM? The NZD/USD is barely 40 pips below the previous Friday close. And yet bank depositors carry more risk for less return while the Aussie banks cream 16-19% equity returns from under capitalised operations in this country.
Yep total agree Stephen. And one thing's for certain, the bank won't be apologising to those that argue for rate cuts, and better still, those that argue that no one should fix - the banks will never complain about those intent upon increasing their margins, in fact should be quietly encouraging them in the verbiage. .
The International Monetary Fund warned in its Global Financial Stability Report in April that the asset management industry now has $76 trillion worth of investments, equal 100pc of world GDP. These funds are prone to “herding” behaviour, and have vastly increased their holdings of emerging market bonds and equities.
The IMF fears a “liquidity storm” once the Fed starts to tighten, causing them to pull out en masse. It has repeatedly called on EM economies to beef up their defences and curb ballooning credit before it is too late. The great worry is what will happen if Fed action causes the dollar to spike dramatically and drives up global borrowing costs, transmitting a This would amount to a “margin call” on $9 trillion of off-shore dollar debt, a figure that has exploded from $2 trillion fifteen years ago. shock through the international financial system.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11671821/Fed-tantrum-sets-…
This IMF outfit really needs to take control of it's self and the press minder.
The IMF fears a “liquidity storm” once the Fed starts to tighten, causing them to pull out en masse. It has repeatedly called on EM economies to beef up their defences and curb ballooning credit before it is too late. The great worry is what will happen if Fed action causes the dollar to spike dramatically and drives up global borrowing costs, a transmitting a double shock through the international financial system. This would amount to a “margin call” on $9 trillion of off-shore dollar debt, a figure that has exploded from $2 trillion fifteen years ago.
The cost indicators of this off-shore dollar debt have been constantly pricing higher since June last year along with the US Dollar Index, up until the recent realisation that the US economy has faltered on the road to the longest recovery path in recent history. Rates have risen to accommodate a lack of creditor interest to extend/roll this seemingly irredeemable pile of IOUs. No doubt the Fed will issue emergency currency currency swap lines when the lenders, never mind the borrowers, claim insolvency as they did during the convulsive GFC event. This IMF report and related press warning is a puff/spin piece hoping to achieve what?
“Is it a coincidence that the United States witnessed a dramatic rise in household debt in the years before the recession? Definitely not. The Great Recession and Great Depression, as well as the current economic malaise in Europe, were caused by a large run-up in household debt followed by a significantly large drop in household spending…. Increasing the flow of credit is disastrously counterproductive when the fundamental problem is too much debt….How do we end such a cycle? With a direct attack on debt…” (Mian and Sufi – 'House.. of Debt’)
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.