The Reserve Bank believes it has raised interest rates enough to bring inflation back into its target band by mid-2024, with help from migration and government fiscal policy.
There was no announcement of ‘mission accomplished’ from the central bank, but the message was that current monetary policy settings are enough to calm inflation.
In its first ever divided decision, the banks’ Monetary Policy Committee voted to lift the Official Cash Rate (OCR) 25 basis points to 5.5% in a five-to-two vote on Wednesday.
The two members who disagreed voted in favour of holding the benchmark rate at 5.25% while waiting to see how economic conditions played out over the next couple of months.
A lift of 50 basis points—which market traders had partly priced in—wasn’t even entertained by the committee.
The bellwether two-year swap rate dropped about 35 basis points after the decision, and the kiwi dollar fell almost 1.5% against the US dollar, dropping from 62.5 US cents to 61.7 US cents.
Markets moved, but Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Orr said the decision should have no impact whatsoever on mortgage and deposit rates.
“What we are doing today is what we have been foreshadowing for quite some time and, if anything, that will be supportive of current mortgage interest rates,” he said.
A stab in the dark
Despite the foreshadowing, most economists and market traders predicted Wednesday’s decision incorrectly. They thought an inflationary budget and soaring migration would force rates higher, but the Reserve Bank disagreed.
It said Budget 2023 was less contractionary than had been expected back in February, but was restrained enough to help push back on inflation.
“Fiscal policy is projected to add to demand over the 2023/24 fiscal year, then dampen demand in subsequent years. Overall, fiscal policy will be contractionary on demand over the projection horizon”.
Orr said the overall effect was the “only relevant thing” for monetary policy and he wasn’t concerned by the short-term impact on demand.
“[Fiscal policy] is being more of a friend than foe to monetary policy at this point in time,” he told reporters on Wednesday.
He made similar remarks about the sudden pick-up in net migration numbers, which pushed Westpac NZ economists to upgrade their OCR forecast to 6% earlier this month.
Several other economists followed suit and markets began to be re-priced for a higher peak in the benchmark rate. The two-year swap rate had climbed all the way to 6% by Wednesday morning.
But Orr and the Monetary Policy Committee took the view that migration was likely to help, rather than hinder, its efforts to bring supply and demand back
“The increase in net inward migration is providing some relief in a very tight labour market, but the net impact on demand – including for housing – is uncertain, as is the impact on inflationary pressure,” it said.
Orr said those migrants who had already arrived had helped to fill job vacancies and alleviate the worker shortage.
“The number one capacity constraint in the economy has been people. Immigration has certainly eased that,” he said.
This was one issue which divided the committee with some members concerned that strong migration inflows could continue long term, which would boost spending and inflation.
Orr told reporters that almost two-thirds of the migration boom had already occurred and the bank expected future inflows to trend back toward the pre-Covid average.
No recession required
Westpac’s chief economist, Kelly Eckhold said the Reserve Bank had upgraded its view on how much output the economy could potentially generate thanks to the influx of workers.
“Implicitly, migration is adding to the economy’s capacity in tandem with demand on resources, allowing the economy to grow more strongly without adding to inflation pressures,” he said in a note.
ANZ chief economist Sharon Zollner said the Reserve Bank no longer seems to believe that a blatant economic slowdown was necessary in order to get inflation down.
The forecasts in the Monetary Policy Statement feature “the tiniest of recessions” with gross domestic product declining 0.2% in the second quarter and 0.1% in the third.
Orr said this was a “short shallow period of flat, if not marginally negative, economic growth”, with the forecast decline well within the margin of error — a recession so small it may not happen.
Economists were a little more cautious about the possibility that interest rates had peaked for the cycle.
ANZ’s Zollner said it was worth remembering that the RBNZ paused twice during its hiking cycle in 2007 and 2008, once for six months and once for more than a year.
“A pause is not necessarily a peak, though the market will undoubtedly take it that way,” she said.
The central bank could be forced to raise rates if house prices started to climb, migration stayed high, or unemployment stays stuck at 3.4%.
Cuts could come sooner than planned (late-2024) if migration takes the heat out of the labour market too quickly, the US debt ceiling crisis causes disorder, or if inflation suddenly falls.
BNZ’s head of research, Stephen Toplis said there was a clear message that the RBNZ does not expect interest rates to fall any time soon.
The cash rate forecast provided by the central bank showed the first cut in the fourth quarter of 2024 and gradually falling to 3.25% by June 2026.
Toplis said the monetary policy committee was likely to cut rates sooner than this, probably in May 2024 — exactly one year's time.
“With 29% of the Committee already of the view the cash rate should not be 5.25% at this juncture, the bias has been clearly established,” he said.
However, assistant governor Karen Silk said the committee had unanimously agreed to the long-term OCR track and warned the market had a history of miscalculating the bank's decisions.
“The market will do what the market will do, that is a reflection of our position,” she said.
92 Comments
Mr Orr has not followed his own guidance.
Increasing OCR rate until inflation is in the 1-3% band.
He also has changed his OCR thinking ( no more rises) based on perceived immigration predictions.
he also believes the government spending and debt is at OK levels and not inflationary.
He is also happy with housing price levels of unaffordability.
His mandate is to ensure inflation is kept at a certain level. I wonder if the is cumulative inflation or inflation rises taken from a, " common point"?.
Eg 0 % + 7.5,% + 4.5% = 12,%
Or
0 + 7.5% =7.5% . O + 4.5% = 4.5%. = 4.5%
It's not actually the level, but the rate of change that matters.
You could equally say "It's still above the 38 cents it was X number of years ago" but it's what the RBNZ have just done (or didn't do to be precise) that matters.
3,219.17 +63.96 +2.03% (NB: Gold against the US$ is actually down. And yet against the NZ$, the NZ$ keeps falling...)
Wrong ZS, they average 6 years internationally from Peak to Bottom. We are at best 1/3 way in.... Japan is the winner at 20years to hit the rocks.
See where NZ is winning and world beating again?? and going???
Imgur: The magic of the Internet
Yeah generally the next phase of this is when the recession arrives, incomes drop, unemployment rises. The OCR is dropped but in NZ because people have their mortgages set to 1, 2, 3 year terms, it takes 1, 2, 3 years for those benefits to flow through to mortgage holders. And it might take 6-18 months for the OCR to be dropped to levels that are stimulatory enough to stop the bleeding.
If Labour continue unabated spending between now and election (which they will have to do to buy a win), then inflation will continue upward. Followed by wages, followed by inflation. The Monetary Policy Committee will double down on their ineptitude when they have to increase rates again. But then, these were the same people who reckoned inflation would be transitory.
Central bankers speak in odd ways. You are totally right that RBNZ could raise rates further at anytime — and they have not ruled that out.
What it has said (explicitly) is that is doesn’t expect it will need to do so based on its economic forecasts. So the bank will only raise rates if something changes or its forecasts are wrong.
They didn’t say the exact words but did say this is the highest they plan to set the OCR. Thus it is the peak.
Plans can change, of course.
Does this actually translate to we are in the shit, so we won’t keep hiking even though inflation is running hot. Maybe they know something we don’t, like mortgage stress etc. The financial stresses will be hitting, especially the lower decile areas with high rents and rising food costs. Those landlords can’t claim the interest deduction, or at least part of it and this will push rents up further.
'The OCR has peaked'
On a serious note, I'm split in my views on this. It is quite possible they have done enough to reduce aggregate demand, but it is also possible that by not raising higher that inflation surges higher again and they regret this decision.
I'm not going to give Orr a hard time on the call as he was going to receive negative reviews whatever decision he made....
1. If he raised too much he would be the public enemy of debt holders/banks/RE industry/mortgage brokers.
2. If he didn't raise, showing a 'stand against inflation' then he may lose public confidence in the RBNZs resolve to do so and have the public angered that the cost of living issues were not being taken seriously enough.
Rock/hard place stuff.
Agreed.
But the answer to his dilemma is "What is best for New Zealand?" and rampant Inflation isn't the answer.
If he 'got it wrong' and raised rates significantly this time, against easing future CPI data, dropping the OCR is an easy call. But if the reverse happens (and likely will) he's going to be two-steps behind the raising the OCR ball. And when he has to do a catchup, that's really going to hurt.
It's an easy decision Observer. His job is to keep inflation under control. And it's not. Inflation is the worst possible economic outcome for pretty much everyone. And it has been caused by the Labour Government and Orr himself. He needs to man up and fix it. Of course he isn't going to, as there would be political fall out as his mate Robertson would hate on him, as pain in the electorate will mean even less votes for Labour.
Laughably, there were two on the MPC that voted against a raise.
One of the biggest factors in pricing a currency are interest rates! The higher an interest rate, the more valuable a currency (all else equal).
Prior to the OCR decision, traders thought interest rates would go to 6% and so the NZ dollar increased. When it became apparent that was unlikely, it fell again.
It is not a rebuff or critique of the central bank, insofar as I understand it. It’s just economics.
Nah they did once remember? All the nerds were raging that every time Telecom announced a new set of broadband plans, it came with the same 10 gigabyte data cap just a little bit faster download speed each time.
So the Commerce Commission stepped in and forced Telecom to open up their assets to their competitors. "Hand over the keys to the exchange" etc. Less than 10 years later the Government begins the first stages of Fibre rollout.
And shipping costs have reduced dramatically over the past 12 months, as has fuel and dairy market auctions.
So that should more than balance it out.
Duopoly does duopoly things. We either break it up or have people going hungry (and all the associated problems and crime that brings) in a country that produces enough food for 40mm people.
I've been wondering the same thing Chris, but I can't quite figure it out myself. It was even alluded to in the media conference that the future direction of the OCR would depend upon inflation, but I think they'll probably hold off until after the election at least.
If you listened to Orr's post announcement discussion he seamed to imply that they were done with OCR rises in this tightening cycle. However he also implied that the RBNZ felt that inflation was going to be easing in the near future on account of a fall in per capita retail spending. He made no mention of imported inflation. In effect the RBNZ has expectations inflation will fall in the near term so no more OCR rises are necessary.
Hello, the RBNZ was very clear that it doesn’t intend to raise rates any higher.
The best place to see this is at the end of the MPS document where it provides a table of economic figures. One of these figures is the offical cash rate, and it is a ‘forecast’ of where the bank intends for the rate to go.
That table shows the OCR staying at 5.5% and not going any higher.
You are right that this wasn’t said specifically, because the bank always retains the right to lift or cut interest rates.
But it has explicitly said it doesn’t plan to do so. Plans change, of course, but those are facts. Not opinion.
If you want specific quotes, try these:
“Members discussed the key economic developments they would need to see in coming quarters to remain confident that lending rates around current levels remained sufficiently contractionary”
“The Committee was comfortable with the projected forward path for the OCR.”
Dan, thanks for a great article and asking some interesting questions at the press conference.
I think where people are tripping up with regards to what the Reserve Bank actually said is in their interpretation of the graph you mentioned in your comment above.
That graph is a forecast. It is not a plan, or an indication of intent, or even a prediction. It's a "best guess" as to where the OCR might be heading, based on assumptions about how the monetary policy committee think things might play out.
The difference is important. A "plan" implies that they will set the OCR according to what is projected in the graph. A "forecast" implies that this projection may change to match the OCR. These are two very different things.
So respectfully, I think it's misleading to say that "the RBNZ was very clear that it doesn’t intend to raise rates any higher". The RBNZ intends to do whatever is needed to bring inflation under control, however it doesn't anticipate having to raise the OCR any higher in order to do so. That's far from being "very clear" about any future actions they might take, especially given how often these predictions have changed from one MPS to the next.
Okay, that’s fair — I was thinking of “doesn’t intend/plan to” and “doesn’t anticipate having to” as being almost synonymous, but you’ve convinced me they are not exactly the same.
The second phrasing is more accurate, and I will use in the future! Hopefully, that idea was already communicated in the story (e.g “pause not peak”)
Thanks Dan. I was just imagining Adrian Orr's response to the chorus of "but you promised you wouldn't!", if he ends up having to raise in 6 months time.
Looking forward to seeing more of you in the press gallery by the way. Jenee left some big shoes to fill, and you're doing a great job of filling them.
the cost of the weekly shop stayed close to a 45-year high. The Office for National Statistics said food prices continued to soar in April, rising by 19pc on an annual basis as the cost of rice, flour, pasta, eggs and fruit climbed faster on an annual basis than in March.
Now that's not NZ but the UK this evening, but how different are we? Not at all, and it's about to get worse.
"the cost of the weekly shop stayed close to a 45-year high"
Strange statement, of course it's at a 45-year high, actually it must be at an all-time high given the recent inflation. No one in their right mind would expect groceries to cost less now than 45 years ago.
Interesting chart from Kelly Eckhold (Westpac) on the correlation between government debt growth and inflation.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fw1ArbVagAAx2-L?format=jpg&name=large
"A hard hitting slide from Richard Clarida on the genesis of todays inflation challenges. Expansionary fiscal and monetary policy was unsurprisingly the driver. NZ fits nicely on these lines"
Perhaps goes to show that our fiscal and monetary policy are currently completely at odds with one another at present.
My theory is that money debt growth ends up asset prices (e.g. property). So that is why we have very high house prices (because it has result in high asset price inflation - not consumer price inflation).
Government debt ends up being spent directly into the economy - e.g. public sector wage increases, welfare payments, additional funds for projects etc - all which directly increase aggregate demand and therefore gets measured in the CPI as consumers demand more goods/services.
No way RBNZ will be able to keep rates this high for long as so many cash strapped debt laden kiwis coming off ultra low rates to hit the 200%++ increase in costs wall and continue to push NZ present middles class consumers pain..
So many businesses will be hitting the wall at the same time 2H23 just as the liquidly of consumer funds dry's up..perfect storm
I'll be surprised if we don't see a cut later this year as it all comes apart... esp. NZ Property market 1 in 10 Kiwis are directly to closely tied employment ,,,
The opening of the Immigration flood gates ...the crisis control move from GOVT muppets trying to keep it all together before the election ....
The most important thing for economic stability is certainty. The RBNZ have "signalled" there will be no more OCR rises at least in the short term. This is all the general public need to carry on business as usual. The election always causes a slowdown up to six months out and my prediction is a National/ACT government and then things will begin to improve. It could be pure luck for them that inflation falls on their watch, either way expect an uptick in the economy in 2024. The rest of this year with the clowns still running the show is well and truly toast, its a clean slate next year.
Remember folks, we are still not even a full 6 months through 2023. I seems to recall it was around 61%-ish of mortgage holders were due to come of fixed term periods across the span of this year so we will still see more and more purse tightening over the next 6months even if the OCR is not changed.
Then factor in that not all mortgages are one fixed rate for the whole lot, many split this into several chunks to minimise shock if the current scenario plays out with aggressive interest rate hikes.
One could argue that this split will actually slow the effect on spending for households due to having a lesser impact when one piece rolls off its' fixed term, however on the other hand it could cause households to take heed and realise the pain that is coming further down the line, buckling down spending appropriately.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.