By Allan Barber
Although not all parties are in favour of it, the proposed moratorium on chain and plant licences has provoked a lot of debate and reaction from all parts of the red meat sector.
Generally the reaction from the farming side has been cautiously positive, although all groups require more clarification of exactly how it would apply and what it would mean to farmers.
Rick Powdrell, Federated Farmers’ Meat and Fibre chairman, said it was important to canvas farmers for their views and hoped other groups, in addition to the Meat and Fibre Council, would discuss it with their members and suppliers.
He also told me he thought the scheme should definitely be considered on its merits and hoped nobody would immediately discount it because it had been proposed by Talleys.
He was pleased there was now momentum for change towards a longer term view which would see the value of meat being set by the market rather than procurement competition.
MIE chairman, John McCarthy, was quoted in this week’s Farmers Weekly as being supportive in principle because the plan recognises industry inefficiency as a result of surplus capacity.
However he does not support the continuation of farm gate competition envisaged by the chain licence proposal which militates against MIE’s vision of a cooperative, farmer-owned processing sector supplied entirely on contract.
The moratorium proposal is, in McCarthy’s words, a case of the tail wagging the dog.
That vision is laudable, but whether McCarthy likes it or not, as things stand at present, the $80 billion farming sector largely depends on the $4 billion processing and marketing sector (his figures – I haven’t checked them personally) for getting its product slaughtered, processed and sold. Whatever the reform process, the status quo is likely to remain for quite some time to come.
As we enter the time of year when plant throughput numbers start to build up, discussions about surplus capacity tend to become skewed by the problem of lead times.
Dean Hamilton, the new CEO of Silver Fern Farms, told Richard Loe on Thursday’s Radio Live farming show the company had never had so much beef capacity on at this time of year, while lamb capacity had recently been tripled because of the late start to spring. He commented farmers would be highly annoyed if they had to wait till January for slaughter space.
This emphasises the enormous difficulty of calculating what the right amount of capacity is and what is too much across a season.
The answer is of course there is no ideal capacity that can cope with every season which is why new chains and plants open in response to changes in livestock numbers, efficiency levels and market opportunities.
Alliance chairman Murray Taggart is lukewarm about the moratorium proposal because it is heavily reliant on government regulation which he does not believe will be forthcoming; he prefers a commercial solution which increases the overall size of the cake, rather than trying to achieve a more profitable sharing of the same cake.
Closures and start ups happen all the time in various industries and his opinion is the meat industry should not be any different.
Taggart believes Alliance is in good shape and backs the company’s ability to handle any competition.
Another side issue of the moratorium proposal has been talk of Trial Run Holdings version two which would involve a group of processors applying to the Commerce Commission for joint approval to take out capacity. AFFCO at least would not support this without agreement to a moratorium on chain and plant licences for a specified number of years.
It looks clear that, in spite of interest in the moratorium proposal, there is still plenty of debate and discussion to take place before any conclusion is reached.
-----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to our weekly Rural email, enter your email address here.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Farms For Sale: the most up-to-date and comprehensive listing of working farms in New Zealand, here »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are some links for updated prices for
- lamb
- beef
- deer
- wool
P2 Steer
Select chart tabs
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allan Barber is a commentator on agribusiness, especially the meat industry, and lives in the Matakana Wine Country where he runs a boutique B&B with his wife. You can contact him by email at allan@barberstrategic.co.nz or read his blog here ». This article was first published in the Farmers Weekly. It is here with permission.
11 Comments
in the past meat companies have had good years at the expense of farmers, and farmers have had good years at the expense of meat companies. But sheep and beef farming has shrunk, and talk of meat compnies reducing capacity is not the answer, as i believe it will only lead to a further shrinking of the industry. You only have to look at the empty comments section of any article on this site relating to sheep and beef to realise the enthusiasm for sheep and beef farming has waned. Farmers don't need high prices, this can be damaging to the industry. As we have seen with dairy, farm prices got pushed up , farms have become overcapitalised and now dairy farmers "need" a higher payout. Why can't farmers and meat companies get together at the start of each season and agree on a price. Then farmers would be able to concentrate on production instead of having to chase markets, which results in the panic selling of half fat stock. We also get the situation at present where there is a shortage of beef, and meat companies are bidding against farmers at saleyards for 2 yr heifers, killing them, when they should be going back to the bull. I think competition is healthy, but our industry lacks rules which stop it damaging itself.
MPI is bringing in new refrigeration rules. who pays?
And dairy land has increased in price. It's not debateable. so have Auckland residences.
Landlording is landlording, proper yeidl is required - that some well heeled landlordws use their rent to subsidise poor business practice is unfortunate.
Tim, they tell me the Wineries are full of unsold wine. The Savi Blanc harvest was huge and a lot of it was poor quality. The question is' how to get rid of this years wine before next years harvest'?
A lack of brains is a common problem.
Meanwhile USA dairy cow kill is back again, milk powder production is up %17, China is not expected to return to the market like before and its demand will remain subdued, brace yourself.
http://www.attenbabler.com/u-s-dairy-products-production-update-dec-14/
no 1 best buyer where?
Meanwhile, the company was selling into "a very weak market", meaning it had to sell the right amount each month and keep up with sales targets.
Synlait was on track but there was considerable uncertainty in dairy markets, Penno said.
"It is our view that it will continue to weaken for a while and it will probably stay weaker than some in the industry would believe." That was a result of over-production in major international dairy nations and weaker demand in China and Russia.
On the bright side, last year's difficult Chinese regulatory environment for infant formula had "settled right down", he said. Chinese registration standards for New Zealand product had left Synlait with unsellable product for part of the past year.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/dairy/63847068/infant-formula-priority
we can not underestimate the premise, that what ever is produced will be sold/has a home to go to. If this faith is not/less so we have a pivot.
If growth is taken out of the equation for a period (or production is limited or goes down), value craters. - as rule of thumb cap rates are growth embedded.
just saying....
My question is how are we benefiting from our free trade agreement with China? I know people in Kiwi rail who believe that the companies decision to continue to buy Chinese trains will put the company under. They are apparently badly built , experiencing unacceptable numbers of break downs. And yet Kiwi rail management continue to paint a rosy picture of the deal and are laying off people to compensate from losses ( including those people who have argued against the purchase of Chinese trains).
Our politicians are benefiting.
I found that much of the chinese maufactured metal products (eg botls, screws etc) were marginally outside tolerance. Only really slightly, but it means things don't meet up and wear and fatigue. They also seem to made from much softer alloys, not up to the average batch strength - it is not uncommon for Chinese brands fasteners to have the tops twist off or threads strip completely out, without much force. It is noticable that a crossthreaded chinese manufactured bolt/nut wont just bind and lock, the metal is so soft that it eithers tears or squashes flat.
I also found all the motor equipment to be unusally problematic. Components failing with only a few uses. And rubberware perishing within weeks of use. Splined connections repeatedly stripping and useless.
RD1 (now FarmSource, because fonterra has lots of money for rebranding but not for paying for it's product) gets a lot of chinese gear as trade. After several failure I just don't buy anything but consumables there (or NZ or US fencing products)
_all_ the Chinese clothing brought at RD1 lost it's elasticity within 6 months, and many started to lose their weft (the fibre in the clothing) after the second wash. Other clothing washed at the same time and with same wear use was unaffected, even 2 years later.
And Fonterra insist on selling on chinas terms.
Randy Greenfield, a dairy specialist for Vita Plus, a Madison-based livestock feed company, has calculated annual profits for the state’s dairy farmers based on their financial records and conversations with agribusiness consultants. Some farms that milk the state average of 117 cows will see profits totaling more than $200,000, Greenfield said. Those that milk 500 cows will make $1 million, while 2,500-cow dairy farms will clear $5 million, he said.
“Financially, for a lot of farmers, this will be the best year they will ever have,” Greenfield said.
http://www.thebullvine.com/news/wisconsin-dairy-farmers-to-rake-in-big-…
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.