I decided to wind up my commentary pieces for the year by talking to the Labour and National governments’ Ministers for Agriculture and Trade to seek their views on the challenges and opportunities facing the country. Unsurprisingly they hold differing opinions of both what has been achieved and what still needs to happen, although they are united in their desire to see New Zealand agriculture progress towards increasing export values and meeting our responsibilities in emissions reduction.
Damien O’Connor told me he has been enormously privileged to serve the country, first as associate minister under Jim Sutton and Jim Anderton in earlier Labour governments, and latterly as Agriculture Minister and Associate then Minister for Trade in the last two governments since 2017. In his earlier stints he learned a lot about rural communities and biosecurity which informed his determination to adopt the M. bovis eradication policy when it was discovered. He is proud of the fact this strategy has been almost completely successful.
He is also proud of the growth in agricultural exports during and since Covid which is testament to the efforts of the whole sector, as well as the team of highly skilled trade negotiators who have enabled the conclusion of the CCTPP and RCEP agreements as well as the signing of FTAs with the UK and EU. These are very good examples of what constitutes a sophisticated modern trade agreement, referencing environmental management, animal welfare, recognition of indigenous peoples, women, and small and medium enterprises. Upgrading the China/NZ FTA was another success.
O’Connor is less optimistic about the prospects for concluding FTAs with India and the Gulf Cooperation Council. India pulled out of RCEP at the last minute and, although it is talking to several other countries including Australia, these discussions are proving to be inconclusive. The Gulf states are unable to reach agreement on what they are prepared to offer New Zealand and the offer is now far worse than it was in 2009. The options with these two markets appear to be a bilateral with Qatar and sophisticated, but selective partnerships with Indian sectors rather than a broad FTA.
On the domestic front he regrets the failure to reach consensus with the sector on He Waka Eke Noa, believing the last Labour offer tabled to have been pretty fair. He is convinced something must be put in place of HWEN and feels there still exists a significant opportunity for New Zealand to demonstrate leadership in the emissions reduction space. He regrets what he terms confusing messages from farming leaders who decided they had to represent the wishes of the most vocal farmers, rather than driving towards admittedly unpopular, but ultimately necessary outcomes. He does not accept the suggestion Labour may have gone too far and too fast with its proposals, believing them to be essential for New Zealand agriculture to meet the standards demanded by our customers and trading partners.
In spite of a long spell in parliament representing the West Coast and the loss of his electorate seat in the recent election, O’Connor remains committed to his work as an opposition MP with the motivation to continue to serve the West Coast, as well as keep the new government honest.
Todd McClay kept the Agriculture and Trade portfolios in the face of strong challenges from coalition partners ACT and NZ First which wanted their spokespeople, Andrew Hoggard and Mark Paterson, to be given the role. However with National MP Nicola Grigg, both of them have been appointed Associate Ministers outside cabinet, thus forming what McClay terms the strongest ever agriculture team, plus Shane Jones as Minister of Fisheries. Paterson will take on responsibility for the wool industry, while delegations for the other two associates will be announced in due course.
McClay will have visited India before Christmas to follow up on O’Connor’s trade delegation earlier in the year to try to advance the relationship with the world’s largest democracy which has proved frustratingly difficult to convince of the desirability of increasing bilateral trade with New Zealand. National has the ambitious targets of negotiating an FTA with India and doubling agricultural exports within 10 years, both of which could be termed highly optimistic or downright impossible. That said, he is confident in the skills of New Zealand’s trade negotiating team which consistently punches above its weight.
McClay’s other priority is to restore confidence to New Zealand farmers by simplifying regulatory obstacles, such as bringing greater certainty to freshwater quality and removing duplication of farm plans. He also insists the government will ensure strong policy on emissions reduction, next year conducting a review of the science around emissions and the present methane reduction targets. He intends to meet farming leaders in the New Year to discuss pragmatic solutions to livestock emissions which he says will avoid leakage of New Zealand production moving offshore to less efficient producers. This government will focus on emissions efficiency rather than reduction at all costs.
If McClay achieves his stated objectives for his two ministerial responsibilities, he will undoubtedly be judged a success by farmers and exporting companies alike. It is too early to judge O’Connor’s achievements in the roles, although the farming community demonstrated its extreme displeasure with the Labour government’s performance by voting out all its rural constituency MPs including O’Connor.
On the other hand, he worked hard and successfully to strengthen New Zealand’s trade position, finally attending the APEC meeting last month in San Francisco as this country’s sole government representative. He has clearly been a very competent and skilful Minister of Trade, while the jury remains out on his time as Minister of Agriculture.
Current schedule and saleyard prices are available in the right-hand menu of the Rural section of this website.
M2 Bull
Select chart tabs
2 Comments
Most of the farming papers arriving here seems pretty optimistic that this government will absolutely hack down all that they perceive as red tape hindering them from development.
Can't help but think they will be sorely disappointed and in things like fresh water and winter grazing I'm fully behind O'Conner.
As for the doubling in ten years, haven't we heard that before. I could easily double the gross earnings off this property in less than ten years. Wouldn't make a profit.
Profits not a problem - no one talks about that thing. It's all about turnover and then alls ok!!
100% agree some maybe in for a rude shock and even if we kept as is would you make more profit(or any profit for many)?
Sounds like you run a rational, facts based operation - all the best for next year.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.