sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

US election result clear & uncontested; markets react to impending weaknesses; EU PPI deflates; AiG index dives; UST 10yr jumps to 4.42%; gold drops hard; oil soft; NZ$1 = 59.4 USc; TWI = 68.7

Economy / news
US election result clear & uncontested; markets react to impending weaknesses; EU PPI deflates; AiG index dives; UST 10yr jumps to 4.42%; gold drops hard; oil soft; NZ$1 = 59.4 USc; TWI = 68.7

Here's our summary of key economic events overnight that affect New Zealand with news it was a night of celebration in the US, especially for billionaires, and men pushing extreme social and religious views. The decisive second coming of a Trump Administration will free up new divisive narratives that will spill over globally. It is a great time to be a crony capitalist because your influence on a morally bankrupt president will be easy.

There will be global economic consequences - almost all of them bad for trade and small countries. Markets have reacted that way already. Impending isolationism is raising the US currency (which will hurt their exporters significantly), commodity prices are already getting a twist, Bond yields are rising, and sharply. And equity markets are rising on the sugar hit of expected lower taxes, ignoring for now the longer term costs of much higher interest rates and much higher inflation as new tariffs essentially impose taxes on US consumers.

The change in culture from a free and open society to one that will be bitter and vengeful will drive global consequences we won't like. But we will have to find our way in a renewed thicket of imposed and imported bile. For a while we will have to live in a fact-free world.

Economically, US mortgage applications fell -10.6% last week from the prior week, and that is their sixth consecutive retreat. They are now back to level-pegging with the low levels of 2023 at this time. Mortgage interest rates rose sharply last week, and are now likely to rise much faster in the future.

Trump's spending plans could add US$7.5 tln to American deficits over 10 years, according to one estimate, far greater than the current track. US Treasury yields rose almost +50 bps in October, when markets were pricing in a higher likelihood of a Trump win. Inflationary pressures from Trump's policies will leave the Fed with less room to cut rates, and keep Treasury yields elevated. The US housing market will be a loser. In fact, that is likely to be generally the case elsewhere because of sharply swelling US deficits.

American car sales rose in October to over a 16 mln annual rate. This is another metric likely to be challenged by higher future borrowing costs.

There was a UST 30yr bond auction earlier this morning, again well supported. The median yield jumped to 4.57% pa, sharply higher than the 4.32% at the prior equivalent event a month ago. Secondary market yields jumped as well (see below) as investors foresee chaotic and unprincipled public policy starting in 2025.

The Central Bank of Malaysia held its overnight policy rate steady at 3% for the ninth consecutive meeting. This was what was expected.

The easing of deflation pressures in the EU turned in September to be worse, with their PPI down -3.3% from a year ago.

In Australia, the Ai Group Industry Index retreated again in October with a sharp drop, especially for new orders. This index has indicated contraction for the last thirty months.

The UST 10yr yield is now at just on 4.42% and up +8 bps from this time yesterday. The key 2-10 yield curve is now more positive, by +18 bps. Their 1-5 curve inversion is less inverted, now by only -2 bps. And their 3 mth-10yr curve inversion is much less inverted, now by -13 bps. The Australian 10 year bond yield starts today at 4.70% and up +8 bps. The China 10 year bond rate is unchanged at 2.13%. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is up another +7 bps to 4.66%.

Wall Street has opened its Wednesday with the S&P500 up +2.3%. Overnight, European markets were down about -0.5% on average. Yesterday, Tokyo ended its Wednesday session up +2.6%. Hong Kong was down -2.2% and Shanghai down a minor -0.1%. Singapore rose +0.6%. The ASX200 ended its Wednesday session +0.8% higher, but the NZX50 slipped -0.1%.

The price of gold will start today at US$2667/oz and down -US$71 from this time yesterday.

Oil prices are down -50 USc at US$72/bbl in the US while the international Brent price is now at US$75.50/bbl.

The Kiwi dollar starts today at 59.4 USc and down -60 bps from this time yesterday. Against the Aussie we are unchanged at 90.5 AUc. Against the euro we are up +40 bps at 55.4 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 starts today at just under 68.7, and actually little-changed again from yesterday at this time.

The bitcoin price starts today at US$74,244 and up +5.9% from this time yesterday. Volatility over the past 24 hours has been very high at just on +/- 4.8%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

The easiest place to stay up with event risk is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

91 Comments

Make America Great Again 💪💪💪 Woohoo, what a great night. It was always going to be tho. The morally bankrupt liberal left had nothing of substance.  Painfully weak, pathetically devoid of any policy initiatives, their future is one of destruction and recriminations. A great result for the free world. Let’s get that swamp drained and the planes to Gitmo fuelled and ready. 🤣🤣

Up
15

Don’t agree that the US consumer will be “taxed” by the tariffs. At least not always. Tariffs are after all simply another form of duty. Go back a bit when President Clinton slapped a duty on NZ lamb imports. The CIF price could not be lifted in adjustment because the product was something of a hard sell in the first place. In effect NZ exporters met the cost.  Essentially believe Trump intends to price import product out of the market and somehow generate compensating production in the USA. That undoubtedly is clumsy and hardly simple to implement and the multitude of distortions that will arrive will not be ironed out quickly or easily.  Trump is now virtually telling the world the USA doesn’t need them but if he is right it will take a lot of damage and a long long time to prove him right.

Up
1

The USA will need the ROW to fund it at the very least. 

Up
1

It's not 'fund' - it's: supply.

So maybe 'support' is the better word. 

But the rest of the world is tapped-out. 

We have seen the end of globalisation - indeed the high-water-mark was perhaps 1995. From here on, closed borders, bloc-alignments, war(s) over 'what's left. 

Up
1

So much like the 1920s then? 

Up
1

No. 

There were 2+ billion planetary inhabitants, and a largely untapped planet.

Now there are 8+ billion planetary inhabitants, and we're on average (some resources, more), half-way through the planet. 

No comparison in dilemma terms, at all. Different ballgame completely. Political similarities - desperate poor voting for shallow promisers - and Lebensraum fur Herrenvolk should have sounded a warning, but otherwise...

Up
2

Add to that the doomsday of 1929 had been deferred but the eventual impact also greatly increased by President Harding  managing to forestall an event of the same characteristics some nine years earlier. Even so, then there was not the element of monumental debt weighing on global economies and the people. As a simple comparison those emerging from that slump were not in possession of maxed out credit cards and vehicles and other luxuries high on the hook.

Up
2

"Now there are 8+ billion planetary inhabitants, and we're on average (some resources, more), half-way through the planet. "

And there lies the cause...everything else is a symptom.

My pick is the realisation occurred 2008....all downhill since then.

Up
1

“We have seen the end of globalisation.”  Aye, as if often, the truth and what it portends, doesn’t need many words.

Up
1

If Trump goes ahead with his tariff plans, will his people put up with the resultant inflation for the greater good? I'm not sure the American population is ready for nuanced thinking beyond 'price goes up, bad'.

Up
12

Therein lies the rub doesn’t it. The people believed in obviously quite some majority that they were better off under Trump last time and will be better off again, this time. Covid and the aftermath revealed the USA population wise is more divided than united and hardly in a light and breezy state of affairs. What then if Trump fails to deliver on these current expectations? Much discontent if not fury in the masses I would predict.

Up
5

In a democracy people get the government they deserve

Up
7

"Much discontent if not fury in the masses I would predict."

'citizen journalists' will ensure the president 'wins' even when the facts show otherwise.

Up
1

The mainstream media opinionists have been found to wilfully exercise their bias and paid for propaganda to further their own & other agenda to the clear detriment of many/most people. A majority now do not trust the MSM & will seek validation or correction from a wider variety of sources.

Up
7

I fear that the real danger of Trump doing something dangerous, rather than simply self-serving, is when he is caught in the position of his own policies causing harm to his population. That's when you need to find someone else to blame.

Up
3

great headline I couldn't stop laughing.

Clearly you are disappointed with the result 

Get over it!

Up
25

Indeed, while the US is opposed to the Ukraine war they are happy to let Israel kill tens of thousands in Palestine - the US was already morally bankrupt.

Up
6

On the contrary, Israel has saved lives.

What exactly do you imagine would happen if Israel was not robust in the way it reacts to attacks on its people and its land?

If Iran and its puppets had their way and Israel was wiped off the face of the map, it would simply be a prelude to an unimaginably large conflict in the Middle East between Sunni and Shia interests.  

Tens of thousands killed would seem like a bit of collateral damage. The deaths would be counted in their millions. 

 

Up
2

Trump saying God sent him. Religion has always been the greatest justification for the worst atrocities. 

Up
4

I don't think Mr Chaston has worked out the dissatisfaction folk have with government.  Which has all the nasty things he ascribes to Mr Trump.  All of them.  Already, before this election.

Let's break that down to a small local local small example.   Some will say it's trite, but in an environment where folk need to hunt supermarket specials it's important.

Auckland ratepayers pay several hundred thousand dollars for some concrete steps at the beach.  The system (aka the swamp) believes this is ok.  And wants to maintain it's power to continue.

 

Up
5

to make it even better, those steps are now covered by sand

Up
0

This used to be a great financial news site.

David you are letting your political opinions ruin the content.

Up
36

David's assessment is not much different to what is being said around the world.

What isn't being said outside of academic economic circles (yet!) is that a full implementation of the President's policies - not dissimilar to those implemented around the world in the 1920s - could produce the same result.

Up
9

What ? That over half of America are "morally bankrupt"?

Ridiculous.

Do the democrats now not believe in democracy?

Up
9

talking sense

You are clearly not familar with William Golding's "Lord of the Flies."

Up
1

This train has been in motion since James Watt invented the steam engine, PDK would probably say since the dawn of agriculture even.  What happened to coal in the 20's is effectively happening to oil now.  As a result, there is a civilizational symmetry playing out.  World powers are fighting over resources and trying to keep their system going at the expense of others.  War and conflict is a given but not because of Trump, you give him too much credit.  Global conflict has been doing nicely in his absence you should note.   It's circling the drain time.   

Up
7

absolutely spot on

 

Up
1

Trump has been the only president since at least WW2 not to start overseas conflicts.  

Rather, he has done more for peace by brokering the Abraham Accords.

Up
1

Not true;

"If we consider the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the war in Afghanistan and the Iraq War, Trump joins Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, John F. Kennedy and Dwight D. Eisenhower in not having officially brought the United States into a new war since 1945."

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-which-us-presidents-le…

Try not to buy into the Trump propaganda BS.

And Reagan broke the back of the USSR which led to an unprecedented period of peace.

Up
0

"Supporters allows us to stay independent and unbiased" - nothing unbiased about those opening paragraphs

Up
0

"But we will have to find our way in a renewed thicket of imposed and imported bile. For a while we will have to live in a fact-free world."

I suggest using X. The best info leading up to this election and reporting of what was going on yesterday was by citizen journalists, not the utterly out of touch fact-full MSM.

Up
4

citizen journalists? I'm reminded of the old statistic - unassailably true - that half the population have a below average I.Q.

Up
5

Be careful Chris, it's not IQ that is important, it is the ability to think clearly and dispassionately. 

Also, is seems to be that those wired for the latter, are a distinct minority. 

This I've put up before, but I can tell by their comments, when people don't fit the minor categories:

Programmed to Ignore? | Do the Math

I am certain that Jimbo Jones, for instance, doesn't fit those categories. So we have a 'worldview vs reality' issue. Put differently; there was always going to be an evolutionary increase in sapience, couldn't be any other way. It was likely that some species got sapient enough to lever energy. It was likely that it went on the lever resource stocks, using that energy. But it wouldn't be wired to be aware of the ramifications, because evolution hadn't favoured that need. So it would hit the physical limits, not wired to anticipate the impasse. I suspect that is why we don't hear from, or get visits from, other parts of the Universe - the same evolution would apply, as would the same short-term irruption. 

Up
2

"there was always going to be an evolutionary increase in sapience"

Look up the Flynn Effect. We might have peaked.

Up
1

C’est la vie. Do what you can do, achieve the small good things. Regardless of who is in office in North America. Macro certainly has an impact, but micro? Move on

Up
8

Thanks David. Interest.co is well led.

Up
7

Moving to New Zealand searches spike on Google following Trump win

I'm shocked, shocked .... (Apologies to Claude Rains.)

Up
2

..well, not that shocked. (Apologies to Futurama.)

Up
3

Well, once Trump has closed the border, all those south american criminals and drug traffickers will be heading to NZ to join their Mexican backpacker mate in the Green party.  Promises of not just permanent residency on offer, but anyone with a good refugee backstory can become a MP in NZ.  Set for life.

Up
0

Washington Post: Trump’s supporters say his unpredictability is a feature, not a bug, of his foreign policy...

I do wish they'd drop the 'unpredictability' tag.

Once you get your head around how he thinks, he's completely predictable. His thought process is not dissimilar to a mafia boss: firstly, "what's best for me?", and secondly, "if I don't care, who does, and can I make them beholden to me if I gift them what they want?".

Up
2

Very hard to argue American politics wasn't already 'morally bankrupt'. They've done a great job of making that clear lately.

Up
9

We in NZ, for one, have one of the highest homelessness rates in the developed world but our political classes are conflicted to do anything but make all of it worse, so that a few at the top can benefit from it.

The do-gooder Labour gov ignored scathing reports from whistleblowers at MBIE on widespread migrant exploitation in NZ, so it could bring headline inflation down with wage theft.

That's how we treat our own and yet claim moral superiority based on how Americans voted over the last few days. All I am saying that NZ needs to come off its high horse on this topic.

Up
9

Source for your data?

"New Zealand’s figures include refugees and asylum seekers who are looking for temporary accommodation, as well as victims of domestic violence. Most other countries do not include those groups. New Zealand’s data also included children and people living in “uninhabitable” housing.

By another measurement in the OECD paper released last week, New Zealand’s homelessness compares more favourably to other countries, although it is still very high.

In this different measurement, New Zealand seventh among the 38 member bloc’s countries for the number of people per 10,000 who are homeless, as defined by just either sleeping rough or in emergency accommodation."

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/nz-leads-world-rankings-of-homel…

 

Up
0

100%!!!! It’s frankly pathetic. Take a look at our own back yard and policies, and perhaps individual viewpoints?

Up
1

You're not going to crack down on migrant exploitation when its your own MPs that are doing it.

Up
0

The world’s in a funny state at the moment, probably due to disparity in income, assets, and age. The centre parties are becoming further apart. And while some think this is great when their team wins, it may not be so great for them when the other team wins. I just hope it doesn’t happen here; so far I think the coalition haven’t been too far right and I personally don’t think Labour went too far left either. However things were much better in the days of Clark/Cullen/Key/English. 

Up
1

I actually think the current mess is largely attributable to the failure of centrism, which essentially favours the status quo and the elite. 

Up
11

+1

Up
1

Depends on who you call the elite! Is Bill Gates the elite, or is he a national treasure? 
My take is that the average Joe in the west still expects a 1960s wage for doing similar work today, we haven’t upskilled enough and our old skill is becoming obsolete. I don’t think there is an easy solution to this problem, whether it be protectionism or socialism it won’t work. Why should we expect a high standard of living when we are no longer the most productive?

Up
0

What would be your fix HM? Protectionism? Income redistribution? Asset redistribution? Easy to blame the centre, but would any extreme party have done better?

Up
0

The following, for a start:

- Tax changes: tax wealth and capital

more, lower income tax

- mass funding of community housing providers, to significantly increase affordable housing opportunities 

- a significant uplift in healthcare investment 

These are the sorts of things that would meaningfully benefit middle and lower middle income households 

Up
0

I would suggest your comment actually highlights the failure of labels. What is 'Centrism'? 

I suggest Trump is the result of the wealth gap. He lies, cheats, commits fraud, treats women like sex objects etc. All basic human traits. Unfortunately to many people he looks just like them, despite being wealthy. He represents to many people they can be as ugly as they want and still come on top. They can fight back at the 'establishment' that they perceive has held them back unfairly. Best of all they don't have to look into a mirror to recognise their own faults. Trump has given them licence to be bigoted, biased, misogynist, anti-government and any other negative trait they want. They won't like what they get in the end, but they asked for it. 

question; does the movie The Purge just get a little closer to becoming a reality?

Up
1

Top comment. 

Up
0

The problem is that politicians moved the Overton Window to the Left, and left the people behind.  The massive Trump swing should not be a surprise - its not that the Right have become more extreme, its that the centre has not shifted as far left as the Left think they should.  What was the centre is now pitched by the Left as being Extreme - a point that Elon made quite succintly in this cartoon. 

https://images.wsj.net/im-535576/?width=780&size=1.5

Up
0

I don’t think the so called shift to ‘the left’ was that great. It’s a shift ‘left’ in terms of ‘progressive social liberties’, but there’s been limited shift leftwards in terms of policy to meaningfully help lower-middle and middle income households.

Up
0

Bit of TDS going on there.

The 10yr-3mth yield curve normalisation approaching fast, (Some market observers, including officials at the Federal Reserve, view the relationship between 3-month and 10-year Treasurys to be more important as a recession indicator), chance of Federal Reserve not dropping rates as much won't bode too well for the CRE sector in the States. 

Up
6

Bingo.

Up
1

Funny how bitcoin hits an ATH (75.5k) and that doesn't even get a mention

And yes, the markets must be wrong.  Economic doom is on its way, but the millions of traders, investments and quant funds are too dumb to see it.  

Up
1

The US Fed deficit is likely to grow much larger, and faster, in the next 4 years. Ergo, valuable things where the supply is limited are going off on a tear. No surprises there.

Up
0

Have to confess I bought more MSTR and IBIT shares last night. Trump has talked of making the US the crypto capital of the world, it's reached the point one doesn't even have to have faith in crypto to invest in it. Pretty much the definition of a meme stock, but when everyone is stampeding in one direction you don't wait to find out why, you run with them. Just make sure to stop before the cliff.

Up
1

'For a while we will have to live in a fact-free world'

Mr Chaston, we have been that for a long while. 

Trump - as I've long pointed out, is a symptom, not a cause. And the MSM had been peddling un-facts for a long, long time. For instance, how many report the depletion per day of finite resources like oil? How many account the tonnage of CO2 added to the above-ground habitat? Nope - they hide behind 'current price' - what is that?

The false filter has been reporting through a money-lens. An artificial, keystroke-issued proxy is NOT a fact (translated: money is NOT a store of wealth).

The US is further down the entropy road than NZ (and Eric Fryckberg yesterday reported that we spend 60% of our infrastructure budget, on maintenance - a figure which climbs with aging structures. US infrastructure - bridges etc  - is older. They will never 'grow' from here; too many aging balls already in the air. 

Their bottom-end has been feeling the pinch for decades (began with Reagan - who was also a symptom, not a cause). The Elite sucked the bottom-end first, and there are now enough being sucked (getting poorer) that they are a voting force. Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris are seen to be Elite, Trump (although he is) doesn't act like one. 

But the MSM doesn't get it - because their worldview is falsely based on money - not the physical world - and they therefore buy into growth being good (if it wipes us out as a species, how can it be good?) and growth being forever possible (which is clearly isn't, on a planet creaking at the seams). 

Knowing that the MSM story doesn't fit their realities, the increasing numbers of disenfranchised are going down rabbit-holes, in whole (intended) or in part. Falling past the Antidotes, as Alice noted. They too, are basing their narratives on questionable base-lines - although the idea that the Elite invented covid to vaccine us to death, is based on the understanding that the planet is hopelessly overpopulated, hopelessly overconsuming. That is the truth, and one which the MSM studiously avoids. 

Long story short - don't blame Trump (or those who vote for him). Stand back and ask: Why Trump? 

We have been living in a fact-free (more accurately, a falsely-based) world for a long time. 

Up
16

Brilliant post, thank you

Up
5

"Stand back and ask: Why Trump? " Everyone is afraid to ask that question and discuss it publically, especially the Americans. They did not and still don't understand that amongst world leaders he was a laughing stock. 

What happens from here is anyone's guess. I suspect on one level the US has dodged a bullet. If Harris had won some Trump supporters may well have armed up and taken to the streets.

Up
2

Sometimes I wonder how far people at the top would go to to stay there in a resource depletion future..  would they increase resource extraction?, or reduce there own or other populations?.   With the technology introduced during the last several years it's not hard to dream up creative ways to achieve an accelerated population decrease while maintaining some stability.

Up
1

BYD to crush Tesla in all markets moving forward. Elon forgot the political bent of people most willing to buy his cars. Fascinating stuff. 

Up
2

Most of the people I know who own Teslas are centre-right. They buy them as a status symbol, and because they are ‘cool’. They are also often Musk fan boys

Up
3

Plenty of left wing environmentalist types own them too!  It seems like a gamble to significantly reduce your market; but then again maybe it significantly increases their appeal to the centre right, creating a niche market at a time when competition in the general market is going to go crazy. 

Up
0

Imagine spending $80k on a crappier car because you dont like the guy who makes the best car in the world.  Teslas are cool, end of story.  As anyone who has been watching all the FSD videos lately knows. 

Up
0

Did you forget one market?

Up
0

There's been a rejection of Tesla in the US by the left due to their dislike of Musk. It's going to be interesting to see how this plays out - Musk has aligned himself with Trump, who appears to be more interested in catering to Big Oil than Big Green. Musk will spend a whole lot of time trying to walk the tightrope between being a Trump ally and not killing his golden goose.

Up
1

Its hard to know if it is just Musk's ego, or if it is actually a cunning plan. There are more than enough republican voters in the US to keep Tesla going, maybe you can charge them a premium because you are their main man Trump's mate, and also get Trump to create a few tariffs to protect Tesla from international competition. 

Up
0

Elon can get even richer by only selling Teslas to 'Mericans.

What most 'mericans haven't figured out yet (or will ever?) is that tariffs on imports mean 'price' freedoms for those not subject to tariffs.

Or put another way, US suppliers will be able to raise their prices to just below a tariffed product. Who wins? Hint: won't be the consumer but the rich will make off like bandits.

btw, the battle over what is subject to import tariffs is going to heat up. For example, if a vehicle is imported in parts, but assembled in the US, where are the tariffs applied? What if the imported products are actually owned by a US company? Anyway, we can let the big boys play this game as the consumer will get fleeced either way.

Up
0

It will also create a drop in productivity. If tariffs artificially create a whole lot of unskilled jobs like car manufacture, there is less incentive to upskill. Although Tesla are supposedly built by robots, so it won't even create many jobs!

Up
0

That's a great intro paragraph!

Up
3

sure - if you are morally superior

The best bit about the Trump victory is seeing journalists in general squirm because their opinions are not gospel

The worst bit is that the next 4 years will be endless commentary of how bad Trump is

Up
3

We had 4 years of endless commentary of how bad/old Biden is too. And here we are still constantly getting comments about Jacinda and Labour.

It will be hard to judge Trump until another 20 or so years. Will protectionism etc make America great again? Its possible I guess. 

Up
0

Trump wins Bigly- despite the lefty media tosh.

Anyway- mortgages are all going to rise bigly too.....get those cheap (less than 6%) locked in fast, they are all going NORTH!

-  Still more Silver Bullets to the staggering, NZ Housing vampire Ponzi.....

Up
3

The MSM is NOT left-leaning. 

It is status-quo-representing; there are as many 'left' as 'right'. 

But the status-quo narrative no longer fits observed reality (see my longer post upthread). 

Up
2

To quote Charlie of Two and Half men, ..."I can sure pick em"... Applies to picking either of Trump or Biden and again if Trump and Harris is the best they've got I'd hate to see the worst.

Let's see what happened over the last four years. Aluminium and steel from NZ have tariffs still in place so a fat lot of good for NZ having Biden around. US still importing Russian fertiliser without additional tariffs but NZ have self imposed a 40% tariff.

Up
2

If the US impose tarrifs where does the (output) growth come from to increase interest rates?

 

 

Up
1

Their problem is our problem. We all buy cheap tat from slave-labour, no environmental regulation countries. And even then, we're struggling to make ends meet. Now bring those industries home - with the wages we need to survive in OUR economies.

We can't afford ourselves; a point I have been making for a while now. 

Billy Joel - We're living here in Allentown...

So you can live beyond your means via debt, until someone decides you aren't worth backing. 

Then......  

Up
1

Indeed... put another way we can live on credit (debt) until we cannot service it.....that point has arguably already been passed as (output) growth is what provides the wherewithal.

Up
1

Or we could just stop wasting money on crap and live a pretty good life. A couple on min wage in NZ make $1536 a week after tax, why do they need to live on credit? 

Up
0

Why?....because the system demands the ever increasing creation of credit (debt) to pay return.

Up
0

Seeing our way forward as New Zealanders is going to be very challengingly. However unlike the 1970's we have more export markets than we did then and if we can avoid being bullied by America to spend more on defense maybe we can go on much as we have done over the last six decades. I go for neutrality please! America has never been welcoming to New Zealand so just don't go looking. Instead shore up markets in South America and Asia. And remain on good terms with China. 

Up
0

"The change in culture from a free and open society to one that will be bitter and vengeful will drive global consequences we won't like. But we will have to find our way in a renewed thicket of imposed and imported bile. For a while we will have to live in a fact-free world."

 

Crikey, for a minute there i thought Jacinda Ardern had been reelected

Up
3

No - she was about an (our) 'rules-based world'. 

This will be a different Elite (the internet-reliant transnationals, which I think are 7 of the biggest 10 global companies, plus hangers-on). They will transcend national regulations - but ironically they still require local rules and enforcement.

Will be interesting to see how long that works

Up
0

The geopolitical  (middle east suez & oil Russia) caused massive spike in global shipping - if Trump can resolve war then paying a bit of extra tarriff will be easily absorbed into a better functioning/efficient shipping network - personally I am looking forward to 4 years of peace.

Up
0

You won't get it. Too many people vastly overestimate what 'merican Presidents - even good ones - can achieve.

Up
1

Great day for Israel and Russia.

Supreme Court will be f'd for 60 years now. Once they remove the chevron doctrine we will see the US life expectancy drop even faster.

Other things that will probably be axed: social security, affordable care Act,  and any chance of antitrust laws being enforced.

Things that will probably be gutted: post office, public education, and the environmental protection agency.

Mass deportation and tariffs will probably happen, ruining communitiee and probably will seriously affect US farmers.

Probably going to see an uptick in hate crimes especially against LGBTQIA, and lots of deaths from a federal abortion ban.

Rich getting a tax cut, and the deficit blowing out even faster.

More gerrymandering to help ensure Republicans keep winning. Things are not looking great.

Up
0