sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

A review of things you need to know before you sign off on Thursday; inflation hits farmers hardest, population skewing older, border relief on the way, swaps lower again, NZD holds, & more

Business / news
A review of things you need to know before you sign off on Thursday; inflation hits farmers hardest, population skewing older, border relief on the way, swaps lower again, NZD holds, & more

Here are the key things you need to know before you leave work today (or if you already work from home, before you shutdown your laptop).

MORTGAGE RATE CHANGES
Nothing changed today.

TERM DEPOSIT RATE CHANGES
The Cooperative Bank raised their TD rates for terms 1 year and longer. None are market-leading.

INFLATION HITS BUSINESSES MUCH HARDER THAN CONSUMERS
Producer prices rose a sharp +8.8% in the year to September, but that was down from a +9.7% rise in the year to June and 9.8% in March. So perhaps the peak has passed? However, capital goods prices rise more than +12% again, but that was due largely to construction costs. On the farm, things are very tough with input costs (other than livestock) rising more than +16% in the year to September, up from +14% in the year to June, and less than +5% in the year to September 2021. Farmers are the main sector being hit the hardest. Dairy farmers face operating cost rises over +17%. Consumer prices are 'only' up 7.2% over the same period.

SKEWING OLDER
Our population rose by a minor +12,500 in the year to September to 5,127,400. That seems to indicate that the pandemic low occurred as at March 2022 of just +500. The median age of our population is now over 38 years, the highest on record. (Twenty years ago it was under 32 year.) Twenty years ago, 66% of our population was of working age, and 11% were 65 or older. Today those proportions are 65% and 16½%. The big change is that the population under 15 is shrinking. There are now 845,000 over-65s, and 203,000 are over 80 years, about the total population of Auckland's Waitakere (204,000), or Wellington City (216,000). There are only four urban areas larger (Christchurch, and the other three Auckland quadrants.)

DEMOGRAPHIC RELIEF COMING?
The ageing pressure may about to ease however. Overseas worker numbers and international student arrivals are rising strongly again. The number of overseas workers coming to NZ could be back up to pre-pandemic levels by the beginning of next year.

2022 FUND MANAGER GONGS
Passive fund manager Smartshares has taken out the annual Research IP overall Fund Manager of the Year Award held overnight. Separate winners were announced in fifteen categories. In addition there were four Advisor Choice awards, and one Investor Choice award (to Generate Investment Management). A full list of finalists and category winners, is here.

RUSSELL JONES TAKES ON WESTPAC CIO ROLE
Westpac NZ has appointed Russell Jones, the former long-term ASB executive who also spent three years at BNZ, as its Chief Information Officer. Jones has been acting in the role since May having succeeded Andrew Henderson. His appointment is subject to Reserve Bank non-objection.

SOLID AUSSIE JOBS DATA
Australia added +32,000 jobs in October and their jobless rate dipped to 3.4% from 3.5% in September. Better yet, there were +47,000 new full time jobs, and a fall of -15,000 part-time jobs here. These better-than-expected and solid labour market results will likely mean the RBA will add another +25 bps to their official rate in early December, taking it to 3.10%. Markets have priced in slightly less than that prior to this jobs data release.

UNINSURABLE
And we should note that in the middle of the inland floods in Australia's eastern state, insurers have had enough, advising residents who live on floodplains (most of the good agricultural region) that their insurance won't be renewed.

LOG IN STILL AN ISSUE
We still have a known issue for readers logging in via Press Patron, which affects ad-free access. We are working on a fix, although don't have a resolution yet. Apologies

SWAP RATES LOWER AGAIN
Wholesale swap rates may be slightly softer today, but the real action comes near the close. Our chart will record the final positions. The 90 day bank bill rate is up +1 bp at 4.16%. The Australian 10 year bond yield is now at 3.65% and down -5 bps. The China 10 year bond rate has risen to 2.85% and back up +2 bps. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is now at 4.18%, and down another -5 bps and now above the RBNZ fix for the NZGB 10 year which down another sharp -6 bps at 4.13%. The UST 10 year is now at 3.73% and down another -5 bps from this time yesterday.

EQUITIES ONLY RISE IN NZ
The S&P500 ended its Wednesday trade down -0.8% and slipping back to Monday's level. Tokyo has opened down -0.2%. But Hong Kong has opened sharply lower, down -2.7%. Shanghai has opened down another -0.8%. The ASX200 little-changed in early afternoon trade. The NZX50 is up a modest +0.3% late in the Thursday session, and led by an Investore (IPL, #37) recovery, and F&P Healthcare (FPH, #1).

GOLD STAYS FIRM
In early Asian trade, gold is at US$1768/oz and down -US$7 from this time yesterday. It's been hovering at this level for basically two years now.

NZD HOLDS
The Kiwi dollar is marginally lower than this time yesterday at 61.3 USc. Against the AUD we are little-changed at 91.2 AUc. Against the euro we off slightly at 59.2 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 is now at 70.2 and very little-changed from this time yesterday.

BITCOIN DIPS
Bitcoin is now at US$16,650 and down -1% from this time yesterday. Volatility over the past 24 hours has been modest also at just over +/- 1.8%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

Daily swap rates

Select chart tabs

Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA
Source: NZFMA

This soil moisture chart is animated here.

Keep abreast of upcoming events by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

96 Comments

There are now 845,000 over-65s

 

Thats a lot of super every week

Qualifying as 

Weekly rate

Single (living alone)  $463 

Single (sharing)   $427

Married, civil union or de facto couple one partner qualifies (and the other is not included)  $356

Married, civil union or de facto couple: both partners qualify  $712

Married, civil union or de facto couple: one partner qualifies and the other is included  $677

Up
5

With this and the growing cost of their healthcare they're getting very expensive indeed for younger Kiwi working taxpayers.

Up
9

A pity Bill English didn’t manage to get the increased age change in. Oh well. Thank goodness it’s not means tested and it increases every year. 

Up
2

ACT will

Up
1

and then Dave will get shunted from Epsom

Up
0

Don’t let principles get in the way of political survival!!!!!

Up
1

Yes like their libertarian principles that when applied to eductions means:  No school zones!  Freedom of choice!  Good schools will grow!  Bad schools will fail!

But then to into the specifics of their policy, there's a big carve out for Epsom, no changes to school zones!  no freedom of choice!  Only existing Epsom property owners shall for eternitiy have the right to send their kids to Grammer and Eggs.

Act even have the policy that when a land title is subdivided in Epsom, the newly created section would not be part of the grammer and eggs school zone.

Up
5

English was only going to change it for folk hitting the age once the last of the baby boomers were safely through.

Up
8

Realisticaly you do have to phase it in. Just like Labour was going to as well.

But in recent times it has been the policy of the party which lost the election.

Up
0

Even someone young wouldn't really want to vote for that without there being some massive provision for their own future.

Up
2

Reduce amount paid. Start at age 69.  Problem solved.

Up
3

Change it to a ubi instead. Problem solved. Otherwise don't worry, it all gets recycled back into the economy. Not banking on receiving it by the time I qualify so taking measures to provide for myself but don't penalize me for doing so and hand it over to those who havnt. 

Up
10

That is a worry with Kiwisaver if they ever make it compulsory and to make getting an annuity compulsory. The next step would be to means test people for income incl kiwisaver income with respect to National Super.

Up
2

The problem is that young people would quite like to get it at 65 as well! So to vote for that they will be hurting themselves later as well.

Up
0

One of the many reasons I vote ACT, is that they would index the retirement/super age to median life expectancy.  

The average life expectancy in the 70s when compulsory super was abolished was 72.  Today it's 82. 

Back then the retirement age was 60.  So the retirement age should be lifted to 70 immediately in line with the increase of life expectancy.  

Up
2

thats a lot of 65 year olds on jobseeker

Up
7

It's better now than never.  Can always grandfather those who are already drawing a pension, and set the cut off date at end of Q4 Fiscal.  

Sure, there's going to be some people who have to wait until they're 70, but that's life isn't it?  No different than young people having to wait another 10 years to buy their first home.  The "tough as nails" "bootstraps" generation will manage just fine if they have to wait another 5 years before going on the old person's benefit.  

Up
1

Correct. People at that age know they are unemployable, they quit work if they are financially able to and go on a benefit.

Up
0

Awe Didums. But they are still paying tax as well

Up
0

No, now they're just beginning to subsidize what they take from the pot.  A bit like claiming unemployed beneficiaries are net tax payers.  

Up
0

Thats a lot of Family Homes and Rental Properties to Offload before moving to the Retirement Homes.

The Perfect Storm.

Up
10

Can someone please tell me what the definition of "included"  is?

Up
1

If you're over 65 and your partner isn't, you can apply and not include your partner in the testing or apply and have them included. If included, then its income tested across you both.

Up
0

to make you feel better,its tied to 66% of the average wage so there should be a steep increase next year.

Up
1

Yes, thanks JA. 

Up
1

That was done far earlier. Living memory not what it was?

Up
10

Yes something positive to look forward too

Up
0

The costliness of NZ Superannuation is that it goes to those who have no need of it.

It ought to be a tax-free benefit universally available at 65: but those who apply for it should be taxed at a high rate on all other income, a rate high enough to deter those who don't need it from claiming it. Susan St John and Clair Dale have the right idea, but governments are too timid to offend their rich, ageing electors.

https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/business/about/our-research/research-…

Up
8

How about clawing it back at 27% like WFF

Up
0

It would also deter the well paid from working after 65.  That would reduce tax revenues and increase the current skill shortage.  

Up
4

It depends on who those well paid people are.  I know plenty of well paid sales reps driving around in full personal use company cars that have hit 65, so get the pay rise courtesy of the tax payer and no motivation to put in 100% at work.  Meanwhile anyone working in internal sales that may want to move into external sales will just have to wait until their successors drop dead before they can "move up the ladder".  

Up
0

I am retired living with my working de facto partner for the last 18 years.  We will be getting married rather belatedly next month.  So for the last five years if I had declared myself as single (sharing) I would have received $71 more per week. Is this fair?  Do readers suggest I divorce the day after my marriage?  

Up
2

I believe that lots of people in China divorced in order to receive more money. Not sure if that loophole has been closed now.

But sure, in NZ there are lots of reasons not to get married.

Up
2

I have a central banker friend in Hungary, who did exactly that, except he was married when a law change made the separation expedient.

Up
0

I don't follow, what does marrige have to do with it? The rules are whether you are a couple or not.  Seems to me your question is: 

 if I had commited benefit fraud, I would have received $71 more per week. Is this fair?

 

Up
6

I think it's about time we made kiwisaver compulsary for everyone in NZ turning 18 from the 1/1/23.  Perhaps a 7% contrib and try to get employer contribs up to 3%.  in fact a great new tool would be a variable contrib rate instead of blunt tool OCR, we could take heat out of retail spending but you would get it back at 65 plus interest

Up
8

Agree that Kiwisaver needs to be made compulsory. I'd even prefer to see a "two speed" system e.g. compulsory 3%, with the variable inflation control able to take that up to say 5% (plus employer 3%) and then an option to be able to contribute more if you like out of pre-tax income up to a certain point ... e.g. across the compulsory and optional contributions you can take up to 10% of your pre-tax income into Kiwisaver. 

Yes I understand that will benefit those on better incomes more (because those on pressured incomes won't likely contribute extra because they can't afford it) but what's more immoral - that, or having wealthy people who could have saved their own way through retirement getting super anyway? 

OCR should still be used, but save $800k, a lot of hot air and a whole load of hassled trees and have some guy off Upwork program an Excel macro that just looks at the inflation rate and adjusts the OCR accordingly, factoring in the effect of the Kiwisaver rate.

At the end of the day we need to get real that having so many people dependent on the state - and a shrinking pool of net tax payers - is not sustainable.

And that isn't a dig at 'dole bludgers'; it's a dig at dole bludgers AND retirees who could save for their own living costs AND public servants doing nebulous, overpaid management work etc. 

We either get real and ahead of this, or we wind up like Greece and have a whole lot of pain when the system inevitably breaks. 

Up
5

I agree, Kiwi Saver needs to become compulsary, the Super eligibility age should go up, and to be eligible, you must have lived (and paid taxes) in NZ for 20 years.

Up
3

Yes! Use govt to force unwilling individuals to fund the invisible hands planet eating machine. 

Up
2

"insurers have had enough, advising residents .... that their insurance won't be renewed."

Whatever the re-sale price of those properties was deemed to be a year ago, it's probable close to $0 now.

Not many lenders will dole out a loan to an uninsured property, so only cash-buyers will be left.

Up
8

“residents that live on flood plains” yet here we have this government enforcing the development near to Napier,  of a 700 odd house suburb on a known flood plain despite the warnings from both regional & local councils and the fact that two years ago it was up to 2 metres deep in water, for  a long period of time. Minister Parker reassures that he doesn’t think that it will happen again. Go figure. Prospective buyers beware,  insure before you buy!

Up
20

We may have reached "Peak Dumb Comment" re Parker.

Up
12

Insurance isn't going to help you, just don't buy there. Once it gets flooded a second time your insurance will go through the roof or they will simply stop insuring you. You simply do not build on low lying areas anymore or anything that is flood prone.

Up
10

Forget all this climate catastrophy stuff, II would never have even considered buying a house in an area which has the slightest risk of flooding. Even if its insured, it would be a huge hassle when it happens next. Same goes with cliff faces, gullies etc.

Up
0

Which area is that?

Up
0

Land value still applies

Up
1

Yes, but, on a flood plain that's had a 100-year event in each of the last 3?

Not many will now pay a lot for land that can wipe out a year's farming effort in one big rain, hoping that the last 3 years 'are the end of it'.

Up
2

NZSX50 is proving pretty resilient, although it is essentially flat over the past 6 months and still down over 14% from start of the year. 
I suspect it will be up and down by year’s end, essentially flat.

Up
2

Sanderson Group? Heard developer of Tamahere Country Club has hit the wall.

Up
1

Will be interesting to see how many are still standing this time next year. There will be a fair few still standing but at much reduced capacity, some decent sized developers have already been shedding staff big time.

The residential construction sector is a ticking time bomb, which hardly anyone has been talking about or writing about. That is quite astonishing.

Up
1

 Yeah- I can’t see how many of them survive. Construction costs are up 15% end values are down 10-15% funding is evaporating at a rate of knots. Feel for the builders, plumbers, sparkies etc who will get burned again.

Up
3

It's gonna be bad for some for sure. 

Anyone who's done it before tries to avoid residential construction like the plague.

Up
0

To a large extent, residential construction is for suckers. So boom/bust.

Up
0

Every part of its pretty bad. Small scale. Clients have high demands but limited funds (usually). Short timeframes.

Upsides are health and safety is a bit lax, and they'll take anyone.

Up
0

Can make very good money if your timing is good and you don’t get too greedy.

Up
1

Costs up 15% bare minimum, I reckon more like 20-25% over past 18 months. And the other things you mention plus demand falling off the cliff as mortgage rates have surged higher.

Anyone with investments or careers highly exposed to residential construction should get out quickly. Well you should have got out a year ago, but better late than never.

Up
0

Probably a bit paranoid. The good players usually survive. 

Up
2

Depends what you call a ‘good player’? When bad shit colludes, it’s hard for any one to come out the other side strongly. 
There’s one or two very reputable developers currently in a bit of strife.

Frankly, I don’t think I am scare mongering or being paranoid at all. Although there are lots of differences, it feels in some ways eerily like 2006-2007.

But people can feel free to ignore my advice if they wish.

Up
2

What is 'reputable'? Notorious?

In every industry you have a range of players. Some are poorly organised, barely profitable, with terrible cashflow. But they manage to scrape by from one job to the next. They're usually first to go and can be of significant size.

The guys with modest but sound fundamentals or the right partnerships and connections are usually fairly resilient.

Up
1

I guess until something significant happens it's not really news.

Interestingly, I've noticed a lot of articles from all around the world citing how crappy build quality has become since covid for new housing - inexperienced labour and inferior product substitutions.

Up
0

Yeah I guess so. Although there are plenty of tell tale signs that good financial journos should be picking up. And a slump will be significant for the economy.

I suspect most journos wouldn’t have a clue what the telltale signs are.

Up
1

hard to tell from the phillopines

Up
0

The number of overseas workers coming to NZ could be back up to pre-pandemic levels by the beginning of next year.

So back to record high levels of net migration - again - under a government who campaigned on reducing it to "sustainable" levels.

Up
16

Conundrum isn’t it. NZ has labour shortages simultaneous to a fairly generous proportion of the population that are not  working. Perhaps simplistically,  this government decided these two dynamics could be married off. If so the premise was at best optimistic but unfortunately, naive in reality.

Up
1

Many over 65s would like to work too, but places that used to hire them 20-30 years ago seem now to prefer easily exploitable migrants instead.

Up
13

I agree. My wife is a keen gardener, very fit and wanted to do something that she enjoys. Our local plant shop was hiring, so she emailed her appln.  She was contacted by them the next day and they sounded quite keen until she was asked her age.

Up
3

I find the opposite. 

Actually I'd really struggle to take someone on under 50, as a general rule. And I'm not even that old.

Oldies are usually more reliable, and if they're experienced they'll pump out 2-3x more work in the same time than a 25 year old.

Maybe it depends on the job. Probably not call centre.

Up
3

Don't most over 65's have a pension to draw?  Maybe it's a good thing!  Helps sort out their indecisiveness.

"Ohhhhhhh, I don't know what to do........I should retire but I also want to keep working........maybe I'll do both and to hell with everyone else".  

Up
0

My divorced sister in law earns barely $70k for a full time job in health. Last month, she turned 65. The extra $16k after tax per year is giving her options. 

Up
4

Good for her.  I'm sure she'd still be entitled even if we were to means test the pension, given she's scraping along on $70k. 

Who knows, she might even receive $20k after tax per year if the savings from means testing are redistributed among those who need it more?  But that would take a huge upheaval of the collective entitlement mentality of our Old Person Benefit recipients.  

Up
0

You poor thing, you've been bitten by the same bug as RickStrauss.

 

Up
2

I'm just a net tax contributor that would like to see our taxes spent more wisely.  We are talking about an area of gross frivolous spend that is not allocated to people based on need, but based on the arrogance of previous generations entitlement mentality.

It has nothing to do with what I can get out of it, my family is more than comfortable, but the country just cant afford to firehose money at people over 65 regardless of need when core services are falling apart and those who truly need it can't afford to heat their homes in winter.

Up
0

Our labour force participation rate is one of the highest in the world, quite a bit higher than similar Western countries.

Up
4

Stop it, you'll ruin the narrative. Kiwis are spoiled and lazy, that's why we need all the immigration.​ We've just got it too good.

Up
6

Curve inversions have gone nuclear. It's one after another (after another), getting bigger and bigger (and bigger). These are serious and deepening warnings that you have to understand because officials and the media don't.

Unprecedented inversion in the German market got more unprecedented. Eurodollar futures are just epically upside down. Even the Treasury yield curve has gone nuclear, with the 10-year benchmark rate well below the Fed's RRP. Huge warnings everywhere, but why? What's the message? Let's go through them.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XbrmbsX6To  

Up
4

Is there a decent resource (for someone of limited intelligence - check the username) where I can learn a bit about what a curve inversion actually means? I see the term used but I don't really understand it particularly well. 

Up
1

Well DT in a normal market it costs more interest if you borrow money longer, ie a 5year fix on your BNZ mortgage is more expensive then say a 3 year... now imagine if in NZ the 6 month cost 1% more then the 5 year, what would that signify.....    short term borrowing was expensive vs long term.

This says the market is expecting bad sh&t to happen and that fed and ecb rates are going to come back down....

curve inversions have happened before most bad sh&t events in the past, i would not be fixing long term here myself i would refix on the 6 month rates only

Up
1

Are the banks taking a risk on 5-year term deposits being too high, then?

I suppose not, so far, with FLP subsidising yields...?

Up
1

no as they are lending quickly at 5 years they do not hang around with unmatched liabilities

Up
0

> magine if in NZ the 6 month cost 1% more then the 5 year, what would that signify

that the market expects the central bank to get inflation under control in 5 years, but not in 6 months?

Up
0
Up
0

it is a likely source of the next credit event....    EuroDollar derivatives across asia must be a worry

Up
1

tks adx. Dread abounds,thinks, a scene 1912 the Titanic. Officer of the watch on the bridge, games with the crew “ I spy with my little eye something beginning with i”

Up
1

Ardern's speech at Women's Summit in Saigon slammed by local CEO:

From Linkedin:

The key moment of the event was the New Zealand’s PM speech but to be honest, I had to leave the room, again, after 5 minutes. The speech was not drafted for this particular event and audience. I think she has presented this multiple times before in front of other audiences and hence, it had no impact on me as a guest who came to the Women Summit and expected something, you know, different.

Up
2

Robot-like.

And speaking of robot-like, phoney virtue signallers, did anyone else laugh at Trudeau’s robot-like statement to Xi’s face?

I am far from a Xi fanboy but you could say at least he’s genuine and tells it as it is…

Up
10

The notion of a head of state seems increasingly silly.

Public speaking isn't synonymous with amazing decision making prowess.

So we have a head of state who's trained in the art of appearances and being as vanilla as tolerable.

Up
4

Xi doesn't tell it like it is.  He speaks in communist double speak.

Up
0

Xi may be able to piss higher but not necessarily further... Canada is a long way away

Up
0

It's a sad day when a pure passive manager wins best fund manager of the year, when there's not even much competition. 

Up
1

It's a sign of the times. This isn't a very optimistic environment so money is wanting to play it safe.

The bold will be rewarded to extremely varying degrees over the coming months and years.

Up
0

Aussie taking the bull by the horns. 

Australia could become a global leader in crypto regulation after the government pledged to introduce custodial and exchange legislation that aims to prevent the crippling losses suffered by local customers in the collapse of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange.

Treasury has signalled it will open consultations to safeguard crypto custody arrangements and regulate exchanges next year, following the current “token-mapping” consultation process suggested by Liberal Senator Andrew Bragg last year.

https://www.afr.com/technology/treasury-pledges-crypto-regulation-next-…

Up
0

Just imagine the amount of houses coming in the market in next 5 years in which the 203k people are living.

And the next generation which needs them are moving offshore.

No housing shortage guys and price collapse coming soon. 

Up
3

Yep, amazingly the system is going to produce a great windfall for people without any additional input required. Going to be so sweet.

Up
1

Twenty years ago, 66% of our population was of working age, and 11% were 65 or older. Today those proportions are 65% and 16½%. The big change is that the population under 15 is shrinking.

More consumers per worker. More future consumers per worker. Buckle up.

Up
4

Spose we'll make a savings in the education sector. 

Up
0