After six years and delays and heavy costs, the Ports of Auckland has ditched its plans to automate its container terminal - and will write-off $65 million on the failed project.
The Auckland Council-owned port company said on Wednesday that "in the best interests of the company, its stakeholders, and the New Zealand supply chain", it had decided to end the automation of the Fergusson Container Terminal.
Ports of Auckland Board Chair Jan Dawson said the decision was made "after careful consideration of the current status of the project, advice from independent experts, and the work required to achieve full terminal automation".
"Our review indicated that despite the best efforts of our team and our supplier, the project is experiencing continuing delays to full terminal roll out, the system is not performing to expectations, and we do not have confidence in the projected timeline or cost to completion.
"With these uncertainties and the need to transform the Port's performance, the Board has determined the best course of action is to cease automation of the Container Terminal."
Chief Executive Roger Gray described it as "a positive decision" that would "come as a relief" to many at Ports of Auckland and in the wider supply chain.
"It gives us certainty about the future and allows us to focus on our core job: safely providing a great service to New Zealand importers and exporters. It will also help us get the business back to the level of profitability we have delivered in the past."
Gray said the end of automation does not mean the loss of all the investment and work that went into it.
"The new infrastructure built as part of the project – for example the new wharf and cranes – provides extra capacity which is essential for future growth."
However, the port would have to write-off approximately $65 million in investments that will no longer be used, "mainly the automation software and guidance system".
"Ports of Auckland attempted automation for the right reasons: to lift capacity, productivity and profitability without further port expansion or reclamation. I am confident we can still meet those aims; we will just take a different path. It was a bold and innovative project, but one that – despite the hard work of many - was unable to be delivered."
According to Ports of Auckland background material the capacity and automation project commenced in 2016 with the goal of "future proofing" the capacity of the port. The targeted delivery date for both the infrastructure and the automation projects was late 2019 / early 2020. The project included automation of some of the straddle operation to achieve significant capacity upgrades.
The automation involved a complex integration project involving multiple vendors, equipment, and software applications to design and implement an operation with targeted productivity levels and the necessary level of system safety assurance.
The infrastructure capacity upgrade work was delivered as planned. This included the new Fergusson North wharf and cranes as well as major pavement upgrades, a new truck loading area, new refrigerated container capacity and other upgrades.
The automation project is now two years over the initial delivery date and is continuing to be unable to meet operational targets.
As part of its review of automation the board commissioned two independent assessments from qualified experts. Both advised that a lot more money and time was needed to make the system fit for purpose, although neither could say with confidence how long or how much investment that would take. In addition, there was an expectation of ongoing disruption to our customers throughout this development and implementation period.
Based on the analysis and options available, the Board had determined that it is in the best interests of the company, its people, customers, and shareholder to discontinue the current automation project and return the Fergusson Container Terminal to a fully manual operation.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.