Intestinal worms in livestock cause large production losses, and an earlier survey showed a large percentage of farms suffered from some drench resistance.
These messages have been around for a while now, but still farmers are reluctant to change their farming system to minimise the damage.
Instead they have relied on pharmaceutical companies to produce new products to solve these problems. However costs continue to erode profits from most farms and operating "smarter with knowledge" from fieldays such as these will give a better return.
Minimising medicinal intervention could be a condition in future for the sale of quality products, and farmers that upskill in these areas will lead the pack.
Strict quarantine systems should be adopted on finishing farms to reduce worm infestation of stock, Taranaki beef and sheep farmers were told last week.Conducted by Feilding veterinarians Trevor Cook and Greta Baynes, they said robust quarantine procedures should be applied on finishing farms for maximum liveweight gain reports The Taranaki Daily. "The finisher is at risk of animals that have a high level of resistance because farmers don't do drench tests. Quarantine procedures are vital for the finisher because significant numbers of animals from other farms pose high risks."Animals should be drenched on arrival at a finishing farm and held in yards for 24 hours to minimise the chance of introducing new worms to paddocks, he said.
Most farmers have no idea which drench is effective. "It's only when drenches are failing badly that it's obvious they're not working. Without doing a test, there is no evidence that resistance is there."The challenge is to have drenches that will be effective in 10 years' time. New drenches are coming but the cost of getting them to market is huge. The biggest opportunity is to use existing drenches smartly so that they are cost-effective."
Mr Cook said that even though the failure rates of pour-on drenches were documented, they continued to be used. Drenching adult animals with pour-ons would lead to drench-resistant worm. He said the Wormwise message of managing worms to protect production applied to dairy farmers as well as beef and sheep farmers.
Grazing dairy heifers and raising bulls to 18 months or two years of age had become an important part of beef farming, but if the animals arrived on a farm loaded up with worms, productivity and profitability would be limited. Ms Baynes said a drench test every three to five years would determine the level of worm resistance in stock and would cost a maximum of $1500. A 2005 survey had shown that 75 per cent of sheep farms and 96 per cent of beef farms had worms resistant to at least one drench family, she said.
Farmers should avoid drenching more frequently than every 28 days, should apply the right amount of drench for the animal's weight, and should calibrate their drench guns.They should also beware of long-acting products which were more likely to select worms that were drench-resistant, she said. Effective combination drenches were better, and could last 20 to 30 years if used in conjunction with a worm population not exposed to drenching. Not all stock should be drenched, Ms Baynes said. Leaving 5 to 10 per cent untreated would help the sustainability of drenches.
The animals with the best liveweight gain should be those that were not treated, she said. A mixed-age ewe in good condition was also at low risk of worm infestation. Sharing lamb grazing with undrenched ewes helped to increase lamb growth rates.An exit drench in autumn would get rid of the resistant worm population, she said.
1 Comments
This whole issue is not new and down right crazy...
I read reports/trial several decades ago, in a lifestyle mag that got my interest because of something my grandfather did in the 1920s and something we where brought up with as children in the 1950s
My grandfather put the old tea leaves in his trough....to prevent worms
As childen we where not allowed tea or coffee, but alowed 1 cup of tea on Sunday...We never had worms.
The report also covered vinegar and apple cider vinegar given to stock...
We have breed NZ native kakariki for nearly 10 yrs now...in the early days we used to dose....untill the local vet showed me how to check for worms, simply floating sample in a brine soln then putting under a $30 childrens microscope....not only did it indicate pesent ot not, but the type of worm.....then use the correct dose and type.
Having clean worms out, I decided to go a step further ..experiment with vinegar and apple cider vingar....adding a few drops each week to the veggies, and mist spraying every 4 to 6 weeks the birds and the flights.
This has been varified when DoC submitted samples from 12 birds to Massey Uni for full checking including DNA testing for deases.
In 7 or 8 yrs never had worms, or mites......and that involves approx 400 plus birds..maybe up to 700.
I do, as routine on any new birds/stock isolate and add a couple drops of invermectin to the back of the neck...
Animals and birds, in the wild have access to necter that has not only turned to wine, but spoiled and turned to vinegar, and other high Ph 'chemicals ' around them....in captivity, be a avary or a paddock, they dont....such conditions prevent natural resistance and access to these natural 'chemicals'
But I dont have a PhD, and nore did my parents or Grandfather......so good old tradtion and commonsence can continue to be safely ignored to be used only as a final soln when all else will eventually fail......I do believe the Drench chemical companies do know about vinegar, know very well about the effects...but as a company, a directors, by law their 1st responsabity is to the shareholders....not the customers or farmers.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.