Agriculture has always needed to borrow to expand. With a dwindling resource in land avaliable for production, urban growth pressurizing prices with lifestyle blocks, and some foreign investment buying land with goals of a longer return, land has appreciated steadily over the years.
But farmers began to rely on that capital growth to survive in their business, and forgot about the real productive value of their properties.
It's the earning capacity of the property that pays the bills, especially the debt. Banks have readjusted the security priorities when lending today, and are enforcing good cashflow responsibilities to ensure their clients survive.
The resilience of farmers has never failed to impress National Bank managing director of rural lending Charlie Graham. He said never underestimate farmers' resourcefulness to work their way through a financial situation reports Country-Wide. Reflecting on 30 years in the rural banking industry, Graham said the most common mistake farmers made was keeping everything to themselves. As a consequence they were forever working in the business, never on it - and seeing where it should be going.
Some farming businesses had outgrown the systems and the overall awareness of financial positions had not been good. Some farmers needed to work on simplifying business accounts to help with forecasting. Some were good with income and production, but not cashflows. There had been criticism that banks were toughening up on lending to farmers, and that banks were out to reduce their exposure to dairy farming.
Graham rejected this and said that in the past financial year, the National Bank moved $2 billion of new lending - mostly to dairy farmers.
Banks did require more accurate information and better budgets. If it is a good-quality proposal, well-planned and a budget with cash surpluses and buffers to withstand a downturn, we're more than happy to lend." Funding costs have risen significantly since the financial crisis. NZ banks are reliant on wholesale funding because Kiwis are poor savers. There is also less credit circulating in the world, and regulations are forcing banks to hold more cash.In the past the National Bank lent about 60% if the farmer had 40% equity. Graham said there was a lot of talk about 100% lending but his bank lent that on a new farm only if the borrower had an existing farm or equity. Now the National Bank was lending 50-55%.
2 Comments
The National Bank trots out the same story time and time again. How about a breakdown of the generous 2 million dollars lent. How much of that was servicing 90 day roll overs?What about the relationship with National Bank and My Farms syndicate? New lending NZRB financial stability report states only .3% in rural sector 2009-2010. DAVID survey done early 2010 on rural debt by myself and Massey Uni collating, From the responses average debt for sheep and beef $320/su and Dairy debt $25.86/kg ms, so paying bank $25su would be a walk in the park for sheep and beef farmers. Banks were lending 2007-2008 $700-$1000 su, and in the dairy sector happy to lend at $33-$75 kgms. Banks know are lending at $100su and about $22kgms. Potential buyers now need about 80% equity, not many fit in that category and FARMER BOB, banks are at the moment reducing and capping sharemilkers od's to the point they have to sell their herds particularly those up North facing a second drought will be forced to leave the industry. While it may be fashionable to engage in slagging farmers,rember that there are 18,000 farmers NZ and how much of the GDP do we produce?
Thanks Janette,
I just purchased some two tooth ewes off a farmer who needed cash flow. I dont see an easy way out, its great that you and Stevel are onto the problem which is profitability and My farms could be a disaster in fact Id bet on it.
Getting this debt down to levels we can afford is going to hurt, especially when our export markets are heading for the worst recession for 70 years.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.