sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Big irrigation schemes including the old Ruataniwha Dam are among projects given fast-track treatment by the Government

Rural News / news
Big irrigation schemes including the old Ruataniwha Dam are among projects given fast-track treatment by the Government
River and forest
Image (c) Adam Forbes

Major water projects are among the list of projects included in the list of fast-track proposals for economic development unveiled by the Government.

The giant of them all is the old Ruataniwha water storage project in central Hawkes Bay. Other schemes are the so-called Klondyke scheme in mid Canterbury and the Amuri Basin scheme in North Canterbury.

Getting these schemes fast-tracked is welcomed by the industry group, Irrigation NZ.     

“The great thing about a panel of experts deciding applications is that it allows people who are actually involved in the project or understand the project to have a view on its actual impacts,” says its chief executive Vanessa Winning. 

“It’s less about the possibilities of a project, it is more about the reality.”

With a storage capacity of a massive 104 million cubic metres, the Ruataniwha scheme is the giant of them all. It would dam up water in a tributary of the Tukituki River and release it for agriculture, drinking water and smoothed river flows. The scheme won resource consent earlier but was killed off in a decision by the Supreme Court.

But it was kept alive by a group that purchased the intellectual property of the original scheme and renamed it the Tukituki Water Security Project (TWSP). A spokesperson for TWSP, Mike Petersen, says the Hawkes Bay regions has always been dry in summer and the problem would get worse with climate change.

“Doing nothing is not a realistic alternative,” he says.

“It denies opportunities to restore significant bodies of water in the Tukituki and Southern Heretaunga catchments culturally and environmentally, at a time when climate change is rapidly degrading water availability.” 

The original scheme was strongly opposed by some residents and NGOs like Forest and Bird, which fought the proposal in the courts. 

Forest and Bird has already denounced the revived project. 

“The Fast-track Approvals Bill is the most extreme attack on nature in decades,” it says.

“New Zealand already has the highest proportion of threatened species in the world, and we’re in the midst of a climate and biodiversity crisis. It is the time to work towards bringing back birdsong, not starting a war on nature.”  

About half the size of Tukituki project is the Klondyke Scheme, run by Mid Canterbury Water Ltd near Ashburton. It would enhance output of existing MHV Water irrigation scheme and Ashburton Lyndhurst Irrigation Ltd by constructing storage for 53 million cubic metres of water. 

The third big scheme would improve irrigation in the Amuri Basin, which is a flat plain between the Cheviot Hills and the mountains. This would be done by constructing a large dam to contain 10 million cubic metres of water. The Amuri Irrigation Company already irrigates 28,000 hectares of land North of the Hurunui River. 

Irrigation NZ says irrigation schemes are more about providing insurance against climate change than agricultural intensification.  And its CEO Vanessa Winning says just getting onto the fast-track list in is not the end of the story. The economics of the scheme and any conditions imposed by the panel of experts will play a part as well.

But she says the need for water must be faced up to. 

“About 90% of our fruit and veggies needs irrigation,” she says.

“It’s not about dairy. This is about food. And I think we do absolutely need to start thinking about not just what are we are exporting, but also what are we providing within New Zealand”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

10 Comments

You can check out the full list of the 149 projects chosen for fast-track in the link to the .pdf in the article below;

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/529962/government-unveils-149-proj…

I never got past looking at the new residential subdivisions in the Auckland region - and thought OMG if traffic is bad now... 

 

Up
5

Stop growing the population now!

Up
4

Excellent news about Ruataniwha Dam, would be good if it could produce electricity as well.

How do Forest & Bird configure this would be detrimental to bird life? Sounds like a joke to me.

Up
11

Water fowl etc.

Up
0

It might get consent but I can't see it ever being funded and built - there just isn't the type of high value crops/land use in the catchment to fund it - even Waimea Dam in Tasman has struggled needing neighbouring districts to pick up part of the tab.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/127867843/waimea-dam-project-f…

Dams simply can't be fully funded by private irrigation interests; no matter whether the business case starts out that way!

Up
5

there just isn't the type of high value crops/land use in the catchment to fund it 

It's a bit chicken and egg. Without enough water, the type and value of crop you can grow can be severely limited.

Up
2

Sounds like in Waimea, the council had to take out a loan to cover all the cost blowouts.  Ratepayers have to cover the cost of the loans, but the irrigators somehow get to keep their 49% equity.  Seems like socialise the build cost, and then privatise the asset?

Drummond said most of the additional cost came from financing costs in relation to an irrigator capacity loan, which the council was responsible for until June 30, 2026.

The interest costs on that portion of that irrigator loan were met from general rates, he said.

That would mean the council would need to collect an additional $216,000 from general rates in the next financial year, he said,

https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350345893/contractors-dispute-ramps-dam…

Up
8

"...socialise the build cost (risk), and then privatise the asset (profit)"

- in the long NZ farming & business tradition

Up
4

People seem to be under illusion the submissions process is a popularity contest, or a numbers game. Hopefully the submissions that are considered are those that have some evidential,  environmental,  or social merit. These are not just thought up in a few days.

Up
4

Great news about Ruataniwha dam. Big areas of resilient soils on those Plains, with their relatively high volcanic faction. Water a limiting factor for utilisation for a whole range of higher value land use, eg counter seasonal seed production for Northern hemisphere, process food crops, etc.

Up
3