sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Migratory birds seen as most likely way bird flu could find its way to New Zealand

Rural News / news
Migratory birds seen as most likely way bird flu could find its way to New Zealand
chooks
Photo by Zachariah Smith on Unsplash.

Research is intensifying among several state agencies to protect New Zealand from bird flu – officially called Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI).

One of the main agencies, the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI), admits far more needs to be known about the way the disease could get here.

For now, the main focus of research is on migratory birds, which could bring in the disease on trans-oceanic flights. HPAI would be a huge danger to the poultry industry, and could decimate wild bird populations such as New Zealand’s unique wildlife. 

In Australia supermarket chain Coles has imposed limits on how many eggs customers can buy after hundreds of thousands of chickens have been destroyed after bird flu was found at five large poultry farms.

It has also jumped the species barrier to affect 80 dairy cattle in 11 US states. And it can cause rare, but serious, illness to humans. 

“Our teams are working hard with industry bodies to understand what information farmers need and to support with readiness planning,” MPI says.

“New Zealand has never had a case of HPAI, but we are closely watching events overseas and preparing.”

Health guidance

The Ministry of Health and Health NZ are also involved in this campaign and are currently updating the national pandemic plan and preparing new health guidance. 

“This includes information for people who might be at higher risk of exposure to the virus if it were found in New Zealand, such as people who work with poultry and dairy cattle, or are exposed to infected birds and marine mammals,” a Ministry official says. 

“HPAI can cause severe illness in humans, but the actual rate of infections is low.  But viruses can change over time, so it’s important to be vigilant.”

 It says people should wash their hands with soap and water or an alcohol hand-rub if they are going tramping, camping or hunting, or are walking dogs near bird colonies. They should also take care while even just being exposed to wild birds or marine mammals, which might have been eating infected birds.  

The chicken sector industry body, the Poultry Industry Association of New Zealand (PIANZ), says the Australian outbreak of APAI was caused by a distinct strain of the avian flu virus, H7N3.   It says this version is deadly to chickens but does not affect wild birds, so the Australian experience does not threaten New Zealand with infection by migratory birds. 

“The strain of avian influenza that is causing the real problems is H5N1, and that is the strain that has gone around the world,” the association’s executive director Michael Brooks says. 

“That is problematic because the pathogen has infected wild birds. It’s gone down through South America and crossed into Antarctica…where potentially, migratory birds could come to New Zealand with the highly pathogenic H1N5 virus.”

These birds could include the Skua Gull, but MPI says there is a lot of uncertainty about this. 

“As information emerges about the distribution of the disease in Antarctica, there will be a better understanding about the likelihood of HPAI reaching New Zealand through wild bird movements,” a Ministry spokesperson says. 

“New Zealand is a partner in the Antarctic Treaty Area, and we are exchanging information with other treaty signatories. The Southern spread of the disease is where all eyes are at the moment. 

“We’re talking regularly with colleagues around the world so we can learn as much as we can about how the disease is behaving as it spreads, and what other countries are doing to manage the disease,” an MPI official says.

Threat to dairy sector considered low

MPI puts the danger to dairy herds as very low. 

“While we should be vigilant, we don’t need to be alarmed about the situation in the US, where an isolated spillover event led to dairy cattle being infected,” the Ministry says. 

“But it is a good reminder of the importance of robust biosecurity systems and practices, such as disinfecting clothing, boots and equipment between farms and recording animal movements.   We are liaising with cattle industry representatives in the United States about how spillover might be handled in New Zealand if that situation were ever to arise.”

There is also regular contact with the US Department of Agriculture, the US Chief Veterinary Officer, and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

But the poultry industry is most at risk from this disease. It is a huge business, providing New Zealanders with their biggest source of meat protein. Brooks says the industry has over 300 farms with four million laying hens and an extraordinary output of 125 million meat chickens annually. 

“Chicken has been our number one meat protein for 20 years now. It surpassed lamb and beef in 2001,” Brooks says. 

This huge business would clearly be under severe threat from avian flu, and protocols are being developed to manage an incursion, along with special alerts being sent out to chicken farmers and vets. 

“There are many types of avian influenza surveillance that we do,” MPI says.

 “There is routine testing of domestic poultry in commercial settings. To enhance surveillance, we’re working with veterinarians and poultry industry organisations to ensure people are aware of clinical signs in poultry and wild birds." 

“The poultry industry regularly tests flocks for Avian influenza for export purposes, as the importing country requests a negative test result as proof of freedom from the disease. The poultry industry supplies these test results to MPI on request or on an annual basis.”

Finally, there is sampling for any sign of avian influenza in sick or dead birds in New Zealand’s sub-Antarctic islands and at Scott Base.

“Community surveillance is important. We ask everybody to keep an eye out for sick or dead birds and report them to the exotic pest and disease hotline,” MPI says.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

22 Comments

Sadly threats like this to our rare seabird population are high.

But then they are far more at risk from human encroachment on nesting sites. We are taking actions on neither very well. Especially with attitudes that a right to access a beach with rare nestlings & tourism trumps right to a species ability to breed. It seems the old practice of avoidance of nesting areas and bird hides are out with the dog's breakfast on NZ native environment locations. Perhaps we need more bird competitions to generate more awareness, more funding for breeding campaigns and to get people stay away, and take their little dogs too... or we will set the flying monkeys on them. If they need exercise there are thousands of km of more urban options & rural ones, most for free. If those without any transport can still exercise then so should those who can literally go anywhere but choose the most environmentally vulnerable sites to do so instead.

Hence if we want to make the most difference being able to remotely track rare species has made a massive development in our scientific knowledge and conservation ability as well as supported controlled environments absent of most humans for breeding (ensuring they are absent of most humans except those hired in the direct species conservation is key). It is also how we are able to identify species journeys so we are aware of the risk of viruses spreading and enable interventions where necessary in rare species. Autopsies on those we are lucky to find only go so far. Ideally we want to minimize the death rates of rare species and increase the breeding success. 

Sadly there are also a host of sea based threats to the bird populations which we have very little control over (we cannot for instance enforce laws on other nations in international waters and have limited controls on those entering our waters as we cannot visibly track and view the actions of all of them when they are in the ocean). This is going to be a more worrying issue going forward as more sea based food is demanded by international populations. Having more defined marine reserves would help enable more areas for protection and some minimal level of controls to enable species survival. How successful was NZ at setting up marine reserves in the past 10years? Yeah don't hold your breath this new threat needs careful watch & study but it is not the critical issues we currently need to have actions on.  

The larger risk to NZ as a whole from H1N1 is the transmission of virus from migratory birds to local free range poultry & small onshore birds which are more prone to severe effects of viruses and at risk of more viruses. It then enters our food and fertilizer chain and hello human mutation transmission.  This is still a small risk given the time required and more pressing viral issues but one that is proven possible in other urban & rural environments. In many poultry breeding areas clean room standards are used where even generator repair employees have to have strict controls on entering the sites & hygiene. Better practices to prevent cross transmission work but we have fewer controls available in more open environments. Hence it is a concern but one of many we already need to watch out for. Luckily it has not mutated to respiratory droplet spread much. It has however been very severe in animal tests with mammals so it pays to track the seabirds, the virus spread, mutations and reactions before it gets to that point. 

Up
1

You can have eggs or you can have free range chickens.  Its now clear you can't have both.  The EU and UK have all moved their chickens indoors again as a result of bird flu.  

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/eggs-chickens-barns-free-range-bird-f…

Up
2

Animal welfare a bit too woke for you?

Up
2

Do you consider the wholesale slaughtering of hundreds of thousands of healthy chickens every time a couple of them catch bird flu to be "animal welfare"?  

Up
4

Not at all, thanks for asking.

I don't consider treating millions of male chicks as waste products - dumping them alive into a macerator, or simply into a trash bag to suffocate - as animal welfare either.

I worked in a poultry processing plant for a couple of years. Chickens, both layers and broilers, are possibly the most abused animals in the food system. It's truly horrible. Needless to say, i do not support this kind of cruelty with my wallet at all.

The smartest thing we could do to safeguard against zoontonic diseases, and the risk of another global pandemic, is just reduce our reliance on intensive animal agriculture. Factory farms, not to mention meat markets, spread diseases from their crowded and unsanitary conditions. In fact, the chickens couldn't survive in such conditions if they weren't being pumped with antibiotics, which of course has harmful consequences for us also.

Up
3

Did the regulations not change about 20 years ago which gave large scale poultry in cages a better living space? They had 15 or more years to upgrade the cages and when they didn't do just closed up shop causing an egg shortage about 3-4 years ago. Are you still saying that the changed living conditions for caged poultry are not good enough?

Up
2

The Govt changed the rules 12 years ago for caged hens (moving from battery cages to colony cages) but then a couple of years ago before the Govt rules came into effect (which was Jan 2023), the supermarkets decided that they would no longer accept colony cage eggs either, so that meant farmers couldnt upgrade their chicken farms and were forced to close (because there was no point in spending money to upgrade cages only to produce eggs that couldnt be sold in supermarkets).  Obviously, they couldnt just upgrade from a battery cage farm to a free range farm (or even a barn farm) because that requires a big increase in land area. 

Up
1

That's incorrect.

Battery cages, where hens were kept 2-5 to a cage, were banned, replaced with barely better "colony cages" which differ from battery cages, in that a colony cage is larger, with around 60 to 80 hens stuffed inside. A cage is still a cage, and even in a colony cage, each bird has about the size of an A4 piece of paper to live her short and sad life.

This gave rise to wilful consumer deception from the egg industry, replacing "cage egg" labelling, with "colony egg", not even mentioning the cage, suggesting some kind of natural, wild lived experience for the hen. The fittings in a colony cage comprise some plastic flaps hanging down from the top, similar to entering a walk-in chiller room. There are no natural materials to create a real nest. Their ‘scratch pad’ is just a tiny rectangle of rougher plastic flooring, compared with the rest of the wire cage floor. It's a farce.

The egg industry had so much time to prepare, yet its leadership did little to guide farmers to get ready. I think they were just sitting back assuming a new government would reverse the ban. But essentially the industry failed to recognise animal welfare progression and act accordingly with appropriate infrastructure investment.

So don't blame "woke" Countdown, who reported that 90% of customers told them that cage-free is important to them anyway.

You can still get your cheap eggs at the less-scrupulous, less-woke Warehouse. The NZ Herald reported on the sad reason why they're so cheap, see the article below for a comparison photo of the cages:

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/why-5-colony-eggs-at-the-warehouse-are-so-cheap/YWDQVLJRLFDJPN4XKDEH2MFWQI/

 

Up
1

That's the beauty of choice, where we can buy what we wish with our own earnings. Those that want free range and can afford them will do so, and those that can't afford free rang eggs or don't see this as part of their moral code will buy non-free range eggs. It's good to have choice in life.

Up
0

What about the hens you're paying to get stuffed into a cage, mate? Do they get a choice in life?

If you don't have empathy for animals, then you don't have empathy.

Up
0

Many free range farms here have netting roofs anyway, to stop hawks having kfc for lunch.

Up
0

That doesnt stop bird poo from landing on the ground and infecting the chickens.  That's how its transmitted - birds flying overhead and pooping.

Up
1

Ah, yes , good points. 

Up
0

Congrats for not understanding viral transmission amongst species. Shall we also chalk up a lack of understanding of ground based virus transmission and soil parasites that kill chickens fast to you as well? Netting actually increases the risk here (you also seem to forget rain exists). Geez it's like you did not know birds fly and how they poop (an essential part of our ecosystem development as we rely on birds flying and pooping to spread seedlings for native plant species to spread as well, the well known downside has always been viral spread and risk of disease from other bird species flying over the same land area).

Sadly it is not just the infected chickens that die, often the whole flock gets culled to prevent wider transmission (more strict protocols then the lax regulations for urban and hobbyist chicken owners).

But hey since hobby chicken owners often have small flocks and the disease kills quickly their whole flock will likely be dead quick; not without risking more mutations and transmission to other species though. It is a natural behaviour for chickens to stop eating, drinking and try to avoid the flock (near impossible with the pecking order & housing conditions). This is an interesting evolutionary behaviour as it kills them fast meant to protect the wider species. However given the tight knit environment of urban and hobbyist owners runs infection quickly travels anyway. It would be a hard lesson for those owners about more protected environments for their flock if we do get avian flu outbreaks in NZ.

Knowing more about chicken raising for both urban, hobbyist and commercial high grade levels it is no surprise how much more risk NZ would be at should outbreaks occur. Only those rearing specialized breeds of chickens in very controlled environments, (with much less transmission as even foreign soils & unchecked water sources are limited in contact, where even the staff have to take more thorough approaches to clean themselves on site before entry), would have a better chance of going unaffected. Even then the risk is still there but at smaller levels.

Up
0

Right, that's it "bring out the shot gun" Any birds come within my chickens range get shot. Hope I don't go to sleep.

Up
1

Shit splatters . Better to establish a no fly zone. 

Up
0

The chicken industry has totally lost the plot anyway. Apparently I am not unusual. MSG will give me a two day headache. If I buy frozen chicken ...its 89 % chicky and 11% msg and other stuff. No go there. 

A cooked chicky from the supermarket is smothered in msg and other nasties. 

So I tried fresh chicken. Still crook. So I googled what the US industry does to a chicken carcase. They drench it in bleach basically. I am not sure what NZ does but it cant be good. Anyways I am so over the shit that goes in our 'food'...if it doesnt come au natural it doesnt go in my trolley. 

Our packaged food industry is poisoning us. Most wont notice til their body finally repels it at an older age. 

Up
2

MSG is naturally occurring in forms of seaweed, and many Asian countries have utilised umami from it for a very long time with mseeminly no adverse effects across the lifespan.

Up
1

Yes it can be naturally occurring ...its in marmite and vegemite. Uranium is naturally occurring too. Do we need MSG lathered on all the frozen chicken we buy? Once you start reading labels its horrific whats in our food in the middle aisles. We dont need it on our meat. 

Generally its hidden in terms such as yeast extract. Or natural flavours. But like cocoa or coffee it can set off some wicked responses in people. Its a minefield eating these days.

 

Up
1

For once I agree with every word you just said, Belle

Up
0

Aw bless...

Up
0

I'd imagine there would be a lot of antibiotics used to keep disease down in those cramped quarters.I'e been in chicken sheds to shovel chook poo out , not as much smell as you'd think , so they must use some hardcore cleaners. that was 30 years ago though . 

Up
0